0% read
← Our Pasts – II — all chapters
Class 7HistoryOur Pasts – IIChapter 5

Tribes, Nomads and Settled Communities

≈ 40 min read · 1 Prelims and 1 Mains questions from this chapter
Attempt questions

Start here: why this chapter matters

In simple wordsHistory books often follow the kings — who won which battle, who built which fort. This chapter steps off the royal road. It asks about the people who lived in the forests and hills, who moved with their herds or carried grain across the country, and how the ordinary ‘rules’ of society — who is high, who is low, who does which work — were themselves changing.

This is Chapter 5 of Our Pasts – II. Chapters 2–4 (gess102–gess104) traced kingdoms, the Delhi Sultanate and the Mughals; this chapter looks at society in the same centuries. It covers: varna-based and tribal societies and how they met; who the tribal people were, region by region; nomads and mobile people, above all the Banjaras; the rise of jatis and new hierarchies, including the Rajput clans; and two tribal states seen closely — the Gonds and the Ahoms. It has ten pages of reading, so eight concept sections. The words NCERT uses — ‘tribe’, ‘caste’, ‘varna’, ‘jati’ — are kept and explained; they describe groups in the past, not judgements about any community. The next chapter, gess106, turns to the Bhakti and Sufi traditions.

Tribal states and mobile peoples, 1100–1760 (axis to scale)110012001300140015001600170012th century · Chero chiefdoms emerge (Bihar, Jharkhand)1228 · Ahoms reach the Brahmaputra valley (13th c. in NCERT)13th–14th centuries · Khokhars powerful in Punjab1523 · Ahoms annex the Chhutiya kingdom1530s · Ahoms already use firearms1564/65 · Mughals attack Garha Katanga (NCERT 1565)1581 · Ahoms annex Koch-Hajo1591 · Raja Man Singh defeats the Cheros1630s · Peter Mundy meets a Banjara tanda (Beyond NCERT)1660s · Ahoms make gunpowder and cannons1662 · Mir Jumla’s Mughal army attacks the Ahoms1671 · Saraighat: Lachit Barphukan defeats the Mughals1714–1744 · Sib Singh: Hinduism predominant among AhomsDots at their dates; blocks on the axis and the bar beside it are periods · labels evenly spaced
Tribal states and mobile peoples on a to-scale axis, 1100–1760; dates beyond the book are marked.
Reading the chapter opening — the title image and Fig. 1 ‘Tribal dance, Santal painted scroll’ (page 49)The title band shows an uncaptioned dark metal piece with two faces side by side; the page carries a QR code to NCERT’s e-content. Fig. 1 is a tall painted scroll of the Santals: rows of men and women in white and coloured cloth, some dancing with arms on each other’s shoulders, some carrying baskets or nets, painted in earth colours on a worn paper ground. The point: tribal communities kept their history and culture in their own forms — painted scrolls, songs, oral traditions — rather than in written chronicles, and the chapter opens with one of them.
  • Links in this book: gess102 (Rajput clans, the Brahmana sabha); gess103 (Alauddin Khalji’s markets, which the Banjaras supplied); gess104 (Akbar, mansabdars, Raja Man Singh, the Akbar Nama); gess107 (regional cultures, including Assam); gess108 (the Bundelas and Marathas who later overpowered the Gonds).
  • Other pages: iest203 (Class 9: the Ahoms, Lachit Barphukan and Saraighat); lehs204 (Class 12: forests and tribes in Mughal India); lesy103 (Class 12 Sociology: caste and tribe as concepts, and the debates about them); hess204 (Class 8: tribal societies under colonial rule); kefa107 (lost-wax bronze casting, still practised by tribal communities). This page links them and does not re-teach them.
  • UPSC: Prelims asked what the Banjaras were (2016: traders). GS1 asks about caste as both fluid and static (2023) — this chapter’s jatis, absorbed tribes and new Rajput clans are the historical evidence. Present-day tribal policy (Fifth Schedule, PESA, Forest Rights) belongs to the polity and sociology pages, not here.
WordWhat it means here
VarnaThe four-fold ranking of society (Brahmana, Kshatriya, Vaishya, Shudra) prescribed in Brahmanical texts
JatiA caste — a smaller, usually occupation-linked group; many jatis formed within each varna
TribeIn NCERT’s usage, a society that did not follow the varna rules and was not divided into many unequal classes, its members bound by kinship
ClanA group of families or households claiming descent from a common ancestor (NCERT’s definition box)
Nomads; itinerant groupsWandering people, many of them pastoralists; groups such as craftspeople, pedlars and entertainers who travel to work (NCERT’s definition box)
TandaA caravan of the Banjaras
Shifting cultivationClearing and burning a patch of forest, sowing in the ashes, and moving on when the soil tires (NCERT’s definition box)
Garh, chaurasi, barhotGond administrative units: a clan’s territory; 84 villages; 12 villages
BhuiyansLandlords of the older political order in the Brahmaputra valley
PaikA person who worked for the Ahom state by rotation
KhelAn Ahom clan, often controlling several villages
BuranjiAhom historical chronicles
CensusA count of the population (the Ahoms took one)
Reading the Keywords box (page 59)Varna, jati, tanda, garh, chaurasi, barhot, bhuiyans, paik, khel, buranji and census. The point: nearly all are words for how people were organised — into ranks, units, clans and labour turns. Each is in the key-terms table and taught below.

At a glance — the six ideas to carry away

  • Two kinds of society: varna rules prescribed by the Brahmanas, growing hierarchy under the Sultans and Mughals (NCERT); and tribes — kinship bonds, land held jointly, few written records but rich oral traditions; they both clashed and depended on each other.
  • Who and where: Khokhars (Punjab, 13th–14th c.), Gakkhars (Kamal Khan made a mansabdar by Akbar), Langahs and Arghuns, Balochis, Gaddis (shepherds, western Himalaya), Nagas, Ahoms; Cheros (defeated by Man Singh, 1591), Mundas, Santals; Kolis, Berads, Koragas, Vetars, Maravars; Bhils; Gonds.
  • Mobile people: pastoralists trade wool and ghee for grain; Banjaras — caravan = tanda; grain for Alauddin Khalji’s markets and the Mughal army (up to 100,000 bullocks); Peter Mundy: a tanda of 14,000 oxen; pedlars, mendicant-merchants, entertainers.
  • New castes: jatis within varnas; tribes and artisans become jatis — jati, not varna, organises society; the rathakaras inscription (12th c., Uyyakondan Udaiyar); new Rajput clans, some once tribes; Islam in Punjab, Sind and the north-west.
  • Gonds: Gondwana, shifting cultivation, clan raja/rai; Garha Katanga (70,000 villages, Akbar Nama) → garh → chaurasi (84) → barhot (12); Aman Das = Sangram Shah; Rani Durgawati resists Asaf Khan (NCERT 1565; most books 1564).
  • Ahoms: from present-day Myanmar, 13th c.; suppress the bhuiyans; annex Chhutiyas (1523), Koch-Hajo (1581); firearms 1530s; Mir Jumla 1662; Lachit Barphukan, Saraighat 1671; paiks, census, khels; Sib Singh (1714–1744); buranjis.

