Every NCERT book that matters for UPSC — open a book, then a chapter. Learn each chapter's concepts, then how UPSC tests them — with diagrams, flowcharts and the past questions to attempt.
Resistance and Resilience (1000–1700 CE)
Start here: why this chapter matters
This is Chapter 3 of NCERT's new integrated Grade 9 textbook Understanding Society: India and Beyond, Part 2: 36 pages (45–80; the last is a notes page). Its parts: what resistance and resilience mean; invasions and resistance in the 11th–12th centuries (a map, Fig. 3.1); Rajput resistance to the Delhi Sultanate and the Mughals (Figs 3.2–3.6); the Ahoms (Figs 3.7, 3.8); Vijayanagara and the Nayakas (Fig. 3.9); the Marathas and their forts (Figs 3.10–3.13); a 17th-century map (Fig. 3.14); the Sikhs and the Jats (Fig. 3.15); Bhakti, Sufism and sulh-i-kul (Figs 3.16–3.21); temples (Figs 3.22–3.27); and the economy — irrigation, the hundī, merchants and the Indian Ocean (Figs 3.28–3.31). A running timeline crosses the bottom of pages 46–53. It ends with a summary and ten questions and activities. Every number is recomputed; our additions are marked †. We use ten concept sections, one per topic.
- How this book relates to UPSC, honestly: it is a new, foundational Class 9 book with a clear theme (resistance and resilience). UPSC asks medieval history as facts and chronology (Prelims) and analysis (Mains GS1). The depth sits in the senior books: lehs202 (Class 12: Bhakti–Sufi Traditions), lehs203 (Class 12: An Imperial Capital — Vijayanagara), lehs204 (Class 12: Peasants, Zamindars and the State — Mughal revenue, mansabs), lehs201 (Class 12: Through the Eyes of Travellers — Bernier, Ibn Battuta), kefa106 and kefa108 (Class 11 Fine Arts: temple and Indo-Islamic architecture) and kehs103 (Class 11: Nomadic Empires — the Mongols).
- Same book: iest201 (Oceans and Life — the Indian Ocean you meet again in the trade section) and iest202 (Life on Earth — Bundelkhand's tanks and the commons). In Book I, iest105 (State and Society up to 1000 CE) covers the centuries just before this one. On historians and sources, jess302 shows how the same events can be read in different ways.
- UPSC from this chapter: Prelims asks about Mahmud's motive (1979), Tarain–Panipat–Company chronology (1984), Khanua (2001), Vijayanagara's founding and fall (1979, 1984, 2015), the dynasties' dates (2023), the Chola navy (1980, 2025), Shivaji's coronation (1985), the mansabdari system (1979, 1981, 1989, 1992, 1996), Bhakti saints and Sufism (1979, 1982, 1984, 1987, 1988, 1990, 1996), the Europeans (1979, 1983, 1994), banjaras (2016) and the hundī (2020). Mains GS1 asks about Sufis and saints (2014), Krishnadeva Raya (2016), Chaitanya (2018), Bhakti literature (2021), Sultanate technology (2023) and Akbar's syncretism (2025). We link 34; questions on Sultanate administration, Mughal painting and architecture sit on other chapters.
| Word | What it means here |
|---|---|
| Resistance | Actively opposing a force or threat to protect power, territory, interests or identity — by war, alliance, diplomacy or negotiation |
| Resilience | The capacity to endure hardship, adapt and keep inherited traditions alive |
| Confederacy | An alliance of several rulers or groups against a common opponent (e.g., Rana Sanga's at Khanua) |
| Iqta | Under the Delhi Sultanate, revenue from a territory assigned to a commander in place of a salary |
| Mansab / mansabdar | Under the Mughals, a rank or office combining military and civil duties; its holder |
| Guerrilla warfare | Small, fast raids, ambushes and surprise attacks using local terrain instead of pitched battles |
| Paik system | The Ahom system in which adult men (paiks) owed service to the state in turns |
| Swarajya | Self-rule — an independent, self-governing territory |
| Miri-piri | The Sikh idea of the Guru's authority over both worldly (miri) and spiritual (piri) matters |
| Khalsa / misl | The Sikh order founded in 1699 / an armed Sikh band, later part of a confederacy |
| Bhakti | Personal, loving devotion to the divine, often sung in local languages |
| Nirguna / saguna | Devotion to a formless divine / to a divine with form and qualities |
| Sufism / silsilah / khanqah | Islamic mysticism / a Sufi order / a Sufi hospice |
| Sulh-i-kul | ‘Peace with all’ — Akbar's later state policy of universal toleration |
| Hundī / sarrāf | A bill of exchange / the money-changer who issued and paid it |
| Haveli temple | A temple built to look like a house (haveli), without a tall spire |
- Opening (p. 45): a banner photograph of an old stone temple on a sunlit rock outcrop, a round cartoon of two students, a QR code to NCERT's e-content, and four ‘Big Questions’ — how rulers used resistance and alliances; what made kingdoms and communities resilient; how Bhakti built solidarity; how agriculture, trade and commerce kept the economy sound. We answer them in the in-text section.
- The running timeline (pp. 46–53): a decade-scale strip along the foot of eight pages, from 980 to 1770, with orange bars for reigns (Rajaraja Chola, Bhoja, Rudrama Devi, Kumbha, Rani Abbakka, Akbar, Aurangzeb) and pointers for events (1001, 1178, 1192, 1206, 1228, 1298, 1301, 1303, 1307, 1320, c. 1325, 1336, 1526, 1576, 1600, 1602, 1659, 1664, 1674). Small portraits mark Aurangzeb and the Pratapgarh event. The point: put every event in order. Our to-scale bar chart (section 1) and the dated tables carry all of it.
At a glance — the six ideas to carry away
- Two ideas: resistance = actively opposing a threat (war, alliances, diplomacy, negotiation); resilience = enduring and adapting while keeping traditions. ‘Resilience is the backbone of resistance.’ The book: a period of conflict and cooperation, not only invasion.
- 1000–1200: Mahmud of Ghazni defeats Jayapala (1001); Naiki Devi beats Muhammad Ghuri at Kasahrada (1178); Ghuri beats Prithviraj at Tarain II (1192); Sultanate 1206. Chauhans, Gahadavalas, Senas fall; Gujarat, Malwa, the Chandellas resist for about a century; Odisha and parts of Assam stay outside Turkish rule.
- Sultanate and Rajputs: iqta, heavier revenue (up to 50%); Khalji sieges of Ranthambore (1301), Chittor (1303), Devagiri (1307); Hammir regains Mewar (c. 1325); Kumbha (1433–68). Mughals: Panipat (1526), Khanua (1527); Akbar's mansabs draw in Amber; Mewar resists — Chittor (1567–68), Haldighati (1576), Dewair (1582), Bhil allies, a treaty exempting Mewar's ruler from attending court.
- Ahoms (1228–1826): terrain, paiks, bāchārī boats; Mir Jumla takes Garhgaon (1662); Lachit Borphukan wins Saraighat (1671). Vijayanagara (1336, Harihara and Bukka): Kumara Kampana ends the Madurai Sultanate; Talikota 1565; Nayakas. Marathas: swarajya, Shivaji crowned 1674, forts (Raigad, Sinhagad, Gingee). Sikhs: Gurus Arjan and Tegh Bahadur executed; Akal Takht, miri-piri, Khalsa 1699, misls. Jats: Gokul (1669), Sinsini (1686).
- Bhakti: local languages, nirguna/saguna, nām kīrtan and sankirtan (Chaitanya), Tulsidas, Sankardev, women saints, Raskhan and Rahim. Sufism: silsilahs (Chishti, Suhrawardi; Qadiri, Naqshbandi). Sulh-i-kul under Akbar.
- Temples: economy, credit, legitimacy (Gajapati as Rauta of Jagannath); destroyed in places from the 11th century, restored elsewhere (Srirangam, Kashi Vishwanath, Govind Dev ji); low-profile ‘haveli’ temples. Economy: Persian wheel, small-scale irrigation, hundī, banjārās, Gujarati merchants, Europeans from the Portuguese on.
