The Constitution and Social Change

This is Chapter 3 of Social Change and Development in India. Chapters 1 and 2 showed how colonialism changed structures and cultures; this chapter asks how the Constitution — and the institutions it created — can be an instrument of deliberate social change. The rationalised chapter is short: eight pages of text (pages 32–39), opening without its earlier introduction, with two numbered sections — 3.1 Panchayati Raj and the challenges of rural social transformation and 3.2 Political parties, pressure and interest groups — seven boxes, one activity and six questions. It therefore has fewer concept sections than most chapters; nothing is padded.

• Builds on Chapter 2 (reformers who sought laws; caste as a political group) and leads into Chapter 4 (the rural structure that shapes panchayats) and Chapter 8 (social movements).
• Pairs with live chapters: Indian Constitution at Work — Chapter 2 Rights in the Indian Constitution (keps202 — Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles), Chapter 6 Judiciary (keps206 — judicial activism, PIL), Chapter 8 Local Governments (keps208 — the 73rd and 74th Amendments in detail); Political Theory, Chapter 5 Rights (keps105); Cultural Change (lesy202).
• UPSC: questions on panchayats (structure, elections, women's reservation, funds, tribal exclusions) recur in Prelims and Mains GS2; GS2 has asked about pressure groups (2013, 2017, 2021, 2026), khap panchayats (2015), women's reservation in local bodies (2019), decentralisation (2022) and the expanding right to life (2023).

• Law = force; justice = fairness. The Constitution is India's basic norm; the Supreme Court is its ultimate interpreter.
• Courts widened rights (Box 3.1): Article 21 → livelihood, health, shelter, education, dignity; right to information in Art. 19(1)(a) (1993); equal pay for equal work read into Art. 14.
• Gandhi: gram swarajya. Ambedkar: local elites would exploit the downtrodden. Compromise: Article 40 (moved by K. Santhanam) → 73rd Amendment, 1992.
• 73rd Amendment: Gram Sabha base, three tiers (States over 20 lakh), elections every 5 years, SC/ST seats, one-third for women — about 800,000 women elected in 1993–94.
• In practice: nyaya and van panchayats, women's confidence (Kalavati), folk-scroll training — but Gram Sabhas captured by landed upper-caste coteries; tribal institutions not automatically democratic (Nongbri).
• Parties seek office; pressure and interest groups lobby (FICCI, ASSOCHAM, INTUC, CITU, Shetkari Sanghatana); Weber: class, status, party; critique — unequal access to the state.

NCERT says the Constitution can help people because it is based on the basic norms of social justice — and it is not just a list of do's and don'ts: it can extend the meaning of social justice, and social movements have helped courts and authorities interpret rights and principles in line with contemporary understanding. Its example: the Directive Principle on village panchayats, moved in the Constituent Assembly by K. Santhanam, became a constitutional imperative ‘after forty odd years’ with the 73rd Amendment in 1992.

There is a difference between law and justice. The essence of law is force — it can coerce obedience, with the power of the state behind it. The essence of justice is fairness. Any legal system works through a hierarchy of authorities. The Constitution is the basis of all rules and authorities — India's basic norm. All other laws are made by procedures it prescribes, by authorities it specifies; a hierarchy of courts, also created by it, interprets laws in disputes; and the Supreme Court is the highest court and the ultimate interpreter of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court has enhanced the substance of Fundamental Rights. Box 3.1 gives instances. A Fundamental Right includes all that is incidental to it: the terse words of Article 21 — the right to life and personal liberty — have been read to include all that goes into a life of quality: livelihood, health, shelter, education and dignity; ‘life’ means more than mere animal existence. These readings have given relief to tortured and deprived prisoners, freed and rehabilitated bonded labourers, acted against environmental degradation, and supported primary health care and primary education. In 1993 the Court held the right to information part of the freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a). And it read the Directive Principle of equal pay for equal work into the right to equality under Article 14, giving relief to plantation and agricultural labourers and others.

Panchayati Raj literally means ‘governance by five individuals’. The aim is a functioning, vibrant democracy at the grassroots. Grassroots democracy is not an alien import, but in a society of sharp inequalities, participation is blocked by gender, caste and class. Villages have also had caste panchayats, which usually represented dominant groups, held conservative views and took — and still take — decisions against democratic norms and procedures.