1. Varna-based society and tribal societies

In simple wordsImagine two neighbouring villages. In one, every family has a fixed rank and a fixed kind of work, written down in rules made by learned men. In the other, everyone is a cousin of everyone else, the fields and pastures belong to the whole village, and the rules are remembered in songs. The two villages trade, quarrel, marry and borrow ideas — and over time both change.

NCERT begins by noting that social change was not the same everywhere. In large parts of the subcontinent society was already divided according to the rules of varna; these rules, prescribed by the Brahmanas, were accepted by the rulers of large kingdoms. The gap between high and low, rich and poor, increased, and — in NCERT’s words — under the Delhi Sultans and the Mughals the hierarchy between social classes grew further. But there were other kinds of society. Many did not follow the Brahmanas’ social rules and rituals, and were not divided into numerous unequal classes; such societies are often called tribes. Members of a tribe were united by kinship. Many lived by agriculture; others were hunter-gatherers or herders; most combined these to use the resources around them; some were nomadic. A tribe controlled land and pastures jointly and divided them among households by its own rules. Tribes usually lived in forests, hills, deserts and places hard to reach; sometimes they clashed with the more powerful caste-based societies and kept their freedom and separate culture — but the two kinds of society also depended on each other, and this mix of conflict and dependence changed both.

Two kinds of society in NCERT’s account (pages 49–50)Varna-based (caste) societyTribal societySocial rulesrules of varna prescribedby the Brahmanasdid not follow thoserules and ritualsDivisionsmany unequal classes;high and low, rich and poornot divided intonumerous unequal classesWhat binds peoplecaste (jati) andrankkinship bonds(clans)Landheld by families,lords and the statecontrolled jointly; shared outamong households by its rulesWherelarge kingdoms;agricultural plainsforests, hills, deserts,places hard to reachRecordstexts, inscriptions,chroniclesfew written records;rich oral traditionsNCERT’s contrast is a broad model: in practice the two kinds of society met, traded, fought and changed each other
NCERT’s two kinds of society, side by side — a model, not a wall between them.
Conflict and dependence: how the two societies shaped each other (NCERT pages 50–55)Caste-based societyvillages and towns in the plains;kings, Brahmanas, artisans,cultivators; grain, cloth,utensils, marketsTribal societiesforests, hills, deserts;kinship-based clans;herding, hunting, shiftingcultivation, forest producegrain, cloth, utensilswool, ghee, animalsclashes; conquestSome tribes join caste societyleading families as rulers;most as lower jatisSome tribes build statesGonds and Ahoms:kingdoms, taxes, land grantsSome reject castee.g. tribes of Punjab, Sind andthe north-west, Muslim early onBoth societies changed — NCERT’s conclusion: ‘constant interaction’ caused both to adapt
Exchange, conflict and three outcomes: joining caste society, building states, or rejecting caste.
Reading the definition box ‘Clan’ (page 51)A clan is a group of families or households claiming descent from a common ancestor; tribal organisation is often based on kinship or clan loyalties. The point: the clan, not a caste rank, is the building block of the societies in this chapter — the Balochi clans, the Gond clans that held garhs, the Ahom khels.
A debate, not a verdict: what is a ‘tribe’, and how does it relate to caste?NCERT’s contrast is one way of drawing the line. Scholars have drawn it differently, and the word ‘tribe’ itself has a history. All entries except NCERT’s are Beyond NCERT; no reading is endorsed, and none is a description of any community today (lesy103 takes the sociology further).
ReadingWhoPosition
Two kinds of society that interactNCERT (this chapter)tribes did not follow varna rules and were not divided into many unequal classes; conflict and dependence changed both kinds of society
Part of the wider Hindu societyG.S. Ghurye, The Aborigines — ‘So-called’ — and Their Future (1943; later The Scheduled Tribes)saw most tribes as closely linked to, and gradually merging with, the surrounding caste society; favoured integration
Distinct cultures to be protectedVerrier Elwin, The Aboriginals (1943) and later writingsstressed the distinct ways of life of tribal communities and argued for protecting them from harmful outside pressures
A continuum, not two boxesF.G. Bailey, ‘“Tribe” and “Caste” in India’ (1961)tribe and caste are two ends of a scale; real groups sit at points between, according to how they hold land and relate to others
A concept with a historyAndré Béteille, ‘The Concept of Tribe with Special Reference to India’ (1986)the Indian category ‘tribe’ was shaped by administrators and scholars and does not mark a single kind of society
Shaped by statesSumit Guha, Environment and Ethnicity in India, 1200–1991 (1999)forest and hill communities and their identities were formed through long interaction with states and markets, not in isolation
Two kinds of society: exam lines
  • NCERT’s tribe: no varna rules, not divided into many unequal classes, kinship bonds, land and pastures held jointly.
  • Tribes combined livelihoods — farming, hunting-gathering, herding; not all were nomadic.
  • The relationship was conflict and dependence, and it changed both societies — not only the tribes.
  • ‘Hierarchy grew under the Sultans and Mughals’ is NCERT’s statement; in an answer, attribute it.

2. Who were tribal people? A region-by-region view

In simple wordsIf your family history was never written down but told by grandparents at festivals, a historian would have to listen to songs and stories, not read files. That is the first problem in tribal history. The second is that tribes were everywhere — in deserts, mountains and forests — and their power rose and fell over time.

Contemporary historians and travellers say very little about tribes. With a few exceptions, tribal people did not keep written records, but they preserved rich customs and oral traditions, passed down the generations; present-day historians have begun to use these to write tribal histories. Tribal people lived in almost every region, and a tribe’s area and influence changed over time. In Punjab the Khokhars were very influential in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries; later the Gakkhars became more important, and their chief Kamal Khan Gakkhar was made a noble (mansabdar) by Akbar. In Multan and Sind, the Langahs and Arghuns dominated wide areas until the Mughals subdued them. The Balochis, a large tribe of the north-west, were divided into many clans under different chiefs. The shepherd Gaddis lived in the western Himalaya; the north-east was dominated by tribes — the Nagas, Ahoms and many others. In present-day Bihar and Jharkhand, Chero chiefdoms had emerged by the twelfth century; Raja Man Singh, Akbar’s general, defeated the Cheros in 1591 and took much booty without fully subduing them, and under Aurangzeb Mughal forces captured many Chero fortresses. The Mundas and Santals lived in this region and in Orissa and Bengal. The Maharashtra highlands and Karnataka were home to Kolis, Berads and others; Kolis lived in Gujarat too. Further south lived Koragas, Vetars, Maravars and many others. The Bhils spread across western and central India; by the late sixteenth century many had become settled agriculturists and some even zamindars, while many Bhil clans remained hunter-gatherers. The Gonds lived in great numbers in present-day Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh.

