0% read
← Politics in India since Independence — all chapters
Class 12PolityPolitics in India since IndependenceChapter 5

Challenges to and Restoration of the Congress System

≈ 40 min read · 2 Prelims and 1 Mains questions from this chapter
Attempt questions

Start here: why this chapter matters

In simple wordsA big family firm has run the town's market for years under one respected founder. When he dies, everyone asks: who will run it — and will the firm survive at all? Rivals start winning customers, and the family quarrels until it splits. One heir wins the customers back with a bold new promise — but the firm she rebuilds is run very differently. This chapter is that story for the Congress between 1964 and 1972.

Chapter 2 described the ‘Congress system’ of the 1950s. In the 1960s it was challenged from outside by a stronger, less divided opposition and from inside, as the party could no longer contain all its differences. This chapter explains the transition after Nehru, how opposition unity and the Congress split threatened Congress dominance, how a new Congress under Indira Gandhi overcame the challenge, and how new policies and slogans ‘restored’ the system.

  • Builds on Chapter 2 (the Congress system and opposition parties) and Chapter 4 (the 1965 and 1971 wars), and leads into Chapter 6 (the crisis of democratic order — the Emergency) and Chapter 8 (coalition politics).
  • Pairs with Indian Constitution at Work: Chapter 4 (Executive — the presidential election of 1969), Chapter 5 (Legislature — anti-defection law, Leader of the Opposition), Chapter 9 (amendments — privy purses, bank nationalisation and the courts) and Chapter 7 (Federalism — President's rule).
  • UPSC: Mains 2013 on ‘Jai Jawan Jai Kisan’; Prelims on the first non-Congress State governments (1987) and the first recognised Leader of the Opposition (1989). Defection law and the Tenth Schedule are tested from Indian Constitution at Work.
WordWhat it means here
SuccessionHow a new leader takes over when the old one dies or leaves
SyndicateAn informal group of powerful Congress organisational leaders in the 1960s
Non-CongressismLohia's strategy of uniting all non-Congress parties to defeat the Congress
CoalitionA government formed by several parties together
SVDSamyukt Vidhayak Dal — joint legislature parties of non-Congress MLAs, 1967
DefectionAn elected member leaving the party on whose symbol he or she was elected
RequisitionistsIndira Gandhi's supporters who requisitioned (demanded) an AICC meeting in 1969
Conscience voteLetting legislators vote as they think right instead of following the party whip
Privy purseAnnual allowances and privileges promised to former princely rulers
Bank nationalisationGovernment taking over ownership of private banks (14 in 1969)
Grand AllianceThe 1971 electoral alliance of major non-communist opposition parties
PopulismPolitics that appeals directly to ‘the people’ through a leader and broad slogans
Reading R.K. Laxman's chapter-opening cartoon (page 1)Four panels follow the Congress symbol of the time, a pair of yoked bullocks, and its farmer-driver across milestones marked 1, 9, 17 and 22 years after independence: at first the pair pulls together; by year nine one bullock snorts and strains; by year seventeen they glare in opposite directions; at year twenty-two they have broken the yoke and charge at each other while the driver flees. NCERT: it depicts the changes within the Congress leading to a head-on confrontation in the 22nd year after independence — 1969. The point: the split did not come suddenly; tensions grew over two decades.

At a glance — the six ideas to carry away

  • Two smooth successions: Shastri by consensus (1964), Indira Gandhi by secret ballot over Morarji Desai (January 1966).
  • Shastri: drought, food crisis, 1965 war, ‘Jai Jawan Jai Kisan’; died at Tashkent, 11 January 1966.
  • 1967: ‘political earthquake’ — lowest Congress Lok Sabha tally since 1952; lost power in 9 States; DMK majority in Madras; SVD coalitions; defections.
  • Lohia's non-Congressism: disparate parties unite because divided votes kept the Congress in power.
  • Syndicate vs Indira: Ten Point Programme (1967), bank nationalisation and privy purses, V.V. Giri beats Sanjeeva Reddy (1969) → split into Congress (O) and (R).
  • 1971: ‘Garibi Hatao’ vs ‘Indira Hatao’; Congress(R) 352, with CPI 375; Congress(O) 16; Grand Alliance <60 — a restored but changed Congress.