1. Resistance and resilience: the chapter's two ideas
NCERT opens by describing the years 1000–1700 as a time of deep political, social and cultural change: repeated invasions and wars, which it says were accompanied by religious discrimination and social distress, and regional powers that pushed back in both military and cultural ways. It defines resilience as the capacity to survive and adapt in hard times while keeping inherited social, cultural and spiritual traditions — for instance by restoring places of worship, adjusting customs and, in many regions, building lasting patterns of coexistence across religious and cultural lines. Resistance is actively opposing a force, authority or threat to protect power, territory, interests or identity — through warfare, alliances, diplomacy, negotiation or other political action. The two are linked: a cause or a leader starts resistance, but the ability to endure comes from resilience. The book is explicit that the period was one of conflict and cooperation, ‘rather than being merely a story of invasion and resistance’. It adds a reason for the invasions besides territory and religion: the surplus produce of fertile river plains.
| How should this period be framed? (Beyond NCERT attribution) | Who | Position |
|---|---|---|
| Religious periods | James Mill, History of British India (1817) | divided India's past into ‘Hindu’, ‘Muslim’ and ‘British’ periods; later historians widely criticised this as a colonial frame that reduces politics to religion |
| Resistance of a civilisation | Nationalist historians, e.g., the History and Culture of the Indian People series edited by R. C. Majumdar | stressed invasion, foreign rule and the long struggle of Indian powers to resist it — close to this chapter's emphasis |
| States, agrarian economy, synthesis | Historians such as Mohammad Habib, Irfan Habib and Satish Chandra | stressed how states collected revenue and recruited elites across faiths, and the rise of shared cultural forms; saw religion as one factor among political and economic ones |
| A connected world | e.g., Richard Eaton, India in the Persianate Age, 1000–1765 (2019) | reads the period through interaction — Sanskrit and Persian worlds overlapping in courts, languages and trade |
| NCERT (this chapter) | NCERT, Grade 9 (2025–26) | invasions with territorial, religious and economic motives; resistance and resilience together; conflict and cooperation |
- Whose words? In exams, attribute judgements: ‘NCERT describes…’, ‘historians such as… argue…’. Strong characterisations (e.g., of motives or of a ruler's policy) are the book's or a historian's reading, not neutral fact.
- ‘Resistance’ is wider than war: the book counts alliances, diplomacy, negotiation and symbolic defiance as resistance (Exercise 1: the answer is (b), not ‘always warfare’).
- Alliances crossed religious lines throughout: Rajput rulers served the Mughals (Raja Man Singh of Amber led the Mughal army at Haldighati †), Hakim Khan Sur fought for Maharana Pratap †, and the Mughal commander at Saraighat was Raja Ram Singh of Amber †. Keep this in mind against any single-cause reading.
2. Invasions and resistance, 1000–1200
The book traces invasions from the mid-7th century, when Arab forces came by land and sea and were repulsed by rulers in the Deccan, Malwa, Kashmir and Rajasthan. Mahmud, Sultan of Ghazni (in present-day Afghanistan and north-eastern Iran), first attacked in 1001, defeating Jayapala of the Hindu Shahi dynasty. Through the 11th and 12th centuries the Hindu Shahis, Chandellas, Solankis and Chauhans fought the Turkish invaders. In 1178 Queen Naiki Devi of the Chaulukya kingdom defeated Muhammad Ghuri at Kasahrada, near Mount Abu. By the end of the 12th century the Chauhans, Gahadavalas and Senas had come under Turkish control (Ghuri defeated Prithviraj Chauhan at the Second Battle of Tarain, 1192), but Gujarat, Malwa and the Chandellas' Bundelkhand resisted for about a century more. The Turks did not conquer present-day Odisha or parts of Assam; several Rajput states stayed centres of resistance; and peninsular India remained outside Turkish control in these two centuries. The Delhi Sultanate was established in 1206.
| Fig. 3.1 dynasty (map described in words) | Centre(s) marked on the map | Where (in words) | What happened (book / †) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hindu Shahis | — | far north-west | Jayapala defeated by Mahmud, 1001 (book) |
| Ghaznavids, Ghurids | — | north-west, beyond the Indus plains | the invaders of the 11th and 12th centuries |
| Chahamanas (Chauhans) | Sakambhari, Ajayameru (Ajmer) | north-west interior | Prithviraj defeated at Tarain, 1192 |
| Chaulukyas (Solankis) | Anahilapataka (Patan) | west, Gujarat | Naiki Devi wins at Kasahrada, 1178; Gujarat resists into the 13th century |
| Paramaras | Dhara | west-central (Malwa) | Bhoja's reign 1000–1055; Malwa resists |
| Gahadavalas | Kanyakubja (Kannauj), Kashi | middle Ganga plain | under Turkish control by c. 1200 (Chandawar, 1194 †) |
| Chandellas | Kalinjar | Bundelkhand | resist for about a century more |
| Senas | Navadvipa, Vijayapura, Vikramapura | Bengal | under Turkish control by early 13th century † |
| Kamarupa | Pragjyotishapura | Brahmaputra valley | parts of Assam stay outside Turkish rule |
| Chalukyas (of Kalyani) | Kalyani, Manyakheta, Taradavadi | western Deccan | outside Turkish control |
| Eastern Gangas | — | east coast (Odisha) | Odisha not conquered by the Turks |
| Cholas | Gangaikondacholapuram | far south | campaigns: Maldives c. 1000, Ganga c. 1022, South-East Asia by sea c. 1025 |
| Also labelled | Kashmir; Sindh | north; lower Indus | — |
- Fig. 3.1: a relief map of the subcontinent with latitude and longitude lines, a compass rose and a 500-km scale; dynasty names in red (Hindu Shahis, Ghaznavids, Ghurids, Chahamanas, Chaulukyas, Paramaras, Gahadavalas, Chandellas, Senas, Kamarupa, Chalukyas, Eastern Gangas, Cholas), black dots for major centres, and red dashed arrows for three Chola campaigns with dates — to the Maldives (c. 1000), towards Bengal (c. 1022) and a naval expedition to South-East Asia (c. 1025). The point: on the eve of the Turkish invasions power was divided among many regional dynasties, and the Cholas projected power overseas. Every label is in our table; no outline or route is redrawn.
- Let's Recall (p. 47): Mahmud's and Ghuri's invasions, met in Grade 7, disrupted the political, social and religious fabric of the subcontinent.
| Mahmud's motives — historians' views (Beyond NCERT attribution) | Who | Position |
|---|---|---|
| Wealth | Mohammad Habib, Sultan Mahmud of Ghaznin (1927) | the raids were driven mainly by plunder of temple and city treasure to finance his Central Asian wars; he did not try to rule India beyond Punjab |
| Religious zeal | Mahmud's court chroniclers (e.g., al-Utbi) and many later writers | the campaigns were presented as holy war; temple destruction is described with approval in the chronicles |
| Mixed motives | Many present-day historians | wealth, prestige, legitimacy in the Islamic world and religious rhetoric worked together; the sources' own aims must be read critically |
| NCERT (this chapter) | NCERT | invasions ‘driven by territorial expansion and religious motives’, with the plains' surplus produce ‘a major reason’ |
| Bare facts | — | first raid 1001; about seventeen raids by tradition †; Somnath raided 1025–26 †; Mahmud died 1030 † |
- Solanki = Chaulukya of Gujarat (capital Anahilapataka). Do not confuse them with the Chalukyas of Kalyani in the Deccan, a different dynasty also on Fig. 3.1.
- Naiki Devi fought as regent for her young son Mularaja II (Beyond NCERT); the book calls her ‘Queen’. Kasahrada (1178) was Ghuri's first major defeat in India.
- Tarain was two battles: Prithviraj Chauhan won the first (1191, Beyond NCERT); Ghuri won the second (1192). UPSC 1984 asked the order: Tarain II (1192) → Panipat I (1526) → East India Company (1600).
- UPSC 1979 keyed ‘to plunder the wealth of India’ as Mahmud's purpose. That is Habib's classic reading; the book itself names territory, religion and wealth. The key is debatable; strategy: in that old one-answer question pick plunder; in Mains, set the motives side by side.
- The Chola campaigns are dated ‘c.’ on the map: the Ganga expedition was under Rajendra I (c. 1019–22 †, hence Gangaikondacholapuram) and the overseas strike on Srivijaya c. 1025 (UPSC 1980, 2025).