When the Constitution was being drafted, panchayats were at first not mentioned, and many members voiced sorrow, anger and disappointment. Dr. Ambedkar, drawing on his own rural experience, argued that local elites and upper castes were so entrenched that local self-government would only mean continued exploitation of the downtrodden, whom the upper castes would silence further. Gandhiji, by contrast, saw each village as a self-sufficient unit running its own affairs, and gram-swarajya as the model for independent India. Only in 1992 did the 73rd Amendment usher in decentralised governance, giving constitutional status to Panchayati Raj Institutions, making elections every five years compulsory, and giving elected bodies control of local resources.

Box 3.2 describes the structure as a pyramid. At the base is the Gram Sabha — the entire body of citizens of a village — which elects the local government and charges it with responsibilities; ideally it is an open forum for discussion and development activity that includes the weaker sections. The 73rd Amendment provided a three-tier system for all States with a population of over twenty lakh; made elections every five years mandatory; reserved seats for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and thirty-three per cent for women; and — NCERT says — constituted a District Planning Committee.

The 73rd and 74th Amendments reserved one-third of all seats in rural and urban local bodies for women — gram and village panchayats, municipalities, city corporations and district boards. This brought women into elected bodies with decision-making power for the first time on this scale: the 1993–94 elections alone brought about 800,000 women into politics.

Powers and responsibilities. The Constitution asks States to give panchayats the powers and authority to function as institutions of self-government: to prepare plans for economic development; to promote schemes for social justice; to levy, collect and appropriate taxes, duties, tolls and fees; and to help devolve responsibilities, especially finances, to local authorities. Welfare duties include burning and burial grounds, records of births and deaths, child welfare and maternity centres, cattle pounds, family planning and promotion of agriculture; development duties include roads, public buildings, wells, tanks and schools, small cottage industries and minor irrigation. Panchayat members monitor schemes such as the IRDP and ICDS.

Funds. Panchayats' main income is from taxes on property, profession, animals and vehicles, a cess on land revenue and rentals, supplemented by grants through the Zilla Panchayat. Panchayat offices are expected to display boards listing funds received and how they were used — a form of the ‘right to information’, letting villagers scrutinise allocations and ask reasons for decisions. Nyaya Panchayats, set up in some States, hear petty civil and criminal cases; they can fine but not sentence; they have often brought parties to agreement and have been effective against men who harass women for dowry or commit violence against them.

Box 3.3 tells of Kalavati, a Dalit woman, nervous about contesting, whose confidence and self-esteem grew after she became a panchayat member — above all, ‘she has a name’, no longer just ‘Ramu's mother’ or ‘Hiralal's wife’. Box 3.4 describes van panchayats in Uttarakhand, where women do most of the work because men often serve far away in the armed forces; facing deforestation and long walks for firewood and fodder, women set up forest councils that raise nurseries, plant saplings and guard forests against illegal felling — the area where the Chipko movement began. Box 3.5 describes training for non-literate women through a phad, a painted cloth scroll of folk storytelling: in ‘Dhukipur’ (sad village) a corrupt pradhan spends school money on her own house; in ‘Sukhipur’ (happy village) a good pradhan builds a health centre and a road — and the message is that voting or winning is not enough; voters must know why they choose someone and value integrity.

Tribal areas. Many tribal areas have rich traditions of grassroots democracy. In Meghalaya, the Khasis, Jaintias and Garos have long-standing institutions at village, clan and state levels — for example the Khasi clan council, the Durbar Kur, presided over by the clan headman. Yet a large part of tribal areas lies outside the 73rd Amendment, perhaps because policymakers did not wish to interfere with traditional institutions. The sociologist Tiplut Nongbri cautions that tribal institutions are not necessarily democratic: commenting on the Bhuria Committee Report, she finds its concern for tradition appreciable but blind to complexity — despite an egalitarian ethos, stratification exists, tribal political institutions show open intolerance of women, and social change has distorted them so much that it is hard to tell what is traditional (Nongbri 2003).

Democratisation is hard in a society with a long history of inequality by caste, community and gender. Given an unequal, undemocratic social structure, members of some groups, communities or castes are often not informed of village meetings and activities. Gram Sabhas are often controlled by a small coterie of rich landlords, usually from the upper castes or landed peasantry, who decide development activities and allocate funds, leaving the silent majority as onlookers. Chapter 4 fills in this rural structure.