1. The challenge of political succession: Shastri and Indira Gandhi

In simple wordsWhen a school's founder-principal retires, outsiders predict chaos. Instead the staff quietly agree on a new principal within days. Two years later, when he too passes away, there is a real contest — settled by a fair vote. Both times the school carries on.

Nehru died in May 1964 after more than a year of illness. Beyond ‘after Nehru, who?’ lay a deeper question: after Nehru, what? Outsiders doubted that India's democracy would survive; like many new nations it might fail to manage a democratic succession, and the army might step in; the new leaders might not handle poverty, inequality and communal and regional divisions. The 1960s were called the ‘dangerous decade’.

From Nehru to Shastri. The succession proved the critics wrong. Congress President K. Kamaraj consulted leaders and MPs and found a consensus for Lal Bahadur Shastri, unanimously chosen leader of the Congress Parliamentary Party. A non-controversial leader from U.P., long a minister under Nehru, known for simplicity and principle, Shastri had once resigned as Railway Minister taking moral responsibility for a major accident. As PM (1964–66) he faced the economic after-effects of the China war, failed monsoons, drought and a serious food crisis, and the 1965 war with Pakistan; his slogan ‘Jai Jawan Jai Kisan’ captured the resolve to meet both. He died suddenly at Tashkent on 11 January 1966, where he had signed the agreement ending the war.

From Shastri to Indira Gandhi. This time there was intense competition between Morarji Desai — former Chief Minister of Bombay State and Union minister — and Indira Gandhi, Nehru's daughter, a former Congress President and Information Minister under Shastri. Senior leaders backed Indira Gandhi, though not unanimously; in a secret ballot of Congress MPs she won the support of more than two-thirds. A peaceful transfer despite intense competition was seen as a sign of democratic maturity. The seniors may have backed her believing her inexperience would make her depend on them; within a year she had to lead the party into an election, amid worsening economic conditions, and set out to gain control of the party.

1964 · after Nehru1966 · after ShastriTriggerNehru dies, 27 May 1964(after a long illness)Shastri dies in Tashkent,11 January 1966Contendersconsensus emergedIndira Gandhi vs Morarji DesaiHow decidedKamaraj consults leaders and MPs;Shastri chosen unanimouslysecret ballot of Congress MPs;Indira wins over two-thirdsSenior leaders’ hopea non-controversial leaderan inexperienced PM whowould depend on themWhat it showedcritics’ fears of failureproved wrongpeaceful transfer despiteintense competitionNCERT pages 73–75 · Beyond NCERT: Gulzarilal Nanda was interim PM both times; the 1966 vote was 355 to 169
The two successions compared.
Beyond NCERT — dates and figures
  • Nehru died on 27 May 1964; Gulzarilal Nanda was interim Prime Minister until Shastri was sworn in on 9 June 1964, and again after Shastri's death until Indira Gandhi took office on 24 January 1966.
  • In the Congress Parliamentary Party vote of 19 January 1966, Indira Gandhi received 355 votes and Morarji Desai 169.
  • Shastri resigned as Railway Minister in 1956 after the Ariyalur rail accident in Madras State. The ‘Kamaraj Plan’ (1963), by which senior leaders resigned from office for party work, is in Kamaraj's NCERT box.
Reading the Guardian quotation, the side cartoon and the Shastri note (pages 73–74)
  • A Guardian (London) editorial of 3 June 1964: in spite of all forebodings, India had named its new Prime Minister with more dispatch and much more dignity than Britain had after Harold Macmillan. The point: a democratic succession at a time when many expected failure.
  • A girl asks: when France or Canada have similar problems, no one talks of failure or disintegration — why are we under constant suspicion? A fair point about how new, poor democracies were judged by outsiders.
  • Note on Shastri (1904–1966): in the freedom movement from 1930; minister in U.P.; Congress General Secretary; Union minister 1951–56, resigning over the railway accident, and again 1957–64; coined ‘Jai Jawan Jai Kisan’.
Reading Laxman's cartoon of 18 January 1966, the Raghu Rai photograph and the Indira Gandhi note (pages 75–76)
  • Laxman: Indira Gandhi stands on the winner's podium holding a trophy marked ‘PM’, applauded by senior Congress leaders, while a runner is only just leaving the ‘START’ line. The point: the party bosses seemed to have settled the race before it began.
  • A photograph by Raghu Rai shows Indira Gandhi with flowers amid a crowd of smiling, Gandhi-capped Congressmen — a lone woman among men.
  • A girl remarks it must have been difficult for one woman in a world dominated by men, and asks why we don't have more women in such positions (Beyond NCERT: the 106th Amendment, 2023, will reserve one-third of Lok Sabha and Assembly seats for women after the next delimitation).
  • Note on Indira Gandhi (1917–1984): PM 1966–77 and 1980–84; Congress President 1959; led the party to victory in 1967, 1971 and 1980; credited with ‘Garibi Hatao’, the 1971 victory, abolition of privy purses, bank nationalisation, the nuclear test and environmental protection; assassinated on 31 October 1984.

