0% read
← Our Pasts – II — all chapters
Class 7HistoryOur Pasts – IIChapter 3

Delhi: 12th to 15th Century

≈ 40 min read · 7 Prelims and 1 Mains questions from this chapter
Attempt questions

Start here: why this chapter matters

In simple wordsThink of a small market town that, within one lifetime, becomes the headquarters of a giant company with branches everywhere. Delhi went through that change between the twelfth and fifteenth centuries. This chapter asks how the new rulers ran such a big ‘company’ — whom they trusted, how they paid their managers, how they taxed — and why the far branches kept breaking away.

This is Chapter 3 of Our Pasts – II. gess102 ended with Prithviraja III losing to Muhammad Ghori in 1192; this chapter picks up the story in Delhi. It is a short chapter in the rationalised (2022) book — nine pages — so this page has eight concept sections, not more. It covers: how Delhi became a capital; the five dynasties of the Delhi Sultanate; what Persian histories (tawarikh) tell us and whose views they carry; Raziyya; the Sultans’ reliance on slaves and clients; the iqta system and taxes; the limits of Sultanate control; and the fifteenth century up to Sher Shah. The next chapter, gess104 (the Mughals), continues from Akbar.

Delhi’s rulers, 1100–1560 (axis to scale)1100120013001400150015601130–1145 · Ananga Pala, Tomara ruler of Delhi (Table 1)1165 · Chauhans (Chahamanas) of Ajmer take Delhi (Table 1)1192 · Prithviraj Chauhan’s rule ends1206 · Qutbuddin Aybak: the Sultanate begins1219 · Mongols under Genghis Khan invade Transoxiana1236 · Raziyya becomes Sultan; removed 12401266 · Ghiyasuddin Balban1290 · Khalji dynasty (Jalaluddin)1296 · Alauddin Khalji: revenue and army reforms1320 · Tughluq dynasty (Ghiyasuddin)1324 · Muhammad Tughluq (NCERT; 1325 in most books)1333 · Ibn Battuta reaches Sind (Beyond NCERT)1351 · Firuz Shah Tughluq1398 · Timur sacks Delhi (Beyond NCERT)1414 · Sayyid dynasty (Khizr Khan)1451 · Lodi dynasty (Bahlul Lodi)1526 · Lodi rule ends (Panipat — Beyond NCERT)1540–1555 · Sur dynasty; Sher Shah 1540–15451556 · Akbar’s reign beginsDots at their dates; blocks on the axis and the bar beside it are periods · labels evenly spaced
Delhi’s rulers on a to-scale axis, 1100–1560, with dates beyond the book marked.
Reading the chapter-opening photograph (page 30) and the Keywords box (page 38)The title band shows an uncaptioned close-up of finely carved stone: rows of rosettes and flowing, curling scroll patterns in a warm brown stone. The point: Sultanate buildings were richly carved — a hint of the architecture that kefa108 teaches and that Exercise 11 sends you to find. The Keywords box lists iqta, tarikh, garrison, Mongols, gender and kharaj — each is explained on this page (‘garrison’ in section 8, since the 2022 text no longer explains it).
  • Links: gess101 (sources and archives, the Persian word ‘Hindustan’, Balban’s Sanskrit inscription, Muhammad Tughluq’s provinces); gess102 (the Chahamanas and Prithviraja III); iest203 (Class 9: resistance to the Delhi Sultanate — Ranthambore, Chittor, Devagiri — and Alauddin’s revenue at up to 50%).
  • Senior pages: lehs201 (Ibn Battuta’s Rihla in depth), kefa108 (Sultanate architecture — the Qutb Minar, Alai Darwaza, Tughluq tombs), kehs103 (the Mongols and Genghis Khan), lehs202 (Sufi shaikhs of Delhi), lehs203 (Vijayanagara, which rose as the Sultanate lost the south). This page links them and does not re-teach them.
  • UPSC: Prelims has asked about the iqta (1998, 2000), the Mongols and Iltutmish (2001, 2021, 2022), the order of the ‘slave’ Sultans (1983) and succession (1982). GS1 asked whether Persian literary sources reflect the spirit of the age (2020).
WordWhat it means here
SultanThe title of the rulers of Delhi from the early thirteenth century; their state is called the Delhi Sultanate
Tarikh, tawarikhPersian for a history (singular) and histories (plural)
BirthrightPrivileges claimed because of birth — for example, the belief that nobles inherited a right to govern (NCERT’s definition box)
Gender distinctionsSocial and biological differences between women and men, usually used to argue that men are superior (NCERT’s definition box)
BandaganSpecial slaves purchased for military service and trained for high office
ClientSomeone under another’s protection — a dependent or hanger-on (NCERT’s definition box)
Iqta; muqti (iqtadar)A territory assigned to a military commander; its holder, who collected its revenue as salary
KharajThe tax on cultivation — about half the peasant’s produce under Alauddin Khalji
GarrisonA fortified settlement with soldiers (a keyword of the chapter)
MongolsCentral Asian nomads who, under Genghis Khan, built a vast empire and attacked the Sultanate

At a glance — the six ideas to carry away

  • Delhi’s rise: capital first under the Tomara Rajputs (Ananga Pala, 1130–1145), then the Chauhans of Ajmer (1165–1192); Jaina merchants, temples, coins called dehliwal; the Sultanate from the early 13th century built many cities — Dehli-i Kuhna, Siri, Jahanpanah.
  • Five dynasties, 1206–1526: Early Turkish (Aybak, Iltutmish, Raziyya, Balban), Khalji (Alauddin 1296–1316), Tughluq (Muhammad 1324–1351, Firuz 1351–1388), Sayyid (Khizr Khan), Lodi (Bahlul).
  • Sources: tarikh/tawarikh in Persian; authors lived in cities, wrote for rewards, upheld birthright and gender distinctions; Fakhr-i Mudabbir’s ‘circle of justice’; Minhaj-us-Siraj on Raziyya; Barani on Muhammad Tughluq.
  • Raziyya (1236–1240), Iltutmish’s daughter, abler than her brothers but removed; compare Rudramadevi (Kakatiya, 1262–1289) and Didda (Kashmir, 980–1003).
  • Administration: bandagan (military slaves) and clients; iqta held by a muqti/iqtadar — not inheritable, transferred, audited; Alauddin: state assesses revenue, kharaj ≈ 50%, cattle and house taxes; side box: khums, zakat, jizya.
  • Limits and change: forest strongholds (Ibn Battuta, from Morocco); Bengal and the south slip away; Mongols (Transoxiana 1219) → big standing army; 15th-century regional states; Sher Shah (1540–1545) → model for Akbar.

1. How Delhi became a capital

In simple wordsA city does not become important by itself. A market brings merchants; merchants bring money and temples; a strong ruler makes it his headquarters; and every new ruler then adds a new neighbourhood with his own name on it. Delhi grew in exactly these layers.

In gess102 there was no kingdom with Delhi as its capital — because Delhi became an important city only in the twelfth century. It first became the capital of a kingdom under the Tomara Rajputs, who were defeated in the middle of the twelfth century by the Chauhans (also called Chahamanas) of Ajmer. Under the Tomaras and Chauhans Delhi became an important commercial centre: many rich Jaina merchants lived there and built several temples, and coins minted there, called dehliwal, circulated widely. Delhi’s change into a capital that controlled vast areas of the subcontinent began with the founding of the Delhi Sultanate at the start of the thirteenth century. The Sultans built many cities in the area we now call Delhi.