3. The Delhi Sultanate, the Rajputs and Mewar's long resistance
The Delhi Sultanate (1206) centralised power. Its iqta system assigned territories to military commanders in place of salaries; it became the way land revenue was collected and, the book says, increased the burden on peasants. During its campaigns the Sultanate's forces demolished sites sacred to local communities (the book's words), which hardened resistance, so that resistance had both political and socio-cultural motives. The Yadavas of Devagiri, Rajput dynasties of Rajasthan, the Kakatiyas of Warangal and the Hoysalas of Karnataka repeatedly resisted the Sultans and checked their expansion; Mewar, Gwalior, Malwa, Awadh, Etawah, Ajmer, Jalore, Kalinjar and Kannauj defied different Sultans. The timeline adds Alauddin Khalji's capture of Anhilwara and plunder of Somnath (1298), his sieges of Ranthambore (1301) and Chittor (1303), Malik Kafur's expedition against Devagiri (1307), the Tughluqs (1320) and the Sisodia Rana Hammir taking Mewar back from the Sultanate's tributaries (c. 1325); later Rana Kumbha (1433–68) built a framework of resistance including forts. In 1526 Babur defeated Ibrahim Lodi at the First Battle of Panipat; in 1527 Rana Sanga (Sangram Singh I) of Mewar led a Rajput confederacy against him at Khanua and lost — a turning point. Relations then varied: Mewar resisted, while the Kachhwahas of Amber cooperated. The Mughals needed the Rajputs' military strength, loyalty and administration, and drew some into the empire through mansabs (ranks combining military and civil duty, introduced by Akbar).
| Sultanate campaigns and who resisted (Beyond NCERT dates †, check) | Ruler who resisted | Outcome † |
|---|---|---|
| Ranthambore, 1301 | Hammira Deva (Chauhan) | fort taken by Alauddin Khalji |
| Chittor, 1303 | Ratan Singh (Guhila) | fort taken; Mewar later regained by Hammir (c. 1325, book) |
| Devagiri, 1307–08 | Ramachandra (Yadava) | made tributary; annexed later (1317) |
| Warangal, 1309–10 and 1323 | Prataparudra (Kakatiya) | tribute first; kingdom ended in 1323 |
| Dwarasamudra, 1311 | Ballala III (Hoysala) | tribute; Ballala fought on until 1343 (see section 5) |
| Jalore, c. 1311 | Kanhadadeva (Chauhan) | fort taken (the book's ‘Don't Miss Out’ names him) |
| Rajput–Mughal relations — readings (Beyond NCERT attribution) | Who | Position |
|---|---|---|
| Heroic resistance | James Tod, Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan (1829–32), and much bardic and popular tradition | celebrated Mewar's refusal to submit; historians value Tod's material but caution that it romanticises and mixes legend with fact |
| Partnership | Many historians of the Mughal state (e.g., Satish Chandra) | Rajput rulers became high mansabdars, kept their home kingdoms (watan jagirs †) and gained office and pay; the alliance was a pillar of the empire |
| Strategic bargaining | NCERT (this chapter) | both sides acted on strategic considerations: some resisted, some negotiated; Mewar's resistance won it a negotiated autonomy |
| Bare facts | — | Khanua 1527; Akbar r. 1556–1605; Chittor 1567–68; Haldighati 1576; Dewair 1582; Pratap d. 1597 †; treaty 1615 † |
- Glossary — Mansab: ‘rank’ or ‘office’; holders were mansabdars; Akbar's system combined military organisation with civil administration, set a clear hierarchy of nobles and strengthened imperial control.
- Fig. 3.2 ‘A painting depicting the Battle of Haldighati’: a crowded miniature in which hundreds of horsemen, foot soldiers and armoured elephants clash across a cream ground, banners and parasols marking commanders, a stream along one corner. The point: a large, set-piece battle — after which Pratap switched to guerrilla war.
- Fig. 3.3 ‘Victory memorial in Dewair, Rajasthan’: a stepped stone path and walls climbing a green hill to a round enclosure with a tall white spire, an inscribed red stone tablet in front. The point: Dewair (1582) is remembered as the turn in Mewar's favour.
- Fig. 3.4: a 19th-century miniature of Maharana Pratap on a white horse, with spear, shield and red turban, against a desert landscape. The point: how later generations pictured him — a portrait made about 250 years after his death, not a likeness from life.
- Let's Recall — the Bhils with Fig. 3.5 ‘Mewar's Coat of Arms’: a shield showing a fort on a hill, held on one side by a Bhil archer with a bow and on the other by a Rajput warrior in armour, a radiant sun face above and a motto scroll below. The point: the Bhils' knowledge of the Aravallis, archery and guerrilla skills made them Pratap's essential allies, and Mewar later put that alliance on its emblem (the book says the centre honours Eklingji, a form of Shiva).
- Let's Explore — Fig. 3.6: a short passage (translated; source given as Rawat Saraswat, Dursā Arhā, Sahitya Akademi, 1983) by the poet Dursa Arha praising Pratap after his death for keeping his horses unbranded, his head unbowed, staying away from the Mughal Nauroz celebrations and never standing guard at the emperor's jharokha darshan. The point: refusing court rituals was itself resistance. Outline in the in-text section.
- Don't Miss Out: other Rajput resisters — Kanhadadeva Chauhan (Jalore), Rana Hammira Deva (Ranthambore), Rana Kumbha (Mewar), Rao Surjan Hada (Bundi).
- Khanua (1527): UPSC 2001 asked whether Khanua was ‘certainly more decisive’ than Panipat because Sanga was ‘certainly a more formidable adversary’; the stored key is (a), both true and the reason explains it. Many historians do call Khanua the more decisive battle (it broke the strongest Rajput coalition), but ‘certainly’ in both lines makes it a judgement call — the key is debatable. Strategy: go with (a), the standard textbook view.
- The siege of Chittor: most accounts date it from October 1567 to February 1568 — about four months; the book says ‘more than five months’. Safe line: ‘a siege of several months (1567–68)’.
- Mansabdari was introduced by Akbar (UPSC 1981, 1989, 1992); mansabdars were officials of the state with military and civil duties (UPSC 1979), and the system's main purpose was to organise the army and nobility (UPSC 1996).
- Dates the book omits: Haldighati, June 1576; Pratap died 1597; the Mewar–Mughal treaty was concluded in 1615 between Amar Singh and Prince Khurram (later Shah Jahan) — Beyond NCERT.
- 1298 or 1299? The timeline dates Alauddin's capture of Anhilwara and Somnath's plunder to 1298; most accounts give 1299. Safe line: ‘at the close of the 13th century’. Mahmud of Ghazni had already raided Somnath in 1025–26 (Beyond NCERT).
4. The Ahoms: six centuries of endurance
The Ahom kingdom of Assam kept its independence for almost six centuries (1228–1826) and resisted several invasions. Its commanders preferred to use the terrain rather than fight head-on: they knew Assam's forests, river systems and monsoon cycles, which invaders lacked. The first Ahom–Mughal clash came in 1615 near Samdhara: a Mughal force under Abu Bakr made early gains but had to retreat, and by 1616 the Ahoms had recovered their land — a pattern repeated over the next sixty years. In 1662 Mir Jumla captured the Ahom capital Garhgaon and imposed a treaty, which the Ahoms renounced soon after the Mughals withdrew. In 1671 the Ahom commander Lachit Borphukan defeated a Mughal fleet at the Battle of Saraighat on the Brahmaputra. The book lists four reasons for Ahom endurance: alliance-building, guerrilla tactics, Assam's geography, and the paik system of military-administrative organisation — plus a navy of light, fast river boats called bāchārī.
- Fig. 3.7 ‘A monument at Guwahati, Assam commemorating the Battle of Saraighat’: a large bronze group of soldiers in turbans, some with spears and swords, kneeling beside a wheeled cannon, led by a towering commander pointing forward with a raised sword. The point: Saraighat and Lachit Borphukan are remembered as a defining victory.
- Fig. 3.8 ‘Model of a bāchārī boat’: a long, narrow, double-pointed wooden hull with many thin oars along both sides. The point: speed and manoeuvrability on a river, where heavy Mughal boats were at a disadvantage.
- Who renounced the 1663 treaty? The book says King Jayadhvaj Singha defied the Mughals within a year of their withdrawal. Most accounts say Jayadhvaj died later in 1663, and it was his successor Chakradhvaj Singha who rejected the treaty and recovered Guwahati in 1667 (Beyond NCERT — check). Safe line: ‘the Ahoms threw off the treaty within a few years’.