2. The fourth general election, 1967: context and non-Congressism

In simple wordsIn a bad year — empty granaries, rising prices, no jobs — people blame whoever is in charge. Rival teams who normally can't stand each other realise that if they stop splitting the anti-government vote, they can finally win.

1967 is a landmark in India's electoral history. In the run-up, two Prime Ministers had died in quick succession, and a PM seen as a political novice had been in office for less than a year. The economy was in grave crisis: successive monsoon failures, widespread drought, falling farm output, serious food shortages, depleted foreign-exchange reserves, falling industrial production and exports, and a sharp rise in military spending diverted from planning. One of the new government's first decisions was to devalue the rupee — in NCERT's words, under what was seen to be pressure from the US: a dollar that had cost less than ₹5 now cost more than ₹7.

Prices rose; people protested against costly essentials, food scarcity and unemployment; bandhs and hartals were frequent. NCERT says the government treated the protests as a law-and-order problem rather than expressions of people's problems, which deepened bitterness. Communist and socialist parties launched struggles for equality; a group that broke away from the CPI(M) to form the CPI (Marxist-Leninist) led armed agrarian struggles (Chapter 6); and the period saw some of the worst Hindu–Muslim riots since independence.

Non-Congressism. Opposition parties led the protests and realised that the division of their votes kept the Congress in power. So parties with entirely different programmes and ideologies formed anti-Congress fronts in some States and made seat-sharing arrangements in others, seeing Indira Gandhi's inexperience and Congress factionalism as their chance. The socialist leader Ram Manohar Lohia named the strategy ‘non-Congressism’ and argued that since Congress rule was undemocratic and against the interests of ordinary poor people, the coming together of non-Congress parties was necessary to reclaim democracy for the people.

⤵ The road to 1967
Two successions, 1964 and 1966a new PM seen as a novice
Economic crisisdroughts, food shortage, falling output and exports, war spending; devaluation (June 1966 — Beyond NCERT)
Popular unrestprice rise, bandhs and hartals; treated as law and order (NCERT)
Opposition draws a lessondivided votes keep the Congress in power
Non-Congressism (Lohia)fronts and seat adjustments among very different parties
February 1967: fourth general electionLok Sabha and Assemblies together; first without Nehru
Reading the box ‘Election in a Rajasthan Village’ (page 77)Based on Anand Chakravarti's study of a village in the Chomu constituency: in village Devisar the 1967 Assembly contest between the Congress and the Swatantra Party became a factional fight between uncle and nephew. The traditional leader Sher Singh was being overtaken by his nephew Bhim Singh, who, as panchayat pradhan, built an alliance of Rajputs and non-Rajputs, worked through Chief Minister Mohan Lal Sukhadia and backed the Congress candidate — hoping for direct access to a future minister. Sher Singh had to back the Swatantra candidate, a jagirdar, promising the village a school. The point: national elections ran on local rivalries, caste alliances and patronage — the factional texture of the Congress system at the grassroots.
Reading the notes on Lohia and Annadurai, and Maxwell's warning (page 78)
  • Ram Manohar Lohia (1910–1967): socialist thinker, among the founders of the CSP, later leader of the Socialist Party and the SSP, Lok Sabha member 1963–67, editor of Mankind and Jan; known for a non-European socialist theory, sharp attacks on Nehru, non-Congressism, advocacy of reservations for backward castes and opposition to English.
  • C.N. Annadurai (1909–1969): journalist and orator, once in the Justice Party and the Dravidar Kazhagam, founded the DMK in 1949, opposed the imposition of Hindi and favoured State autonomy; Chief Minister of Madras from 1967.
  • Neville Maxwell, ‘India's Disintegrating Democracy’, The Times (London), 1967: order would slip beyond civil government, the army would become the only source of authority, and the experiment of developing India democratically had failed. The point: a confident outside prediction that events proved wrong.