⤵ From market town to imperial capital (NCERT pages 30–31)
Tomara RajputsDelhi first becomes a kingdom’s capital; Ananga Pala 1130–1145
Chauhans of Ajmerdefeat the Tomaras (Table 1: 1165); Prithviraj Chauhan to 1192
A commercial centreJaina merchants and their temples; dehliwal coins circulate widely
The Delhi Sultanatefrom the early thirteenth century, Delhi controls vast areas
A city of citiesSultans build Dehli-i Kuhna, Siri, Jahanpanah, Tughluqabad, Firuzabad
Reading Map 1 — selected Sultanate cities of Delhi, 13th–14th centuries (page 30), and its question — as a tableNCERT’s map shows a stretch of the Yamuna with its old course, hatched hilly ground, water channels and tanks, and the outlines of several walled cities. It is not redrawn here; its labels are set out below with their builders, which are Beyond NCERT (Hauz-i Sultani’s builder is left out as uncertain). The point: ‘Delhi’ was not one city but many, each new ruler adding his own — and the side question asks you to find Dehli-i Kuhna, Siri and Jahanpanah.
Label on Map 1Built by (Beyond NCERT)Note
Dehli-i Kuhna (with the Qutb Minar)‘Old Delhi’ of the Rajput rulers and the early SultansQutb Minar begun under Aybak, completed under Iltutmish (kefa108)
SiriAlauddin Khaljia garrison city for his army, built when Mongol attacks were at their height
Hauz Khasa great tank of Alauddin Khalji’s timeFiruz Shah later repaired it and built a madrasa on its bank
JahanpanahMuhammad Tughluqwalls joining Dehli-i Kuhna and Siri into one city
TughluqabadGhiyasuddin Tughluqa massive fort-city to the south-east
AdilabadMuhammad Tughluqa smaller fort beside Tughluqabad
Firuzabad (Firuz Shah Kotla)Firuz Shah Tughluqby the Yamuna, north of the older cities
Hauz-i Sultania royal tank near Dehli-i Kuhnaidentification left out here
Old course of the river Yamuna—the river has since moved east; cities were sited near water
Delhi’s rise: exam lines
  • Delhi was first a capital under the Tomaras, not the Chauhans and not the Sultans (Exercise 1).
  • Dehliwal = coins minted in Delhi under the Tomaras and Chauhans — not a tax, not a city.
  • The Jaina merchants and their temples belong to the pre-Sultanate, Rajput period.
  • Prithviraj’s dates differ inside NCERT: Table 1 here says 1175–1192; gess102 says 1168–1192; standard accounts put his accession about 1178 (Beyond NCERT). Safe line: ‘Prithviraja III, c. 1178–1192’; only 1192 is fixed.
  • NCERT says the Chauhans defeated the Tomaras in the ‘middle of the twelfth century’ but its table ends the Tomaras in 1165. Treat 1165 as the table’s date, not an exact battle year.

2. The rulers of Delhi: five dynasties

In simple wordsA family business can stay one name for centuries, or the ‘shop’ can keep changing owners while the building stays the same. The building here is Delhi’s throne: between 1206 and 1526 it passed through five ‘families’ of owners — and a few owners, like Raziyya, held it only briefly.

NCERT’s Table 1 lists the rulers of Delhi and asks you to identify the five dynasties that together made up the Delhi Sultanate: the Early Turkish rulers (1206–1290), the Khalji dynasty (1290–1320), the Tughluq dynasty (1320–1414), the Sayyid dynasty (1414–1451) and the Lodi dynasty (1451–1526). Before them came two Rajput dynasties, the Tomaras and the Chauhans. The table names only selected rulers in each dynasty.

Reading Table 1 — ‘The rulers of Delhi’ (page 31)A full-page table of dynasties with their date ranges and, under each, a few rulers with their dates. It is set out below with every date as printed. The point: five dynasties in 320 years — some long (the Tughluqs, 94 years), some short (the Khaljis, 30); and the gaps in the list (1240–1266; after Firuz Shah; after Bahlul Lodi) are rulers NCERT does not name.
Dynasty (Table 1)DatesRulers named, with dates
Tomaras (Rajput)early 12th century–1165Ananga Pala, 1130–1145
Chauhans (Rajput)1165–1192Prithviraj Chauhan, 1175–1192
Early Turkish rulers1206–1290Qutbuddin Aybak 1206–1210; Shamsuddin Iltutmish 1210–1236; Raziyya 1236–1240; Ghiyasuddin Balban 1266–1287
Khalji dynasty1290–1320Jalaluddin Khalji 1290–1296; Alauddin Khalji 1296–1316
Tughluq dynasty1320–1414Ghiyasuddin Tughluq 1320–1324; Muhammad Tughluq 1324–1351; Firuz Shah Tughluq 1351–1388
Sayyid dynasty1414–1451Khizr Khan 1414–1421
Lodi dynasty1451–1526Bahlul Lodi 1451–1489
Who ruled from Delhi, 1100–1560 — bars drawn to scale11001200130014001500Tomarasearly 12th c.–1165Chauhans1165–1192Early Turkish rulers1206–1290 · 84 yrsKhalji dynasty1290–1320 · 30Tughluq dynasty1320–1414 · 94 yrsSayyid dynasty1414–1451 · 37Lodi dynasty1451–1526 · 75Mughals: Babur, Humayun1526–1540Sur dynasty1540–1555 · 15Mughals restored1555 → Akbar 1556The Delhi Sultanate: five dynasties, 1206–1526 = 320 years (84 + 30 + 94 + 37 + 75)Bold rows = the five Sultanate dynasties of NCERT’s Table 1 · dashed ends = dates NCERT leaves open · Babur’s years Beyond NCERT
Who ruled from Delhi, 1100–1560, with each dynasty’s length to scale; the Sultanate’s five dynasties add up to 320 years.
Beyond NCERT — filling the gaps in Table 1
  • 1240–1266: after Raziyya came short reigns and then Nasiruddin Mahmud (1246–1266), with Balban as his powerful deputy; Balban then took the throne.
  • ‘Slave dynasty’ or ‘Mamluks’ is an older name for the Early Turkish rulers; historians prefer ‘Early Turkish’ because the rulers came from more than one family (Aybak’s, Iltutmish’s, Balban’s) and not all were slaves when they ruled. NCERT uses ‘Early Turkish rulers’.
  • Muhammad Tughluq: NCERT gives 1324–1351; most standard accounts give 1325–1351. Iltutmish: NCERT 1210; many books 1211.
  • Timur sacked Delhi in 1398, under a later Tughluq, weakening the Sultanate before the Sayyids.
  • The Lodis after Bahlul: Sikandar Lodi (1489–1517) and Ibrahim Lodi (1517–1526), who lost to Babur at the First Battle of Panipat (1526).
Dynasties: exam lines and answer-key notes
  • Order: Early Turkish → Khalji → Tughluq → Sayyid → Lodi. The Sayyids and Lodis ruled from Delhi and Agra.
  • Early Turkish order: Aybak → Iltutmish → Raziyya → (Nasiruddin Mahmud) → Balban. UPSC 1983 asked for this order (key: Aybak, Iltutmish, Nasiruddin Mahmud, Balban — consistent with the table plus the Beyond NCERT gap).
  • Raziyya was Iltutmish’s daughter, not Aybak’s.
  • UPSC 1982 keyed succession among the Sultans as ‘generally hereditary’. Most Sultans were indeed followed by a son, grandson, brother or nephew, but there was no fixed law of succession, nobles often decided, and NCERT stresses conflict at each accession (section 5). The key is disputed rather than wrong: in that question pick ‘hereditary’ as the least wrong option.
  • Safe date lines: Muhammad Tughluq 1325–1351 (NCERT 1324); 1206–1526 for the Sultanate.

