0% read
← Understanding Society: India and Beyond – I — all chapters
Class 9Social ScienceUnderstanding Society: India and Beyond – IChapter 7

Elections

≈ 55 min read · 19 Prelims and 7 Mains questions from this chapter
Attempt questions

Start here: why this chapter matters

In simple wordsYour class chooses a monitor every year. Everyone gets one vote, there is more than one candidate, a teacher counts fairly, and next year there is a fresh vote. An election is that idea for a whole country — with laws for the rules, an umpire (the Election Commission) and teams (political parties).

This is Chapter 7 of the new integrated Grade 9 book: 22 pages (161–182) built round four ‘Big Questions’ — why elections are essential; how electoral systems and rules shape representation and fairness; what institutions and laws do to keep elections free and fair; and what challenges elections face. It has 13 figures (a fill-in diagram, a photo collage, the single transferable vote box, a photograph of roll checking, the voters' pledge, a chart of ECI apps, an EVM with Braille, photographs of home voting, two charts on political parties, an outline map for an activity, a chart of recognition criteria and an illustration of the ‘road’ to free elections), a three-country table of electoral systems, a box of corrupt practices, several Don't Miss Out, Let's Recall, Let's Explore, Let's Map, Let's Analyse and Think About It boxes, a Before we move on summary and 14 questions and activities. We use nine concept sections. Every number is recomputed; our additions are marked †.

  • Earlier in this book: iest106 (Democracy — popular sovereignty, universal adult franchise, the multi-party system and India's scale; read it first); iest101–105 (sources, earth and early societies — iest105 has the sabhā, samiti and gaṇas). Next: iest108 (economics).
  • Matching live chapters (for depth): Class 10 jess404 (Political Parties — functions, national and State parties, reforms) and jess405 (Outcomes of Democracy); Class 11 keps203 (Election and Representation — FPTP vs PR, reserved seats, the Election Commission, reforms), keps204 (Executive — electing the President), keps205 (Legislature — anti-defection), keps208 (Local Governments — State Election Commissions); Class 12 leps202 (one-party dominance), leps206 (the Emergency and 1977) and leps208 (coalitions).
  • UPSC, honestly: elections, the Election Commission, the RPAs, party recognition, anti-defection and electoral reform are tested every few years in Prelims and regularly in GS2 — at the depth of the Class 11 polity book and standard references. This chapter is a clear first frame. We link 26 questions whose core it teaches: FPTP and STV (1991, 1994, 1995, 2017), the Election Commission (1980, 1994, 2004, 2006, 2017), parties and recognition (1988, 1991), defection (1992, 2014), corrupt practices (1990), delimitation (2024), the right to vote (1984, 2011, 2017), and Mains on simultaneous elections, EVMs, the Model Code, corrupt practices, anti-defection, roll revision and electoral reform.
WordWhat it means here
Direct / indirect electionCitizens vote for the representative themselves / citizens' representatives choose the leader (margins, p. 161)
PsephologyThe scientific study of elections, from Greek psēphos, ‘pebble’ — pebbles were used to vote in ancient Greece (p. 162)
ConstituencyThe area that elects one representative (Lok Sabha or Vidhan Sabha)
FPTP (plurality)The candidate with the most votes wins, even with less than half
Majority (two-round) systemA winner needs more than 50%; otherwise the top two face a second round
Proportional representation (PR)Seats shared in proportion to votes; in a list system voters choose a party
Single transferable vote (STV)Voters rank candidates; those reaching a quota win; votes move by next preference
QuotaMinimum votes to win under STV: [valid votes ÷ (seats + 1)] + 1
DelimitationFixing the number of seats and the boundaries of constituencies so that each represents about the same population
Electoral rollThe list of voters of a constituency, polling station-wise; only those on it can vote
SIRSpecial Intensive Revision — a house-to-house update and check of the roll
Service voterMainly members of the armed forces and others serving away from home under the law (†); may vote by ETPBS
Recognised / RUPP partyNational or State party meeting ECI criteria / registered but unrecognised
WhipA party's direction to its members on how to vote in the House
DefectionLeaving, or voting against, the party on whose ticket one was elected
Model Code of ConductECI's guidelines for parties, candidates and governments during elections
EVM / VVPATElectronic voting machine / Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail — a slip the voter can see
Reading the chapter opening, the Big Questions and the margins (pages 161–162)An orange banner with an illustration of voters in a queue before a building, a roundel of smiling voters showing inked fingers, a QR code and the four Big Questions. The opening text recalls Gurmat, the Grade 8 class representative, and asks three questions — can she stay CR without a fresh election, can a government stay beyond its term, can we really choose if only one party contests? — answering ‘No’ to all: periodic elections and accountability go together. The margins define direct and indirect elections.
How India's election machinery grew — book's dates and † Beyond NCERT19501960197019801990200020102020ECI set up, 25 Jan 1950 (book)1st general election, 1951–52 †Model Code begins, Kerala 1960 †1967: coalition era (book)1st EVM use, 1982 †52nd Amdt: anti-defection, 198561st Amdt: vote at 18, 1988 †Multi-member ECI, 1993 †Candidates must disclose assets and cases (SC, 2002) †EVMs in all Lok Sabha seats, 2004 †2002 Commission's boundaries in force, 2008 †NOTA and first VVPAT use, 2013 †VVPAT with every EVM (Lok Sabha), 2019 †Anoop Baranwal judgment; CEC Act, 2023 †2024: bonds judgment; home voting nationwide; ONOE report †Amdt = Constitutional Amendment Act; ONOE = One Nation, One Election (High-Level Committee report, March 2024 †).
Milestones of India's election machinery (our time line; † items are Beyond NCERT).

At a glance — the six ideas to carry away

  • Direct: Lok Sabha, Vidhan Sabha, local bodies (every five years). Indirect: President, Vice-President, Rajya Sabha (and Vidhan Parishads).
  • Systems: FPTP (most votes wins, even under 50%) for Lok Sabha and Assemblies; PR by single transferable vote for Rajya Sabha, Vidhan Parishads, President and VP; quota = [valid votes ÷ (seats + 1)] + 1.
  • Laws: RPA 1950 (seats, rolls); RPA 1951 (conduct, corrupt practices, disputes); Presidential and VP Elections Act 1952. Delimitation: four Commissions — 1952, 1963, 1973, 2002.
  • ECI: set up 25 Jan 1950; Arts 324–329; CEO → DEO → RO/ERO; rolls (SIR), schedules, parties and symbols; National Voters' Day 25 Jan; home voting (85+, PwD 40%) nationwide in 2024.
  • Parties: national party = any one of 6% votes in 4 States + 4 LS seats / 2% LS seats from 3 States / State party in 4 States. Anti-defection: 52nd Amendment, 1985 — Speaker/Chairman decides.
  • Challenges: misinformation, fake news, intimidation (and money power †) — met through the RPAs, Model Code, EVMs, VVPAT, awareness and vigilant citizens.

1. Why elections matter — direct and indirect elections

In simple wordsA cricket captain chosen once and never again could stop listening to the team. A fresh vote every season keeps the captain answerable. Elections are that regular check — and in a big country some posts are filled by the people directly, others by the people's representatives.

The book: elections are one of the most important ways of exercising democratic rights; regular and periodic elections are the core of democracy. Members of the Lok Sabha, the Vidhan Sabhas and local bodies (panchayats, municipal corporations) are elected directly every five years; the President, the Vice-President and members of the Rajya Sabha are elected indirectly. Elected representatives are accountable to the people, and the vote is the principal means of holding them to account. An election is how we exercise the right to vote and fulfil our responsibility as citizens. Fig. 7.1 places four reasons round the word ‘Elections’ — equality, representation, accountability, legitimacy — and leaves two boxes for you to fill. A Don't Miss Out explains psephology. ‘Inside India's Election Machinery’ then says free, fair and transparent elections in so vast a country need laws, a coordinated system at national, State and local levels and many stakeholders — the ECI, parties, civil society, media and voters — whose powers come from the Constitution and parliamentary laws.

Who is elected directly, who indirectly — and by which system (book; † details)Citizens aged 18+whose names areon the electoral rollDirectly elected — FPTP, five-year termsLok Sabha543 seats, one MP per constituency †Vidhan SabhaState (and some UT) AssembliesPanchayats, municipalitiesrun by State Election Commissions †Indirectly elected(proportional representation by single transferable vote)Rajya Sabhaby the elected MLAs of each State (and some UTs) †Presidentelected MPs and MLAs (incl. Delhi, Puducherry) †Vice-Presidentall MPs of both Houses, elected and nominated †Vidhan Parishad (six States)MLAs, local bodies, graduates, teachers + nomineeselectedmembers voteFPTP = the candidate with the most votes wins the seat. Vidhan Parishad (Art. 171 †): 1/3 by MLAs, 1/3 by local bodies,1/12 by graduates, 1/12 by teachers, about 1/6 nominated by the Governor (art, science, literature, co-operatives, social service).
Direct and indirect elections, and the system used for each (our chart; † details Beyond NCERT).
Reading Fig. 7.1 ‘Importance of elections in a democracy’ and the Don't Miss Out on psephology (page 162)
  • Fig. 7.1: a ring of six coloured segments around the word ‘Elections’ — Accountability (yellow), Representation (light blue), Equality (dark blue), Legitimacy (red) and two empty pale segments to fill in. Suggested fills †: participation and peaceful change of government (or choice) — each is secured because every adult can vote and the loser hands over power.
  • Don't Miss Out: psephology — psēphos (pebble) + -logy (study).
Beyond NCERT — the constitutional basics
  • Article 326: Lok Sabha and Assembly elections on the basis of adult suffrage; the age was cut from 21 to 18 by the 61st Amendment Act, 1988. Article 325: one general roll per constituency; no one excluded only on grounds of religion, race, caste or sex.
  • Lok Sabha: 543 elected seats; 84 reserved for Scheduled Castes and 47 for Scheduled Tribes since the 2008 delimitation (Art. 330). Rajya Sabha: at most 250 (238 elected + 12 nominated); at present 245 (233 + 12).
  • President (Art. 54): elected members of both Houses and of the State Assemblies, including Delhi and Puducherry (70th Amendment, 1992). Vice-President (Art. 66): all members of both Houses, nominated ones included. Both by PR through STV, with a secret ballot.
  • Vidhan Parishad (Art. 171): no more than one-third of the Assembly's size and not fewer than 40 members.
Read carefully — direct and indirect
  • Nominated MPs vote for the Vice-President but not for the President; MLCs (Vidhan Parishad members) vote for neither.
  • Rajya Sabha members are elected by elected MLAs — not by the people, and not by MLCs.
  • Local-body elections are conducted by State Election Commissions (Arts 243K, 243ZA), not by the ECI †.