3. The verdict of 1967: coalitions and defections

In simple wordsThe big team still won the national championship — but lost half its regional matches. Where it lost, odd combinations of rivals formed joint teams, and players kept switching sides between matches.

The fourth general elections to the Lok Sabha and Assemblies were held in February 1967, the Congress facing voters without Nehru for the first time. Observers called the results a ‘political earthquake’. The Congress kept a Lok Sabha majority, but with its lowest tally of seats and votes since 1952; half of Indira Gandhi's ministers lost, and stalwarts such as Kamaraj (Tamil Nadu), S.K. Patil (Maharashtra), Atulya Ghosh (West Bengal) and K.B. Sahay (Bihar) were defeated.

Congress share of Lok Sabha seats (bars to scale)0%25%50%75%100%majority line1952364 of 489 (74%)1957371 of 494 (75%)1962361 of 494 (73%)1967283 of 520 (54%)1971352 of 518 (68%)1952–62 from NCERT Chapter 2 · 1971 = Congress(R) seats from NCERT* 1967 seats and the 1967 and 1971 House sizes are official ECI figures (Beyond NCERT)
Congress share of Lok Sabha seats, 1952–1971 (1967 from official ECI figures).

The change was more dramatic in the States. The Congress lost its majority in seven States, and in two others defections prevented it from forming a government. These nine — Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, West Bengal, Orissa, Madras and Kerala — spanned the country. In Madras, the DMK won a clear majority after leading a massive student anti-Hindi agitation — the first time any non-Congress party had won a majority of its own in any State. The other eight had coalition governments of non-Congress parties. People joked that one could take a train from Delhi to Howrah without passing through a single Congress-ruled State.

1967: nine States without a Congress government (not a map)Lost its majority — 7 StatesNCERT names them within its list of nineDefections — 2 Statesprevented a Congress governmentMadrasDMK majorityKeralacoalitionWest BengalcoalitionBiharSVD coalitionOrissacoalitionPunjabUnited FrontUttar PradeshSVD; defectionsHaryanadefectionsMadhya PradeshdefectionsRajasthan: no majority, butCongress formed the government‘You could take a train from Delhi to Howrah without passing through a Congress-ruled State’NCERT pages 79–80 · grouping of individual States into the two categories follows standard accounts (Beyond NCERT); see the trap box
The nine States of 1967 — a grouping, not a map.
Reading the illustration ‘Assembly Election Results 1967’ and the side cartoon (page 79)An outline illustration shades the States where the Congress won a majority in the 1967 Assembly polls and those where it did not, noting that in Rajasthan it lacked a majority but formed the government with help from others. NCERT says it is not a map drawn to scale. (Not reproduced here.) A girl beside election flags asks whether non-Congressism is relevant today and whether it could be applied against the Left Front in West Bengal — written when the Left Front ruled there; it lost power in 2011 (Beyond NCERT). The point: any alliance of rivals against a dominant party follows the logic of non-Congressism.
NCERT's ‘two other States’ — and the three it names laterPage 80 says defections prevented Congress governments in two States; page 81 says breakaway Congress legislators installed non-Congress governments in three — Haryana, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh. Beyond NCERT: in all three, Congress governments were first formed and then fell to defections in 1967 (in U.P., Charan Singh's defection brought down the Congress ministry in April 1967). Safe line: the Congress lost power in nine States in 1967 — through lost majorities and through defections. Also: the DMK was the first non-Congress party to win a majority on its own in a State; the first non-Congress government is usually dated to Kerala 1957 (UPSC 1987; see Chapter 2).

Coalitions. With no single party in a majority, non-Congress parties formed joint legislature parties — Samyukt Vidhayak Dal — so these were called SVD governments. Most partners were ideologically incongruent: Bihar's SVD included the socialist SSP and PSP with the CPI on the left and the Jana Sangh on the right; Punjab's ‘Popular United Front’ joined the two rival Akali parties (Sant and Master groups) with the CPI, CPI(M), SSP, Republican Party and Jana Sangh.

LeftRightBihar SVDCPISSPPSPJana SanghPunjab ‘Popular United Front’CPI(M)CPISSPJana SanghAlso in the Punjab front, not placed on this axis: Akali Dal (Sant group), Akali Dal (Master group), Republican PartyIllustrative placement on one left–right axis, for the parties whose economic programmes were described in Chapters 2 and 3NCERT: coalition partners were ‘ideologically incongruent’ — united mainly by opposition to the Congress
How wide the 1967 coalitions stretched (illustrative).