3. Understanding Delhi under the Sultans: the tawarikh and the circle of justice

In simple wordsImagine a history of your town written only by the mayor’s speech-writers, all living in the best neighbourhood and hoping for a bonus. You would learn a lot about the mayor and his ideas of good government — and little about the people in the villages around. That is the strength and the limit of the tawarikh.

Histories were called tarikh (singular) and tawarikh (plural) in Persian, the language of administration under the Delhi Sultans. Their authors were learned men — secretaries, administrators, poets and courtiers — who both recorded events and advised rulers on governance, stressing the importance of just rule. NCERT asks you to keep three things in mind: the authors lived in cities (mainly Delhi), hardly ever in villages; they often wrote for Sultans in the hope of rich rewards; and they advised rulers to preserve an ‘ideal’ social order based on birthright and gender distinctions — ideas that were not shared by everybody.

Reading the box ‘The circle of justice’ (page 32) and its side questionSummarised: Fakhr-i Mudabbir, writing in the thirteenth century, argued that a king needs soldiers; soldiers need salaries; salaries come from revenue paid by peasants; peasants can pay only when they are prosperous and content; and that happens only when the king ensures justice and honest government. The side question asks whether ‘circle of justice’ is a good name for the relationship between king and subjects. The point: in this theory the ruler’s survival depends on the peasants’ well-being — but it is advice from above, in which peasants matter as payers of revenue (Exercise 5).
The ‘circle of justice’ (Fakhr-i Mudabbir, 13th century — NCERT page 32)The king survivesand rulesJustice and honestgovernance by the kingPeasants prosperousand happyPeasants can payrevenueRevenue payssoldiers’ salariesSoldiersserve the kingBreak any link andthe whole circle failsRead it as advice from a learned courtier to rulers: the king’s own survival depends on the peasants’ well-being
Fakhr-i Mudabbir’s circle of justice: six links, each depending on the one before.
Reading the definition boxes ‘Birthright’ and ‘Gender distinctions’ (page 32)Two margin definitions: birthright — privileges claimed on account of birth, such as nobles’ supposed inherited right to govern; gender distinctions — social and biological differences between women and men, usually used to argue that men are superior. The point: these are the two ideas the tawarikh authors defended, and the next two sections show them under strain — a woman on the throne (Raziyya) and humble-born men in high office (Barani’s complaint).
Four voices from the Sultanate, side by sideWho and whenWhat NCERT takes from themRead with care becauseFakhr-i Mudabbirlearned courtier,13th centurythe ‘circle of justice’:king, soldiers, peasantsadvice written forrulers, from a cityMinhaj-us-Sirajchronicler ofRaziyya’s ageRaziyya abler than herbrothers — yet he was uneasyjudges by an ‘ideal’order of men over womenZiyauddin Baranichronicler,mid-14th centuryMuhammad Tughluq’s ‘humble’officials, criticisedvalues birthright;scorns the ‘low-born’Ibn Battutatraveller fromMorocco, 14th centurychieftains’ forestfortificationsan outsider’s eye —not a tarikh authorTawarikh authors lived in cities, wrote for Sultans in hope of rewards, and upheld birthright and gender distinctions (NCERT)
Four voices in this chapter, side by side: who they were, what NCERT takes from them, and why to read them with care.
Beyond NCERT — the works behind the names
  • Minhaj-us-Siraj wrote the Tabaqat-i Nasiri (around 1260), named after Sultan Nasiruddin Mahmud.
  • Ziyauddin Barani wrote the Tarikh-i Firuz Shahi (1357), a history of the Sultans from Balban to the early years of Firuz Shah, and the Fatawa-i Jahandari, advice on statecraft.
  • Fakhr-i Mudabbir wrote a work on the art of war and government, the Adab al-Harb wa al-Shuja‘a, in the time of Iltutmish.
  • Ibn Battuta’s travel account is the Rihla (lehs201). GS1 2020 asked whether Persian literary sources reflect the spirit of their age — this section and gess101 give the material.
Sources: exam lines
  • Language of administration under the Sultans: Persian (Exercise 2) — not Arabic, not Turkish.
  • Tarikh is singular, tawarikh plural.
  • The ‘circle of justice’ is Fakhr-i Mudabbir’s (13th century), not Barani’s.
  • The tawarikh authors were urban and wrote for rewards: they tell us little about villages, ordinary men and women (Exercise 8).

4. Raziyya: a woman on the throne

In simple wordsPicture the best candidate for school captain being passed over because ‘captains are always boys’. Even the teacher who writes in her report that she is the most capable may still feel uneasy about it. That was Raziyya’s position — and the chronicler who praised her was also the one who doubted her.

In 1236 Iltutmish’s daughter Raziyya became Sultan. The chronicler of the age, Minhaj-us-Siraj, recognised that she was more able and qualified than all her brothers, but he was not comfortable with a queen as ruler. Nor were the nobles happy with her attempts to rule independently. She was removed from the throne in 1240.

Reading the box ‘What Minhaj-us-Siraj thought about Raziyya: What other important female rulers of India did?’ (page 33) and its questionsSummarised: Minhaj thought a queen’s rule went against an ideal order created by God in which women were to be subordinate to men — and asked, in effect, what use her excellent qualities were when she was not counted among men. Raziyya, on her inscriptions and coins, called herself the daughter of Sultan Iltutmish. In contrast, Rudramadevi (1262–1289) of the Kakatiya dynasty of Warangal changed her name in her inscriptions and presented herself as a man; and Didda, who ruled Kashmir (980–1003), bore a title from ‘didi’ (elder sister), an affectionate name from her subjects. The questions ask you to restate Minhaj’s ideas, whether Raziyya shared them, and why it was so hard for a woman to rule. The point: three women rulers handled the same prejudice in three different ways — claiming a father’s authority, taking a man’s identity, or winning affection.
RulerKingdom and dates (NCERT)How she presented her rule (NCERT)
DiddaKashmir, 980–1003known by an affectionate title from ‘didi’ (elder sister)
RaziyyaDelhi Sultanate, 1236–1240inscriptions and coins name her the daughter of Sultan Iltutmish
RudramadeviKakatiyas of Warangal, 1262–1289changed her name in inscriptions and presented herself as a man
Raziyya and women rulers: exam lines and an NCERT slip
  • Raziyya: 1236–1240, daughter of Iltutmish; the chronicler is Minhaj-us-Siraj.
  • Minhaj praised her ability and still opposed a woman ruling — both halves matter.
  • Rudramadevi — Kakatiya, Warangal; Didda — Kashmir. Don’t swap them.
  • NCERT slip: it places Warangal in ‘modern Andhra Pradesh’. Since 2014 Warangal is in Telangana. Safe line: ‘the Kakatiyas of Warangal (present-day Telangana)’.
  • Exercise 9 calls Raziyya ‘unique in the history of the Delhi Sultanate’ — the only woman to rule it.

5. Slaves and clients: whom could a Sultan trust?

In simple wordsA new company boss may prefer to promote people who owe everything to him, rather than old families who think the company is theirs by right. Such people are loyal — to him. When he retires, his successor brings his own trusted team, and the two teams clash. The Sultans had exactly this problem.