Reading Map 1 — ‘Location of some of the major Indian tribes’ (page 51) — as a tableNCERT’s map writes tribal names across the regions where they lived, with rivers and the two seas. It is not redrawn here; its labels are grouped below by the regions the text uses. The side question asks you to find, on a physical map, the areas where tribal people may have lived. The point: tribal names cluster in hills, forests, deserts and frontier zones — the north-west, the central Indian forest belt (Gondwana), the eastern plateau and the north-east.
Region (as in the text)Labels on Map 1Note
North-westBalochis, Gakkhars, Janjuhas, Khokhars, Langahs, Arghuns, SammasKhokhars, Gakkhars, Langahs, Arghuns, Balochis named in the text
Western India (Gujarat, Rajasthan)Kolis, Jaitwas, BhilsBhils and Kolis named in the text
Central India (Gondwana)Gonds, Baigas, Bhils, Kolis, Khonds, KoyasGonds and the Gond kingdoms are section 6
Western highlands (Maharashtra, Karnataka)Katkaris, Berads, KoragasKolis, Berads and Koragas named in the text
East (Bihar, Jharkhand, Bengal, Orissa)Cheros, Oraons, Mundas, SantalsCheros, Mundas and Santals named in the text
North-eastKochs, Khasis, Ahoms, Kacharis, NagasAhoms are section 7; Nagas named in the text
Far southBadagas, Vetars, MaravarsVetars and Maravars named in the text
Reading Fig. 2 ‘Bhils hunting deer by night’ (page 52)A detail of a Mughal-period painting: in a dark, rocky, wooded landscape, men in leaf garments with bows creep towards deer, one carrying a light. The point: it shows one livelihood — hunting — that NCERT says many Bhil clans kept, while others had become settled farmers and zamindars. It is a court painter’s view of a forest people, so read it as how outsiders pictured them, not as a full picture of Bhil life.
Beyond NCERT — some names in context
  • The Khokhars appear in the Delhi Sultanate’s chronicles as a powerful group of the Punjab; the Langahs ruled Multan and the Arghuns Sind in the early sixteenth century before Mughal conquest.
  • Raja Man Singh of Amber (gess104) led the campaign against the Cheros while governor in the east.
  • Today many of these communities are recognised as Scheduled Tribes under the Constitution; that framework, and present-day policy, are taught in the polity and sociology pages (hess204, lesy103), not here.
Who and where: exam lines and an NCERT update
  • Khokhars (13th–14th c.) then Gakkhars — Punjab; Kamal Khan Gakkhar made a mansabdar by Akbar.
  • Langahs and Arghuns — Multan and Sind; Balochis — north-west, many clans; Gaddis — shepherds of the western Himalaya.
  • Cheros — Bihar/Jharkhand; defeated by Man Singh in 1591; subjugated under Aurangzeb.
  • Bhils — western and central India, not the north-east (Exercise 3d).
  • There were tribes in the north-west (Exercise 3b is false).
  • Updates: the Gonds’ ‘Andhra Pradesh’ area is largely in Telangana since 2014; ‘Orissa’ is Odisha since 2011. Safe line: ‘central India — present-day Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra, Telangana and Odisha’.

3. How nomads and mobile people lived: the Banjaras

In simple wordsBefore trucks and trains, how did grain get from the villages that grew it to the cities and armies that needed it? On the backs of animals, driven by families who spent their lives on the road — buying where food was cheap and selling where it was dear. They were the country’s moving supply chain.

Nomadic pastoralists moved over long distances with their animals, living on milk and other pastoral products, and exchanged wool, ghee and the like with settled agriculturists for grain, cloth, utensils and other goods, buying and selling as they moved. The Banjaras were the most important trader-nomads; their caravan was called a tanda. Alauddin Khalji (gess103) used them to carry grain to the city markets; Jahangir wrote in his memoirs that they carried grain on bullocks from different areas and sold it in towns; and they transported grain for the Mughal army on campaign — with a large army there could be 100,000 bullocks. Many pastoral tribes reared and sold animals, such as cattle and horses, to the prosperous. Castes of petty pedlars travelled from village to village making and selling ropes, reeds, straw matting and coarse sacks; mendicants sometimes acted as wandering merchants; and castes of entertainers performed in towns and villages for a living.

Reading the box ‘The Banjaras’ (page 53) and its questionSummarised: Peter Mundy, an English trader in India in the early seventeenth century, described meeting a tanda of 14,000 oxen laden with grain such as wheat and rice. The Banjaras took their households — wives and children — with them, and a tanda was made up of many families, perhaps 600 or 700 people. They owned their oxen; sometimes merchants hired them, but most often they were merchants themselves, buying grain where it was cheap and carrying it to where it was dearer, then reloading with other saleable goods. They moved only 6 or 7 miles a day, in the cool weather, and let the oxen graze freely where land was plentiful. The question asks how grain moves from villages to cities today, and how that compares. The point: the Banjaras were carriers and traders at once, and the grain trade — and Mughal armies — depended on them.
A Banjara tanda as Peter Mundy described it (NCERT box, page 53)Buy cheapgrain where it isplentiful and cheapCarryon their own oxen,families travelling tooSell dearwhere graincosts moreReloadwith anything thatsells elsewhereand round again, year after year14,000oxen in one tanda600–700people in a tanda6–7 milesa day (≈ 10–11 km)100,000bullocks with a large armyOwners of their oxen; sometimes hired by merchants, most often merchants themselves (Mundy, as NCERT gives him)The army figure is NCERT’s (page 53) — about seven tandas the size Mundy met
The tanda’s trading cycle and the numbers in Mundy’s description.
⤵ Grain from field to city and camp (NCERT pages 52–53)
Surplus villagegrain is plentiful and cheap
The tanda buysBanjara families load their own oxen
Slow march6–7 miles a day, oxen grazing freely on open land
Town marketssold where grain is dearer (Jahangir’s memoirs; Alauddin’s markets)
Army campsgrain for the Mughal army — up to 100,000 bullocks
Reloadwith goods that sell elsewhere, and move on
Reading Fig. 3 — mobile traders loading nuts on camels (page 52) — and the definition box ‘Nomads and itinerant groups’ (page 53)Fig. 3 is a lively miniature with a Persian text panel at the top: men gather nuts from the ground and load them in bags onto kneeling camels. Its caption explains that a chain of mobile traders linked India with the outside world: Central Asian traders brought such goods in, and the Banjaras and others carried them to local markets. The definition box says nomads are wandering people, many of them pastoralists who move from pasture to pasture with their flocks and herds; itinerant groups — craftspersons, pedlars, entertainers — travel to practise their occupations; and both often visit the same places every year. The point: ‘nomadic’ did not mean aimless — these were regular circuits that knitted together villages, towns, armies and distant lands.
Beyond NCERT — the Banjaras over time
  • Peter Mundy travelled in India between 1628 and 1634; his journals are a major English source for Shah Jahan’s early years.
  • Irfan Habib’s studies of Mughal commerce treat the Banjaras as the main bulk carriers of grain and salt overland.
  • Banjara communities live in many states today; their later history, including under colonial rule, is beyond this chapter.
Nomads: exam lines and answer-key notes
  • Banjaras = trader-nomads; caravan = tanda (Exercise 1). UPSC 2016: in medieval India the Banjaras were generally traders — key (d), consistent with this chapter.
  • Rulers who used them, in NCERT: Alauddin Khalji (city markets) and the Mughals (army); Jahangir wrote about them.
  • Mundy: 14,000 oxen, 600–700 people, 6–7 miles a day. The 100,000 bullocks figure is NCERT’s, for a large army — not Mundy’s tanda.
  • Pastoralists exchanged wool, ghee for grain, cloth, utensils (Exercise 4).