2. Turning votes into seats — FPTP, two rounds, proportional representation

In simple wordsThree schools choose sports captains differently. In the first, whoever gets the most votes wins — even with only 40%. In the second, a winner needs more than half, so the top two face a re-vote. In the third, each house gets places on the sports council in proportion to its votes. Same votes, different results.

The book: the first step is deciding how votes become seats; the way seats are allotted distinguishes one system from another. The framers discussed the two most common systems and chose the plurality or ‘First-Past-The-Post’ (FPTP) system. The Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabhas are elected by FPTP; the Rajya Sabha, the President and the Vice-President by proportional representation. Its table compares three imaginary countries: Haritbhumi (FPTP, 25 seats — each voter picks one candidate; the one with the most votes wins even below 50%; Party A with 40% forms the government), Ratnadweep (majority system, 25 seats — a winner needs over 50%, otherwise the top two meet again; Party Y wins round 2 with 55%) and Swarnalok (PR, 100 seats on a national list — voters choose a party; seats M 40, N 35, O 15, P 10 — power is shared proportionately). A Let's Explore asks groups to study six countries' systems on different continents.

The book's three imaginary countries — same idea, three ways of turning votes into powerHaritbhumi — FPTP25 seats; most votes wins each seatA40%B35%C25%A has the most votes (40%)→ A forms the government (book)† Yet 60% voted for others — andseat shares can differ from voteshares (see the next chart).Ratnadweep — two roundsa winner needs more than 50%Round 1X45%Y40%Z15%Round 2 (top two only)X45%Y55%50%Y wins round 2 with 55% (book);† e.g. if all of Z's 15% went to YSwarnalok — PR100 seats from a national party listM40% → 40 seatsN35% → 35 seatsO15% → 15 seatsP10% → 10 seatsshare of votesseats wonseats match votes: power is shared
The book's table as three bar charts (our drawing; the Ratnadweep transfer is our reading †).
Feature (book's table, p. 164)FPTP — HaritbhumiMajority — RatnadweepPR — Swarnalok
Seats2525100 (nationwide list)
PartiesA, B, CX, Y, ZM, N, O, P
How voting worksone vote for one candidate; most votes wins, even below 50%one vote for one candidate; over 50% needed, else top two in round 2vote for a party; seats in proportion to votes
Sample resultA 40, B 35, C 25X 45, Y 40, Z 15M 40, N 35, O 15, P 10
Who governs (book)Party AParty Y (55% in round 2)power shared: 40/35/15/10 seats
Used in India for †Lok Sabha, Vidhan Sabhas (and local bodies)— (not used for legislatures)STV form: Rajya Sabha, Vidhan Parishads, President, VP
FPTP in real life: votes vs seats, Karnataka Assembly, Dec 1994 (UPSC Prelims 1995's figures; 224 seats †)Janata Dal36% of votes116 of 224 seats = 51.8%Congress31% of votes35 of 224 seats = 15.6%BJP20.4% of votes40 of 224 seats = 17.9%share of votesshare of seats36% of the votes gave a majority of seats; 31% gave fewer seats than 20.4% — each seat is won locally by the most votes.
A real FPTP outcome: votes and seats, Karnataka Assembly, December 1994 — the figures UPSC printed in its 1995 Prelims question (our chart).
Reading Fig. 7.2 ‘Indian elections — a festival of democracy’ and the Electoral Systems table (pages 163–164)
  • Fig. 7.2: six photographs — a family showing inked fingers; young women smiling with inked fingers; women in bright saris holding up voter cards; a hand holding an EVM ballot unit; a couple in a decorated ‘selfie frame’ at a polling station; an elderly man in a wheelchair beside a queue. The point: voting is a shared, inclusive public event.
  • Table: icons head each row (a globe, a crown of seats, figures, a ballot box, a percentage dial, a speaker at a podium). Our table and chart above give its content.
Positions side by side: FPTP or proportional representation?
  • For FPTP (the choice of the Constituent Assembly; the reasoning set out in the Class 11 book, keps203): simple to understand and count; each area has its own representative; tends to give clear majorities and stable governments; encourages broad parties that must win across groups.
  • For PR: seats match votes, so small parties and scattered minorities are represented; fewer ‘wasted’ votes. The Law Commission's 170th Report (1999) † suggested adding some list-PR seats to a mainly FPTP House.
  • Critics of PR: fragmented legislatures and coalition bargaining; weaker link between a voter and one local representative; list systems can strengthen party leaderships.
  • Critics of FPTP: vote–seat gaps (as in the chart above); winners on a minority of votes; many votes elect no one.
  • Mixed systems † — e.g. Germany, New Zealand (since 1996) — combine constituency seats and list seats. No verdict here: each system trades fairness of proportions against simplicity and stability.
Read carefully — electoral systems
  • FPTP does not require 50% (UPSC 2017): the winner needs only more votes than any other candidate.
  • NCERT simplification: ‘Party A (40% of votes) forms the government’. Under FPTP the government is formed by whoever commands a majority of seats in the House; vote shares only hint at seats — 36% gave a majority in Karnataka in 1994, while 31% gave fewer seats than 20.4% (UPSC 1994, 1995). Safe line: ‘FPTP converts votes to seats constituency by constituency; seat shares can differ widely from vote shares.’
  • India uses PR only in its STV form, for indirect elections — not a party-list system (UPSC 1994).
  • The ‘majority’ two-round system is not used for any Indian legislature †.

3. Proportional representation by single transferable vote — and the Legislative Councils

In simple wordsPicture a class electing two prefects. Each student ranks the candidates 1, 2, 3. Anyone with enough first choices is in. If no one else is, the least popular candidate drops out and each of those ballots moves to that student's next choice — until both places are filled. No vote is wasted on a hopeless candidate.

The book: six States — Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Telangana and Uttar Pradesh — have a bicameral legislature: the Vidhan Parishad (Legislative Council, upper house) and the Vidhan Sabha (Legislative Assembly, lower house). The Vidhan Parishad is elected by members of the Vidhan Sabha and of local bodies, and by graduates and teachers of the State, and the Governor nominates some members from fields such as art, science, social service, literature and co-operatives. Elections to the Vidhan Parishad use PR by single transferable vote. Fig. 7.3 gives the count in four steps: voters mark preferences; first preferences are counted and those reaching the quota are elected; the lowest candidate is eliminated and their votes transferred to second preferences; this continues until all seats are filled. Quota = [total valid votes ÷ (seats to be filled + 1)] + 1.

Fig. 7.3's steps on a small example † — 99 valid votes, 2 seats to fillQuota = [99 ÷ (2 + 1)] + 1 = 33 + 1 = 34 votesCount 1 — first preferencesP34 — electedQ26R22S17quota 34Count 2 — S (lowest) eliminatedP34 (elected in count 1)Q31R34 — electedSout: 12 votes go to R, 5 to Q (next preferences)quota 34Elected: P (count 1) and R (count 2). Real STV also passes on a winner's surplus votes — here P has none (34 = quota).India uses STV for the Rajya Sabha, the Vidhan Parishads, the President and the Vice-President (book).
Fig. 7.3's four steps run on a small example (our numbers †).
Reading Fig. 7.3 ‘Single transferable vote system’ and the Let's Explore on electoral systems (page 165)
  • Fig. 7.3: a boxed formula — total valid votes over seats-to-be-filled-plus-one, in square brackets, plus one, equals the minimum votes to win — above the heading ‘Counting and Transfer of Votes’ and four numbered steps (summarised above). The square brackets mean ‘whole-number part’: drop any fraction before adding 1.
  • Let's Explore: groups of 5–6 pick six countries from different continents, present their electoral systems and latest results (outline in the in-text answers).
Beyond NCERT — STV in India
  • The formula is known as the Droop quota. With one seat it becomes ‘half the votes plus one’ — an absolute majority (our check: [100 ÷ 2] + 1 = 51).
  • Rajya Sabha elections use STV with an open ballot for party MLAs since a 2003 amendment of the RPA; the Supreme Court upheld the open ballot in Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India (2006).
  • In the President's election each MLA's vote carries a value based on the State's population (1971 census) and each MP's vote an equal share of the MLAs' total; disputes go to the Supreme Court (Art. 71).
  • Councils are created or abolished by Parliament on a resolution of the Assembly (Art. 169).
Read carefully — STV
  • Quota with 4,000 valid votes and 3 seats: [4000 ÷ 4] + 1 = 1,001 — not 1,000 and not 1,334.
  • STV is a preferential system: voters rank candidates; the ballot is not for a party list.
  • The President is elected by proportional representation by STV (UPSC 1991) even though only one post is filled — so in effect the winner needs over half of the total value of valid votes.