Defection. Defection — an elected representative leaving the party on whose symbol he or she was elected for another — shaped the making and unmaking of State governments after 1967. Breakaway Congress legislators helped install non-Congress governments in Haryana, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh. Constant realignments gave rise to the phrase ‘Aya Ram, Gaya Ram’. Most non-Congress coalitions did not last: they lost majorities, and either new combinations formed or President's rule was imposed. The 1967 results proved the Congress could be beaten — but there was no substitute yet.

Reading the box ‘The story of Aya Ram, Gaya Ram’ (page 81)The phrase came from Gaya Lal, an MLA in Haryana, who in 1967 changed parties three times in a fortnight — Congress to United Front, back to Congress, and within nine hours to the United Front again. When he announced his move to the Congress, its leader Rao Birendra Singh presented him to the press in Chandigarh saying ‘Gaya Ram was now Aya Ram’. NCERT adds that the Constitution was later amended to prevent defections. Beyond NCERT: the 52nd Amendment (1985) added the Tenth Schedule (anti-defection law); the 91st Amendment (2003) removed the exemption for a ‘split’ of one-third and capped the size of ministries — details in Indian Constitution at Work, Chapter 5.
Reading Kutty's cartoon of 1974 and the side cartoon (page 80)
  • Kutty: a long multi-seat bicycle ridden by leaders of several non-communist parties — labelled among others BKD, Swatantra, SSP, Utkal Congress and BLD — heading towards a sign reading ‘Keep right — no left turn’. NCERT: a cartoonist's reading of Charan Singh's attempt to build a united front of non-communist parties in 1974. The point: after 1967, opposition unity remained a recurring, awkward project of many riders (Beyond NCERT: the merger produced the Bharatiya Lok Dal in 1974).
  • A boy asks what's so unusual about hung assemblies and coalitions — we see them all the time. True today; in 1967 they were new, because the Congress had ruled almost everywhere (Chapter 8 covers the coalition era).

4. Indira Gandhi vs the ‘Syndicate’ and the split of 1969

In simple wordsThe elders of a family business picked a young heir expecting her to follow their advice. She brought in her own advisers, announced popular new schemes, and when the elders chose their own candidate for a top post, she backed a rival — and won. The family split into two firms.

The real challenge came not from the opposition but from within. The ‘Syndicate’ — powerful leaders who controlled the party organisation — had helped install Indira Gandhi and expected her to follow their advice. Gradually she asserted herself, chose trusted advisers from outside the party, and sidelined the Syndicate. She faced two tasks: building independence from the Syndicate and regaining the ground lost in 1967. NCERT says she adopted a bold strategy — converting a power struggle into an ideological struggle by giving government policy a Left orientation. In May 1967 the Congress Working Committee adopted a Ten Point Programme: social control of banks, nationalisation of general insurance, ceilings on urban property and income, public distribution of food grains, land reforms and house sites for the rural poor. The Syndicate formally approved it but had serious reservations.

Reading the box ‘The Congress Syndicate’ and the notes on Kamaraj, Nijalingappa and Karpoori Thakur (pages 81–82)
  • The Syndicate was led by K. Kamaraj (former Madras CM, then Congress President) and included S.K. Patil (Bombay), S. Nijalingappa (Mysore), N. Sanjeeva Reddy (Andhra Pradesh) and Atulya Ghosh (West Bengal). Both Shastri and Indira Gandhi owed their position to it; it had a decisive say in her first Council of Ministers and in policy. After the split its leaders stayed in the Congress (O) and, since Indira Gandhi's Congress (R) won the test of popularity, lost power and prestige after 1971.
  • Kamaraj (1903–1975): freedom fighter, Congress President, Madras CM; spread education despite his own deprivation, introduced the mid-day meal; proposed the 1963 ‘Kamaraj Plan’. Nijalingappa (1902–2000): Constituent Assembly member, Mysore CM, ‘maker of modern Karnataka’, Congress President 1968–71. Karpoori Thakur (1924–1988): socialist, Lohia's follower, Bihar CM (1970–71, 1977–79), introduced reservations for backward classes in Bihar, opposed English.
  • A side cartoon: ‘So State leaders as king-makers at the Centre is nothing new — I thought it happened only in the 1990s.’