Every day, groups seek to make their voices heard and draw government's attention to grievances. Industrialists form associations such as FICCI and ASSOCHAM; workers form trade unions such as INTUC and CITU; farmers form unions such as the Shetkari Sanghatana; agricultural labourers have their own unions. Tribal and environmental movements come in Chapter 8.

In a democracy political parties are key actors. A party is an organisation oriented to achieving legitimate control of government through elections — established to gain power and use it to pursue a programme, based on some understanding of how society ought to be. Parties represent the interests of different groups, and interest groups try to influence them. When groups feel ignored, they may form a new party or a pressure group that lobbies government. Interest groups pursue specific interests, mainly by lobbying legislators. Organisations that seek power but are denied standard means are best regarded as movements until they achieve recognition.

Not all groups have the same access or ability to pressure the government. Some therefore argue that the concept of pressure groups underestimates the power of dominant social groups — class, caste or gender — and that it is more accurate to say that dominant classes control the state. NCERT adds that this does not deny the important role of social movements and pressure groups in a democracy.

Numbers

One-liners

• Law's essence is force; justice's essence is fairness.
• The Constitution is India's basic norm; the Supreme Court its ultimate interpreter.
• Article 21 now covers livelihood, health, shelter, education and dignity.
• Gandhi: gram swarajya; Ambedkar: village elites would exploit the downtrodden.
• Article 40 was a Directive Principle; the 73rd Amendment made panchayats compulsory.
• One-third of local seats for women brought about 800,000 women into office in 1993–94.
• Tribal institutions are not necessarily democratic (Nongbri).
• Gram Sabhas are often captured by landed upper-caste coteries.
• Parties seek office; pressure groups seek influence; movements seek recognition.

Traps to avoid

• The District Planning Committee is Art 243ZD (74th Amendment), not the 73rd as Box 3.2 says.
• ‘17% for SC/ST women’ is NCERT's figure; the Constitution reserves one-third of SC/ST seats for SC/ST women.
• Ambedkar opposed village-centred self-government; Gandhi championed it.
• Right to information: Art 19(1)(a), not Art 21, in NCERT's Box 3.1.
• Equal pay for equal work is a Directive Principle read into Art 14 — the Constitution does provide for it.
• The amendments were passed in 1992 but came into force in 1993.
• Meghalaya and Nagaland lie largely outside Part IX (Art 243M).
• ‘Box 3.7 on the last page’ for the three tiers is a slip — it is Box 3.2.
• Nyaya panchayats can fine but cannot sentence.

Prelims — what UPSC asks

• Panchayati Raj structure: three tiers (1996); elections ‘decided by’ (1990 — key: State Government, correct for 1990; since 1993 elections are a constitutional mandate conducted by State Election Commissions); what the 73rd did not provide (1997); 73rd provides SEC and SFC but not the DPC (2011 — note Box 3.2's slip); States outside PRIs — Meghalaya and Nagaland (1986); local self-government as democratic decentralisation (2017).
• Funds: UPSC 1991 keyed ‘levy duties’ over ‘professional tax’ as a panchayat income source; NCERT lists a tax on profession among panchayat incomes, so the key is disputed — both are defensible.
• Rights: equal pay for equal work is provided (Art 39(d)), so statement 1 in 2006 is false.

Mains — where it appears and how to answer

• Rights and courts (GS2): the Constitution as a living instrument and the expanding right to life (2023) — Box 3.1 plus the case table; frame with law versus justice.
• Local democracy (GS2): women's reservation and patriarchy (2019) — Kalavati, phad training, 800,000 women, proxy and capture; decentralisation and grassroots governance (2022) — the 73rd's design versus coterie control; khap panchayats (2015) — caste versus constitutional panchayats.
• Pressure groups (GS2): structure and functioning (2013), informal versus formal groups (2017), business associations (2021 — FICCI, ASSOCHAM, Budget consultations), pressure groups and pluralism versus corporate power (2026) — use NCERT's definitions, Weber, and the pluralist and class views side by side.
• Present provisions as dated facts and evaluations as attributed evidence; avoid present-day political commentary.

Tap an option. NCERT's own exercise questions come first; the rest test the figures and common confusions.

Open any question to attempt it in the Question bank — your attempt is saved to your progress.