Model answer & approach
- What is meant by a somatotype? Discuss the Heath-Carter anthropometric method, giving its advantages over that of Sheldon's method. How can somatotyping be applied in sports sciences? (Answer in 350 words)
Introduction
A somatotype is a quantified description of present body shape. The Heath-Carter procedure replaced Sheldon's photographic ratings with instrument measurement, and it is that shift which makes somatotyping usable in sport.
Body
1. What a somatotype is: a three-numeral rating of the shape and composition of the whole body, expressed in the fixed order endomorphy, mesomorphy, ectomorphy. Endomorphy rates relative fatness, mesomorphy musculoskeletal robustness relative to height, ectomorphy relative linearity or slenderness. Each is rated on a continuous scale, so 3-5-2 describes a moderately fat, strongly muscled, slightly linear physique, and the rating describes shape independently of body size.
2. The Heath-Carter anthropometric method: ten measurements are taken, stature and weight, four skinfolds (triceps, subscapular, supraspinale, medial calf), two bone breadths (biepicondylar humerus, bicondylar femur) and two girths (flexed arm, calf). Endomorphy comes from the sum of three skinfolds corrected for stature; mesomorphy from corrected girths and breadths against height; ectomorphy from the height-weight ratio. The result is plotted on a somatochart, X equalling ectomorphy minus endomorphy, Y twice mesomorphy minus the other two.
3. Advantages over Sheldon: Sheldon rated standardised nude photographs, so his method was subjective, needed a photographic archive, was largely restricted to adult males, and rested on a closed 1-7 scale of 76 types. Above all he held the somatotype to be fixed and genotypic. Heath-Carter is objective and repeatable, open-ended at both ends, applicable to both sexes and all ages, usable in the field, and phenotypic, so it records change with training and age.
4. Use in sports science: it yields event-specific profiles, established by Carter's studies of Olympic competitors, with throwers endomesomorphic, gymnasts and sprinters balanced mesomorphs, and distance runners ectomesomorphic. Coaches use it for talent identification, for allocating players to positions, and for judging how far an athlete's physique matches the elite profile for the event. Because the rating is phenotypic it also tracks the effect of a training or dietary programme over a season, and flags the loss of mesomorphy during injury and rehabilitation.
Conclusion
Somatotyping converts physique into a comparable number. Its value in sport lies precisely in the Heath-Carter method's admission that physique is modifiable, which Sheldon's system denied.
Open this in the study app →