The presidential election of 1969. After President Zakir Hussain died in 1969, the Syndicate, despite Indira Gandhi's reservations, made her long-time opponent, Lok Sabha Speaker N. Sanjeeva Reddy, the official Congress candidate. She retaliated by encouraging Vice-President V.V. Giri to stand as an independent, and announced big popular measures — nationalisation of fourteen leading private banks and the abolition of the privy purse. Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Morarji Desai differed sharply on both and left the government. Congress President Nijalingappa issued a whip for Reddy; Indira Gandhi's supporters requisitioned a special AICC meeting (hence ‘requisitionists’), which was refused; the PM, after silently supporting Giri, openly called for a ‘conscience vote’. Giri won; the official candidate lost.

The defeat formalised the split. The Congress President expelled the Prime Minister; she claimed her group was the real Congress. By November 1969 the Syndicate's group was called the Congress (Organisation) and hers the Congress (Requisitionists) — also the Old and New Congress. Indira Gandhi projected the split as an ideological divide between socialists and conservatives, the pro-poor and the pro-rich.

⤵ How the Congress split, 1967–69
1967: weakened CongressSyndicate expects a dependent PM
May 1967: Ten Point ProgrammeLeft orientation; Syndicate approves with reservations
1969: Zakir Hussain diesSyndicate nominates Sanjeeva Reddy over the PM's reservations
PM's movesbacks V.V. Giri; nationalises 14 banks; presses for ending privy purses
Syndicate's movesparty whip for Reddy; AICC requisition refused; Morarji leaves government
‘Conscience vote’ — Giri winsofficial candidate defeated
November 1969: splitPM expelled; Congress (O) and Congress (R)
Congress (Organisation) — ‘Syndicate’Congress (Requisitionists) — Indira GandhiLeadersKamaraj, Nijalingappa, S.K. Patil,Sanjeeva Reddy, Atulya Ghosh, MorarjiIndira Gandhi and supporters;advisers from outside the party1969 candidateN. Sanjeeva Reddy (official)V.V. Giri (independent)Methodparty whip to vote for Reddy;discipline of the organisation‘conscience vote’; requisitionedAICC meeting (refused)Their casebreach of discipline; ‘politicalnarcissism’ (Nijalingappa)socialists vs conservatives;pro-poor vs pro-richOutcome, 197116 Lok Sabha seats352 seats; the ‘real’ CongressNCERT pages 81–84, 87 · each side’s case is given as it stated it, not as a verdict
The two sides of the split, each in its own words.
Beyond NCERT — exact facts of 1969 (UPSC 1989)
  • Zakir Hussain died on 3 May 1969; Giri resigned as Vice-President to contest, and was elected on 20 August 1969 after second-preference votes were counted — no candidate had a majority of first preferences.
  • Fourteen banks with deposits over ₹50 crore were nationalised by ordinance on 19 July 1969; the Supreme Court struck down the first law on compensation grounds (R.C. Cooper, 1970), and Parliament passed a fresh Act in 1970.
  • The Congress Working Committee loyal to Nijalingappa expelled Indira Gandhi on 12 November 1969. Her government lost its own majority; as the largest opposition group, the Congress (O)'s Ram Subhag Singh became, in December 1969, the first formally recognised Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha (UPSC 1989).
Beyond NCERT — how the split is judged (side by side)
  • Indira Gandhi's supporters saw it as a fight to implement a socialist, pro-poor programme blocked by conservative party bosses; the popular verdict of 1971 is cited in support.
  • The Syndicate and its supporters saw it as a breach of party discipline and a bid for personal power — Nijalingappa's letter of 11 November 1969 (NCERT page 84) warned of a leader becoming a victim of ‘political narcissism’ egged on by ‘sycophants’; Morarji Desai called the abolition of privy purses a ‘breach of faith’.
  • Scholars such as Sudipta Kaviraj (Exercise Q10) argue the new politics centralised the party and turned ideology into electoral slogans; others credit the period with bringing the poor and marginal groups into the Congress's base. Present both.
Reading the box ‘Abolition of Privy Purse’ (page 84)Integration of the princely States had been preceded by an assurance that rulers' families could keep some private property and receive an allowance — the privy purse — based on the extent, revenue and potential of their State. There was little criticism at the time, as integration came first. But hereditary privileges sat badly with the Constitution's equality and justice; Nehru was dissatisfied. After 1967 Indira Gandhi backed abolition; Morarji Desai called it morally wrong, a ‘breach of faith with the princes’. A constitutional amendment failed in the Rajya Sabha in 1970; the government's next step was struck down by the Supreme Court; abolition became a major issue in the 1971 election, and after the victory the Constitution was amended to remove the legal obstacles.
⤵ Ending the privy purses
1947–49: assurance at integrationallowances and privileges for former rulers (Chapter 1)
After 1967: demand for abolitionequality vs ‘breach of faith’ (Morarji Desai)
1970: amendment fails in the Rajya Sabhashort of the special majority
1970: executive step struck downNCERT calls it an ordinance (see trap)
1971 election issuestrong public support
1971: Constitution amendedprivy purses abolished (Beyond NCERT: 26th Amendment)
Privy purse: precise pointsNCERT says the government ‘issued an ordinance’ that was struck down. Beyond NCERT: in September 1970 the President issued orders de-recognising the rulers, which the Supreme Court struck down in Madhav Rao Scindia v. Union of India (December 1970). Abolition came through the 26th Amendment Act, 1971, which deleted Articles 291 and 362. Safe line: privy purses were abolished by the 26th Amendment (1971) after a failed amendment and an executive order struck down by the Supreme Court in 1970.
Reading Laxman's ‘The Left Hook’, the V.V. Giri note, the Hindustan Times page and Vijayan's cartoon (pages 83–85)
  • Laxman, 21 August 1969: a garlanded boxer — V.V. Giri — raises his gloves in victory while the Syndicate's nominee, represented by Nijalingappa, kneels clutching a battered bag marked ‘Congress’; Indira Gandhi stands in the corner. The title ‘The Left Hook’ ties the knockout to the PM's leftward turn.
  • Note on Giri (1894–1980): labour leader, High Commissioner to Ceylon, Labour Minister, Governor of U.P., Kerala and Mysore, Vice-President 1967–69 and acting President after Zakir Hussain's death; resigned and won as an independent with Indira Gandhi's support; President 1969–74.
  • Hindustan Times, 16 August 1969: ‘PM insists on free vote — Congress splits on historic day — No-confidence move against Nijalingappa’.
  • Vijayan in Shankar's Weekly, 20 July 1969: two Syndicate leaders, waving a flag reading ‘The Indian Syndicate National’, tell a small Indira Gandhi that Bapu's wish was to see the Congress dissolved. The point: each side claimed Gandhi's legacy; the cartoonist mocks the bosses' sudden respect for it.
Reading Nijalingappa's letter (page 84)In his letter of 11 November 1969 expelling Indira Gandhi from the party, Nijalingappa wrote that history was full of instances of the tragedy that overtakes democracy when a leader who rose on a popular wave or with a democratic organisation's support becomes a victim of ‘political narcissism’, egged on by a coterie of unscrupulous sycophants. The point: the Syndicate's case was framed as a defence of party democracy against personal rule — a warning NCERT links to the next chapter.

