Model answer & approach
- India maintains strong ties with countries that will assure a free and open Indo-Pacific and guarantee greater connectivity with rest of the world. Analyze. (Answer in 250 words)
Introduction
India's partner selection in the Indo-Pacific tracks two tests: who helps keep the sea lanes open and rule-bound, and who helps India connect around a Chinese-dominated landmass. Both are being met unevenly.
Body
1. India's own definition: Modi's Shangri-La Dialogue address of 2018 made the Indo-Pacific inclusive and ASEAN-centred rather than a containment coalition, extended by the Indo-Pacific Oceans Initiative (2019) and SAGAR, renamed MAHASAGAR in 2025.
2. The maritime core: the Quad and its maritime domain awareness initiative, the foundational agreements with the United States, the reciprocal access arrangement with Japan, the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership with Australia (2020), and France's Indian Ocean partnership through Reunion.
3. South-east Asian depth: alignment with the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific (2019), the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership with Singapore (2024), BrahMos delivered to the Philippines in 2024 and access at Sabang.
4. Connectivity as the second track: IMEC announced at the New Delhi G20 (2023), the ten-year Chabahar contract (2024), the INSTC, Sittwe port and the Kaladan and Trilateral Highway projects.
5. The gap between design and delivery: Kaladan and the Trilateral Highway are stalled by Myanmar's civil war, IMEC by the Gaza conflict, and Chabahar by American sanctions risk.
6. The trade weakness: having exited RCEP in 2019, India offers security partnership without economic integration, which limits how much assurance it can actually provide.
Conclusion
The analysis holds: India's Indo-Pacific relationships are organised around openness and connectivity rather than ideology. The binding constraint is execution and India's reluctance to enter binding regional trade arrangements, not intent.
Open this in the study app →