- ‘The Brahmaputra as an effective boundary’ is loose: the Mughals briefly retook Guwahati (1679 †) and the Ahoms expelled them at Itakhuli (1682), after which the Manas river marked the frontier (Beyond NCERT). Safe line: ‘Saraighat (1671) checked Mughal expansion into the Brahmaputra valley’.
- 1228 = the arrival of the Ahom founder Sukaphaa (Beyond NCERT); 1826 = the Treaty of Yandabo after the Burmese wars, when the British took over (Beyond NCERT). 1826 − 1228 = 598 years.
- The paik system: every adult man was a paik owing service in rotation; groups of paiks were organised under officers — one reason the Ahoms could raise forces fast (Beyond NCERT; detail in Grade 8).
5. Vijayanagara and the Nayakas
In the Deccan and the south, the Delhi Sultanate's campaigns weakened older kingdoms: Malik Kafur, Alauddin Khalji's general, attacked cities and temples including Warangal, Belur and Madurai; later, under Muhammad bin Tughluq, the Sultanate pushed further south, contributing to the decline of the Pandyas and the rise of a new Madurai Sultanate. Against this background Harihara and Bukka founded Vijayanagara in 1336, near present-day Hampi (Karnataka). A formidable river and rugged, rocky terrain gave natural defence. The state expanded south of the Krishna and Tungabhadra, became one of the richest in the region, and encouraged literature in Kannada, Telugu, Tamil and Sanskrit. Under Bukka it subdued the Madurai Sultanate and annexed Arcot. In 1342 the ageing Hoysala king Vira Ballala III fought the Madurai Sultanate (the Battle of Kannanur) but was captured in a surprise counter-attack and executed. For almost four decades Vijayanagara fought Madurai, until Bukka's son Kumara Kampana killed the Sultan, ended the Madurai Sultanate and reinstated the images in the Rajasimheshwara temple at Kanchipuram and the Ranganathaswamy temple at Srirangam. The empire peaked under Krishnadevaraya (died 1529), who gave grants to temples including Tirupati and the Vitthala temple. In 1565 an alliance of the Deccan sultanates defeated Vijayanagara at Talikota; the city was sacked and largely abandoned, and the empire broke into Nayaka kingdoms, which kept up defiance — such as Muthu Virappa Nayak III of Madurai in the story of the Mughal slipper.
| Vijayanagara, step by step | Date | What happened (book / †) |
|---|---|---|
| Founding | 1336 | Harihara and Bukka (Sangama brothers †) found Vijayanagara near Hampi |
| Hoysala defeat | 1342 (1343 in many accounts †) | Vira Ballala III executed after the Battle of Kannanur against the Madurai Sultanate |
| Madurai Sultanate ended | c. 1371–78 † | Kumara Kampana's campaign; images restored at Srirangam and Kanchipuram (Gangadevi's Sanskrit poem Madhura Vijayam tells it †) |
| Peak | 1509–1529 † | Krishnadevaraya: wars against neighbours, temple grants, the Amuktamalyada in Telugu (section 10) |
| Talikota | 1565 | defeat by an alliance of Deccan sultanates (Bijapur, Ahmadnagar, Golconda, Bidar †); capital sacked |
| Nayakas | late 16th century on | Madurai, Thanjavur, Gingee and others (Fig. 3.14) |
- Fig. 3.9 ‘An aerial view of Hampi, the capital of the Vijayanagara Empire’: a drone photograph of a large temple complex — tall stepped gateway towers, pillared halls and long colonnades on a dusty plain — with boulder-strewn hills and green trees behind. The point: the rocky, boulder-covered landscape that the text calls a natural defence, and the scale of the city's temples.
- Let's Recall (p. 57): Krishnadevaraya's 16th-century peak, his grants to Tirupati and the Vitthala temple, his death from illness in 1529.
- Don't Miss Out — the slipper (pp. 57–58): by local tradition the Mughal emperor sent a royal slipper to subordinate rulers, to be received at the border with ceremony and tribute; Muthu Virappa Nayak III refused to go to the border, made the envoys bring it into his hall, put his own foot in it, asked mockingly why the other one of the pair had not been sent, and expelled the messengers. The point: defiance can be symbolic. The book marks it as tradition, so treat it as a story, not a recorded event.
- Harihara I founded the new city on the south bank of the Tungabhadra (a tributary of the Krishna) and ruled as the agent of the deity Virupaksha (UPSC 2015; lehs203).
- Talikota is also called the battle of Rakshasa–Tangadi (Beyond NCERT). UPSC 1979 keyed ‘unity among the Muslim rulers’ for the empire's fall — the book's ‘alliance of the Deccan sultanates’. Note that the sultanates often fought one another before and after 1565.
- The empire did not end in 1565: the Aravidu dynasty ruled on from Penukonda and Chandragiri into the 17th century (Fig. 3.14 still shows ‘Aravidus’) — Beyond NCERT.
- The Gahadavala, Kakatiya, Yadava and Hoysala kingdoms all rose in the 11th–12th centuries, none in the early 8th (UPSC 2023): Gahadavalas c. 1090–1194, Kakatiyas independent c. 1163–1323, Yadavas c. 1187–1317, Hoysalas to 1343 (Beyond NCERT, approximate).
- The book's ‘Rajasimheshwara temple’ at Kanchipuram is the Pallava-built Kailasanatha temple (Beyond NCERT).
6. The Marathas, swarajya and the fort network
The Marathas were a formidable force in the Deccan, especially in the 17th and 18th centuries. The founding of an independent Maratha state in 1674 is tied to Chhatrapati Shivaji, crowned that year as sovereign ruler. The Marathas had long been part of the region's politics; their knowledge of the Deccan's complex terrain and their martial skills made them strong in war and administration. Territory and sovereignty were linked to swarajya (self-rule), and Shivaji is regarded as one of its earliest proponents. Long wars against the Mughals and others drained the Mughal Empire — Aurangzeb spent more than two decades in the Deccan trying to subdue them — and the Marathas built a wide network of tributary alliances beyond their direct rule. Their land of hills and deep valleys made forts such as Raigad and Sinhagad the nuclei of guerrilla war: swift attacks from several directions, safe retreats, advanced outposts and frontier forts that could serve as fallback capitals. Forts were also centres of administration and justice, and with strong walls, water sources and armouries they could withstand long sieges. The timeline adds the Battle of Pratapgarh (1659), where Shivaji killed Afzal Khan.
| Fig. 3.14 (map described in words): powers of the 17th century | Region (in words) | Note (book / †) |
|---|---|---|
| Mughals | a broad band across the north and centre | the dominant empire |
| Sikhs, Satnamis, Jats | Punjab and the Delhi–Agra region | Sikhs and Jats in section 7; the Satnamis rebelled in 1672 † |
| Rathores, Sisodiyas, Bundelas | Rajputana and Bundelkhand | Rathores of Marwar, Sisodiyas of Mewar, Bundelas of Orchha |
| Nizam Shahis, Adil Shahis, Qutb Shahis | the Deccan | Ahmadnagar, Bijapur, Golconda; on the map together though Ahmadnagar was annexed in 1636 † |
| Marathas | the western Deccan and coast | section 6 |
| Aravidus, Udaiyars, Zamorins, Nayakas | the far south | Vijayanagara's last dynasty; Wodeyars of Mysore; rulers of Calicut; Nayakas |
| Koch, Ahoms, Jaintias, Kacharis, Nagas, Shans | the north-east and beyond | Ahoms in section 4 |
| Uzbeks, Safavids, Pathans, Yusufzais, Brahuis | the north-west and beyond | Central Asian and Iranian empires; Afghan and Baloch groups |
| ‘Savulus’ | Sri Lanka | label as printed — we could not identify it with certainty; check |
- Fig. 3.10 ‘A painting of Chhatrapati Shivaji with his personal guards’: Shivaji on a white horse under a green hillside, rows of guards with shields, spears and tall feathered standards around him. The point: a ruler at the head of a disciplined force.
- Let's Recall (p. 58): what strategies and institutions helped the Marathas — outline in the in-text section.
- Fig. 3.11 ‘Raigad fort’: a tall dark-stone gateway with a pointed arch, lit by low sun, ruined walls behind. Fig. 3.12 ‘Sinhagad fort’: round bastions and a stone stairway in thick green monsoon vegetation, a valley far below. The point: forts built into steep terrain.