Governing a kingdom as vast as the Sultanate needed reliable governors and administrators. Rather than appointing aristocrats and landed chieftains, the early Sultans, especially Iltutmish, preferred their special slaves purchased for military service, called bandagan in Persian. They were carefully trained to hold some of the most important offices; being totally dependent on their master, they could be trusted. The Khaljis and Tughluqs continued to use bandagan and also raised people of humble birth, often their clients, to high posts as generals and governors. But this brought political instability: slaves and clients were loyal to their masters and patrons, not to their heirs; each new Sultan had his own servants, so an accession often saw conflict between the old and the new nobility. The patronage of humble people also shocked many elites, and the authors of tawarikh criticised the Sultans for appointing the ‘low and base-born’.

Slaves and clients: loyal to the master, not to his heir (NCERT pages 33–34)Sultan Abuys and trains slaves(bandagan); raises humbleclients to high officeHis bandagan and clientsgenerals and governors;totally dependent on him,so he can trust themSultan B (the heir)comes to the thronewith his own servantsand clientsA diesOld nobilityA’s men — loyal to ANew nobilityB’s men — loyal to BConflict at each accession — the ‘element of political instability’Meanwhile elites and the authors of tawarikh criticised Sultans for raising the ‘low and base-born’ (NCERT)
Why trusted slaves and clients made accessions unstable: loyal to the master, not to his heir.
⤵ From purchased slave to rival nobility (NCERT pages 33–34)
Purchase and trainbandagan bought for military service and trained for office
Promotegenerals and governors — dependent on the Sultan, so trusted
Add clientsKhaljis and Tughluqs raise humble-born dependants too
The master dieshis men are loyal to him, not to his heir
Old against newthe new Sultan’s servants clash with the old nobility; elites and chroniclers complain
Reading the box ‘Slaves rather than sons’ (page 34) and its questionSummarised: the Sultans were advised to look after a slave they had raised and promoted, since it takes a lifetime and luck to find a worthy, experienced one — and wise men held that such a slave was better than a son. The question asks why a slave might be better than a son. The point: a slave owed his whole position to the master, had no independent claim to the throne and could be promoted or removed at will; a son could be a rival claimant — but the same dependence made the slave loyal only to that master.
Reading the definition box ‘Client’ (page 34)A client is someone under the protection of another — a dependent or hanger-on. The point: clients, like slaves, rose by the Sultan’s favour, not by birth — which is why the elites who believed in birthright (section 3) resented them.
Reading the box ‘Officials of Sultan Muhammad Tughluq’ (page 34) and its questionSummarised: Muhammad Tughluq gave high administrative posts to Aziz Khummar, a wine distiller; Firuz Hajjam, a barber; Manka Tabbakh, a cook; and two gardeners, Ladha and Pira. Ziyauddin Barani, a mid-fourteenth-century chronicler, reported these appointments as a sign that the Sultan had lost his political judgement and could not rule. The question asks why Barani criticised the Sultan. The point: Barani judged by birthright — the humble origins of the appointees, not their work, were his complaint; the source tells us as much about Barani’s values as about the Sultan.
A debate, not a verdict: how to read BaraniBarani is the most quoted chronicler of the fourteenth century, and historians read his judgements in different ways. The table sets the readings side by side; all except NCERT’s are Beyond NCERT. No reading is endorsed here.
ReadingWhoPosition
The chronicler’s own verdictZiyauddin Barani (as NCERT reports him)appointing the humble-born showed the Sultan’s loss of judgement and incapacity to rule
A voice of birthrightNCERT (this chapter)tawarikh authors upheld an ‘ideal’ order of birthright not shared by everybody; elites were ‘shocked’ by such patronage
A didactic historianPeter Hardy, Historians of Medieval India (1960)Barani wrote history to teach moral and religious lessons to rulers, shaping events to fit them
An aristocrat’s prejudiceMohammad Habib and Afsar Umar Salim Khan, The Political Theory of the Delhi Sultanate (1961)Barani’s advice shows a strong contempt for the low-born; his political ideas should be read as a class view
Slaves and clients: exam lines
  • Bandagan = slaves purchased for military service — trained for high office; not household servants, not peasants in bondage.
  • Iltutmish especially favoured them (NCERT).
  • The instability came from loyalty to the master, not his heirs.
  • Barani criticised Muhammad Tughluq for appointing a wine distiller, a barber, a cook and two gardeners.
  • Beyond NCERT: Firuz Shah Tughluq kept a separate department of slaves (diwan-i bandagan); this is the fact behind a 2002 option, not this chapter’s text.

6. Muqtis and iqtas

In simple wordsInstead of paying a regional manager a fixed salary, a company lets him keep the revenue of one district — on condition that he keeps a team ready, sends no false bills and moves to another district every few years so he never treats it as his own. That is an iqta.

Like the earlier Sultans, the Khalji and Tughluq rulers appointed military commanders as governors of territories of varying sizes. These lands were called iqta, and their holder was called iqtadar or muqti. The muqti’s duty was to lead military campaigns and maintain law and order in his iqta. In exchange, he collected the revenues of his assignment as salary, and paid his soldiers from them. Control over muqtis worked best when the office was not inheritable and iqtas were held for a short period before the holder was shifted. These harsh conditions were rigorously imposed under Alauddin Khalji and Muhammad Tughluq. The state appointed accountants to check how much revenue a muqti collected, and made sure that he collected only the taxes prescribed by the state and kept the required number of soldiers.

How an iqta worked under the Khaljis and Tughluqs (NCERT page 35)The Sultanassigns, transfers, auditsMuqti (iqtadar)a military commanderThe iqtaa territory of varying size;its peasants pay only thetaxes the state prescribesHis soldiersthe required number,paid from the iqta’srevenueState accountantscheck the revenue collectedassigns the iqtacampaigns,law and orderrevenue = his salarypays themControls (rigorous under Alauddin Khalji and Muhammad Tughluq): the office is NOT inheritable;iqtas are held for a short time, then the muqti is shifted; accountants audit him; he keeps the required soldiers
How an iqta worked: assignment, revenue, soldiers — and the controls that kept the muqti in check.
⤵ Keeping a muqti in check (NCERT page 35; Exercise 7)
Assign an iqtato a military commander, as governor of a territory
Pay through revenuehe collects the iqta’s revenue as salary and pays his soldiers
Not inheritableno son succeeds automatically
Short tenureshifted to another iqta after a short time
Auditstate accountants check the revenue he collects
Enforce limitsonly prescribed taxes; the required number of soldiers
Beyond NCERT — the iqta across time
  • The iqta was an institution the Turkish rulers brought from the Islamic lands of West and Central Asia, not an ancient Indian one (the point of a 2019 statement).
  • In Mughal times the comparable assignment was the jagir, held by mansabdars (gess104, lehs204); in Vijayanagara, the amara held by nayakas (lehs203); under the Marathas, mokasa. UPSC 2000 matched exactly these.
  • Under Firuz Shah Tughluq iqtas tended to become hereditary again — the reverse of Alauddin’s rule.
Iqta: exam lines
  • Iqta = the land/territory; muqti or iqtadar = its holder. Iqta is not a tax and not a coin.
  • The iqta revenue was the muqti’s salary; he also paid his soldiers from it.
  • The office was not inheritable — controls were strictest under Alauddin Khalji and Muhammad Tughluq.
  • UPSC 1998: early Turkish administration was ‘essentially military’ because the country was parcelled out as iqtas among military leaders — both true, and the reason explains it.
  • Iqta → Delhi Sultans; jagir → Mughals; amara → Vijayanagara; mokasa → Marathas (UPSC 2000).

