Vertical devolution has stayed at 41% since the 14th Finance Commission; a stated share other than 41% marks that statement false.
(c) I, III and IV
Let’s analyze the statements based on the recommendations of the 15th Finance Commission (FC-XV), which covered the period 2021–22 to 2025–26.
| Parameter | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Vertical Devolution | 41% of net Union taxes to be shared with states |
| Total Transfers | Approx. ₹52.24 lakh crores over 5 years |
| Local Body Grants | ₹4.36 lakh crores (Tied + Untied grants) |
| Performance-Based Grants (Education) | ₹4,800 crores for school education outcomes |
| Agriculture Reform Incentive | ₹45,000 crores |
| Health Sector Grants | ₹70,051 crores including for PM-ABHIM |
| Disaster Risk Management Fund | Continuation of SDRMF with ₹1.6 lakh crores |
| Tax Effort Criterion | Weightage reintroduced to reward better fiscal performance |
| Population Criterion | Based on 2011 Census data (15% weight) |
| Income Distance Criterion | Highest weightage (45%) for horizontal distribution |
| Concept / Term | Description | Relevance to the Question | Related Policies / Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Finance Commission (FC) | A constitutional body under Article 280, constituted every 5 years to recommend devolution of taxes between Centre and States | 15th FC was headed by N.K. Singh and submitted its report for 2021–26 | Mandated to strengthen fiscal federalism |
| Vertical Devolution | Share of Union’s net tax revenue devolved to all states | 15th FC recommended 41%, not 45% | Retained from 14th FC; adjusted due to J&K reorganization |
| Horizontal Devolution | Distribution of devolved amount among states using criteria like income distance, population, etc. | Tax effort reintroduced as a criterion | Encourages states to increase their own tax revenue |
| Tax Effort Criterion | Measures how much tax a state raises per capita relative to its income | Reintroduced in FC-XV to reward efficient fiscal performers | Helps incentivize states to widen tax base |
| Performance-Based Grants | Grants tied to states achieving certain measurable outcomes | ₹4,800 crore for education, ₹45,000 crore for agriculture reforms | A shift from entitlement-based to results-based transfers |
| Non-lapsable Defence Fund | A separate modernization fund outside annual budget allocations | Recommended by FC-XV for long-term defence preparedness | ₹1.5 lakh crore envisaged over 5 years |
| Local Body Grants | Funds given directly to rural and urban local bodies | ₹4.36 lakh crore allocated (60% tied, 40% untied) | Linked to service delivery in sanitation, drinking water |
| Disaster Risk Management Fund (SDRMF) | Fund to support disaster preparedness and response | Continued with funding formula and enhanced flexibility | Linked to State Disaster Response Fund (SDRF) mechanism |
| Agricultural Reform Incentives | ₹45,000 crore fund to support reforms in agricultural marketing, land records, infrastructure | Directly mentioned in the question | Encourages states to adopt long-pending agri reforms |
| Population Criterion (2011 Census) | Used to determine horizontal share of states | 15% weight given in FC-XV | Replaced earlier use of 1971 Census to reflect current demographics |
| Topic | Significance |
|---|---|
| Fiscal Federalism | Shows evolving Centre-State financial relations |
| Cooperative Federalism | Performance grants encourage reform-oriented governance |
| Social Sector Incentives | Grants for education and health show focus on human development |
| Agriculture Reform | Reflects intent to modernize agri-markets through fiscal levers |
| Local Governance | Increased funding to panchayats and urban local bodies ensures grassroots delivery of services |