- Don't Miss Out — Fig. 3.13 ‘Gingee Fort or Senji Fort in Tamil Nadu’: stone towers and walls crowning a sheer, boulder-cracked rock face. The text: in Villupuram district; a marvel of military and civil engineering; a gateway said to be defensible by a few against ten thousand; held in turn by Vijayanagara Nayakas, Bijapur, the Mughals, Marathas, French and English; and declared a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2025 at the 47th session of the World Heritage Committee in Paris.
- Fig. 3.14 ‘Some political dynasties in the Indian subcontinent in the 17th century’: a relief map with names in brown and a 500-km scale. The point: in the 17th century the Mughals were dominant but surrounded by many regional powers. Every label is in our table.
- Shivaji's coronation (June 1674) took place at Raigad (UPSC 1985 — Beyond NCERT, but the book shows Raigad).
- Gingee in 2025: it was inscribed as one of twelve forts of the serial World Heritage property ‘Maratha Military Landscapes of India’ (with Raigad and others in Maharashtra) — not on its own (Beyond NCERT — check the list). Sinhagad is not among the twelve.
- ‘More than two decades’: Aurangzeb moved to the Deccan in 1681 and died there in 1707 — 26 years (Beyond NCERT).
- The ‘Ashtapradhan’ (council of eight ministers) belongs to Shivaji's administration (UPSC 1995, 1998; not in this book — learn it from Grade 8 or a standard text).
7. The Sikhs and the Jats
Guru Nanak founded a spiritual movement in the late 15th century, later called Sikhism, stressing devotion to one God, social equality and the rejection of rituals. Under his successors the community grew, especially in Punjab, Sindh and the Gangetic plains; Punjab — fertile, densely peopled, with many peasants — was under the Lodis and then the Mughals. The book says the Mughal state intervened more in the Gurus' affairs from the early 17th century as their influence grew: Jahangir ordered the execution of Guru Arjan Dev (the fifth Guru), on the stated ground that he had supported the rebel prince Khusrau; this was a turning point in Sikh organisation. Guru Hargobind (the sixth) was detained in Gwalior Fort, where Sikhs gathered outside to honour him; he founded the Akal Takht, a seat of temporal authority, and the idea of miri-piri — the Harmandir Sahib for spiritual authority (piri), the Akal Takht for worldly authority (miri). In 1675 Aurangzeb ordered the execution of Guru Tegh Bahadur (the ninth). NCERT describes the Mughal state's treatment of the Gurus in very strong terms, as rooted in politics and also in what it calls the Mughals' rigid and discriminatory religious practices, and says it convinced the Sikhs that persecution had to be met with organised, and when necessary armed, resistance. In 1699 Guru Gobind Singh founded the Khalsa with a martial code; after the execution of his sons, the Sikhs formed armed groups, the misls, which became a confederacy, and many peasants became soldiers. The Jats, a farming community of the Ganga–Yamuna Doab, the book says, were burdened by heavy taxes and resented Aurangzeb's religious policies; they rose under Gokul in 1669, and again in 1686 under the zamindars of Sinsini and Sogar; by 1691 the Mughals had the upper hand, but resistance continued.
| Sikh–Mughal conflict — readings (Beyond NCERT attribution) | Who | Position |
|---|---|---|
| Political reason given at the time | Jahangir's own memoir (Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri) | links the order against Guru Arjan to his blessing of the rebel Khusrau and to the Guru's growing following |
| Religious persecution | Sikh tradition and many historians of Sikhism | the executions were martyrdom for faith; they shaped the community's commitment to resist injustice |
| Both at once | Many present-day historians | imperial politics (rebellions, succession, control of Punjab) and religious policy combined; the weight differs from Jahangir to Aurangzeb |
| NCERT (this chapter) | NCERT | political motives and the Mughals' discriminatory religious practices together |
| Bare facts | — | Guru Arjan d. 1606 †; Akal Takht founded 1606 †; Guru Tegh Bahadur d. 1675; Khalsa 1699; Guru Gobind Singh d. 1708 at Nanded † |
- Fig. 3.15 ‘A 19th century image of Sri Harmandir Sahib (Golden Temple), Amritsar’: an old sepia photograph of the temple standing in its square tank, joined by a causeway to a gateway, rows of buildings round the water. The point: the seat of spiritual authority (piri) in the miri-piri pair.
- Don't Miss Out: the Italian traveller Niccolao Manucci wrote a long 17th-century account of India that describes the Jat resistance (his work is known as the Storia do Mogor †; he was from Venice †).
- Guru Gobind Singh was not executed: the book lists him with Gurus Arjan and Tegh Bahadur as victims of Mughal brutality. His two younger sons were executed at Sirhind and his two elder sons fell in battle at Chamkaur (1704–05); he died in 1708 at Nanded after an assassin's attack (Beyond NCERT). Safe line: ‘his sons were killed and he was in long conflict with Mughal commanders’.
- Miri-piri is Guru Hargobind's, not Guru Amar Das's (UPSC 1996 used that distractor). The Adi Granth was compiled under Guru Arjan.
- Misls belong to the 18th century, after this chapter's period (Beyond NCERT); the book's sentence runs them straight on from 1699.
- Guru Nanak preached that God is one (UPSC 1982) — he did not preach a war society.
- Gokul Jat's rising: 1669; Sinsini: 1686, subdued by 1691. The Jats later built a state at Bharatpur (18th century, Beyond NCERT).
8. Bhakti, Sufism and sulh-i-kul: faith that travels
Between the 11th and 17th centuries Bhakti — personal devotion to the divine, sung in local languages — transformed religious life. It rose in peninsular India from the 7th century (the Alvars, devotees of Vishnu, such as Andal, and the Nayanars, devotees of Shiva, such as Karaikal Ammaiyar), stressing inclusion, equality, simplicity and everyday life; Eknath taught in Marathi a path open to all without institutions. From the 14th century a strong wave spread across the north; Ramananda bridged southern and northern traditions. Two streams developed: nirguna (a formless divine) and saguna (a divine with attributes). Saints came from very diverse social backgrounds. The book argues Bhakti was also resilience: where temple building was restricted or temples were destroyed, devotees could turn to nām kīrtan (reciting the divine Name) and community singing (satsang), which did not depend on buildings and were hard to suppress. Sankardev composed the Kirtana Ghosha, still central to Vaishnava practice in Assam. Chaitanya Mahaprabhu and Guru Nanak used community singing (sankīrtan) to bridge social divides; Chaitanya led public sankīrtan in Bengal to protest a Qazi's restrictions on devotion. In Rajasthan the Dadu Panth and Niranjani Sampradaya gave stability; some kept bands of warrior ascetics to protect trade routes and travelling saints. The epics were retold in regional languages — Tulsidas's Ramcharitmanas in Awadhi; Atukuri Molla's Telugu Ramayana. Women saints rose to prominence — Akka Mahadevi and Lal Ded as ascetics, Bahinabai as a householder devoted to Vithoba — and devotees of many backgrounds joined: Raskhan (Braj; Prem Vatika, Sujan Raskhan), Rahim (Abdul Rahim Khan-i-Khana, a Mughal commander who wrote Braj verse to Krishna) and Bibi Lachimar. Rulers continued to invoke goddesses as protectors in war. Sufism, a mystical dimension of Islam, expanded with the Turks; it arose in West Asia as a spiritual response to worldliness among some ulema and to legal orthodoxy, spread through orders (silsilahs) — Chishti and Suhrawardi under the Sultanate, Qadiri and Naqshbandi under the Mughals — and through khanqahs and shrines; Sufis used Hindavi and Bengali, adopted local practices including breath control (habs-i-dam, like prāṇāyāma), and contributed to the spread of Islam. In the later part of Akbar's reign, sulh-i-kul (‘peace with all’) became state policy; the book reads it as partly political — to win non-Muslim powers' support — and notes Akbar's reverence for the Sun.