4. The rule book — the Representation of the People Acts and delimitation

In simple wordsA football league needs two rule books: one says who may play and how the teams and fields are set up; the other says how a match is played, what counts as a foul and who settles disputes. India's election laws are split the same way — and every few decades the ‘fields’ (constituencies) are redrawn so that each holds about the same number of people.

The book: two major laws govern elections — the Representation of the People Act, 1950, which deals mainly with allocation of seats and delimitation of constituencies, preparation and revision of electoral rolls, and the right of every citizen aged 18 and above to vote without discrimination; and the Representation of the People Act, 1951, which covers all other aspects of conducting elections and post-election disputes — nomination of candidates, campaigns, voting procedure and resolution of disputes. There is also the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952. The 1951 Act lists electoral offences and corrupt practices; the book's examples are any gift, offer or promise to make a person contest, withdraw, vote or not vote; appeals to vote or not vote on grounds of religion, caste, race, community or language; and getting help for a candidate from government personnel — gazetted officers, judges and magistrates, armed forces, police and excise officers. Delimitation fixes the number of seats and the boundaries of Lok Sabha and Assembly constituencies so that the ratio of seats to population is as equal as possible; without it one MP might represent five lakh people and another twenty-five lakh (one vote worth five times another — our check). A Don't Miss Out says Article 82 mandates a Delimitation Commission, and India has had four — 1952, 1963, 1973 and 2002 — and asks why there was so long a gap between 1973 and 2002.

⤵ From notification to result — the RPA 1951 time line († Beyond NCERT)
Schedule and notificationthe ECI fixes the schedule; the President (Lok Sabha) or Governor (Assembly) issues the notification on its advice; the Model Code is already in force from the announcement
Nominationslast date: the 7th day after the notification (Sec. 30); candidates file affidavits on assets, education and criminal cases
Scrutiny and withdrawalscrutiny the next day; withdrawal by the 2nd day after scrutiny; symbols allotted
Campaignpoll at least 14 days after the withdrawal date; campaigning stops 48 hours before the close of poll (Sec. 126)
Poll and countEVM with VVPAT; counting under the Returning Officer, who declares the result
Disputesan election petition to the High Court within 45 days of the result (Sec. 81); appeal to the Supreme Court
Delimitation Commissions (book) and the freeze on seat numbers († Beyond NCERT)1950196019701980199020002010202020301st Commission, 19522nd, 19633rd, 1973 (1971 census †)4th, 2002 (Justice Kuldip Singh †)its boundaries in force, 2008 †↑ band: seat numbers per State frozen on the 1971 census †† The 42nd Amdt (1976) froze them until after the 2001 census; the 84th Amdt (2001) extended the freeze to the first census after 2026.† The 2002 Commission redrew boundaries on the 2001 census (87th Amdt, 2003) without changing any State's number of seats.† Its orders have the force of law and cannot be questioned in court. Book: Article 82 — readjustment after every census.
The four Delimitation Commissions and the freeze on seat numbers (our time line; † items Beyond NCERT).
Reading the corrupt-practices box and the Don't Miss Out on Delimitation Commissions (page 166)
  • Box: a pale yellow panel with three round push-buttons (blue, green, red) and a finger reaching for them, each button beside one example of a corrupt practice (summarised above). The image recalls pressing an EVM button.
  • Don't Miss Out: Article 82; four Commissions; ‘find out the reason for the long interval between 1973 and 2002’ (answered in the in-text outlines).
Beyond NCERT — corrupt practices and disqualification, dated
  • Section 123 of the RPA 1951 lists corrupt practices: bribery; undue influence; appeals on grounds of religion, race, caste, community or language and use of religious symbols; promoting enmity; propagating or glorifying sati (Sec. 123(3B), added by the Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act, 1987); false statements about a candidate's personal character; hiring vehicles to carry voters; spending beyond the limit; help from government servants; booth capturing.
  • In Abhiram Singh v. C.D. Commachen (2017) a seven-judge bench (4:3) read ‘his religion’ in Sec. 123(3) to bar appeals based on the religion of the candidate, the agent or the voter.
  • Lily Thomas v. Union of India (2013) struck down Sec. 8(4), which had let sitting legislators keep their seats while appealing a conviction; a conviction with a sentence of two years or more now disqualifies at once (Sec. 8(3)).
  • Delimitation Commissions were set up under Delimitation Commission Acts of 1952, 1962, 1972 and 2002; the 2002 Commission was chaired by Justice Kuldip Singh.
Read carefully — laws and delimitation
  • NCERT slip: ‘Article 82 mandates the establishment of a Delimitation Commission’. Article 82 requires the readjustment of seats and constituencies after each census ‘by such authority … as Parliament may by law determine’; the Commissions themselves come from Delimitation Commission Acts passed by Parliament (Art. 170 covers Assemblies). Safe line: ‘Article 82 provides for readjustment after every census; Parliament sets up a Delimitation Commission by law.’
  • NCERT wording: boundaries change with shifts in population (counted at the census), not ‘population density’. And since 1976 the number of seats per State has been frozen on the 1971 census — the 2002 Commission redrew boundaries only †.
  • Four Delimitation Commissions so far (UPSC 2024) — 1952, 1963, 1973, 2002 — and their orders cannot be challenged in court †.
  • UPSC 1990 — pending key: of gifts to voters, caste/religion appeals, false character attacks and glorifying sati, which are corrupt practices? By 1990 all four were — Sec. 123(3B) had been inserted by the Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act, 1987 — so the answer by the law in force is (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4. Don't rely on a key that leaves out sati.
  • The right to vote itself comes from Article 326; the RPA 1950 sets who is registered (age on the qualifying date, ordinary residence) †.

5. The umpire — the Election Commission, its officers and the electoral roll

In simple wordsIn a match, the umpire does not belong to either team, keeps the rules, checks that only registered players take the field and can stop foul play. The Election Commission is that umpire: independent, in charge of the whole process, starting with the list of who may vote.

The book: the Constitution vests in the Election Commission of India (ECI) the superintendence, direction and control of the entire process of conducting elections. Its Let's Recall: the ECI is an autonomous, permanent constitutional body set up on 25 January 1950; it conducts elections to the Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha, Vidhan Sabhas, Vidhan Parishads, and the offices of President and Vice-President; Articles 324 to 329 provide for it and its powers. In each State, the Chief Electoral Officer, appointed by the ECI from among civil servants in consultation with the State government, supervises election work; District Magistrates, Sub-Divisional Magistrates, Tahsildars and other officers serve as District Election Officers, Returning Officers and Electoral Registration Officers. Its functions: (1) the electoral roll — enumerators visit every household; rolls are prepared polling station-wise; only those on the roll vote; the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) updates, verifies and corrects the rolls so no eligible citizen is left out and no ineligible person is included, adds young voters who have just turned 18, and deletes names for death, change of residence, duplicate entry or being permanently untraceable, after time for claims and objections; (2) the schedule — when a House's five-year term ends or it is dissolved early, weighing weather, harvests, examinations and festivals; (3) parties and symbols — only parties registered with the ECI can contest (independents can also contest); it insists on periodic organisational elections inside parties; classifies parties as national, State or registered-unrecognised; allots symbols to national and State parties; and acts as a quasi-judicial body in disputes over recognition and symbols; (4) free and fair elections — fairness, accurate counting and accessibility, without which elections lose democratic value.