7. The countryside and its taxes

In simple wordsSuppose local strongmen used to collect ‘fees’ from every shop in their area. A new city government abolishes their right to collect, makes them pay tax themselves, measures every shop, and hires some of the same strongmen as its tax inspectors. That is roughly what Alauddin Khalji did in the countryside.

As the Sultans brought the hinterland of their cities under control, they forced the landed chieftains — the samanta aristocrats — and rich landlords to accept their authority. Under Alauddin Khalji the state took the assessment and collection of land revenue into its own hands. The chieftains’ rights to levy taxes were cancelled, and they too were forced to pay taxes. The Sultan’s administrators measured the land and kept careful accounts. Some of the old chieftains and landlords served the Sultanate as revenue collectors and assessors. There were three types of taxes: on cultivation, called kharaj, about 50 per cent of the peasant’s produce; on cattle; and on houses.

⤵ Alauddin Khalji takes over the land revenue (NCERT page 35)
Subdue the chieftainssamanta aristocrats and rich landlords forced to accept the Sultan
Cancel their rightschieftains may no longer levy taxes — and must pay taxes themselves
Measure and recordthe Sultan’s administrators measure land and keep careful accounts
Re-use local mensome old chieftains serve as revenue collectors and assessors
Collect three taxeskharaj (about half the produce), a cattle tax and a house tax
Reading the side box ‘There were also other taxes levied — khums, zakat, jizyah’ (pages 35–36)A margin box citing U.N. Day’s Administrative System of Delhi Sultanat (1959). Summarised: khums was one-fifth of war booty, and one-fifth on mines and treasure trove; zakat was a religious duty on Muslims with means to give a fortieth part of their annual savings to the needy and to travellers — not, in principle, a tax levied by rulers, though Firuz Shah Tughluq collected it as a regular tax with a separate account, some influential people evaded it, and Muslim traders paid a 2.5 per cent zakat on imports and exports under both the Sultans and the Mughals; jizya was paid by non-Muslims given the status of zimmis (protected people) — at first collected along with the land tax (kharaj), and made a separate tax by Firuz Shah. The point: the Sultanate’s revenue rested mainly on kharaj; these three were levies defined by religious law, whose collection changed with the ruler.
Taxes in the Sultanate: the chapter’s three and the side box’s threeTaxOn what · how muchWho paidNote (NCERT)Kharajcultivation · about 50%of the peasant’s producepeasantsassessed and collected by thestate under Alauddin KhaljiCattle taxon cattlecattle ownersone of Alauddin’sthree taxesHouse taxon houseshouseholdersone of Alauddin’sthree taxesKhumsone-fifth of war booty;one-fifth on mines, treasurethe state tooka shareside box (U.N. Day, 1959)Zakata 40th part of savings;2.5% on tradeMuslims with means;Muslim tradersa religious duty — Firuz Shahcollected it as a regular taxJizyaa tax on zimmis(‘protected people’)non-Muslimsfirst collected with kharaj;Firuz Shah made it separate2.5% = one-fortieth; kharaj (about one-half) was twenty times that rate
Six taxes side by side: the three in the chapter’s text and the three in its side box.
A debate, not a verdict: jizya and the character of the SultanateHow far religion shaped Sultanate taxation and policy is read differently by contemporaries and historians. The table puts the readings side by side, each with its author; all except NCERT’s side box are Beyond NCERT. No verdict is given, and none of these is a statement about any present-day community.
ReadingWhoPosition
A tax folded into land revenueNCERT’s side box, citing U.N. Day (1959)jizya on zimmis was at first collected along with kharaj; Firuz Shah made it a separate tax
A ruler’s own religious framingFiruz Shah Tughluq, Futuhat-i Firuz Shahithe Sultan presented his measures, including his taxation, as following religious law
A contemporary record of protestShams-i Siraj Afif, Tarikh-i Firuz Shahirecords that Firuz Shah extended jizya to Brahmanas, who had earlier been exempt, and that they protested
A theorist who wanted moreZiyauddin Barani, Fatawa-i Jahandariurged Sultans to rule strictly by religious law and complained that they governed by their own regulations (zawabit)
Politics before religionK.A. Nizami, Religion and Politics in India during the Thirteenth Century (1961)the Sultans’ policies were shaped mainly by political needs; state regulations often outweighed the views of the theologians
Taxes: exam lines
  • Kharaj = tax on cultivation, about 50% of produce under Alauddin (a keyword of the chapter); with it, taxes on cattle and houses.
  • Under Alauddin the state assessed and collected revenue; chieftains lost the right to tax and paid taxes.
  • Khums = one-fifth (booty, mines, treasure); zakat = one-fortieth (2.5%), a religious duty; jizya = on non-Muslim zimmis.
  • Firuz Shah: zakat collected as a regular tax; jizya collected separately (NCERT’s side box).
  • Beyond NCERT: Alauddin also fixed prices in Delhi’s markets (UPSC 1979, 1987); the rationalised NCERT text no longer teaches this, so learn it from a standard book.

8. The limits of Sultanate power: forests, chieftains and the Mongols

In simple wordsA city police force may control the main roads but not the dense lanes of an old quarter, where local bosses know every corner; and a branch office far away may simply stop reporting to headquarters. Meanwhile a powerful rival gathers on the border. The Sultans faced all three problems at once.

Large parts of the subcontinent stayed outside the Sultans’ control. It was hard to rule distant provinces like Bengal from Delhi, and soon after southern India was annexed the whole region became independent. Even in the Gangetic plain there were forested areas that Sultanate forces could not penetrate, where local chieftains set up their own rule. Rulers like Alauddin Khalji and Muhammad Tughluq sometimes forced control over these areas, but only for a short time. From outside came the Mongols: under Genghis Khan they invaded Transoxiana in 1219, and the Sultanate faced their onslaught soon after. Mongol attacks increased under Alauddin Khalji and in the early years of Muhammad Tughluq, forcing both to keep a large standing army in Delhi — a huge administrative challenge.