4. Changing society: new castes and hierarchies

In simple wordsThink of a school that once sorted pupils into just four ‘houses’. As the school grows and offers more subjects, it starts sorting them into many smaller clubs — chess, robotics, carpentry — each with its own badge and rules. Soon the clubs, not the houses, decide who sits where. Jatis became society’s ‘clubs’.

As the economy and society’s needs grew, people with new skills were required. Smaller castes, or jatis, emerged within varnas — new castes appeared among the Brahmanas, for example. At the same time, many tribes and social groups were taken into caste-based society and given the status of jatis, and specialised artisans — smiths, carpenters and masons — were recognised by the Brahmanas as separate jatis. Jatis, rather than varna, became the basis for organising society.

Jatis, not varna, become the working basis of society (NCERT page 54)The four varnasthe older scheme · new skills needed as the economy growsNew castes within varnase.g. new castes appearamong the BrahmanasTribes and social groupstaken into caste-basedsociety as jatisSpecialised artisanssmiths, carpenters, masonsrecognised as separate jatisMany jatis — the units that organise societyeach with its occupation, rules and rankBox: a 12th-century sabha of Brahmanas at Uyyakondan Udaiyar (Tamil Nadu) fixes the occupations of the rathakaras
Three routes to new jatis — within varnas, from tribes, from artisans.
Reading the box ‘Deliberations on jati’ (page 54)Summarised: a twelfth-century inscription from Uyyakondan Udaiyar, in Tiruchirapalli taluka (present-day Tamil Nadu), records a meeting of a sabha of Brahmanas (gess102) that discussed the status of the rathakaras (literally ‘chariot makers’) and laid down their occupations: architecture, building coaches and chariots, erecting gateways for temples with images, preparing wooden equipment for sacrifices, building mandapas, and making jewels for the king. The point: a jati’s place and work were decided — and recorded — by an assembly; caste was being defined and redefined in this period, and skilled artisans were given a recognised status.
Reading Fig. 4 ‘Bronze crocodile, Kutiya Kond tribe, Orissa’ (page 54)A long, finely cast bronze crocodile with a ridged, patterned back, short legs and an open snout. The point: tribal communities had their own skilled metal-working traditions (the lost-wax technique — kefa107), a reminder that ‘tribal’ did not mean without crafts or art.
A debate, not a verdict: how did caste change over time?NCERT describes jatis multiplying and absorbing tribes and artisans. Historians and sociologists explain caste’s history differently; all entries except NCERT’s are Beyond NCERT and none is endorsed. They are about the past, not judgements on any present-day group.
ReadingWhoPosition
Jati becomes the basis of societyNCERT (this chapter)new skills and economic growth produced new jatis within varnas; tribes and artisans were recognised as jatis by the Brahmanas
Absorption of tribal groups and cultsD.D. Kosambi, Myth and Reality (1962)tribal groups and their deities were drawn into Brahmanical society over centuries, as jatis and as local forms of gods
Mobility by adopting higher customsM.N. Srinivas, Religion and Society among the Coorgs of South India (1952)‘Sanskritisation’: groups could rise in rank by adopting the customs and rituals of higher castes
Caste hardened laterSusan Bayly, Caste, Society and Politics in India (1999)caste ranking became far more pervasive and rigid in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries than in earlier periods
Shaped by colonial ruleNicholas Dirks, Castes of Mind (2001)colonial census and administration made caste a fixed, all-India category in ways it had not been before
Jatis: exam lines
  • Jatis = the new castes within varnas (Exercise 2a). Varnas are four; jatis are many.
  • Three routes: new castes within varnas; tribes and groups taken into caste society; artisans (smiths, carpenters, masons) recognised as jatis.
  • The rathakaras inscription is from Uyyakondan Udaiyar, Tiruchirapalli (Tamil Nadu), 12th century; a sabha of Brahmanas fixed their occupations.
  • In GS1 answers on caste as ‘fluid and static’ (2023), this section is the historical evidence for fluidity — attribute interpretations to their authors.

5. Rajput clans, tribes and the caste order

In simple wordsWhen a new family becomes rich and powerful, it often wants an old, respectable family name to match — a coat of arms, a famous ancestor. Rising groups in medieval India did something similar: successful clans came to be called Rajputs, and tribal chiefs who built kingdoms often sought the same status.

Among the Kshatriyas, new Rajput clans became powerful by the eleventh and twelfth centuries. They came from different lineages — NCERT names Hunas, Chandelas, Chalukyas and others — and some had been tribes earlier. Many of these clans came to be regarded as Rajputs and gradually replaced older rulers, especially in agricultural areas, where a developed society was emerging and rulers used their wealth to build powerful states. Their rise set an example for tribal people: gradually, with the support of the Brahmanas, many tribes became part of the caste system — but only the leading tribal families could join the ruling class, and a large majority joined the lower jatis. On the other hand, many dominant tribes of Punjab, Sind and the North-West Frontier had adopted Islam quite early, continued to reject the caste system, and — in NCERT’s words — the unequal social order prescribed by orthodox Hinduism was not widely accepted there. NCERT sums up: the emergence of states is closely tied to social change among tribal people.

⤵ From tribe to caste society (NCERT page 55)
A tribal societykinship-based, land held jointly
Contact and changetrade, conflict, agriculture and wealth bring new rulers
Brahmana supporttribes become part of the caste system
Leading familiesjoin the ruling class; may claim Rajput status
Most membersjoin the lower jatis
Or a different pathtribes of Punjab, Sind and the north-west adopt Islam early and reject caste
A debate, not a verdict: tribes, states and the Rajput modelWho the Rajputs were is debated in gess101 (bardic, colonial and modern readings). Here the question is how tribal chiefs became rulers. All entries except NCERT’s are Beyond NCERT; no reading is endorsed.
ReadingWhoPosition
The Rajput exampleNCERT (this chapter)Rajput clans, some once tribes, became rulers; tribal leading families followed with Brahmana support
A political process, not a single originB.D. Chattopadhyaya, ‘Origin of the Rajputs’ (1976)‘Rajput’ status was reached by diverse lineages — some of tribal background — as they gained land and power in early medieval Rajasthan
The ‘Rajput myth’ in tribal state formationSurajit Sinha, ‘State Formation and Rajput Myth in Tribal Central India’ (1962)tribal chiefs in central India who built states claimed Rajput descent to legitimise their rule
Adopting higher-caste waysM.N. Srinivas (1952)Sanskritisation describes how rising groups took on the customs of higher castes to claim higher rank
Rajput clans and tribes: exam lines
  • New Rajput clans rose by the 11th–12th centuries; NCERT names Hunas, Chandelas, Chalukyas as lineages; some had been tribes.
  • Only leading tribal families joined the ruling class; most tribal people joined lower jatis.
  • Tribes of Punjab, Sind and the North-West Frontier adopted Islam early and rejected the caste system (NCERT).
  • Key idea: state formation ↔ social change among tribes — the frame for the Gonds and Ahoms.

6. A closer look: the Gonds

In simple wordsPicture many small family-run farms in a huge forest, each with its own head. Over time a few farms grow big, swallow the small ones and set up offices, accounts and districts — and the once-equal families now have bosses, clerks and priests. That is how a Gond kingdom grew — until a much bigger power arrived.