Who runs an election — the chain of officers (book) and what sits outside it (†)Election Commission of IndiaChief Election Commissioner + Election Commissioners (Art. 324)Chief Electoral Officer — each State/UTnamed by the ECI with the State government (book)District Election Officerusually the District Magistrate (book)Returning Officerconducts the poll andcount in a constituencyRegistration Officer(ERO) prepares andrevises the rollPresiding Officer + polling officers at each station; BLOs for the roll †State Election Commissions (Arts 243K, 243ZA) †conduct panchayat and municipal elections —not the ECIElection disputes †an election petition goes to the High Court (RPA 1951);Art. 329 bars courts from stopping an election midwayBook: officers on loanDMs, SDMs, Tahsildars and other State officersare designated DEOs, ROs and EROs for elections
The chain of election officers, and what lies outside the ECI (our chart; † details Beyond NCERT).
⤵ How the roll is cleaned — the SIR as the book describes it († Beyond NCERT)
House-to-house enumerationofficials (booth level officers †) visit every household and collect details of eligible electors
Draft rollprepared polling station-wise for each constituency
Additions and deletionsnew 18-year-olds added; names removed for death, shifting, duplicate entry or being permanently untraceable
Claims and objectionstime given to object or claim; the Electoral Registration Officer decides
Final rollpublished; only those on it can vote; legal basis: RPA 1950, Sec. 21 (intensive or summary revision) †
Reading the Let's Recall, Fig. 7.4 ‘An officer on election duty verifying voter's name from electoral roll’, the Think About It and the Let's Explore on ETPBS (pages 167–168)
  • Let's Recall: the ECI's founding date, its range of elections and Articles 324–329.
  • Fig. 7.4: a close-up photograph of a polling official's hands with a pen over printed roll pages and voter slips on a table — the roll is the gate to voting.
  • Think About It: you will turn 18 soon; find the registration steps and documents and talk to a new voter about the process (outline in the in-text answers).
  • Let's Explore: ETPBS lets service voters vote on an electronically received postal ballot from outside their constituency; find out who service voters are.
Beyond NCERT — the Commission itself, dated
  • Art. 324 superintendence; 325 one roll, no exclusion on religion, race, caste or sex; 326 adult suffrage; 327–328 Parliament's and States' power to make election laws; 329 courts may not interfere midway — disputes by election petition only.
  • The ECI was single-member until 16 October 1989; two Election Commissioners were added, the posts ended on 1 January 1990, and it has been three-member since 1 October 1993; decisions by majority (upheld in T.N. Seshan v. Union of India, 1995). Tenure: six years or age 65.
  • Removal: the CEC only like a Supreme Court judge (Art. 324(5)); other Commissioners only on the CEC's recommendation.
  • National Voters' Day is held on 25 January since 2011, the ECI's foundation day.
  • Registration: since the Election Laws (Amendment) Act, 2021, there are four qualifying dates a year — 1 January, 1 April, 1 July and 1 October.
Positions side by side: who should appoint the Election Commissioners?
  • The text: Article 324(2) — the President appoints the CEC and Commissioners ‘subject to the provisions of any law made by Parliament’. Until 2023 no such law existed; appointments were made on the advice of the Union government.
  • Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India (2 March 2023): a five-judge bench held that, until Parliament made a law, appointments should be made on the advice of a committee of the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition (or leader of the largest opposition party) in the Lok Sabha and the Chief Justice of India.
  • The Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023: a selection committee of the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition and a Union Cabinet Minister nominated by the Prime Minister, choosing from names short-listed by a search committee.
  • Supporters of the Act: Parliament has made the law the Constitution and the Court envisaged; appointments stay with authorities accountable to Parliament. Critics: a two-to-one executive majority on the committee weakens the Commission's independence. Petitions on the Act were filed in the Supreme Court — check the latest. No verdict here.
Positions side by side: the Special Intensive Revision (bare facts)
  • The book and the ECI: an intensive revision makes sure no eligible citizen is left out and no ineligible person is included — adding new voters and removing the dead, the shifted, duplicates and the untraceable.
  • Dated facts †: the ECI ordered an SIR of Bihar's rolls in June 2025 and announced a second phase covering more States and Union Territories later in 2025; petitions questioning parts of the process (documents required, time allowed, risk of excluding eligible voters) were heard by the Supreme Court. Check the latest orders.
  • Concerns raised by petitioners and critics: the burden of documents on the poor and migrants; the possibility of wrongful deletions. Responses by the ECI and supporters: claims-and-objections stages, appeals, and the constitutional need for accurate rolls of citizens (Art. 326). No verdict here.
Read carefully — the ECI
  • NCERT slip: ‘Only political parties registered with the ECI can contest elections.’ Any qualified elector may contest; registration under Sec. 29A, RPA 1951 (inserted 1989) brings benefits such as a common symbol. Candidates of unregistered parties contest as independents — as the book itself goes on to say. Safe line: ‘Registration with the ECI gives a party legal status and benefits; it is not a condition for a candidate to contest.’
  • NCERT overstatement: ‘the ECI ensures inner-party democracy’. The ECI's guidelines ask parties to hold organisational elections, but it has no statutory power to enforce inner-party democracy or to deregister a party for not doing so †. Safe line: ‘the ECI urges parties to hold periodic organisational elections’.
  • The ECI does not conduct local-body, Speaker or Deputy Chairman elections and does not decide election disputes (UPSC 1994); it does prepare rolls, recognise parties and allot symbols (UPSC 2004), fix schedules and decide disputes over splits and mergers of recognised parties (UPSC 2017).
  • The ECI is set up by a definite article of the Constitution — Art. 324 (UPSC 2006).

6. No voter to be left behind — inclusion, technology, EVMs and VVPAT

In simple wordsA good school sports day has a ramp for a student in a wheelchair, someone to read the notice for a student who cannot see, and a way for a student away on a trip to still send an entry. The ECI tries to make voting work like that — for the very old, the disabled, soldiers far from home — and uses apps and machines to run it.

The book: the ECI has taken several initiatives to make elections more inclusive — infrastructure accessibility and technology-assisted inclusion for persons with disabilities (PwDs), senior citizens, transgender persons and Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs). Voting from home for senior citizens above 85 and PwDs with a benchmark disability of 40% was extended across India for the first time in the 2024 General Elections. Fig. 7.6 shows a digital ecosystem: ETPBS for service voters; the Voter Helpline App (registration, transposition, verification, news); cVIGIL (report Model Code violations within minutes; flying squads reach the spot by auto-location); ERONET (form processing, dashboards, role-based access, e-rolls); Sugam (managing vehicles requisitioned for election work); Suvidha (for candidates and parties — nomination forms, permissions for meetings, rallies, vehicles, loudspeakers); and Saksham (for PwDs — registration, finding the polling station). With over 96.8 crore eligible voters, the ECI uses information technology and e-governance for rolls, nominations, campaign regulation, law enforcement, coordination, security, counting, results and disputes. A Don't Miss Out describes the International Election Visitors' Programme (IEVP) and MoUs with 28 election bodies and three international organisations — IFES, International IDEA and the United Nations.

Reading the Don't Miss Out on National Voters' Day and Fig. 7.5 ‘Voters' Pledge’ (page 169)Fig. 7.5: the pledge in small capitals on a wooden-framed plaque, with the ECI web address. In our words: citizens with faith in democracy pledge to uphold its traditions and the dignity of free, fair and peaceful elections, and to vote in every election fearlessly, uninfluenced by religion, race, caste, community, language or any inducement. The Don't Miss Out: 25 January is National Voters' Day.
Reading Fig. 7.6 ‘Digital ecosystem for electoral services and voter engagement’ (page 170)A semicircular chart with the ECI's emblem at the centre and three coloured arcs labelled Candidates (orange), Election Officials (pink) and Voters (green). Lines lead from each arc to app descriptions: Suvidha from Candidates; ERONET and Sugam from Election Officials; ETPBS, Voter Helpline, Saksham and cVIGIL from Voters. The point: each group in an election has its own digital service.
Reading Fig. 7.7 ‘EVM with Braille’, Fig. 7.8 ‘Voting from home for senior citizens’, the ‘No Voter to Be Left Behind’ text and the IEVP box (pages 171–172)
  • Fig. 7.7: a drawing of a control unit cabled to a ballot unit with numbered rows of buttons, and a magnified circle showing raised Braille dots beside each button — so voters with visual impairment can vote on their own.
  • Fig. 7.8: two photographs — an elderly woman at home showing her inked finger; and an elderly woman in a rural home casting her vote with polling staff holding a portable screened compartment marked for home voting.
  • Don't Miss Out: the IEVP and its MoUs (numbers as of the book's writing — check the ECI for the latest).
Beyond NCERT — EVMs, VVPAT and NOTA, dated
  • EVM: first used in 1982 at some polling stations of the Paravur Assembly constituency, Kerala; the Supreme Court set that result aside in 1984 because the law did not yet provide for machines; Sec. 61A was added to the RPA 1951 in 1988; EVMs were used in 16 Assembly constituencies in 1998 and in every Lok Sabha seat from 2004.
  • VVPAT: first used in a 2013 by-election in Nagaland; in Subramanian Swamy v. ECI (October 2013) the Supreme Court asked for phased introduction; every EVM had VVPAT in the 2019 Lok Sabha election. In April 2019 the Court raised slip verification from one to five random polling stations per Assembly segment.
  • NOTA (‘None of the Above’): ordered in PUCL v. Union of India (27 September 2013); first used in the Assembly elections of late 2013. It does not change who wins.
  • Service voters (RPA 1950, Sec. 20(8)): members of the armed forces, members of a State's armed police serving outside that State, and government employees posted abroad, with spouses living with them; they may vote by ETPBS or by proxy (classified service voters).
Positions side by side: EVMs and VVPAT (bare facts)
  • The ECI: EVMs are standalone, not connected to any network, use one-time-programmable chips, and pass first-level checks, randomised allotment and mock polls before candidates' agents; VVPAT lets each voter see a slip; the count of slips is matched with the machine in sampled stations.
  • Petitioners and critics have asked for wider VVPAT counts, a return to paper ballots or independent audits, citing the need for verifiable trust.
  • Association for Democratic Reforms v. ECI (26 April 2024): the Supreme Court rejected pleas to return to paper ballots or count all VVPAT slips; it directed that symbol-loading units be sealed and stored for 45 days, and allowed candidates placed second or third to seek verification of the microcontrollers of up to 5% of EVMs per Assembly segment, at their cost. No verdict here — record the dated facts.
Read carefully — inclusion and technology
  • Home voting in 2024: senior citizens above 85 and PwDs with 40% benchmark disability — not ‘above 80’ (the rule first said 80 in 2020 and was changed to 85 in 2022 †).
  • ETPBS is for service voters, not for every citizen living away from home; ordinary migrants vote where they are registered.
  • cVIGIL = citizens' reports of Model Code violations; Suvidha = candidates' permissions; Saksham = PwDs; ERONET = roll management; Sugam = vehicles.
  • In Exercise 1, prisoners cannot vote: under Sec. 62(5) of the RPA 1951 a person in prison or lawful police custody may not vote (upheld in Anukul Chandra Pradhan, 1997 †); a person under preventive detention can — by postal ballot †. The question's word ‘reforms’ hides this distinction.

