UPSC via PYQs
UPSC Prelims 2026Question 2Modern History

The artificially fixed rupee-sterling exchange rate prescribed by the Hilton-Young Commission (1926) was adopted by the British Government for which one of the following reasons ?

Options

  1. (a)Aiding the flow of remittances from India and maintaining India’s creditworthiness
  2. (b)Providing support to Indian importers
  3. (c)Encouraging export of cotton produce from India
  4. (d)Preventing depreciation of the Rupee in terms of gold
Correct answer: a
Decision rule

For any colonial currency or revenue decision, pick the reason that eases remittances to Britain, not the one that helps Indian traders or exporters.

Explanation

Correct Answer

(a) Aiding the flow of remittances from India and maintaining India’s creditworthiness


Explanation of the Correct Answer

  • The Hilton-Young Commission, officially called the Royal Commission on Indian Currency and Finance, was appointed to examine India’s currency and financial system.
  • In 1926, it recommended fixing the rupee-sterling exchange rate at 1 shilling 6 pence per rupee, instead of the earlier/preferred rate of 1 shilling 4 pence.
  • This artificially high exchange rate benefited the British Government because it made it easier to transfer funds from India to Britain in the form of:
    • Home Charges
    • pensions of British officials
    • interest payments
    • dividends and profits of British companies
    • other remittances from India to Britain
  • It also helped maintain India’s creditworthiness in the London money market, which was important for British financial interests.

Therefore, the exchange rate was fixed primarily to serve imperial financial interests, not Indian trade or industry.


Why Other Options Are Incorrect

OptionVerdictExplanation
(a) Aiding the flow of remittances from India and maintaining India’s creditworthinessCorrectA higher rupee value helped British financial transfers from India and preserved India’s credibility in London’s financial markets.
(b) Providing support to Indian importersIncorrectA stronger rupee could make imports cheaper, but this was not the main colonial objective behind the fixed rate.
(c) Encouraging export of cotton produce from IndiaIncorrectA stronger rupee actually made Indian exports costlier in foreign markets, hurting exporters such as cotton producers.
(d) Preventing depreciation of the Rupee in terms of goldIncorrectThe Commission did recommend a gold bullion standard, but the political-economic reason for adopting the high rupee-sterling rate was mainly to protect British financial interests and remittances.

Relevant Supplementary Information

Hilton-Young Commission and Rupee-Sterling Exchange Rate

AspectDetails
Official nameRoyal Commission on Indian Currency and Finance
Common nameHilton-Young Commission
Year1926
ChairmanSir Edward Hilton Young
Recommended exchange rate1 rupee = 1 shilling 6 pence
Indian commercial preference1 rupee = 1 shilling 4 pence
Currency standard recommendedGold bullion standard
Major institutional recommendationEstablishment of a central bank, later leading to the Reserve Bank of India
Main beneficiary of high exchange rateBritish Government and British financial interests
Main Indian groups affected adverselyExporters, producers, and sections of Indian industry

Impact of a High Rupee-Sterling Rate

Group / SectorEffect of High Rupee ValueReason
British GovernmentBenefitedEasier remittance of Home Charges and official payments to Britain
British investorsBenefitedEasier transfer of profits, dividends, and interest
Indian exportersHurtIndian goods became costlier abroad
Indian importersSome benefitImports became relatively cheaper
Indian producersHurtExport competitiveness declined
London money marketBenefitedIndia’s financial credibility and payment capacity were protected

Key Takeaways from the Tables

  • Hilton-Young Commission = currency and finance commission, not a political or education commission.
  • It recommended a high rupee-sterling rate of 1s 6d per rupee.
  • The rate was favourable to British remittances and London financial interests.
  • Indian exporters and producers generally preferred a lower rate such as 1s 4d.
  • The Commission is also historically important because it recommended the creation of a central bank, eventually leading to the Reserve Bank of India. The RBI’s own historical chronology records that the Hilton-Young Commission recommended establishing a central bank for India.

Context and Current Relevance

  • The issue reflects the colonial character of India’s monetary policy, where currency decisions often served imperial financial requirements rather than Indian economic interests.
  • The debate over 1s 6d vs 1s 4d became part of the larger nationalist critique of colonial economic exploitation.
  • The Commission also shaped India’s institutional monetary history by recommending a central bank, which later became the Reserve Bank of India.

