Model answer & approach
- Assess the role of Government Process Reengineering (GPR) in promoting good governance. (Answer in 150 words)
Introduction
Government Process Reengineering rebuilds an official procedure from its purpose upwards, asking why a step exists at all rather than automating it as it stands.
Where it advances good governance
- Fewer steps: Passport Seva replaced a multi-window file journey with an appointment-based flow, cutting turnaround from weeks to days.
- Discretion designed out: e-procurement, GeM and self-certification narrow the points at which rent can be extracted.
- Built round the citizen: direct benefit transfer reorganised subsidy delivery around the beneficiary, not the department.
Where it stops short
- Automation without redesign: e-office often digitises an unreformed file, so delay survives in electronic form.
- Rules resist: many steps are fixed by statute and financial codes that no single department can rewrite.
- Capacity is uneven: process mapping is a scarce skill, so reform stalls at pilots.
- Exclusion: the citizen without connectivity loses the counter the redesign removed.
Conclusion
GPR is necessary but partial: it advances good governance where the underlying rules are simplified alongside the process, and merely relocates delay where they are not.
Open this in the study app →