Frontiers of Sultanate power (schematic rings — not a map)DELHIarmy, garrisonDistant provinces: Bengal; the south broke awayForests and hills: chieftains’ strongholdsHinterland: chieftains submit; land measuredArrow: the ‘internal frontier’ — control pushed outward from Delhi, but only for short spellsExternal threat: the MongolsTransoxiana 1219; attacks peak under Alauddinand early Muhammad TughluqResponsea large standing army in Delhi —‘a huge administrative challenge’
The limits of Sultanate power as rings around Delhi (schematic, not a map), and the Mongol threat outside.
Reading the box ‘Chieftains and their fortifications’ (page 36) and its questionSummarised: Ibn Battuta, a fourteenth-century traveller from Morocco, reported that chieftains fortified themselves in mountains, in rocky, uneven, rugged places and in bamboo groves. Indian bamboo, he noted, is not hollow but large and so interwoven that even fire cannot harm it. Inside these forest ‘ramparts’ the chieftains kept their cattle and crops and had rainwater; only powerful armies could subdue them, by entering the forests and cutting down the bamboo with special tools. The question asks how the chieftains arranged their defence. The point: the landscape itself was the fortress — which is why the Sultans’ armies had to clear forests (Exercise 10).
Beyond NCERT — what the 2022 text no longer explains
  • Siri and the garrison: ‘garrison’ is still a chapter keyword. After a Mongol army besieged Delhi in Alauddin’s reign (1303), he built Siri as a garrison city for his soldiers.
  • Alauddin’s army reforms: soldiers were paid in cash; horses were branded (dagh) and soldiers listed with descriptions to stop fraud; prices in Delhi were controlled so that soldiers could live on their pay (UPSC 1987: to keep a large army at lower cost).
  • Muhammad Tughluq shifted the capital to Daulatabad (Devagiri) in the Deccan (around 1327) and issued a token currency of copper/bronze (around 1329–30); both are in standard books, not in this chapter.
  • Ibn Battuta reached Sind in 1333 and served Muhammad Tughluq as qazi of Delhi (lehs201).
  • Mongols and the Sultans: Genghis Khan reached the Indus in 1221 pursuing the Khwarazm prince, in Iltutmish’s reign (UPSC 2001, 2021); a Mongol army besieged Delhi under Alauddin (UPSC 2022). Timur crossed the Indus in 1398, under a later Tughluq — not under Muhammad Tughluq.
Frontiers: exam lines and NCERT slips
  • NCERT slip: it calls Transoxiana ‘in north-east Iran’. Transoxiana (Mawarannahr, the land between the Amu Darya and Syr Darya) is in Central Asia — mostly present-day Uzbekistan — to the north-east of Iran. Safe line: ‘Genghis Khan invaded Transoxiana (Central Asia) in 1219’.
  • Mongol attacks increased under Alauddin Khalji and early Muhammad Tughluq — not under Firuz Shah.
  • Ibn Battuta came from Morocco (Exercise 4).
  • Exercises 3 and 6 rest on passages removed in 2022 (the farthest extent; ‘internal’ and ‘external’ frontiers). Standard answer to 3: Muhammad Tughluq. Outlines for both are in the exercise section.
  • Distant provinces broke away: Bengal; the south soon after annexation (Beyond NCERT: Madurai Sultanate, Vijayanagara and the Bahmani kingdom arose in the 1330s–40s; lehs203).

9. The fifteenth and sixteenth centuries: regional states and Sher Shah

In simple wordsWhen a big chain store shrinks, the local shops around it do not disappear — they grow, and some become famous in their own right. Then a sharp manager of one small shop takes over the old flagship store and runs it so well that the next big owner copies his methods.

After the Tughluqs, the Sayyid and Lodi dynasties ruled from Delhi and Agra until 1526. By then Jaunpur, Bengal, Malwa, Gujarat, Rajasthan and the whole of south India had independent rulers with flourishing states and prosperous capitals. This period also saw the rise of new ruling groups, the Afghans and the Rajputs. Some of the new states were small but powerful and very well administered. Sher Shah Sur (1540–1545) began as the manager of a small territory for his uncle in Bihar, and in time challenged and defeated the Mughal emperor Humayun (1530–1540, 1555–1556). He captured Delhi and founded his own dynasty. Although the Sur dynasty ruled for only fifteen years (1540–1555), it introduced an administration that borrowed from Alauddin Khalji and made it more efficient; this became the model that Akbar (1556–1605) followed when he consolidated the Mughal Empire.

The 15th and 16th centuries: a smaller Delhi, strong regional states (NCERT pages 36–37)Delhi and AgraSayyids 1414–1451 · Lodis 1451–1526JaunpurBengalMalwaGujaratRajasthanSouth Indiaindependent rulers · flourishing states · prosperous capitals · new ruling groups: Afghans and RajputsSher Shah Surmanager of a smallterritory in BiharDefeats Humayuncaptures Delhi;Sur dynasty 1540–1555Sur administrationborrows from AlauddinKhalji, more efficientAkbar (1556–1605)follows it as a modelfor the Mughal Empire
A smaller Delhi among strong regional states, and the chain from Alauddin through Sher Shah to Akbar.
⤵ From Alauddin to Akbar: an administrative inheritance (NCERT pages 35–37)
Alauddin Khaljistate measures land and collects revenue itself
Sayyids and Lodisrule a smaller kingdom from Delhi and Agra to 1526
Sher Shah Surfrom a small territory in Bihar, defeats Humayun; Sur dynasty 1540–1555
A more efficient systemSur administration borrows from Alauddin and improves it
Akbar (1556–1605)takes it as his model for the Mughal Empire (gess104)
Beyond NCERT — Sher Shah and the regional states
  • Sher Shah defeated Humayun at Chausa (1539) and Kannauj (Bilgram, 1540); his reforms included a silver coin, the rupiya, land measurement for revenue, and the rebuilding of the great road from Bengal to the north-west with sarais. His tomb is at Sasaram (Bihar).
  • Among the regional states: the Sharqi Sultans of Jaunpur, the Sultans of Bengal, Malwa and Gujarat, the Rajput kingdom of Mewar (iest203), and in the south Vijayanagara (lehs203) and the Bahmani kingdom. Their architecture is in kefa108.
Fifteenth and sixteenth centuries: exam lines
  • The Sayyids and Lodis ruled from Delhi and Agra.
  • Sher Shah 1540–1545; the Sur dynasty 1540–1555 (15 years). Humayun ruled twice: 1530–1540 and 1555–1556.
  • Sher Shah’s administration borrowed from Alauddin Khalji (not from Akbar) and became Akbar’s model.
  • New ruling groups of the period: Afghans and Rajputs.

NCERT’s side questions and Activities — short answers

The chapter’s question boxes, in page order, and ‘Imagine’.

Page 30: Take a look at Table 1 again and identify the five dynasties that together made the Delhi Sultanate.
The Early Turkish rulers (1206–1290), the Khaljis (1290–1320), the Tughluqs (1320–1414), the Sayyids (1414–1451) and the Lodis (1451–1526). The Tomaras and Chauhans were Rajput dynasties before the Sultanate.
Page 30: Look at Map 1 and locate Dehli-i Kuhna, Siri and Jahanpanah.
Use the Map 1 table: Dehli-i Kuhna is the oldest city, beside the Qutb Minar in the south-west of the area; Siri lies to its north-east; Jahanpanah is the walled area between and joining the two. Tughluqabad and Adilabad lie further south-east, and Firuzabad far to the north beside the Yamuna.
Page 32: Do you think the circle of justice is an appropriate term to describe the relationship between the king and his subjects?
Yes, in that it describes a chain of dependence: king ← soldiers ← salaries ← revenue ← prosperous peasants ← justice, so the ruler’s survival depends on the subjects’ welfare. But it is a view from above: peasants appear mainly as revenue-payers, the ‘justice’ is the king’s to give, and real peasants had no say; whether rulers followed the advice is another question.
Page 33: Express Minhaj’s ideas in your own words. Do you think Raziyya shared these ideas? Why do you think it was so difficult for a woman to be a ruler?
Minhaj believed God had made a world in which women were subordinate to men, so however talented a queen was, her rule was out of place. Raziyya clearly did not share this: she took the throne, tried to rule independently and issued coins and inscriptions in her own right as Iltutmish’s daughter. It was hard for a woman to rule because chroniclers, theologians and nobles held these ideas of gender, the nobles resented her independence, and power rested on commanding soldiers and nobles who expected a man.
Page 34 (Slaves rather than sons): Can you think of any reason why a slave would be better than a son?
A slave owed everything to his master, had no claim to the throne, could be promoted or dismissed at will and was trained for his job; a son could be a rival, impatient to rule, or less able. So a trusted slave seemed more loyal and dependable — though, as NCERT notes, only to that one master.
Page 34 (Officials of Sultan Muhammad Tughluq): Why do you think Barani criticised the Sultan?
Barani believed in birthright — that only men of noble birth were fit to govern. A wine distiller, a barber, a cook and gardeners in high office offended that ideal, and threatened the elites to whom Barani belonged and for whom he wrote. He judged them by their birth, not their performance; the criticism also reflects his wider disapproval of Muhammad Tughluq.
Page 36 (Chieftains and their fortifications): Describe the ways in which the chieftains arranged for their defence.
They fortified themselves in mountains and in rocky, rugged places, and in dense groves of solid, interlocking bamboo that even fire could not destroy; inside these natural ramparts they kept their cattle and crops and collected rainwater, so they could hold out for long. Only powerful armies, cutting down the bamboo with special instruments, could subdue them.
Imagine (page 37): You are a peasant in Alauddin Khalji’s or Muhammad Tughluq’s reign and you cannot pay the taxes demanded by the Sultan. What will you do?
Possible responses: plead with the assessor or the local headman (often an old chieftain now serving as collector) for a reduction; borrow from a moneylender; sell cattle or stored grain; ask the muqti to be fair (only prescribed taxes are allowed); join others in refusing to pay; or flee to the forests where chieftains held out beyond the Sultan’s reach — remembering that kharaj took about half the harvest, with cattle and house taxes on top.