7. Political parties — role, recognition and coalitions

In simple wordsIn a school debate, students team up — each team prepares a case, chooses speakers and argues for it, and the audience can compare. Parties do this for a country: they gather opinion, put up candidates, publish promises, and either govern or keep the government on its toes.

The book: most of the dozens of candidates in a constituency belong to a party, though some are independents; voters learn about candidates, policies, development plans and positions mainly through parties, which help democracy work through governance, accountability, representation and public engagement, and present their agendas at rallies and in the media. Fig. 7.9: parties organise public opinion, campaign on issues, offer meaningful choices and help voters decide. Fig. 7.11: citizens → parties → contest elections (campaigns, manifestos) → the winning party forms the government and formulates and implements policies; the opposition ensures accountability through debates and committees. India has a multi-party system reflecting its diversity of languages, cultures, religions and regions. The ECI registers and recognises parties on set criteria (Fig. 7.12): a national party needs any one of — 6% of valid votes in four or more States plus four Lok Sabha seats; 2% of Lok Sabha seats from at least three States; or recognition as a State party in at least four States; a State party needs any one of five conditions; registered unrecognised parties (RUPPs) have not secured enough votes or have never contested since registration. A Let's Explore says 1967 ended the era of single-party dominance and began the era of alliances; in 1977 parties came together as the Janata Party after the Emergency and formed what the book calls the first coalition government at the national level; since the late 1990s the NDA (led by the BJP) and the UPA (led by the INC, which the book says dissolved in 2023 and was reconstituted as the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance) have been the major alliances.

Fig. 7.12 as a chart — meet ANY ONE condition (Election Symbols Order, 1968 †)National partyState party6% of valid votes in 4 or more States(Lok Sabha or Assembly) + 4 Lok Sabha seats2% of Lok Sabha seats (11 of 543 †)won from at least 3 Statesrecognised as a State partyin at least 4 States6% of votes in the Assembly election + 2 Assembly seats6% of votes in the Lok Sabha election + 1 Lok Sabha seat3% of Assembly seats or 3 seats, whichever is more1 Lok Sabha seat per 25 (or part) of the State's seats8% of valid votes in the State (Lok Sabha or Assembly)† Worked: 2% of 543 = 10.86 → at least 11 seats. One seat per 25 or part: UP (80 seats) → 4; Bihar (40) → 2; Kerala (20) → 1.Registered unrecognised parties (RUPPs, book): below these thresholds or never contested; their candidates pick ‘free symbols’ †.† Since a 2016 amendment, status is reviewed after two successive general elections rather than every one (check the latest).
Fig. 7.12's recognition criteria as a comparison chart, with our worked numbers (†).
⤵ From a new party to a reserved symbol († Beyond NCERT)
Registerapply to the ECI under Sec. 29A of the RPA 1951 (inserted 1989) with the party's constitution, which must pledge allegiance to the Constitution
Contest as an RUPPcandidates choose from the ECI's list of free symbols
Meet a criterionvote share and seats at a general election (Fig. 7.12)
RecognitionState or national party under the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968; a reserved symbol
Disputessplits, mergers and symbol disputes among recognised parties decided by the ECI (para 15 of the Order)
Reading Fig. 7.9 ‘Importance of Political Parties’, Fig. 7.11 ‘Role of Political Parties’ and Fig. 7.12 (pages 172–176)
  • Fig. 7.9: a dark circle reading that parties are essential because they work at the grassroots, linked to four coloured icons (people, a megaphone, a ballot box, a ‘VOTE’ badge) with the four roles above.
  • Fig. 7.11: a colour flowchart — Citizens (blue) → Political Parties (orange) → Contest Elections (green) → two columns: Winning Party → Forms Government → Formulates and Implements Policies; Opposition Party → Ensures Accountability → Participation in Debates, Committees.
  • Fig. 7.12: three coloured panels — national party criteria (yellow), RUPPs (blue), State party criteria (green); our chart above.
Reading the Let's Map with Fig. 7.10, the policy-comparison activity, and the Let's Explore boxes on party numbers and alliances (pages 173–177)
  • Let's Map 1 and Fig. 7.10: a plain yellow outline map of India with State boundaries, on which students are asked to plot the symbols of State parties of three States and list their agendas. We do not reproduce the map or any symbol; a table of State → party → agenda (with the ECI list as source) does the same job.
  • Let's Map 2: a green table with columns Policy area, Party's viewpoint, Any policy or law aligned with it, Source — rows Education, National security, Social welfare, Environment, Economy, Health — for two parties in the last Lok Sabha election, using manifestos and newspapers.
  • Let's Explore (p. 176): find the number of State parties and RUPPs on the ECI website.
  • Let's Explore (p. 177): the coalition history above, and a blank table — Year (1977, 1999, 2004, 2009, 2014, 2019, 2024), Alliance won, National parties, State parties.
Beyond NCERT — numbers to quote with source (check the latest)
  • The ECI's notification of April 2023 listed six national parties — the six named in Exercise 7. State-party and RUPP numbers change with each review; take them from the ECI's latest list.
  • Recognised parties get a reserved symbol, free copies of rolls, broadcast time on public media and up to 40 ‘star campaigners’ (RUPPs: 20) whose travel is not counted in candidates' expenses.
  • Bare outcomes for the p. 177 table: 1977 Janata Party; 1999 NDA; 2004 UPA (formed after the results); 2009 UPA; 2014, 2019 and 2024 NDA. Fill in the member parties from ECI results.
Read carefully — parties
  • Parties are recognised by the Election Commission (UPSC 1991) — not by the Speaker, the President or the Law Commission. The four-State route to national status is the classic answer (UPSC 1988).
  • NCERT simplification: ‘the Janata Party formed the first coalition government’. The Janata Party of 1977 was formed by the merger of several opposition parties into one party; it was the first non-Congress government at the Centre. Safe line: ‘1977: the Janata Party, a merger of opposition parties, formed the first non-Congress government at the Centre.’ (Class 12 leps206 covers this.)
  • NCERT wording: the UPA's ‘dissolution in 2023’ is the book's description; the safe dated fact is that the INDIA alliance (Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance) was formed by a group of opposition parties, including the INC, in July 2023 †.
  • Before 2016 a party's status was reviewed after every general election; now after two in a row † — check the latest.

8. Defection and the anti-defection law

In simple wordsIf a player picked for the blue team walks over to the red team in the middle of the tournament, the fans who backed blue feel cheated. Yet a player may also leave because the team is being run unfairly. The anti-defection law decides which switching costs a member the seat.

The book: anyone may leave one party and join another — but once elected on a party's ticket, leaving it is defection: abandoning the party under whose banner one was elected, by joining another party or acting independently of the party's decisions, especially when voting in the House. Seen from party discipline and political stability, this is called political opportunism; but defection can also be seen as upholding conscience or responding to changing public expectations. Its Don't Miss Out: the Anti-Defection Law was passed in 1985 through the 52nd Constitutional Amendment Act to prevent defection and give stability; a member of Parliament or a State Assembly who voluntarily gives up party membership or votes against the party's whip can be disqualified; the Speaker or Chairman decides.

⤵ How a defection case runs (the book's rule; † details)
The acta member voluntarily gives up party membership, or votes or abstains against the whip without permission (not condoned within 15 days †); an independent joins a party †; a nominated member joins a party after six months †
Petitionanother member petitions the presiding officer
Decisionthe Speaker (Lok Sabha, Assemblies) or Chairman (Rajya Sabha, Councils) decides
Exceptiona merger supported by two-thirds of the legislature party †; the one-third ‘split’ exception was removed by the 91st Amendment, 2003 †
Reviewthe decision is open to judicial review (Kihoto Hollohan, 1992 †)
Reading the defection text and the Don't Miss Out on the Anti-Defection Law (page 175)Two columns of text beside Fig. 7.11, with a cartoon pair of students pointing; the box gives the 1985 law, its purpose (stability), its two grounds and the presiding officer's role. The book itself presents two ways of seeing defection — opportunism and conscience.
Positions side by side: the anti-defection law
  • The book's two readings: defection as political opportunism that destabilises elected governments; or as a way to follow conscience or respond to voters.
  • Supporters of a strong law: it ended frequent floor-crossing of the late 1960s (‘Aya Ram, Gaya Ram’ †), protects the mandate voters gave a party, and gives governments stability.
  • Critics (including several commentators and reports †): it ties every vote to the whip, weakening individual members' deliberation (UPSC Mains 2013); presiding officers, who come from parties, decide cases with no fixed time limit. The Supreme Court has asked Parliament to consider an independent mechanism (Keisham Meghachandra Singh, 2020 †) and has held that Speakers should decide within a reasonable time.
  • Reform ideas on record † — limiting the whip to confidence and money votes; deciding cases by the President or Governor on the ECI's advice (Dinesh Goswami Committee, 1990) — are proposals, not law. No verdict here.
Read carefully — defection
  • Grounds (UPSC 1992): voluntarily giving up membership, defying the whip, an independent joining a party — not merely speaking against the party.
  • The provisions are in the Tenth Schedule (UPSC 1998, 2014), added by the 52nd Amendment, 1985 — not the 42nd or 44th.
  • Since 2003 (91st Amendment) there is no ‘split’ exception; only a two-thirds merger protects members †.
  • The Speaker's decision is not final beyond the courts: Kihoto Hollohan (1992) allows judicial review †.