5. The 1971 election and the restoration of the Congress

In simple wordsThe heir who split from the family firm had only a minority of shareholders. Instead of bargaining, she called a vote of all customers, offered one simple promise — ‘remove poverty’ — while her rivals' only message was ‘remove her’. The customers chose her overwhelmingly.

The split left Indira Gandhi's government a minority, sustained by issue-based support from parties including the CPI and the DMK. It projected its socialist credentials and pushed implementation of land reform laws and further land-ceiling legislation. To end dependence on others and seek a mandate, the government recommended dissolution of the Lok Sabha in December 1970 — another bold move. The fifth general election followed in 1971.

The contest seemed loaded against the Congress (R), a faction of a weakened party, while the organisation was thought to be with the Congress (O). All the major non-communist, non-Congress parties formed the Grand Alliance — NCERT lists the SSP, PSP, Bharatiya Jana Sangh, Swatantra and Bharatiya Kranti Dal; the ruling party allied with the CPI. But the new Congress had an issue, an agenda and a positive slogan; the Grand Alliance had no coherent programme. Indira Gandhi said the alliance had one common programme — ‘Indira Hatao’ (Remove Indira) — and offered her own: ‘Garibi Hatao’ (Remove Poverty): growth of the public sector, ceilings on rural land and urban property, removing disparities in income and opportunity, and abolishing princely privileges. Through it she sought a base among the landless, Dalits, Adivasis, minorities, women and unemployed youth — an independent nationwide support base.

