Model answer & approach
- Subash is Secretary, PWD in the State Government. He is a senior officer, known for his competence, integrity and dedication to work. He enjoys the trust and confidence of Minister Incharge of PWD and Programme Implementation. As a part of his job profile, he is responsible for policy formulation, execution of projects relating to infrastructure initiatives in the State. Besides, he oversees the technical and administrative aspects relating to planning, designing and construction etc.
Subash's Minister is an important Minister in the state and significant growth in urban infrastructure development and road network has been registered during his tenure. He is very keen for launching of ambitious road construction project in the near future.
Subash is in regular touch with the Minister and is working various modalities of road construction project. Regular meetings, interactions and presentations are made by him to the Minister before a formal public announcement of the project is made by the Minister. Subash's only son Vikas is in real estate business. His son from his own sources is aware that a mega road project is on the anvil and announcement in this regard is expected anytime. He is very keen to know from his father the exact location of the upcoming project. He knows that there would be quantum jump in the prices of land in the vicinity. Buying land at this stage at cheaper prices would pay him rich dividends. He is pleading with him (his father) day in and day out to share him location of the proposed project. He assured him that he would handle the matter discretely as it would not attract any adverse notice as he in the normal course, keeps on buying land as a part of his business. He feels pressurised because of constant pleadings by his son.
Another significant aspect of the matter pertained to the extra/undue interest in the above project by the Minister PWD. His nephew was also having big infrastructure project company. In fact, the Minister has also introduced his nephew to him and indicated to him to take care of his nephew's business interest in the forthcoming project. The Minister encouraged him to act fast in the matter as early announcement and execution of mega road project would enhance his status in the party and public life.
In the above backdrop, Subash is in a fix as to the future course of action.
(a) Discuss the ethical issues involved in the case.
(b) Critically examine the options available to Subash in the above situation.
(c) Which of the above would be most appropriate and why?
(Answer in 250 words)
(a) Ethical Issues Involved:
1. Conflict of Interest: Subash faces pressure from his son to misuse privileged information for personal financial gain.
2. Integrity and Confidentiality: Sharing project details would violate official secrecy and breach public trust.
3. Political Pressure and Nepotism: The Minister’s attempt to influence project allocation in favor of his nephew undermines fairness and transparency.
4. Professional Responsibility: Subash must balance loyalty to his Minister with duty to the Constitution and public interest.
5. Accountability and Public Trust: Misuse of authority or confidential data would erode institutional credibility.
(b) Options Available to Subash:
1. Yield to Pressures: Share project information with his son or favor the Minister’s nephew—this is illegal, unethical, and violative of conduct rules.
2. Politely Resist: Refuse both requests while maintaining professional decorum and reminding stakeholders of legal implications.
3. Escalate Concerns: If pressure persists, document and report the matter to Chief Secretary or Vigilance Commission, ensuring institutional transparency.
4. Transfer Request: Seek recusal or transfer if impartial functioning becomes untenable, while maintaining official confidentiality.
(c) Most Appropriate Course of Action:
Subash should adopt Option 2 and 3—resist unethical pressures and uphold professional integrity. He must maintain confidentiality of government information, remind his son of the legal consequences of insider trading, and report ministerial interference through proper channels.
This course aligns with civil service values of integrity, objectivity, and public accountability, reinforcing his duty to serve the public interest over personal or political gain.
Open this in the study app →