9. Challenges to free and fair elections — and the reform debates

In simple wordsA road to school can have potholes — some you can see, some hidden under water. The road to a fair election has potholes too: lies spread on phones, threats, money changing hands. The answer is to fill them — with rules, umpires, machines that can be checked, and alert citizens.

The book: conducting elections for over 96.8 crore voters (2024), with thousands of polling stations and hundreds of parties across diverse regions, is a challenging task. Against misinformation, fake news and intimidation, the ECI relies on the RPA 1950 and 1951, the Model Code of Conduct, EVMs, the VVPAT, voter-awareness campaigns and other measures; with constant vigilance and active citizens, elections become more representative and democracy more robust. Fig. 7.13 draws this as a road to a polling booth with potholes, and the Let's Analyse asks you to fill in more. Before we move on: voting is a constitutional right and a duty; elections are the soul of democracy, giving every citizen an equal voice; the RPAs, the Delimitation Commission and the ECI keep elections free, fair and transparent; parties present diverse programmes so voters can choose; and despite challenges the ECI tries to keep elections at every level impartial. The exercises add money power (Q12) and ‘One Nation, One Election’ (Q14).

Reading Fig. 7.13 ‘Challenges to free and fair elections’, the Let's Analyse and Before we move on (pages 178–179)
  • Fig. 7.13: an illustration of a winding grey road leading to a building marked ‘Polling Booth’ with a queue of voters and a signpost to ‘Free and Fair Elections’; potholes are labelled Intimidation, Misinformation and Fake News, others are blank; a man runs along the road holding out what looks like a banknote — a hint of money power.
  • Let's Analyse: fill the empty potholes and suggest remedies (in-text outlines).
  • Before we move on: the five points summarised above.
Beyond NCERT — the Model Code, money and criminal records, dated
  • Model Code of Conduct: began as a code agreed by parties for the 1960 Kerala Assembly election; the ECI circulated a code to parties for the 1962 general election; strict enforcement grew from the 1990s. It is a consensus code, not a statute — but many of its rules overlap with the RPA and criminal law.
  • Spending limits (from January 2022): up to ₹95 lakh per Lok Sabha candidate and ₹40 lakh per Assembly candidate in larger States; there is no limit on a party's spending.
  • Disclosure: Union of India v. ADR (2002) — candidates must declare criminal antecedents, assets and education by affidavit. Public Interest Foundation (2018) and Rambabu Singh Thakur (2020) — parties must publish candidates' criminal cases and why they chose them.
  • Silence period: no public meetings or display of election matter in the 48 hours ending with the close of poll (Sec. 126, RPA 1951).
Positions side by side: money in politics and electoral bonds (bare facts)
  • The scheme: electoral bonds were notified in January 2018 (Finance Act, 2017 amendments); citizens and companies could buy them from the State Bank of India and give them to parties, with donors' identities not disclosed to the public.
  • The government's stated aims: move donations from cash into banking channels; protect donors from reprisals.
  • Petitioners' objections: voters' right to know who funds parties; removal of the earlier cap on company donations; unequal access to donor information.
  • Association for Democratic Reforms v. Union of India (15 February 2024): a five-judge bench unanimously struck the scheme down as violating the right to information under Article 19(1)(a), and ordered the SBI to stop issuing bonds and give the data to the ECI, which published it in March 2024.
  • Other proposals on record † — State funding of elections (Indrajit Gupta Committee, 1998; Dinesh Goswami Committee, 1990) — remain proposals. No verdict here.
Positions side by side: ‘One Nation, One Election’ (Exercise 14)
  • Dated facts: Lok Sabha and Assembly elections were held together in 1951–52, 1957, 1962 and 1967; the cycle broke with early dissolutions from the late 1960s. A High-Level Committee chaired by former President Ram Nath Kovind (set up September 2023) submitted its report in March 2024, recommending simultaneous Lok Sabha and Assembly elections first and local-body elections within 100 days after; the Union Cabinet accepted it in September 2024; the Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Ninth Amendment) Bill, 2024 and the Union Territories Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2024 were introduced in the Lok Sabha on 17 December 2024 and referred to a Joint Parliamentary Committee — check the latest.
  • Supporters' arguments: lower costs; less frequent Model Code periods that pause new schemes; less disruption to administration, security forces and schools; less voter fatigue.
  • Critics' arguments: strain on federalism when an Assembly falls mid-term; possible effect on accountability if voters are consulted less often; national issues may overshadow State issues; very large demand for EVMs and staff.
  • No verdict — the class debate in Exercise 14 should use both lists.
Read carefully — challenges and the ‘right and duty’ to vote
  • NCERT wording: ‘Casting a vote is a constitutional right as well as a duty.’ Voting is not compulsory in India and is not a Fundamental Duty (Art. 51A; UPSC 2011). The Supreme Court has called the right to vote a statutory right flowing from the RPA (e.g. Jyoti Basu v. Debi Ghosal, 1982; Kuldip Nayar, 2006), resting on adult suffrage in Article 326. Safe line: ‘the right to vote rests on Article 326 and is given effect by the RPA; voting is a civic duty, not a legal one.’
  • UPSC 2017 — a debated key: ‘Right to vote and to be elected in India is a …’ The stored key is (d) Legal Right, following those judgments; some argue for (c) Constitutional Right because Article 326 guarantees adult suffrage. Choose (d) with the judgments in mind, and know both arguments.
  • The Model Code is not an Act of Parliament †.
  • Electoral bonds were struck down in February 2024; don't write that they are in use.

In-text questions and activities — answer outlines

One fill-in figure, four Let's Explore boxes, two Let's Map tasks, a Think About It, a Let's Analyse and a Don't Miss Out question. Outlines below.

Fig. 7.1 (p. 162): Fill the two empty boxes with reasons why elections matter, and say how each is ensured.
Examples †: Participation — every adult on the roll can vote, so all take part in choosing government. Peaceful change of government (or choice) — rival candidates and parties compete, and the loser hands over power without force. Equality (one person, one vote), representation (each constituency elects a member), accountability (fresh mandate every five years) and legitimacy (government rests on votes) are the book's four.
Let's Explore (p. 165): Six countries on different continents — their electoral systems and latest results.
Examples of systems †: United Kingdom — FPTP; France — two-round system for the President and the National Assembly; Germany — mixed (constituency + list) proportional; South Africa — party-list PR; Australia — preferential voting for the House, STV for the Senate; Brazil — open-list PR; Japan — mixed. For each, cite the latest result from the country's election body with its date; compare votes with seats.
Don't Miss Out (p. 166): Why the long interval between the Delimitation Commissions of 1973 and 2002?
The 42nd Amendment (1976) froze the number of seats per State on the 1971 census until after the 2001 census, so that States which slowed population growth would not lose seats. The 84th Amendment (2001) extended the freeze on seat numbers to the first census after 2026 but allowed boundaries to be redrawn; the 87th Amendment (2003) based that on the 2001 census. The 2002 Commission therefore redrew boundaries without changing any State's seats; its orders took effect in 2008 †.
Think About It (p. 168): Steps and documents for registering as a voter; ask a new voter about the experience.
Outline †: fill Form 6 online (voters' portal or Voter Helpline App) or with the Booth Level Officer; give proof of age (e.g. birth certificate, school certificate), proof of address and a photograph; the ERO verifies (a BLO may visit) and adds you to the roll; you get an EPIC (voter ID). There are four qualifying dates a year (1 January, 1 April, 1 July, 1 October) and 17-year-olds can apply in advance. Discuss ease or difficulty honestly — online steps, documents, verification time.
Let's Explore (p. 168): Who are service voters and who can use ETPBS?
Service voters † (RPA 1950, Sec. 20(8)): members of the armed forces; members of forces to which the Army Act applies; members of a State's armed police serving outside that State; and persons employed by the Government of India in posts outside India — with their spouses living with them. They can use ETPBS: the blank postal ballot is sent electronically, printed, marked and returned by post. Classified service voters may instead vote by proxy.
Let's Map 1 (p. 173): Plot the symbols of State parties of three States on the map and list their agendas.
Method: take the ECI's current list of recognised State parties for your three States; record each party's name and symbol name (from the ECI list), and two or three agenda points from its latest manifesto, citing the document and date. Present as a table or on the outline map as your teacher asks. Keep it descriptive — note what each party promised, without judging it.
Let's Map 2 (p. 174): Compare two parties' policy preferences (education, national security, social welfare, environment, economy, health) from the last Lok Sabha election.
Use primary sources — the two manifestos — plus at least two newspapers. For each area: the party's stated position (quoted briefly), a law or policy that matches it, and the source with date. Use the same format for both parties, give equal space, and avoid adjectives that praise or condemn. The skill is fair comparison.
Let's Explore (p. 176): Find the number of State parties and RUPPs.
Open the ECI's latest notification of recognised parties and its list of registered unrecognised parties; note the date of each list. The April 2023 notification had six national parties †; State-party and RUPP counts change with reviews and new registrations, so quote the figure with its date.
Let's Explore (p. 177): Which alliance won the Lok Sabha elections of 1977, 1999, 2004, 2009, 2014, 2019 and 2024, and its national and State parties?
Bare outcomes †: 1977 — Janata Party; 1999 — NDA; 2004 — UPA (formed after the results); 2009 — UPA; 2014, 2019, 2024 — NDA. For each row, take the member parties and their recognised status from the ECI's results and party lists for that year; count national and State parties separately.
Let's Analyse (p. 178): Fill the empty potholes with more challenges; how can we overcome them?
More potholes †: money power and vote-buying; criminalisation of candidates; hate speech and appeals to caste or religion; paid news and deepfakes; low turnout and urban apathy; errors in rolls; violence in some areas. Remedies: enforce the Model Code and the RPA (cVIGIL, flying squads); disclosure and spending limits; voter education (SVEEP); fact-checking and media literacy; accurate roll revision; security deployment; citizens' vigilance.