NCERT exercise — answer outlines

‘Let’s recall’ (1–4), ‘Let’s understand’ (5–7), ‘Let’s discuss’ (8–10) and ‘Let’s do’ (11), pages 37–38. Questions 3 and 6 rest on passages removed in the 2022 rationalisation; their outlines say so.

1. Which ruler first established his or her capital at Delhi?
The Tomara Rajputs first made Delhi the capital of a kingdom (NCERT); Table 1 names Ananga Pala (1130–1145) as their ruler.
2. What was the language of administration under the Delhi Sultans?
Persian.
3. In whose reign did the Sultanate reach its farthest extent?
Muhammad Tughluq (1324–1351 in NCERT; 1325–1351 in most books). The current text no longer states this — the passage was removed in 2022 — but it is the standard answer: his armies reached far into the south, though the region soon broke away (section 8).
4. From which country did Ibn Battuta travel to India?
Morocco, in north-west Africa.
5. According to the “circle of justice”, why was it important for military commanders to keep the interests of the peasantry in mind?
Because soldiers’ salaries came from revenue paid by peasants, and peasants could pay only if prosperous and content. A commander who oppressed them would ruin the revenue, so his soldiers could not be paid and the king could not survive. Justice to peasants was therefore in the military’s own interest.
6. What is meant by the “internal” and “external” frontiers of the Sultanate?
The terms come from a passage removed in 2022. Internal frontier: consolidating control over the hinterland of the garrison towns — subduing chieftains, clearing forests, measuring land and collecting taxes (sections 7–8). External frontier: military expeditions into distant regions — Bengal and south India — which were hard to hold and soon broke away. (Beyond NCERT: these campaigns were led under Alauddin Khalji by Malik Kafur and continued under Muhammad Tughluq.)
7. What were the steps taken to ensure that muqtis performed their duties? Why do you think they may have wanted to defy the orders of the Sultans?
Steps: the office was not inheritable; iqtas were held briefly and muqtis were transferred; state accountants checked the revenue collected; muqtis could collect only the taxes the state prescribed and had to keep the required number of soldiers. Why defy: to keep more revenue for themselves; to make the iqta hereditary for their sons; because transfers broke their local ties; because distance from Delhi and command of soldiers gave them power of their own; and because their loyalty was to the Sultan who appointed them, not his heirs.
8. Do you think the authors of tawarikh would provide information about the lives of ordinary men and women?
Mostly not. They lived in cities (mainly Delhi), wrote for Sultans in hope of rewards, and upheld an order based on birthright and gender; their subjects were rulers, nobles, wars and advice on governance. Ordinary people appear only incidentally — as revenue-payers, rebels or ‘low-born’ officials. Their lives must be traced through other sources: travellers like Ibn Battuta, inscriptions, coins, buildings and literature.
9. Raziyya Sultan was unique in the history of the Delhi Sultanate. Do you think women leaders are accepted more readily today?
Points for discussion: women today have equal political rights in law — voting, contesting, holding the highest offices — and India has had women as prime minister, president, chief ministers and speakers; one-third of panchayat seats are reserved for women (73rd Amendment, 1992 — Beyond NCERT), and the 2023 constitutional amendment provides for reserving one-third of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies once it comes into force (Beyond NCERT). Yet women remain a minority in legislatures and still face prejudice like Minhaj’s. Acceptance has grown, but is not complete.
10. Why were the Delhi Sultans interested in cutting down forests? Does deforestation occur for the same reasons today?
Then: forests sheltered chieftains who resisted the Sultanate (Ibn Battuta’s bamboo fortresses), so clearing them removed their strongholds; cleared land could be given to peasants and taxed; and roads and trade routes became safer. Today: forests are cleared mainly for agriculture, mining, dams, roads, industry and the growth of towns — economic reasons rather than defeating rebels, though in both cases forests are cleared to open land for revenue and control.
11. Find out whether there are any buildings built by the Delhi Sultans in your area. Are there any other buildings in your area that were built between the twelfth and fifteenth centuries? Describe some of these buildings, and draw sketches of them.
A local project. In Delhi: the Qutb Minar and its mosque, Alai Darwaza, Tughluqabad, Hauz Khas, Firuz Shah Kotla, the Lodi tombs (kefa108). Elsewhere: the Atala mosque at Jaunpur, Sultanate buildings at Mandu (Malwa), Ahmedabad (Gujarat), Gaur and Pandua (Bengal), and temples and forts of the period such as Warangal and Hampi (lehs203). Describe the materials, arches and domes, inscriptions and purpose; draw your own sketches.
For Exercise 11: readings of the first great mosque of DelhiThe mosque beside the Qutb Minar is the building most often asked about, and it is read in different ways. All attributions are Beyond NCERT; no verdict is given.
ReadingWhoPosition
The builders’ own recordthe mosque’s inscription (Aybak’s time)states that material from demolished temples was used in its construction
A survey of the remainsAlexander Cunningham, Archaeological Survey reports (1860s)documented the carved temple pillars re-used in the mosque’s colonnades
Temples as royal symbolsRichard Eaton, ‘Temple Desecration and Indo-Muslim States’ (2000)attacks on temples in conquered capitals were political acts aimed at symbols of the defeated rulers’ authority
A statement for a mixed audienceSunil Kumar, The Emergence of the Delhi Sultanate (2007)reads the mosque as a display of conquest to the people of Delhi, and notes that the name ‘Quwwat al-Islam’ is a later label