The Gonds lived in a vast forested region called Gondwana — ‘country inhabited by Gonds’ — and practised shifting cultivation. The large Gond tribe was divided into many clans, each with its own raja or rai. As the power of the Delhi Sultans declined, a few large Gond kingdoms began to dominate smaller Gond chiefs. The Akbar Nama mentions the Gond kingdom of Garha Katanga with 70,000 villages. Administration was becoming centralised: the kingdom was divided into garhs, each controlled by a particular Gond clan; each garh into units of 84 villages called chaurasi; and each chaurasi into barhots of 12 villages. The rise of large states changed Gond society: a basically equal society gradually divided into unequal social classes; Brahmanas received land grants from Gond rajas and became more influential; and Gond chiefs wished to be recognised as Rajputs. So Aman Das, raja of Garha Katanga, took the title Sangram Shah; his son Dalpat married princess Durgawati, daughter of Salbahan, the Chandel Rajput raja of Mahoba. Dalpat died early; the very capable Rani Durgawati ruled for her five-year-old son, Bir Narain, and the kingdom grew. In 1565 (NCERT) Mughal forces under Asaf Khan attacked; Durgawati resisted strongly, was defeated and chose death rather than surrender; her son soon died fighting too. Garha Katanga was rich — it earned much by trapping and exporting wild elephants — and the Mughals took a huge booty of coins and elephants, annexed part of the kingdom and granted the rest to Chandra Shah, Bir Narain’s uncle. Gond kingdoms survived for some time, but weaker, and later lost out to the Bundelas and Marathas.

How a Gond kingdom was divided (NCERT pages 55–56) — nested unitsKingdom (e.g. Garha Katanga)the Akbar Nama: 70,000 villagesGarheach controlled by a particular Gond clanChaurasia unit of 84 villagesBarhota unit of 12 villages12 villages = 1 barhot · 7 barhots = 84 villages = 1 chaurasiCentralising: each level answered to the one above — a sign of a tribal society becoming a state
Garh, chaurasi and barhot: the nested units of a centralising Gond kingdom.
⤵ Garha Katanga: from clan chiefs to Mughal conquest (NCERT pages 55–57)
Clans and raismany Gond clans, each with its raja; shifting cultivation
Big kingdomsas the Sultans decline, large Gond kingdoms dominate smaller chiefs
Centralisinggarh → chaurasi (84 villages) → barhot (12 villages)
Social changeunequal classes; land to Brahmanas; Aman Das becomes Sangram Shah
Durgawati rulesfor her son Bir Narain; the kingdom expands
Mughal attackAsaf Khan; Durgawati dies resisting; booty, part annexed, rest to Chandra Shah
Reading Map 2 ‘Gondwana’ (page 56) — as a tableA map of the Narmada (‘Narbada’) basin with places marked and a legend for Mughal suba boundaries and sarkar lines. It is not redrawn here; its labels are below, with notes that are Beyond NCERT. The point: the map lays Mughal administrative lines over Gond country — Gondwana as the Mughals came to divide it.
Label on Map 2Note (Beyond NCERT)
Garhathe seat that gave Garha Katanga its name; near present-day Jabalpur
Mandlaa later capital of the same Gond line (Garha-Mandla)
Chauragarha hill fort of the kingdom
Bandolgarh, Bairogarh, Kolangaother places marked on the map; identifications left out here
Narbada (Narmada) and Tapti riversthe Narmada valley ran through the Gond lands
Legend: suba boundary, sarkarMughal provinces and districts drawn over Gond country — the map is a Mughal-era view
Reading Fig. 5 ‘A Gond woman’, Fig. 6 ‘A carved door, Gond tribe, Bastar area’ and the definition box ‘Shifting cultivation’ (pages 55–56)Fig. 5 is a black-and-white portrait photograph of a Gond woman wearing a nose ring and bead necklaces. Fig. 6 is a wooden door carved in low relief with rows of animals — elephants among them — and circular, wheel-like motifs. The definition box: trees and bushes in a forest patch are cut and burnt, the crop is sown in the ashes, and when the land loses fertility another plot is cleared and planted the same way. The point: the Gonds are shown as a living people with their own art, and shifting cultivation as a method suited to forest land — not as ‘primitive’. Elephants on the door echo the kingdom’s wealth from elephants.
Beyond NCERT — Garha Katanga and after
  • Most accounts date Durgawati’s last battle to June 1564, near Narai, and Bir Narain’s death to the fall of the fort of Chauragarh soon after. The Mughal commander was Khwaja Abdul Majid Asaf Khan, governor of Kara under Akbar.
  • Some accounts name Durgawati’s father as Kirat Rai (Kirti Singh) of the Chandels of Kalinjar–Mahoba, rather than Salbahan.
  • Other Gond kingdoms included Deogarh, Chanda and Kherla; Garha-Mandla lasted under Gond rajas into the eighteenth century before Maratha conquest.
Gonds: exam lines and NCERT dates
  • Gondwana = ‘country inhabited by Gonds’; shifting cultivation.
  • Garha Katanga: 70,000 villages — the source is the Akbar Nama (Exercise 2c).
  • Units: garh (a clan’s) → chaurasi = 84 villages → barhot = 12 villages. A chaurasi had villages, not cities (Exercise 3c).
  • Aman Das → Sangram Shah; Dalpat married Durgawati (Chandel Rajput of Mahoba); her son Bir Narain; Mughal commander Asaf Khan.
  • Date: NCERT 1565; most accounts 1564. Safe line: ‘in 1564–65 Mughal forces under Asaf Khan conquered Garha Katanga’.
  • Later the Gonds lost out to the Bundelas and Marathas.

7. A closer look: the Ahoms

In simple wordsSuppose a kingdom has almost no money to pay workers, but it has people. So it counts everyone, and each village takes turns sending men to build dams and roads in peacetime and to fight in war — and in return each man gets land to farm. That is how the Ahom state built its strength.

The Ahoms migrated to the Brahmaputra valley from present-day Myanmar in the thirteenth century. They created a new state by suppressing the older political system of the bhuiyans (landlords). In the sixteenth century they annexed the kingdoms of the Chhutiyas (1523) and Koch-Hajo (1581) and subjugated many other tribes. For their large state they used firearms as early as the 1530s, and by the 1660s could make high-quality gunpowder and cannons. They faced many invasions from the south-west: in 1662 the Mughals under Mir Jumla attacked and, despite a brave defence, the Ahoms were defeated — but direct Mughal control did not last long. The Ahom state rested on forced labour: those who worked for the state were paiks. A census was taken; each village sent a number of paiks by rotation; people from crowded areas were moved to thinly populated ones, breaking up Ahom clans; and by the first half of the seventeenth century the administration was quite centralised. Almost all adult men served in the army in war; at other times they built dams, irrigation systems and other public works. The Ahoms introduced new methods of rice cultivation. Society was divided into clans, or khels; with very few artisan castes, artisans came from neighbouring kingdoms; a khel often controlled several villages. The peasant got land from his village community, and even the king could not take it away without the community’s consent. The Ahoms first worshipped their own tribal gods; in the first half of the seventeenth century the influence of Brahmanas grew, with land grants to temples and Brahmanas; under Sib Singh (1714–1744) Hinduism became the predominant religion, though the kings did not entirely give up their traditional beliefs. Ahom society was sophisticated: poets and scholars received land, theatre was encouraged, important Sanskrit works were translated into the local language, and historical chronicles, buranjis, were written — first in the Ahom language and then in Assamese.