| Fig. 3.19 region | Saints (book) | Language and century (Beyond NCERT †, approximate) |
|---|---|---|
| Northern and Central | Lal Ded, Guru Nanak, Ramananda, Kabir, Mirabai, Raidasa, Vallabhacharya, Surdas, Tulsidas | Kashmiri (Lal Ded, 14th c.); Punjabi (Nanak, 15th–16th); Hindi dialects incl. Braj and Awadhi (Kabir, Raidas, Surdas, Tulsidas, 15th–16th); Rajasthani/Braj (Mirabai, 16th); Vallabha (Pushtimarg, c. 1500) |
| Southern | Basavanna, Madhvacharya, Annamacharya, Pothana, Poonthanam Namboothiri | Kannada (Basavanna, 12th); Madhva (Dvaita, 13th); Telugu (Annamacharya, Pothana, 15th); Malayalam (Poonthanam, 16th) |
| Western | Eknath, Jnanadeva, Muktabai, Namadeva, Janabai, Chokhamela, Narasimha Mehta, Bhalana, Pipaji, Tukaram | Marathi (Jnanadeva, Namadeva, Muktabai, Janabai, Chokhamela 13th–14th; Eknath 16th; Tukaram 17th); Gujarati (Narasimha Mehta, 15th); Pipaji (Rajasthan) |
| Eastern | Jayadeva, Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, Krittibasa, Madhava Kandali, Sankardev | Sanskrit (Jayadeva, Gita Govinda, 12th); Bengali (Chaitanya, Krittibas's Ramayana, 15th–16th); Assamese (Madhava Kandali, 14th; Sankardev, 15th–16th) |
| Bhakti, Sufism and ‘syncretism’ — readings (Beyond NCERT attribution) | Who | Position |
|---|---|---|
| Synthesis | Tara Chand, Influence of Islam on Indian Culture (1936), and others | saw Bhakti and Sufism meeting and shaping each other — a composite culture |
| Older roots | Many historians of Bhakti | Bhakti began with the Tamil Alvars and Nayanars centuries before the Turks; it was not created by contact with Islam |
| Resilience | NCERT (this chapter) | Bhakti preserved traditions under pressure by making devotion portable, local and collective |
| Social critique | Historians of caste and gender | stressed saints from labouring castes and women saints who questioned hierarchy — while noting how far society actually changed is debated (UPSC 2014 asks exactly this) |
| How did Islam spread? — theories (Beyond NCERT attribution) | Who | Position |
|---|---|---|
| Four theories, and a test | Richard Eaton, The Rise of Islam and the Bengal Frontier, 1204–1760 (1993) | sorted explanations into conversion by the sword, for political patronage, for social liberation from caste, and by migration; argued none fits well alone — Muslim populations grew most where states were weak (east Bengal, west Punjab), not near capitals |
| Gradual acculturation | Eaton (same work) | in east Bengal, forest clearing and settled farming led by pioneers linked to Sufi shrines brought gradual change over generations |
| Force and pressure | Many other historians and writers | stress that coercion, discriminatory taxes and state patronage mattered in particular times and places |
| NCERT (this chapter) | NCERT | Sufis ‘contributed to the spread of Islam’, using local languages and practices |
- Fig. 3.16 ‘Saint Kabir with Namdeva, Raidas and Pipaji, Jaipur, early 19th century’: a painting of four saints seated on a green ground before a red house; one works at a long white warp stretched on a frame. The point: saints from working lives (Kabir is remembered as a weaver), shown together though they lived in different centuries.
- Let's Explore (p. 64): the Nayanars (Karaikal Ammaiyar) and Alvars (Andal). Don't Miss Out: saints sang in different languages, united by devotion to the ultimate reality.
- Fig. 3.17 ‘King Pratap Rudra of Odisha bowing to Chaitanya Mahaprabhu’: a painting of saffron-clad devotees seated under a tree as a king prostrates on the ground before them. The point: royal reverence for a Bhakti saint (Prataparudra was the Gajapati king †).
- Don't Miss Out — the epics (p. 65): translations of the Ramayana and Mahabharata into regional languages; Tulsidas's Ramcharitmanas in Awadhi.
- Don't Miss Out — Fig. 3.18 ‘A stamp commemorating Atukuri Molla’: an Indian postage stamp (₹5) with a painted portrait of a woman holding a palm-leaf manuscript. The text: daughter of a potter of Gopavaram (Badvel, Andhra Pradesh), she composed the Telugu Molla Ramayanam and recited it at Krishnadevaraya's court.
- Fig. 3.19 ‘Some prominent Bhakti Saints from 12th–17th centuries’: four red-headed panels listing 29 saints by region. Our table carries all of them.
- Let's Map (p. 67): mark the present-day States of the saints on a map of India, add a saint from your own State and share a verse — outline in the in-text section (our table gives the regions; mark them on your own blank map).
- Think About It — Fig. 3.20: a scroll with a translated vakh (saying) of Lal Ded: learning scriptures is easy, living them is hard; the search for the Real is not simple; in deep looking, words fall away into a joyful, silent awakening. The question: knowing a rule versus following it — outline in the in-text section.
- Don't Miss Out — goddesses: rulers invoked Kali, Durga, Bhavani and other forms of Shakti in war; Annamaraja of Bastar is believed to have received his sword from Manikyadevi (Danteshwari), Kumara Kampana a goddess-given sword at Madurai, and Shivaji a sword from Tulja Bhavani. The book marks these as beliefs.
- Fig. 3.21 ‘A Mughal painting depicting Akbar worshipping the Sun’, in a box on sulh-i-kul: a small standing figure in a light robe facing a radiant disc, inside a frame of Persian calligraphy panels. The point: Akbar's later, more inclusive court practice.
- Don't Miss Out — Sufism: origins, silsilahs, khanqahs, local languages and habs-i-dam (as in the text above).
- Kabir is the classic nirguna saint (UPSC 1990); Tulsidas, Surdas and Mirabai are saguna.
- Chaitanya: Bengal (Nabadwip), Krishna devotion through dance and song — kirtan (UPSC 1979, 1988). Sankardev also used nām-kirtan, plays and songs in Assam, but the classic answer for ‘dance and song kirtans’ is Chaitanya. The Qazi episode comes from Chaitanya's hagiographies (Beyond NCERT).
- Regions (UPSC 1987): Namdeva — Maharashtra; Chaitanya — Bengal; Surdas — Uttar Pradesh; Nanak — Punjab.
- Raskhan wrote Prem Vatika (UPSC 1996) — straight from this chapter.
- Sufism grew within Islam (UPSC 1979). The Chishti order takes its name from Chisht near Herat, not a village in Ajmer (Beyond NCERT).
- Sulh-i-kul is a policy of toleration; Din-i-Ilahi (Tauhid-i-Ilahi, 1582 †) was a small discipleship circle around Akbar — do not equate the two. The book does not use the term Din-i-Ilahi.
- Warrior ascetics: armed Dadupanthi and other ascetic bands are best documented in the 18th century (Beyond NCERT); the book's ‘standing armies’ needs that date.
- Atukuri Molla's dates are uncertain; her recital at Krishnadevaraya's court is a tradition (Beyond NCERT).
9. Temples: destruction, restoration and adaptation
Temples were central to social, economic and political life. They managed large land grants, employed architects, artisans, sculptors, priests, musicians and staff, gave credit to cultivators, village assemblies and merchant groups, supported irrigation, preserved arts such as Bharatanatyam, served as centres of education, and even had quasi-judicial roles — collecting local taxes and imposing penalties. They gave legitimacy to rulers: in some kingdoms the deity was the sovereign and the king its deputy — the Gajapatis of Odisha called themselves the Rauta (deputy) of Jagannath, the Kachhwahas of Jaipur ruled on behalf of Govindadevaji, and the rulers of Kota saw themselves as representatives of Rama. The Brihadeeswara (Rajarajeshvara) temple at Thanjavur received huge gifts of gold, ornaments and vessels; temple towns such as Thanjavur, Kanchipuram and Puri became cities. Temple building flourished between the 7th and 13th centuries. From the 11th century, the book says, many temples were destroyed, particularly in the Ghaznavid and Ghurid invasions, and from the 12th century some temples and maṭhs were plundered or destroyed and mosques sometimes built on the same sites. At the same time local rulers, merchant guilds and communities maintained and restored temples; rulers allied with the central power could usually build major structures. A Hoysala royal temple at Kannanur was turned into a mosque under the Sultanate and restored as a temple by Kumara Kampana; Todar Mal and Raja Man Singh rebuilt the Kashi Vishwanath temple under Akbar (later demolished in Aurangzeb's reign; the present temple was built beside the original site by Ahilyabai Holkar in 1780); Man Singh built the Govind Dev ji temple at Vrindavan, and the Bundela king Vir Singh a new Keshav Dev temple at Mathura. From the 16th century many temples were built in less visible places, in narrow lanes, looking like ordinary houses without tall shikharas — the ‘haveli temple’ described by some historians — which the book reads as an adaptation to avoid destruction. Maharana Jagat Singh refortified Chittor and built the large Jagdish temple in Udaipur, which some scholars see as a response to Shah Jahan's Jama Masjid in Delhi.