Questions and activities (pages 179–182) — answer outlines

Fourteen questions and activities after the Before we move on summary (section 9). Try first, then open.

1. What reforms has the ECI introduced to make voting more inclusive for (a) PwDs, (b) service voters, (c) senior citizens above 85, (d) prisoners, (e) persons in preventive detention?
(a) Saksham app, Braille on EVMs, ramps and wheelchairs, volunteers, home voting for 40% benchmark disability. (b) ETPBS postal ballots; proxy voting for classified service voters †. (c) Home voting (nationwide in 2024), priority at booths. (d) Prisoners cannot vote — Sec. 62(5) of the RPA 1951 bars anyone in prison or lawful police custody †; there is no inclusion reform for them (they may still contest unless disqualified). (e) Persons in preventive detention can vote by postal ballot † — the proviso to Sec. 62(5).
2. What are the functions of the ECI? Which is most important for free and fair elections? Explain.
Functions: preparing and revising rolls (SIR); fixing schedules; registering and recognising parties, allotting symbols, deciding symbol disputes; enforcing the Model Code; running polls with EVMs/VVPAT; counting; inclusion measures; voter education. A defensible choice: the electoral roll — without an accurate, inclusive list no election can be free or fair; or enforcing the Model Code — it levels the field. Give reasons and an example.
3. Elections are the soul of a democracy. Do you agree? Why or why not?
Agree in part: elections give every citizen an equal voice, make governments accountable and give them legitimacy, and allow peaceful change. But elections alone are not enough — rights, rule of law, free media, independent courts and an honest count are needed too (iest106: Team D held elections without real choice). Conclude with a balanced view.
4. Explain at least three differences between national and State/regional parties.
Recognition: national — any one of the national criteria (e.g. State party in four States); State — any one of five State criteria. Symbol: national parties' symbols are reserved across India; State parties' in their States. Reach and focus: national parties contest across many States on all-India issues; State parties focus on one State's region, language or issues. Also: broadcast time and campaign facilities differ †.
5. Why should you vote? Rank: (a) choose my representative, (b) makes me responsible, (c) change a non-performing representative, (d) strengthens democracy.
Any order with reasons is acceptable. One example: (d) — each vote adds legitimacy and participation; (a) — direct say in who speaks for me; (c) — accountability through the next election; (b) — a personal benefit. Discuss why others ranked differently.
6. What is the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the ECI? Explain its objectives and necessity.
An intensive, house-to-house update of the electoral rolls. Objectives (book): no eligible citizen left out, no ineligible person included; add new 18-year-olds; delete the dead, shifted, duplicate and permanently untraceable; settle claims and objections before the final roll. Necessity: people move, die or come of age; accurate rolls protect the principle of one person, one vote. Note that recent SIRs have been debated and examined by the Supreme Court — state both sides and check the latest †.
7. Match the parties AAP, BJP, BSP, CPI(M), INC and NPP with their symbols.
From the ECI's list of reserved symbols †, in words: AAP — broom; BJP — lotus; BSP — elephant; CPI(M) — hammer, sickle and star; INC — hand; NPP — book. These six were the national parties in the ECI's April 2023 list.
8. Case study (Ishani): (a) ECI initiatives used; (b) another valid document; (c) Model Code violations; (d) a title; (e) how police and army personnel vote.
(a) Online registration; wheelchair and volunteers; police security; VVPAT slip; identity checked with an alternative document; home voting for the 89-year-old grandmother. (b) Any photo document on the ECI's notified list †, e.g. passport, driving licence, PAN card, MGNREGA job card, or a bank/post-office passbook with photograph. (c) Campaigning the day before the poll — groups distributing pamphlets and raising slogans — breaks the 48-hour silence on public campaigning (Sec. 126, RPA 1951 †); posters and wall writing on property without permission breach the Model Code and anti-defacement rules †. (d) e.g. ‘Ishani's First Vote’ or ‘No Voter Left Behind’. (e) Army and other service voters: ETPBS postal ballot or proxy †; police and staff on election duty: postal ballot, or an Election Duty Certificate to vote where they are posted if they are electors of that constituency †.
9. Three countries: A (multi-party, voting rights), B (one party, voting rights), C (monarchy, no voting, no parties). (a) Difference between voting in a multi-party and a single-party system? (b) Where would you like to live and why?
(a) In A the vote is a real choice among competing parties and can change the government; in B voting endorses one party — there is no alternative to choose. (b) A personal answer with reasons — e.g. A for choice, rights and accountability, even with an average standard of living; note that a high income (C) does not by itself give political freedom. Keep the countries imaginary, as the book does.
10. What are the challenges to conducting free and fair elections?
Book: scale (96.8 crore voters, 2024), misinformation, fake news, intimidation. Add †: money power, criminalisation, hate speech, paid news and deepfakes, roll errors, booth-level violence in some areas, low turnout. Remedies: RPA and Model Code enforcement, EVM-VVPAT checks, disclosure, voter awareness, vigilant citizens.
11. On the Stage: role-play a school election (Election Commissioner, Returning Officer, Polling Agent, Candidate, Campaigner, Polling Officer, Police, Journalist).
Plan: Commissioner announces a schedule and code; RO takes nominations, scrutinises and publishes the list; candidates campaign within limits, stop before polling day; polling officer checks names on a class roll and inks fingers; agents watch; secret ballot; count in public; RO declares; journalist reports facts from both sides. Debrief on what made it fair.
12. Make videos or audios on ‘My Vote My Nation’, ‘No Voter to be Left Behind’, ‘How to Eliminate the Ill of Money Power’.
Keep them factual and non-partisan: how to register and check your name; facilities for PwDs and the elderly; how cVIGIL works; why vote-buying is a corrupt practice under Sec. 123 and how to report it. Name no current party or leader; cite ECI sources.
13. Choose a national or State party; chart its last two Assembly elections — promises, vote %, seats, women contestants, women elected.
Take numbers only from the ECI's statistical reports; promises from the party's manifesto; give each source with the year. Present side by side for the two elections and compute changes (e.g. vote-share change in percentage points; share of women among candidates and among winners). Describe, do not evaluate.
14. Can ‘One Nation, One Election’ improve the efficiency of the electoral process? Debate advantages and limitations.
Use the positions box (section 9): dated facts — 1951–67 simultaneous elections; the High-Level Committee report (March 2024); the two Bills introduced on 17 December 2024 and sent to a JPC. Advantages argued: lower cost, fewer Model Code periods, less disruption, less voter fatigue. Limitations argued: federalism and mid-term dissolutions, accountability, national issues overshadowing State issues, logistics. End by stating the open questions, not a verdict.
Reading the party-symbol table (Exercise 7, page 180) and the three-country chart (Exercise 9, page 181)
  • Exercise 7: a two-column table listing six party names with small black-and-white symbol drawings in shuffled order for matching. We do not reproduce any symbol; the matching is given in words from the ECI's list (answer 7).
  • Exercise 9: a table comparing imaginary Countries A, B and C by political dimension (constitution, elections, voting rights, parties) and economic dimension (standard of living). The point: elections without choice, or prosperity without voting, are not democracy.
⤵ Answer frame for any question on elections
Definefree, fair, periodic elections on universal adult franchise
Constitutional and legal basisArts 324–329; RPA 1950 and 1951; Tenth Schedule; with years
Institutions and processECI and its officers; rolls; FPTP and STV; delimitation; parties and recognition
Inclusion and technologyhome voting, ETPBS, apps, EVM with VVPAT
Challenges and positionsname challenges; give dated judgments and Acts; attribute views; no verdict on any party or government

What to remember

Numbers

ECIset up 25 January 1950; Arts 324–329; three-member since 1993 †
Votersover 96.8 crore (2024, book); about 64.2 crore voted (ECI †)
2024 Lok Sabha poll7 phases, 19 April – 1 June (44 days) †
Bicameral States6 — Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Telangana, Uttar Pradesh
STV quota[valid votes ÷ (seats + 1)] + 1 — e.g. 99 votes, 2 seats → 34
Delimitation Commissions4 — 1952, 1963, 1973, 2002; seat numbers frozen on 1971 census to after 2026 †
Lok Sabha reserved seats84 SC + 47 ST = 131 of 543 †
National party6% votes in 4 States + 4 LS seats / 2% LS seats (11) from 3 States / State party in 4 States
State partyfive routes incl. 8% of valid votes in the State
National parties (ECI, 2023 †)6
Anti-defection52nd Amendment, 1985; Tenth Schedule; 91st Amendment, 2003 †
Voting age18 (61st Amendment, 1988 †)
Home votingabove 85, or PwD with 40% benchmark disability — nationwide in 2024
Silence period48 hours before close of poll (Sec. 126 †)
Election petitionto the High Court within 45 days (Sec. 81 †)
Earliest poll dateabout 24 days after notification (7 + 1 + 2 + 14) †
Spending limits₹95 lakh (Lok Sabha), ₹40 lakh (Assembly), larger States, 2022 †
Karnataka 199436% votes → 116 of 224 seats (51.8%) — FPTP distortion

One-liners

  • Direct: Lok Sabha, Vidhan Sabha, local bodies; indirect: President, Vice-President, Rajya Sabha.
  • FPTP: most votes wins — no 50% needed.
  • India's PR is the single transferable vote, used for indirect elections.
  • RPA 1950 = seats and rolls; RPA 1951 = conduct, corrupt practices, disputes.
  • Delimitation keeps one person, one vote, one value.
  • The ECI superintends, directs and controls elections to Parliament, State legislatures, President and VP.
  • Only those on the roll vote; the SIR updates the roll.
  • Parties are registered and recognised by the ECI; symbols under the 1968 Order.
  • Anti-defection: 52nd Amendment, 1985; the presiding officer decides, courts can review.
  • Free and fair elections need laws, an umpire, checkable machines and vigilant citizens.