The Ahom state and its paiks (NCERT pages 57–58)The Ahom king and his officerscentralised in the first half of the 17th centuryCensusthe population is counted;people moved from crowdedto thinly settled areasVillages send paikseach village sends a numberof paiks, by rotation —forced labour for the stateClans (khels) recasta khel often controls severalvillages; old clan groupsbroken up by the movesIn waralmost all adult menserve in the armyIn peacedams, irrigation and other publicworks; new methods of rice cultivationLand: given to the peasant by his village community — even the king could not take it without the community’s consent
The paik system: census, rotation, war and public works — and the village community’s hold on land.
⤵ Building the Ahom state (NCERT pages 57–58)
Migrationfrom present-day Myanmar into the Brahmaputra valley, 13th century
A new statethe bhuiyans’ older system suppressed
ExpansionChhutiyas 1523, Koch-Hajo 1581; firearms from the 1530s
Paiks and censusvillages send paiks by rotation; people resettled; clans broken up
Centralisedby the first half of the 17th century; Mughal attack 1662 does not end the state
CultureBrahmanas and temples get land; Sib Singh 1714–1744; buranjis in Ahom, then Assamese
Reading the box ‘Lachit Barphukan and the defeat of the Mughals in Assam’ (page 57)A photograph of a large memorial sculpture group — a commander with raised sword and soldiers around him — with text credited to the Government of Assam’s Directorate of Information and Public Relations. Summarised: the Ahom general Lachit Barphukan defeated Aurangzeb’s army in 1671 at the Battle of Saraighat, near Guwahati; the box gives the Mughal army, led by Ram Singh of Amber, as 18,000 cavalry, 30,000 infantry, 15,000 archers, 5,000 gunners and over 1,000 cannons; it says Lachit used his skills and the terrain to stop Mughal expansion, that the battle was mostly fought on the river Brahmaputra, and that a memorial now stands at the site. The point: the Mughal victory of 1662 was reversed, and the box completes NCERT’s line that direct Mughal control ‘could not last long’. Its figures (68,000 troops in all, plus cannons) are the state government’s account, and are attributed as such here.
Reading Map 3 ‘Tribes of eastern India’ (page 57) — as a list — and Fig. 7 ‘Ear ornaments, Koboi Naga tribe, Manipur’ (page 58)Map 3 marks the Brahmaputra and its valley with these labels: Bhutan, Miris, Daflas, Chhutiyas, Kochs, Ahoms, Naga tribes, Garos, Khasis, Jaintias, Kacharis, Bangladesh, Myanmar. It is not redrawn. The point: the Ahoms shared the region with many peoples — the Kochs and Chhutiyas they annexed, the Nagas, Khasis, Garos, Jaintias, Kacharis, Miris and Daflas. Fig. 7 shows a pair of fan-shaped ear ornaments made of fine yellow fibres with red and blue centres. The point: tribal societies of the north-east had refined crafts of their own.
A debate, not a verdict: how to read the Ahom stateThe Ahom kingdom has been described from different vantage points. All entries except NCERT’s and the box’s are Beyond NCERT; no reading is endorsed.
ReadingWhoPosition
A tribal state that centralisedNCERT (this chapter)paiks, census and resettlement broke up clans and centralised the state; Brahmanical influence grew; a sophisticated literary culture
A heroic defenceGovernment of Assam (NCERT’s Lachit box)Lachit Barphukan’s skill and use of the terrain defeated a large Mughal army at Saraighat in 1671
History from the chroniclesEdward Gait, A History of Assam (1906)a colonial administrator’s narrative of the Ahom kings, built largely on the buranjis
The buranjis and LachitS.K. Bhuyan, editions of the buranjis; Lachit Barphukan and His Times (1947)edited and published the chronicles and wrote the standard account of Lachit and the Mughal wars
A state built on labour serviceAmalendu Guha, Medieval and Early Colonial Assam (1991)analysed the paik system as the economic base of the Ahom state, and its strains in the eighteenth century
Beyond NCERT — the Ahoms in brief
  • The founder, Sukaphaa, entered the Brahmaputra valley in 1228 from the Shan region of upper Burma (the Myanmar–China borderlands).
  • The Ahom kingdom lasted until the British took over Assam after the Treaty of Yandabo (1826).
  • The Ahom royal burial mounds, the moidams of Charaideo, were inscribed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2024 (UPSC 2026 asked about them; kefa/culture pages).
  • iest203 has the Ahoms’ resistance and Saraighat in more detail.
Ahoms: exam lines
  • Came from present-day Myanmar in the 13th century; suppressed the bhuiyans (landlords).
  • Annexed Chhutiyas 1523 and Koch-Hajo 1581; firearms 1530s; gunpowder and cannons 1660s.
  • Mir Jumla 1662 (Mughal win, short-lived) ≠ Saraighat 1671 (Ahom win under Lachit Barphukan, against Ram Singh of Amber).
  • Paik = labourer for the state by rotation (Exercise 1: labourer — paik); khel = clan; buranji = chronicle (Exercise 2b).
  • Sib Singh (1714–1744): Hinduism predominant — but traditional beliefs kept.
  • Land came from the village community; even the king needed its consent to take it.

8. Conclusion: interaction and change

In simple wordsNo society in this chapter stood still. The caste-based plains and the tribal hills and forests kept meeting — in markets, wars and marriages — and each borrowed, resisted and changed. Some tribes merged into caste society, some refused it, and some built kingdoms strong enough to stand up to an empire.

NCERT concludes that considerable social change took place. Varna-based society and tribal people constantly interacted, and this made both adapt and change. There were many tribes with diverse livelihoods. Over time many merged with caste-based society; others rejected both the caste system and orthodox Hinduism; and some established extensive states with well-organised administration, became politically powerful — and so came into conflict with larger and more complex kingdoms and empires.

The Gonds and the Ahoms compared (Exercise 9)The GondsThe AhomsOriginlived long in Gondwana,central Indiamigrated from present-dayMyanmar, 13th centuryLivelihoodshifting cultivation;elephant trade (Garha)rice cultivation;new methods introducedBecoming a statebig kingdoms dominate smallGond chiefs as Sultans declinesuppress the bhuiyans; annexChhutiyas 1523, Koch-Hajo 1581Administrationgarh → chaurasi (84)→ barhot (12)census; paiks by rotation;centralised by the mid-1600sBrahmanasland grants; chiefs seekRajput statusland grants; Hinduism predominantunder Sib SinghAgainst the MughalsGarha Katanga falls (1564–65);later lose to Bundelas, Marathaslose to Mir Jumla (1662) butMughal rule does not last; SaraighatSimilar: tribal societies that became states, centralised, and drew in Brahmanas · Different: how they ended up facing Mughal power
Gonds and Ahoms side by side — two tribal societies that became states, with different fates against the Mughals.
Conclusion: exam lines
  • Three outcomes for tribes: merged with caste society; rejected caste and orthodox Hinduism; built states.
  • State-building brought tribes into conflict with bigger kingdoms and empires — the Gonds lost Garha Katanga; the Ahoms held out.
  • Change ran both ways: caste society absorbed tribes and artisans and itself became a society of many jatis.