What to remember

Numbers

Delhi becomes an important city12th century
Ananga Pala (Tomara)1130–1145
Chauhans rule Delhi (Table 1)1165–1192
Prithviraj Chauhan (Table 1 · gess102 · standard)1175–1192 · 1168–1192 · c. 1178–1192
Delhi Sultanate (five dynasties)1206–1526 = 320 years
Early Turkish · Khalji · Tughluq · Sayyid · Lodi84 · 30 · 94 · 37 · 75 years
Qutbuddin Aybak · Iltutmish1206–1210 · 1210–1236
Raziyya1236–1240
Balban1266–1287
Alauddin Khalji1296–1316
Muhammad Tughluq (NCERT · most books)1324–1351 · 1325–1351
Firuz Shah Tughluq1351–1388
Mongols invade Transoxiana1219
Rudramadevi (Kakatiya) · Didda (Kashmir)1262–1289 · 980–1003
Kharaj under Alauddinabout 50% of produce
Khums · zakatone-fifth · one-fortieth (2.5%)
Sher Shah · Sur dynasty1540–1545 · 1540–1555 (15 years)
Humayun · Akbar1530–1540 and 1555–1556 · 1556–1605

One-liners

  • Delhi was first a capital under the Tomaras; the Chauhans of Ajmer followed.
  • Jaina merchants built temples in Delhi; its coins were called dehliwal.
  • Five dynasties: Early Turkish, Khalji, Tughluq, Sayyid, Lodi.
  • Tawarikh were histories in Persian, written by city-dwelling learned men.
  • Fakhr-i Mudabbir described the circle of justice.
  • Minhaj-us-Siraj thought Raziyya able but disliked a queen ruling.
  • Raziyya called herself Iltutmish’s daughter; Rudramadevi presented herself as a man.
  • Bandagan were slaves purchased for military service; Iltutmish favoured them.
  • Slaves and clients were loyal to masters, not heirs — accessions brought conflict.
  • Barani criticised Muhammad Tughluq for appointing humble men.
  • An iqta was held by a muqti, who drew its revenue as salary and paid soldiers.
  • Alauddin Khalji brought land revenue under the state; kharaj was about half the produce.
  • Forests and distant provinces stayed outside Delhi’s firm control.
  • Mongol attacks forced Alauddin and Muhammad Tughluq to keep a large army.
  • Sher Shah’s administration borrowed from Alauddin and became Akbar’s model.

Traps to avoid

  • First capital at Delhi: the Tomaras — not the Chauhans, not Aybak.
  • Persian, not Arabic, was the language of administration.
  • Tarikh = singular, tawarikh = plural.
  • Circle of justice: Fakhr-i Mudabbir, not Barani or Minhaj.
  • Raziyya was Iltutmish’s daughter, ruled 1236–1240.
  • Iqta = the territory; muqti/iqtadar = the holder; not inheritable.
  • Kharaj = tax on cultivation (about 50%), not a religious tax.
  • Zakat 2.5% (one-fortieth); khums one-fifth.
  • Transoxiana is in Central Asia, not ‘north-east Iran’ as NCERT says.
  • Warangal is now in Telangana, not Andhra Pradesh as NCERT says.
  • Prithviraj’s dates: 1175 (this table), 1168 (gess102), c. 1178 (standard).
  • Sher Shah borrowed from Alauddin Khalji; Akbar borrowed from Sher Shah.

How to strategise

Prelims — what UPSC asks

  • Iqta (section 6): UPSC 1998 (A/R: early Turkish administration essentially military because the land was parcelled out as iqtas — both true, R explains A) and 2000 (match iqta–Delhi Sultans, jagir–Mughals, amaram–Vijayanagara, mokasa–Marathas). Learn the holder, the salary logic and the controls.
  • Mongols (section 8): Genghis Khan in Iltutmish’s reign (2001; 2021 statement on the Indus); the 2022 three-statement question (first invasion not under Jalaluddin; a Mongol siege of Delhi under Alauddin; Muhammad Tughluq). The chapter gives the frame (1219; attacks peak under Alauddin and early Muhammad Tughluq); the details are Beyond NCERT.
  • Dynasties and succession (sections 2, 5): order of the early Sultans (1983: Aybak, Iltutmish, Nasiruddin Mahmud, Balban); succession ‘generally hereditary’ (1982, key disputed — no fixed law, conflict at accessions).
  • Expect matching on terms: bandagan, muqti, kharaj, khums, zakat, jizya, tawarikh; and the NCERT slips (Transoxiana, Warangal, Prithviraj’s dates) as statement traps.

Mains — where it appears and how to answer

  • Persian sources (GS1 2020: ‘Persian literary sources of medieval India reflect the spirit of the age’): use NCERT’s three cautions about the tawarikh (urban authors, written for rewards, upholding birthright and gender), Fakhr-i Mudabbir’s circle of justice, Minhaj on Raziyya and Barani on Muhammad Tughluq — then the Hardy / Habib readings of Barani and gess101’s points on manuscripts.
  • State and society: for answers on Sultanate administration or women in medieval politics, use the iqta controls, Alauddin’s revenue, the slave-noble cycle and the three women rulers. On jizya, temples and religious policy, set the attributed readings side by side (U.N. Day, Firuz Shah, Afif, Barani, Nizami, Eaton, Kumar) and avoid any present-day framing. Architecture belongs to kefa108.

Self-check

Tap an option. NCERT's own exercise questions come first; the rest test the figures and common confusions.

1. Delhi first became the capital of a kingdom under the:

2. Which of these was NOT one of the five dynasties of the Delhi Sultanate?

3. The ‘circle of justice’ was described by:

4. Bandagan were:

5. Which statement about the iqta under Alauddin Khalji and Muhammad Tughluq is correct?

6. Under Alauddin Khalji, kharaj was:

7. Rudramadevi, who changed her name in her inscriptions and presented herself as a man, ruled the:

8. Sher Shah Sur’s administration, which Akbar later followed, borrowed elements from:

UPSC questions from this chapter

Open any question to attempt it in the Question bank — your attempt is saved to your progress.

Prelims

7 questions · newest first
2022Prelims GSWith reference to Indian history, consider the following statements : 1. The first Mongol invasion of India happened during the reign of Jalal-ud-din Khalji. 2. During the reign of Ala-ud-din Khalji, one Mongol assault marched up to Delhi and besieged the city. 3. Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq temporarily lost portions of north-west of his kingdom to Mongols. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?Attempt →2021Prelims GSConsider the following statements : 1. It was during the reign of Iltutmish that Chengiz Khan reached the Indus in pursuit of the fugitive Khwarezm prince. 2. It was during the reign of Muhammad bin Tughlug that Taimur occupied Multan and crossed the Indus. 3. It was during the reign of Deva Raya II of Vijayanagara Empire that Vasco da Gama reached the coast of Kerala. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?Attempt →2001Prelims GSThe Mongols under Gengis Khan invaded India during the reign ofAttempt →2000Prelims GSMatch List I with List II and select the correct answer using the codes given below the Lists : Codes: List I List II I. Iqta (A) Marathas II. Jagir (B) Delhi Sultans III. Amaram (C) Mughals IV. Mokasa (D) VijayanagaraAttempt →1998Prelims GSAssertion (A): At first the Turkish administration in India was essentially military. Reason (R): The country was parcelled out as ‘Iqtas’ among leading military leaders.Attempt →1983Prelims GSThe following are the rulers of the slave dynasty I. Ghiyasuddin Balban II. Iltutmish III. Qutbuddin Aibak IV. Nasiruddin Mahmud The correct order in which these sultans ruled over India isAttempt →1982Prelims GSThe succession of Delhi Sultans to the throne was generallyAttempt →

Mains

1 questions
2020GS1Persian literary sources of medieval India reflect the spirit of the age. Comment. (Answer in 250 words)Write answer →

7 Prelims and 1 Mains UPSC questions are linked to this chapter. More from Our Pasts – II.