Table: Important British-Era Currency and Finance Commissions / Developments

Commission / DevelopmentYearMain FocusKey Recommendation / OutcomeHistorical Significance
Herschell Committee1893Indian currency problemClosure of Indian mints to free coinage of silverBeginning of shift away from silver standard
Fowler Committee1898Currency stabilizationRecommended gold exchange standard and fixed rupee around 1s 4dLinked Indian currency more firmly to sterling
Chamberlain Commission1913Indian currency and financeSupported continuation of the gold exchange standardReflected pre-World War I currency policy
Babington-Smith Committee1919Post-war currency instabilityRecommended high rupee value around 2sProved impractical due to post-war economic instability
Hilton-Young Commission1926Currency and financeRecommended 1 rupee = 1s 6d and creation of a central bankLed eventually to the establishment of the Reserve Bank of India
Gold Standard and Reserve Bank of India Act1925Legal framework for currency stabilizationProvided statutory backing for currency arrangementsReflected British efforts to stabilize exchange and reserves
Reserve Bank of India Act1934Central bankingProvided for the establishment of RBIRBI began operations in 1935
Reserve Bank of India established1935Central bank for IndiaRBI became banker to government and regulator of currency and creditMajor institutional development in India’s monetary history

Table: Major Rupee-Sterling Exchange Rate Debates

Exchange RateAssociated WithWho Favoured ItReason
1 rupee = 1s 4dEarlier gold exchange standard; Indian commercial preferenceIndian exporters, producers, commercial interestsHelped exports by keeping Indian goods more competitive abroad
1 rupee = 1s 6dHilton-Young Commission recommendationBritish Government and British financial interestsHelped remittances to Britain and maintained India’s creditworthiness
1 rupee = 2sBabington-Smith Committee recommendationSections of British official opinion after World War IAttempted to restore currency stability at a high rupee value, but was impractical
Lower rupee valueNationalist and export-oriented criticismIndian producers and exportersFavoured Indian trade competitiveness
Higher rupee valueColonial financial policyBritish officials, investors, and creditorsFavoured Home Charges, pensions, interest payments, and sterling remittances

Table: Effects of High vs Low Rupee-Sterling Exchange Rate

AspectHigh Rupee ValueLow Rupee Value
Example1 rupee = 1s 6d1 rupee = 1s 4d
Imports into IndiaCheaperCostlier
Exports from IndiaCostlier for foreign buyersCheaper and more competitive
Indian exportersHurtBenefited
Indian importersBenefitedHurt
British remittances from IndiaBenefitedLess favourable
Home ChargesEasier to remitMore burdensome
Indian producersOften harmed due to weaker export demandOften benefited through better export competitiveness
Colonial government preferenceGenerally favouredGenerally resisted
Nationalist economic viewCriticised as pro-BritishSeen as more favourable to Indian interests

Table: Related Colonial Economic Concepts

ConceptMeaningConnection with Rupee-Sterling Debate
Home ChargesPayments made by India to Britain for administrative, military, pension, debt, and other obligationsA high rupee value made these remittances easier for the colonial government
Gold Exchange StandardCurrency system where the rupee was linked to sterling, which was linked to goldHelped Britain control India’s monetary system without large gold circulation in India
Gold Bullion StandardA system where currency could be converted into gold bullion, not ordinary gold coinsRecommended by Hilton-Young Commission
Sterling balancesForeign exchange reserves held in pounds sterlingReflected India’s financial dependence on Britain
Exchange ratioThe fixed value of rupee in terms of sterlingCentral issue in colonial currency policy
Drain of wealthTransfer of resources from India to Britain without adequate economic returnExchange-rate policy supported such transfers through remittances
Council BillsInstruments used by the British to manage trade payments and transfer funds between India and BritainPart of the broader colonial financial mechanism

Key Takeaways

PointExplanation
Hilton-Young Commission recommended 1s 6dThis was an artificially high rupee-sterling rate.
High rupee helped BritainIt aided remittances, Home Charges, pensions, interest payments, and profit transfers to Britain.
Indian exporters preferred 1s 4dA lower rupee value made Indian exports more competitive.
Currency policy was colonial in natureIt prioritized imperial finance over Indian producers and exporters.
Hilton-Young Commission also recommended RBIIts recommendation contributed to the eventual establishment of the Reserve Bank of India in 1935.
Exchange-rate debates were linked to economic nationalismNationalists criticized such policies as part of the colonial drain of wealth.


Open this in the study app →

Related questions the exam has asked

Independent UPSC previous-year-questions study tool — not affiliated with or endorsed by the UPSC. Question text is reproduced from publicly released UPSC examination papers.
UPSCviaPYQs · Privacy · Terms