NCERT’s side questions and Activities — short answers

The chapter’s question boxes, in page order, and ‘Imagine’.

Page 50: On a physical map of the subcontinent, identify the areas in which tribal people may have lived.
Use the Map 1 table: hills and mountains (the north-west frontier, the western Himalaya, the north-eastern hills), forest belts of central and eastern India (Gondwana, the Chhota Nagpur plateau, the Vindhyas and Satpuras), the Western Ghats and Deccan highlands, the deserts of the north-west, and forested hills of the far south — places, as NCERT says, difficult to reach.
Page 53 (The Banjaras): Find out how grain is transported from villages to cities at present. In what ways is this similar to or different from the ways in which the Banjaras functioned?
Today grain moves by trucks, railway wagons and sometimes ships, through mandis, traders, government procurement and warehouses. Similar: traders still buy where grain is cheap and sell where it is dear; carriers are sometimes hired by merchants and sometimes trade themselves. Different: speed (hundreds of kilometres a day, not 6–7 miles), scale and the role of the state; carriers no longer travel with their families or need open grazing land; prices are linked across the country.
Page 58: Discuss why the Mughals were interested in the land of the Gonds.
Garha Katanga was rich — 70,000 villages (Akbar Nama) and wealth from trapping and exporting wild elephants, which the Mughals valued for war; it lay across the routes between north India and the Deccan; it yielded booty of coins and elephants; and an independent, expanding kingdom on the empire’s edge was a challenge the Mughals did not accept.
Page 58: Why do you think the Mughals tried to conquer the land of the Ahoms?
To extend the empire to its north-eastern frontier and secure Bengal’s borders; for the valley’s resources (rice lands, forest products, elephants); because the Ahoms were a powerful, expanding state that clashed with Mughal-held areas (‘invasions from the south-west’); and for prestige. NCERT notes that even after the 1662 victory direct control did not last; Saraighat (1671) ended the attempt.
Imagine (page 59): You are a member of a nomadic community that shifts residence every three months. How would this change your life?
Points: four homes a year; few possessions, all portable; life organised around animals, seasons and routes; schooling and friendships interrupted (or learning from family and on the road); skills in trade, herding and travel; strong bonds within the group and regular meetings with the same villages each year (NCERT’s definition box); dependence on grazing land and on goodwill of settled people; difficulties with documents, services and rights that assume a fixed address today.

NCERT exercise — answer outlines

‘Let’s recall’ (1–4), ‘Let’s understand’ (5–7), ‘Let’s discuss’ (8–9) and ‘Let’s do’ (10–12), pages 59–60.

1. Match the following: garh, tanda, labourer, clan, Sib Singh, Durgawati — with khel, chaurasi, caravan, Garha Katanga, Ahom state, paik.
Garh — chaurasi (both Gond administrative units); tanda — caravan; labourer — paik; clan — khel; Sib Singh — Ahom state; Durgawati — Garha Katanga.
2(a). The new castes emerging within varnas were called ______.
Jatis.
2(b). ______ were historical works written by the Ahoms.
Buranjis.
2(c). The ______ mentions that Garha Katanga had 70,000 villages.
Akbar Nama.
2(d). As tribal states became bigger and stronger, they gave land grants to ______ and ______.
Brahmanas and temples (NCERT’s Ahom section names both; the Gond rajas also gave land to Brahmanas). For the Ahoms, poets and scholars also received land.
3. State whether true or false: (a) Tribal societies had rich oral traditions. (b) There were no tribal communities in the north-western part of the subcontinent. (c) The chaurasi in Gond states contained several cities. (d) The Bhils lived in the north-eastern part of the subcontinent.
(a) True. (b) False — Khokhars, Gakkhars, Langahs, Arghuns and Balochis lived there. (c) False — a chaurasi was a unit of 84 villages. (d) False — the Bhils lived across western and central India.
4. What kinds of exchanges took place between nomadic pastoralists and settled agriculturists?
Pastoralists exchanged wool, ghee and other pastoral products — and animals such as cattle and horses — for grain, cloth, utensils and other goods from settled agriculturists. Trader-nomads like the Banjaras also carried grain from surplus areas to towns and armies, and brought goods from distant traders to local markets.
5. How was the administration of the Ahom state organised?
It was centralised by the first half of the seventeenth century and rested on forced labour: a census was taken; each village sent a number of paiks by rotation; people were moved from crowded to thinly populated areas, breaking up clans. Almost all adult men served in the army in war and built dams, irrigation and public works in peace. Society was organised in khels (clans) controlling villages; peasants got land from the village community. The state used firearms from the 1530s and made gunpowder and cannons by the 1660s, granted land to Brahmanas, temples, poets and scholars, and kept chronicles (buranjis).
6. What changes took place in varna-based society?
As the economy grew and new skills were needed, smaller castes — jatis — emerged within varnas (e.g. among Brahmanas); tribes and social groups were taken in as jatis; artisans (smiths, carpenters, masons) were recognised as separate jatis; jati rather than varna became the basis of society; assemblies of Brahmanas fixed jatis’ occupations (the rathakaras inscription); new Rajput clans, some once tribes, became rulers; and, in NCERT’s account, hierarchy grew under the Sultans and Mughals.
7. How did tribal societies change after being organised into a state?
Taking the Gonds: a basically equal society divided into unequal classes; administration was centralised (garh, chaurasi, barhot); Brahmanas received land and influence; chiefs sought Rajput status (Sangram Shah; the Chandel marriage). Taking the Ahoms: clans were broken up by resettlement; a census and the paik system bound people to state service; Brahmanas and temples gained land and Hinduism became predominant under Sib Singh, while older beliefs survived. In both, states brought power — and conflict with empires.
8. Were the Banjaras important for the economy?
Yes. They were the main bulk carriers of grain overland, linking surplus villages to town markets (Alauddin Khalji’s Delhi; Jahangir’s account) and keeping armies fed on campaign (up to 100,000 bullocks). As traders in their own right they evened out prices between regions, carried other goods on the return trip, and connected local markets to long-distance trade (Fig. 3). Without them, cities and armies would have been hard to supply.
9. In what ways was the history of the Gonds different from that of the Ahoms? Were there any similarities?
Different: the Gonds were long settled in Gondwana and practised shifting cultivation, while the Ahoms migrated from Myanmar and introduced new rice-growing methods; the Gonds organised by garh–chaurasi–barhot, the Ahoms by census and paiks; the Gonds’ Garha Katanga fell to the Mughals (1564–65), while Mughal control over the Ahoms did not last and the Ahoms won at Saraighat (1671); the Gonds later declined against the Bundelas and Marathas. Similar: both were tribal societies that became centralised states, both gave land to Brahmanas and drew closer to Brahmanical religion, both grew rich and powerful — and both came into conflict with the Mughal Empire (see the comparison grid).
10. Plot the location of the tribes mentioned in this chapter on a map. For any two, discuss whether their mode of livelihood was suited to the geography and the environment of the area where they lived.
Use the Map 1 table to plot them on an outline map. Examples: the Gaddis, shepherds of the western Himalaya — moving flocks between high summer pastures and lower winter grazing suits mountain slopes unsuited to large-scale farming; the Gonds — shifting cultivation suits thick forest with thin soils, where cleared patches lose fertility and are left to regrow; the Banjaras — long-distance carrying suits open plains with grazing land along the way; the Ahoms — wet-rice farming and dams suit the flood plain of the Brahmaputra.
11. Find out about present-day government policies towards tribal populations and organise a discussion about these.
A project. Starting points (taught elsewhere, not here): the Constitution’s provisions for Scheduled Tribes and the Fifth and Sixth Schedules; the PESA Act (1996); the Forest Rights Act (2006); reservation in education, jobs and legislatures; tribal sub-plans and welfare schemes. Discuss both aims and concerns — for example land and forest rights, displacement, education in mother tongues and cultural protection (lesy103, the polity pages).
12. Find out more about present-day nomadic pastoral groups in the subcontinent. What animals do they keep? Which are the areas frequented by these groups?
A project. Examples: Gaddis (sheep and goats; Himachal Pradesh), Bakarwals and Gujjars (goats, sheep, buffaloes; Jammu and Kashmir), Raikas/Rebaris (camels, sheep; Rajasthan and Gujarat), Dhangars (sheep; Maharashtra), Kurumas/Kurubas (sheep; Karnataka and Telangana), yak herders of the eastern Himalaya (Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh). Record their seasonal routes and how their lives are changing.