Traps to avoid

  • Article 82 provides for readjustment after each census; Commissions come from Acts of Parliament.
  • Registration with the ECI is not needed to contest; unregistered parties' candidates are independents.
  • The ECI urges, but cannot enforce, inner-party elections.
  • Voting is not compulsory and not a Fundamental Duty; the right to vote is statutory, resting on Art. 326.
  • FPTP needs only the most votes, not 50%.
  • Local-body polls: State Election Commissions, not the ECI.
  • Nominated MPs vote for the Vice-President, not the President.
  • Prisoners cannot vote; preventive detainees vote by postal ballot.
  • 1977 Janata Party: a merger of parties — first non-Congress government at the Centre.
  • Four Delimitation Commissions; seat numbers frozen on the 1971 census.
  • UPSC 1990: glorifying sati was a corrupt practice (Sec. 123(3B)) — answer (d).
  • Home voting is for those above 85, not 80.

How to strategise

Prelims — what UPSC asks

  • From this chapter: who handles elections (1980); ECI functions and limits (1994, 2004, 2017); ECI as a constitutional body (2006); FPTP and STV (1991, 1994 ×2, 1995, 2017); party recognition (1988, 1991); defection (1992, 2014); corrupt practices (1990 — mind the key); delimitation (2024); voting as right and duty (1984, 2011, 2017 — a debated key).
  • Learn article → subject (324–329, 82, 171, 243K/243ZA, 326), Act → content (RPA 1950 vs 1951), amendment → year (52nd 1985, 61st 1988, 91st 2003) and the recognition thresholds. Where the book is loose (Art. 82, ‘only registered parties’, ‘duty’ to vote), use the precise form.

Mains — where it appears and how to answer

  • GS2: simultaneous elections (2017, 2024); EVMs and trust (2018); the Model Code and the ECI (2022); corrupt practices (2025); the right to vote and roll revision (2026); anti-defection and MPs' role (2013).
  • Write basis (articles, Acts, years) → institution and process → data with source and year → dated judgments → attributed positions → balanced way forward; never evaluate a current party, leader or government.

Self-check

Tap an option. NCERT's own exercise questions come first; the rest test the figures and common confusions.

1. The Election Commission of India does NOT conduct elections to:

2. Under first-past-the-post, a candidate wins a seat by getting:

3. Under STV, with 4,000 valid votes and 3 seats, the quota is:

4. The anti-defection law was added to the Constitution by the:

5. How many Delimitation Commissions has India had?

6. A party is recognised as a national party if, among other routes, it is recognised as a State party in at least:

7. In the 2024 general election, home voting was available nationwide to:

UPSC questions from this chapter

Open any question to attempt it in the Question bank — your attempt is saved to your progress.

Prelims

19 questions · newest first
2024Prelims GSHow many Delimitation Commissions have been constituted by the Government of India till December 2023?Attempt →2017Prelims GSRight to vote and to be elected in India is aAttempt →2017Prelims GSConsider the following statements : 1. The Election Commission of India is a five-member body. 2. Union Ministry of Home Affairs decides the election schedule for the conduct of both general elections and bye-elections. 3. Election Commission resolves the disputes relating to splits/mergers of recognised political parties. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?Attempt →2017Prelims GSConsider the following statements : 1. In the election for Lok Sabha or State Assembly, the winning candidate must get at least 50 percent of the votes polled, to be declared elected. 2. According to the provisions laid down in the Constitution of India, in Lok Sabha, the Speaker’s post goes to the majority party and the Deputy Speaker’s to the Opposition. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?Attempt →2014Prelims GSWhich one of the following Schedules of the Constitution of India contains provisions regarding anti-defection?Attempt →2011Prelims GSUnder the Constitution of India, which one of the following is not a fundamental duty ?Attempt →2006Prelims GSWhich one among the following commissions was set up in pursuance of a definite provision under an Article of the Constitution of India ?Attempt →2004Prelims GSConsider the following tasks: 1. Superintendence, direction and conduct of free and fair elections. 2. Preparation of electoral rolls for all elections to the Parliament, State Legislatures and the Office of the President and the Vice-President. 3. Giving recognition to political parties and allotting election symbols to political parties and individuals contesting the election. 4. Proclamation of final verdict in the case of election disputes. Which of the above are the functions of the Election Commission of India?Attempt →1995Prelims GSConsider the table given below providing some details of the results of the election to the Karnataka State Legislative : Assembly held in December, 1994. Political Party Percentage of popular votes obtained. Number of seats secured Janata Dal 36 116 Congress 31 35 BJP 20.4 40 In terms of electoral analysis, the voter-seat distortion is to be explained as the result of the adoption of theAttempt →1994Prelims GSWhich of the following electoral systems have been adopted for various elections in India ? I. System of direct elections on the basis of adult suffrage. II. System of proportional representation by means of the single transferable vote. III. List system of proportional representation. IV. Cumulative system of indirect elections. Select the correct answer from the codes given below. Codes:Attempt →1994Prelims GSAssertion (A): In India, the political parties which formed the governments represented the majority of seats secured in the elections to the House of the People at the Centre and the Legislative Assemblies in the States but not the majority of votes. Reason (R): The elections based on the majority vote system decide the result on the basis of relative majority of votes secured. In the context of the above statements, which one of the following is correct?Attempt →1994Prelims GSWhich of the following is/are among the functions of the Election Commission of India ? I. Conduct of election for the posts of the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker, Lok Sabha and the Deputy Chairman, Rajya Sabha. II. Conduct of election to the Corporations and Municipalities. III. Deciding on all doubts and disputes arising out of the elections. Select the correct answer from the codes given below. Codes :Attempt →1992Prelims GSWhich of the following are the circumstances under which an elected member of Parliament may be disqualified on the ground of defection? 1. If he voluntarily gives up his membership of a political party 2. If he votes or abstains from voting contrary to any direction issued by his political party without prior permission of the political party 3. If he speaks against the political party 4. If he joins a political party other than the party on whose ticket he contested and got elected Select the correct answer from the codes given below:Attempt →1991Prelims GSIn India political parties are given recognition byAttempt →1991Prelims GSTo elect the President of India which one of the following election procedures is used?Attempt →1990Prelims GSConsider the following activities indulged in by a candidate during an election campaign: 1. Giving gifts to voters to induce them to vote 2. Appealing for votes on the grounds of caste or religion 3. False character assassination of other candidates 4. Propagation and glorification of sati Which of these constitute the corrupt practices ?Attempt →1988Prelims GSA political party is recognised as a national partyAttempt →1984Prelims GSDemocracy exists in India. Government is run by the elected representatives of the people. For proper functioning of this systemAttempt →1980Prelims GSAll responsibilities regarding elections in India are entrusted toAttempt →

Mains

7 questions
2026GS2Is the right to vote a fundamental right ? Discuss the position of the Election Commission of India while undertaking the revision of electoral rolls. Can it also examine the question of citizenship of voters ? (Answer in 150 words)Write answer →2025GS2Discuss the 'corrupt practices' for the purpose of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. Analyze whether the increase in the assets of the legislators and/or their associates, disproportionate to their known sources of income, would constitute 'undue influence' and consequently a corrupt practice. (Answer in 150 words)Write answer →2024GS2Examine the need for electoral reforms as suggested by various committees with particular reference to “one nation – one election” principle. (Answer in 150 words)Write answer →2022GS2Discuss the role of the Election Commission of India in the light of the evolution of the Model Code of Conduct. (Answer in 250 words)Write answer →2018GS2In the light of recent controversy regarding the use of Electronic Voting Machine (EVM), what are the challenges before the Election Commission of India to ensure the trustworthiness of elections in India? (Answer in 150 words)Write answer →2017GS2‘Simultaneous election to the Lok Sabha and the State Assemblies will limit the amount of time and money spent in electioneering but it will reduce the government’s accountability to the people’ Discuss. (Answer in 150 words)Write answer →2013GS2The role of individual MPs (Members of Parliament) has diminished over the years and as a result healthy constructive debates on policy issues are not usually witnessed. How far can this be attributed to the anti-defection law, which was legislated but with a different intention? (Answer in 150 words)Write answer →

19 Prelims and 7 Mains UPSC questions are linked to this chapter. More from Understanding Society: India and Beyond – I.