| Deity as sovereign (book) | Ruler | Deity | Form of the claim |
|---|---|---|---|
| Odisha | Gajapati kings | Jagannath (Puri) | the king as Rauta, the deity's deputy |
| Jaipur (Amber) | Kachhwaha rulers | Govindadevaji | governed on the deity's behalf |
| Kota | Rajput rulers | Rama (book) | rulers as the deity's representatives |
| Vijayanagara (UPSC 2015) | Harihara I and successors | Virupaksha | rule as the deity's agent (lehs203) |
| Temple destruction — historians' readings (Beyond NCERT attribution) | Who | Position |
|---|---|---|
| Mainly political | Richard Eaton, ‘Temple Desecration and Indo-Muslim States’ (2000) | counted about 80 instances he considered reliably documented, 1192–1760; argued most targeted royal temples tied to enemy kings' sovereignty during conquest or rebellion, while temples of loyal subjects were usually protected |
| Far wider and religious | Sita Ram Goel, Hindu Temples: What Happened to Them (1990–91), and others | compiled long lists of sites and argued destruction was much more extensive and driven by religious doctrine, as many chronicles themselves claim |
| How it was remembered | Romila Thapar, Somanatha: The Many Voices of a History (2004) | showed how Mahmud's raid on Somnath was recorded very differently in Persian chronicles, Sanskrit inscriptions, Jain texts and later colonial writing |
| NCERT (this chapter) | NCERT | many instances of destruction from the 11th century, alongside maintenance, restoration and new building by rulers, guilds and communities |
- Fig. 3.22 ‘Sri Ranganathaswamy Temple, Srirangam’: a towering, many-tiered gopuram covered in painted figures under a deep blue sky, temple roofs below. The point: one of the temples whose image Kumara Kampana reinstated.
- Fig. 3.23 ‘Brihadeeswara Temple, Thanjavur’: a wide paved courtyard with a pillared stone pavilion on the left and the great gateway towers on the right. The point: a royal temple that received vast gifts and anchored a temple town.
- Fig. 3.24 ‘Kashi Vishwanath Temple, Varanasi’: gilded spires and a golden dome at sunset, crowds and garlands in front. The point: a temple rebuilt more than once — Todar Mal and Man Singh's rebuilding, the later demolition, Ahilyabai Holkar's temple of 1780.
- Fig. 3.25 ‘Jagat Shiromani Temple, Amer’: a carved temple with domed pavilions and spires on a high plinth against bare hills; built by Queen Kanakwati, wife of Man Singh I, dedicated to Krishna and Mirabai.
- Don't Miss Out — Figs 3.26 and 3.27: the red-sandstone and white-marble Jama Masjid, Delhi with three domes and two tall minarets, beside the white, richly carved spire of the Jagdish temple, Udaipur. The point: buildings as political statements — the book reports scholars' view that Jagat Singh's temple answered Shah Jahan's mosque.
- The haveli example does not fit its photo: the book cites the Jagat Shiromani temple as a haveli-type example, but Fig. 3.25 shows it with prominent spires. Safe line: ‘haveli temples — house-like, without tall shikharas — are found in Delhi, Varanasi and Rajasthan’.
- Another reason for the haveli form (Beyond NCERT): the Pushtimarg (Vallabha) tradition worships Krishna as a child living in a home, so its temples are deliberately built as houses (e.g., Shrinathji at Nathdwara, late 17th century). Defence and devotion may both explain the style.
- Dates the book does not give (Beyond NCERT): Todar Mal's rebuilding of Kashi Vishwanath c. 1585; its demolition 1669; Jagdish temple 1651; Jama Masjid 1650–56.
- Temples' wealth made them targets in war between Indian kingdoms too — e.g., the Kashmiri king Harsha (11th century) is recorded in Kalhana's Rajatarangini as seizing temple treasures (Beyond NCERT) — one reason historians read motives case by case.
10. The economy: irrigation, hundīs, merchants and the Indian Ocean
The early second millennium saw agriculture expand and centres of craft production multiply. Land revenue was the state's main income; as empires grew, so did the area cultivated, and collection grew stricter — under Alauddin Khalji and Muhammad bin Tughluq the land tax rose to as much as 50% of produce, plus other taxes. The Delhi Sultans and later the Mughals had a limited role in maritime trade: their interest in coasts and ports was mostly political, military and customs duties, so coastal commerce stayed largely with regional powers and local communities. Irrigation devices — rope pulleys and the Persian wheel — raised output; Vijayanagara combined canals with many small-scale irrigation works. The hundī — like a cheque in some respects — was a bill of exchange for large payments and safe long-distance remittance, run by networks of money-changers (sarrāfs) and their agents (gumāshtas). Inland, caravans linked India to Central Asian routes; local traders such as the banjārās, along with revenue officials, linked villages and towns. From the 13th century seaborne trade grew, linking western India to the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea, and India became a hub of the Indian Ocean network between the eastern Mediterranean and China. Krishnadevaraya's Amuktamalyada urged rulers to manage ports well, grow trade in horses, elephants, gems, pearls and sandal-paste, and shelter foreign traders in hard times. From the 16th century the Portuguese sought to control ocean trade while the Mughals centralised land revenue; the Dutch, English, Danes and French followed. New merchant groups controlled wealth, production and supply chains and funded states; peasants grew raw materials while weavers, dyers and bleachers produced cotton textiles. Before the 15th century Arab, Chinese and Indian merchants dominated the ocean trade; later Gujarati merchants especially, and groups in Malabar, Coromandel and Bengal, prospered. Indian merchants worked as traders, shippers, bankers, brokers, dubhāshīs (interpreters), diplomats and officials, and even agriculturist groups such as the Vellalar joined the trade, some learning Portuguese, French, English and Persian.
| Europeans in the Indian Ocean (book's order; dates on the timeline, † beyond) | Arrived / formed | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Portuguese | 1498 † (Vasco da Gama at Calicut) | the first Europeans to trade by the Cape route (UPSC 1979, 1983); sought control of ocean trade |
| English East India Company | 1600 | charter of 31 December 1600 † |
| Dutch East India Company (VOC) | 1602 | the first permanent joint-stock company (UPSC 1994 — see the trap) |
| Danes | 1616 † | Tranquebar (Tamil Nadu coast) from 1620 † |
| French East India Company | 1664 | Pondicherry from 1674 † |
- Don't Miss Out — Fig. 3.28 ‘A hundī stamped by the Bank of Bengal, Agra, with a denomination of one rupee and eight annas’: a pale paper with a printed stamp, two round seals and several lines of handwritten script. The point: a written promise to pay that moved instead of coins. Our diagram shows how it worked and converts the sum (24 annas = 1.5 rupees).
- Think About It (p. 74): why a hundī was safer and more convenient — outline in the in-text section.
- Fig. 3.29 ‘A painting of a sarrāf or money changer’: a man seated cross-legged under a tiled awning, counting coins, with a striped counter in front and a caption in two scripts. The point: the person behind the hundī network.
- Don't Miss Out — Fig. 3.30 ‘A translated excerpt from the Amukthamālyadā’: on a scroll, Krishnadevaraya's advice to manage ports, grow trade in horses, elephants, gems, pearls and sandal-paste, shelter foreigners in drought and sickness, and reward favoured people with gardens, yards and mines. The point: a south Indian ruler who valued ocean trade.
- Fig. 3.31 ‘A painting of a woman weaver’: a woman in a white sari and jewellery holding a spindle, stretching long red threads between pegs under two trees, a caption in Tamil script below. The point: the textile workers behind India's main export.
- Think About It (p. 76): cultural and economic pillars of a community and resilience — outline in the in-text section.
- The spinning wheel is not an irrigation device. The book lists ‘rope pulleys, spinning wheel and Persian wheel’ as irrigation technologies. Safe line: irrigation used the Persian wheel (saqiya) and rope-and-bucket lifts; the spinning wheel (charkha), which also spread in this period, belongs to textiles (Beyond NCERT; UPSC Mains 2023 on Sultanate technology).