What to remember

Numbers

Chero chiefdoms emergeby the 12th century
Khokhars powerful in Punjab13th–14th centuries
Man Singh defeats the Cheros1591
Banjara tanda (Peter Mundy)14,000 oxen; 600–700 people; 6–7 miles a day
Bullocks carrying grain for a large Mughal armyup to 100,000
Rathakaras inscription, Uyyakondan Udaiyar12th century
New Rajput clans powerful11th–12th centuries
Garha Katanga (Akbar Nama)70,000 villages
Chaurasi · barhot84 villages · 12 villages (7 barhots = 1 chaurasi)
Mughal attack on Garha Katanga (NCERT · most books)1565 · 1564
Bir Narain’s age when Durgawati began to rule5
Ahoms reach the Brahmaputra valley (NCERT · Beyond NCERT)13th century · 1228
Ahoms annex Chhutiyas · Koch-Hajo1523 · 1581
Ahom firearms · gunpowder and cannons1530s · 1660s
Mir Jumla’s attack · Saraighat1662 · 1671
Mughal army at Saraighat (Assam government’s figures)68,000 troops + over 1,000 cannons
Sib Singh1714–1744

One-liners

  • Tribes did not follow varna rules and were not divided into many unequal classes.
  • Tribal members were united by kinship; land and pastures were held jointly.
  • Tribes kept few written records but rich oral traditions.
  • Kamal Khan Gakkhar was made a mansabdar by Akbar.
  • Raja Man Singh defeated the Cheros in 1591.
  • By the late 16th century many Bhils were settled farmers, some even zamindars.
  • The Banjaras were trader-nomads; their caravan was a tanda.
  • Alauddin Khalji and the Mughals used the Banjaras to carry grain.
  • Jatis, rather than varna, became the basis of organising society.
  • A 12th-century sabha of Brahmanas fixed the rathakaras’ occupations.
  • Some new Rajput clans had earlier been tribes.
  • Gondwana means the country inhabited by Gonds.
  • Aman Das of Garha Katanga took the title Sangram Shah.
  • Rani Durgawati resisted the Mughals under Asaf Khan and died rather than surrender.
  • The Ahoms suppressed the bhuiyans and built a state on the paik system.
  • Lachit Barphukan defeated the Mughals at Saraighat in 1671.
  • Buranjis were Ahom chronicles, first in Ahom, then Assamese.

Traps to avoid

  • Jatis are many and formed within varnas; varnas are four.
  • The Banjaras were traders, not agriculturists or warriors (UPSC 2016).
  • The 100,000 bullocks were for a large army — Mundy’s tanda had 14,000 oxen.
  • Chaurasi = 84 villages, barhot = 12 — villages, not cities.
  • Garha Katanga’s 70,000 villages: from the Akbar Nama.
  • Durgawati’s last battle: NCERT 1565, most books 1564.
  • Durgawati was a Chandel Rajput princess married to the Gond Dalpat.
  • Mir Jumla 1662 was a Mughal win; Saraighat 1671 an Ahom win.
  • Paik = labourer for the state; khel = clan; buranji = chronicle.
  • Bhils: western and central India, not the north-east.
  • Tribes of Punjab, Sind and the north-west adopted Islam early and rejected caste.
  • Gond lands: today largely MP, Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra, Telangana, Odisha (NCERT says Andhra Pradesh).

How to strategise

Prelims — what UPSC asks

  • Banjaras (section 3): UPSC 2016 — ‘generally traders’. Learn tanda, Alauddin and the Mughal army, and Mundy’s numbers.
  • Likely statement material from this chapter: paik, khel, buranji, bhuiyans (Ahoms); garh, chaurasi, barhot (Gonds); Saraighat 1671 vs Mir Jumla 1662; Chhutiyas 1523, Koch-Hajo 1581; Gakkhars and Kamal Khan; Cheros and Man Singh (1591). UPSC 2026 asked about the Ahom moidams — a culture question beyond this chapter.
  • Traps from NCERT’s own text: Durgawati’s date (1565 vs 1564), her father’s name, states renamed or divided since the book was written.

Mains — where it appears and how to answer

  • Caste as fluid and static (GS1 2023: ‘Why is caste identity in India both fluid and static?’): use this chapter for the historical side of fluidity — jatis forming within varnas, tribes and artisans becoming jatis, Rajput clans of tribal origin, Gond chiefs claiming Rajput status — set against the attributed readings (Kosambi, Srinivas, Chattopadhyaya, Surajit Sinha, Susan Bayly, Dirks). The present-day side is in lesy103.
  • For GS1 answers on tribes in history, use the two state-formation case studies (Gonds and Ahoms) and the conflict-and-dependence frame; for colonial-era tribal questions go to hess204 and lehs301. Keep descriptions respectful and attribute every interpretation.

Self-check

Tap an option. NCERT's own exercise questions come first; the rest test the figures and common confusions.

1. In NCERT’s account, which feature describes tribal societies?

2. The caravan of the Banjaras was called a:

3. Which ruler, according to NCERT, made the Gakkhar chief Kamal Khan a mansabdar?

4. In a Gond kingdom, a chaurasi was:

5. Rani Durgawati of Garha Katanga resisted the Mughal forces led by:

6. Under the Ahoms, a paik was:

7. Lachit Barphukan defeated the Mughals at Saraighat in:

8. According to NCERT, what became the basis for organising society as the economy grew?

UPSC questions from this chapter

Open any question to attempt it in the Question bank — your attempt is saved to your progress.

Prelims

1 questions · newest first
2016Prelims GSBanjaras during the medieval period of Indian history were generallyAttempt →

Mains

1 questions
2023GS1Why is caste identity in India both fluid and static? (Answer in 250 words)Write answer →

1 Prelims and 1 Mains UPSC questions are linked to this chapter. More from Our Pasts – II.