| Option | Verdict | Explanation |
|---|
| (a) Aiding the flow of remittances from India and maintaining India’s creditworthiness | Correct | A higher rupee value helped British financial transfers from India and preserved India’s credibility in London’s financial markets. |
| (b) Providing support to Indian importers | Incorrect | A stronger rupee could make imports cheaper, but this was not the main colonial objective behind the fixed rate. |
| (c) Encouraging export of cotton produce from India | Incorrect | A stronger rupee actually made Indian exports costlier in foreign markets, hurting exporters such as cotton producers. |
| (d) Preventing depreciation of the Rupee in terms of gold | Incorrect | The Commission did recommend a gold bullion standard, but the political-economic reason for adopting the high rupee-sterling rate was mainly to protect British financial interests and remittances. |
| Aspect | Details |
|---|
| Official name | Royal Commission on Indian Currency and Finance |
| Common name | Hilton-Young Commission |
| Year | 1926 |
| Chairman | Sir Edward Hilton Young |
| Recommended exchange rate | 1 rupee = 1 shilling 6 pence |
| Indian commercial preference | 1 rupee = 1 shilling 4 pence |
| Currency standard recommended | Gold bullion standard |
| Major institutional recommendation | Establishment of a central bank, later leading to the Reserve Bank of India |
| Main beneficiary of high exchange rate | British Government and British financial interests |
| Main Indian groups affected adversely | Exporters, producers, and sections of Indian industry |
| Commission / Development | Year | Main Focus | Key Recommendation / Outcome | Historical Significance |
|---|
| Herschell Committee | 1893 | Indian currency problem | Closure of Indian mints to free coinage of silver | Beginning of shift away from silver standard |
| Fowler Committee | 1898 | Currency stabilization | Recommended gold exchange standard and fixed rupee around 1s 4d | Linked Indian currency more firmly to sterling |
| Chamberlain Commission | 1913 | Indian currency and finance | Supported continuation of the gold exchange standard | Reflected pre-World War I currency policy |
| Babington-Smith Committee | 1919 | Post-war currency instability | Recommended high rupee value around 2s | Proved impractical due to post-war economic instability |
| Hilton-Young Commission | 1926 | Currency and finance | Recommended 1 rupee = 1s 6d and creation of a central bank | Led eventually to the establishment of the Reserve Bank of India |
| Gold Standard and Reserve Bank of India Act | 1925 | Legal framework for currency stabilization | Provided statutory backing for currency arrangements | Reflected British efforts to stabilize exchange and reserves |
| Reserve Bank of India Act | 1934 | Central banking | Provided for the establishment of RBI | RBI began operations in 1935 |
| Reserve Bank of India established | 1935 | Central bank for India | RBI became banker to government and regulator of currency and credit | Major institutional development in India’s monetary history |
| Exchange Rate | Associated With | Who Favoured It | Reason |
|---|
| 1 rupee = 1s 4d | Earlier gold exchange standard; Indian commercial preference | Indian exporters, producers, commercial interests | Helped exports by keeping Indian goods more competitive abroad |
| 1 rupee = 1s 6d | Hilton-Young Commission recommendation | British Government and British financial interests | Helped remittances to Britain and maintained India’s creditworthiness |
| 1 rupee = 2s | Babington-Smith Committee recommendation | Sections of British official opinion after World War I | Attempted to restore currency stability at a high rupee value, but was impractical |
| Lower rupee value | Nationalist and export-oriented criticism | Indian producers and exporters | Favoured Indian trade competitiveness |
| Higher rupee value | Colonial financial policy | British officials, investors, and creditors | Favoured Home Charges, pensions, interest payments, and sterling remittances |
| Aspect | High Rupee Value | Low Rupee Value |
|---|
| Example | 1 rupee = 1s 6d | 1 rupee = 1s 4d |
| Imports into India | Cheaper | Costlier |
| Exports from India | Costlier for foreign buyers | Cheaper and more competitive |
| Indian exporters | Hurt | Benefited |
| Indian importers | Benefited | Hurt |
| British remittances from India | Benefited | Less favourable |
| Home Charges | Easier to remit | More burdensome |
| Indian producers | Often harmed due to weaker export demand | Often benefited through better export competitiveness |
| Colonial government preference | Generally favoured | Generally resisted |
| Nationalist economic view | Criticised as pro-British | Seen as more favourable to Indian interests |
| Concept | Meaning | Connection with Rupee-Sterling Debate |
|---|
| Home Charges | Payments made by India to Britain for administrative, military, pension, debt, and other obligations | A high rupee value made these remittances easier for the colonial government |
| Gold Exchange Standard | Currency system where the rupee was linked to sterling, which was linked to gold | Helped Britain control India’s monetary system without large gold circulation in India |
| Gold Bullion Standard | A system where currency could be converted into gold bullion, not ordinary gold coins | Recommended by Hilton-Young Commission |
| Sterling balances | Foreign exchange reserves held in pounds sterling | Reflected India’s financial dependence on Britain |
| Exchange ratio | The fixed value of rupee in terms of sterling | Central issue in colonial currency policy |
| Drain of wealth | Transfer of resources from India to Britain without adequate economic return | Exchange-rate policy supported such transfers through remittances |
| Council Bills | Instruments used by the British to manage trade payments and transfer funds between India and Britain | Part of the broader colonial financial mechanism |
| Point | Explanation |
|---|
| Hilton-Young Commission recommended 1s 6d | This was an artificially high rupee-sterling rate. |
| High rupee helped Britain | It aided remittances, Home Charges, pensions, interest payments, and profit transfers to Britain. |
| Indian exporters preferred 1s 4d | A lower rupee value made Indian exports more competitive. |
| Currency policy was colonial in nature | It prioritized imperial finance over Indian producers and exporters. |
| Hilton-Young Commission also recommended RBI | Its recommendation contributed to the eventual establishment of the Reserve Bank of India in 1935. |
| Exchange-rate debates were linked to economic nationalism | Nationalists criticized such policies as part of the colonial drain of wealth. |