- Fig. 3.28 is from a later period: the Bank of Bengal dates from the early 19th century, so the photographed hundī is colonial-era, not 1000–1700. It shows the instrument's form, not a medieval original.
- Hundī = bill of exchange (UPSC 2020); banjaras = traders, often moving grain on pack bullocks (UPSC 2016).
- First joint-stock company (UPSC 1994): stored key ‘the Dutch’. The English company was chartered first (1600) but financed voyage by voyage at the start; the VOC (1602) was the first permanent joint-stock company. The key is debatable; strategy: answer ‘Dutch’ for ‘joint-stock’ and ‘English’ only if the question says ‘first company chartered’.
- 50% is the peak demand under Alauddin; Akbar's zabt took about one-third of average produce (Ain-i-Akbari; Beyond NCERT). Check whether a question means the Sultanate or the Mughals.
In-text questions, Big Questions and activities — answer outlines
The four Big Questions, then every Let's Recall, Let's Explore, Let's Map and Think About It box that asks something, in order.
Big Question 1: How did Indian rulers use resistance and alliances to safeguard their lands?
Big Question 2: What factors contributed to the resilience of different kingdoms and communities?
Big Question 3: How did the Bhakti tradition foster a sense of solidarity?
Big Question 4: How did the expansion of agriculture, trade and commerce keep the economy sound?
Let's Explore (Fig. 3.6): Identify any two specific actions in Dursa Arha's lines that show Maharana Pratap kept his independence from the Mughal court.
Let's Recall (p. 58): What do you remember about the strategies and institutions that helped the Marathas establish their power?
Let's Explore (p. 64): Explore the contributions of the Nayanar saints (like Karaikal Ammaiyar) and the Alvar saints (like Andal) to the spread of Bhakti in peninsular India.
Let's Map (p. 67): Locate and label the present-day states of the saints in Fig. 3.19; add a saint from your own state; share a verse you know.
Think About It (Fig. 3.20): Lal Ded says it is easy to learn scriptures but hard to live them. What is the difference between knowing a rule and following it? Give an example.
Think About It (p. 74): What made the hundī safer and more convenient than carrying money over long distances?
Think About It (p. 76): Identify cultural and economic pillars in any community. How do they contribute to resilience when facing external pressures?
NCERT questions and activities — answer outlines
Ten questions and activities. Try first, then open.
1. Choose the most appropriate answer: resistance and resilience are closely connected because (a) resistance always involves warfare; (b) resilience enables communities to endure difficulties and sustain resistance; (c) resistance is possible only with a large army; (d) resilient societies avoid all conflict.
2. Why and how did groups such as the Sikhs, Marathas and Rajputs assert their political power and identity during periods of changing political authority?
3. Why did some Rajput rulers decide to negotiate alliances with the Mughal power?
4. Imagine you are a foreign trader from Italy or France in a port market such as Surat, Masulipatnam or Puducherry, wanting a deal for cotton textiles. How would you secure the product, whose help would you seek, and what challenges would you face?
5. Watch a video at the given link (indianculture.gov.in, ‘Tales of forts’) and analyse the functions of forts. How did rulers see their strategic importance?
6. What architectural changes occurred in temple construction during this period? How do they reflect the resilient nature of Indian civilisation?
7. A kingdom has limited military resources but fertile land, strong local support and detailed knowledge of its terrain. Explain two ways these could contribute to its resilience when threatened.
8. ‘A tradition becomes more resilient when people can carry it with them.’ Do you agree? Explain with examples from the Bhakti tradition.
9. Voices from the Past: choose any two — a Bhakti saint, a Rajput soldier, an Ahom commander, a Maratha administrator, a merchant, a Jat leader — and write a short first-person account of what resilience means to them.
10. Design a fort: draw a simple labelled plan with residences, defensive walls, a water source, food storage, an escape route, a watchtower and an administrative area; explain how it helps the kingdom withstand a long siege.
- UPSC 1979 (Mahmud's purpose): key ‘plunder of wealth’ — debatable; the book names territory, religion and wealth.
- UPSC 2001 (Khanua): key (a) — a judgement call because of ‘certainly’.
- UPSC 1994 (first joint-stock company): key ‘Dutch’ — debatable, since the English company was chartered first.
- Book slips: Jayadhvaj vs Chakradhvaj (1663 treaty); the ‘Brahmaputra boundary’; Guru Gobind Singh listed as if executed; misls dated with the 17th century; ‘spinning wheel’ as irrigation; the 19th-century hundī photograph; the Jagat Shiromani temple as a haveli example; Chittor siege length; 1298 vs 1299; Gingee inscribed as part of a twelve-fort property.
What to remember
Numbers
One-liners
- Resistance is the visible fight; resilience is the staying power under it.
- The book's frame: conflict and cooperation, not invasion alone.
- North and west bore the brunt of the Turks in the 11th–12th centuries; the peninsula stayed outside.
- Rajputs both resisted (Mewar) and allied (Amber) — mansabs bound the allies to the empire.
- Terrain plus community made small powers durable: Aravallis and Bhils, Brahmaputra and paiks, Deccan hills and forts.
- Vijayanagara rose in 1336 against the Sultanate's southern push and fell at Talikota in 1565.
- Sikh resistance grew from faith to institutions: Akal Takht, miri-piri, Khalsa, misls.
- Bhakti made devotion portable — local languages, kirtan, satsang, epics for all.
- Temples were economies and seats of legitimacy; destroyed in places, restored and redesigned in others.
- Hundīs, merchants and ports kept the economy dynamic through political change.
Traps to avoid
- Solanki = Chaulukya of Gujarat; not the Chalukyas of Kalyani.
- Tarain: 1191 Prithviraj won, 1192 Ghuri won.
- Mansabdari was introduced by Akbar; mansabdars were officials of the state.
- The 1663 treaty was thrown off under Chakradhvaj Singha (Guwahati retaken 1667), per most accounts.
- The Ahom–Mughal frontier settled at the Manas after Itakhuli (1682), not simply at Saraighat.
- Guru Gobind Singh was not executed; he died at Nanded in 1708. Misls are 18th-century.
- Miri-piri belongs to Guru Hargobind, not Guru Amar Das.
- The spinning wheel is a textile tool, not an irrigation device.
- Gingee entered the World Heritage List in 2025 as one of twelve ‘Maratha Military Landscapes’.
- Sulh-i-kul (policy) ≠ Din-i-Ilahi (a discipleship circle).
How to strategise
Prelims — what UPSC asks
- From this chapter: Mahmud (1979), chronology of Tarain, Panipat and the Company (1984), Khanua (2001), Vijayanagara (1979, 1984, 2015), dynasties' dates (2023), the Chola navy (1980, 2025), Shivaji (1985), the mansabdari system (1979, 1981, 1989, 1992, 1996), Bhakti and Sufism (1979, 1982, 1984, 1987, 1988, 1990, 1996), the Europeans (1979, 1983, 1994), banjaras (2016) and the hundī (2020). Learn the dated tables and the saints' table; then read lehs202–204.
- Medieval Prelims rewards chronology and pairs (saint–region–language, ruler–battle–year, order–founder). Build your own timeline from our bar chart and keep debatable keys (1979 Mahmud, 2001 Khanua, 1994 joint-stock) in mind.
Mains — where it appears and how to answer
- GS1: Sufis and saints (2014), Krishnadeva Raya (2016), Chaitanya (2018), Bhakti literature (2021), Sultanate technology (2023), Akbar's religious syncretism (2025). Use the chapter's frame — resistance, resilience, conflict and cooperation — but write analytically.
- On contested topics (invaders' motives, temple destruction, conversion, Rajput–Mughal and Sikh–Mughal relations), set out the readings side by side with their authors and the evidence; avoid present-day framing.
Self-check
Tap an option. NCERT's own exercise questions come first; the rest test the figures and common confusions.
1. According to the chapter, resistance and resilience are linked because:
2. Who defeated Muhammad Ghuri at Kasahrada in 1178?
3. The Battle of Saraighat (1671) was won by:
4. Which pair is correctly matched?
5. Vijayanagara was defeated at Talikota in 1565 by:
6. A hundī in medieval India was:
7. Which of these is NOT an irrigation device?
UPSC questions from this chapter
Open any question to attempt it in the Question bank — your attempt is saved to your progress.