The outcome. The Congress(R)–CPI alliance won more seats and votes than the Congress had in any of the first four elections: 375 seats and 48.4% of votes; the Congress(R) alone won 352 seats with about 44%. The Congress (O), with so many stalwarts, won less than a quarter of Indira Gandhi's party's votes and just 16 seats. The Grand Alliance won fewer than 60. Indira Gandhi's Congress established its claim to be the ‘real’ Congress. Soon after came the East Pakistan crisis and the 1971 war (Chapter 4), which added to her popularity — even opposition leaders admired her statesmanship — and her party swept the State Assembly elections of 1972. Seen as protector of the poor and a strong nationalist leader, within four years she had warded off the challenges to her leadership and to Congress dominance.

The 1971 Lok Sabha result in NCERT’s numbers (seats; bars to scale)Congress(R)–CPI combine375 seats · 48.4% votesCongress(R) alone352 seats · about 44% votesGrand Alliance (all)fewer than 60 seatsCongress(O)16 seats · under a quarter of Congress(R)’s votesmajority (259 of 518*)Grand Alliance bar drawn dashed at its stated maximum (‘less than 60’) · * House size 518: ECI figure (Beyond NCERT)
The 1971 result in NCERT's numbers.
1967196819691970197119721973Feb 19674th generalelectionMay 1967Ten PointProgrammeMay 1969President ZakirHussain diesJuly 1969*14 banksnationalisedAug 1969V.V. Girielected PresidentNov 1969Congress splits:(O) and (R)Dec 1970Lok SabhadissolvedMar 1971*5th general election:Congress(R) 352Dec 1971Bangladeshwar won1972State elections:Congress sweepsTo scale by month · * Beyond NCERT month (NCERT: banks nationalised in 1969; 1971 election ‘held in February’ — see trap)
From the 1967 shock to the 1972 sweep, to scale by month.
⤵ Restoration, 1969–72
Minority government after the splitissue-based support from the CPI and DMK
Socialist credentialsland reform push; bank nationalisation; privy purses
December 1970: Lok Sabha dissolveda fresh mandate sought
Congress(R) + CPI‘Garibi Hatao’ — a positive programme
Grand Allianceno common programme beyond ‘Indira Hatao’ (her charge)
1971: 352 seats (combine 375)Congress(O) 16; Grand Alliance fewer than 60
Bangladesh war, December 1971popularity soars
1972: Congress sweeps State electionsdominance restored — but a different party
When was the 1971 election held?NCERT says the fifth general election was held in February 1971. Beyond NCERT: polling took place between 1 and 10 March 1971, with results in mid-March. Safe line: the fifth general election, March 1971, called a year early after the Lok Sabha was dissolved in December 1970. NCERT's list of Grand Alliance members does not mention the Congress (O), which standard accounts treat as a central member; the ‘fewer than 60’ combined tally is NCERT's.
Reading Laxman's ‘The Grand Finish’, ‘The cup that cheers’ and Kutty's conveyor belt (pages 87–88)
  • ‘The Grand Finish’ (Laxman): on a ‘Mid-term race’ podium marked 1, 2 and 3, three Indira Gandhis stand on steps labelled ‘strong constituency’, ‘weak constituency’ and ‘doubtful constituency’; leading opposition figures, still bunched near the start, exclaim: ‘I can't believe it! I thought I was coming first, you second and he third…!’ The point: she won even where she was weakest; the opposition's calculations collapsed.
  • ‘The cup that cheers’ (Laxman): Indira Gandhi lifts a trophy labelled ‘massive support’ — after 1971 the popular mandate itself was her prize.
  • Kutty: Chief Ministers labelled Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Haryana, Punjab, M.P., A.P., Bihar and Assam move along a factory conveyor belt as Indira Gandhi picks and places them. NCERT: the new manner of choosing CMs inspired it. The point: after 1971 the central leader, not State party units, chose Chief Ministers — a sign of centralisation.
Reading the side cartoon on ‘Garibi Hatao’ (page 86)‘Almost four decades after Garibi Hatao we still have much poverty around — was the slogan only an election gimmick?’ (NCERT wrote this when four decades had passed; it is now over fifty years.) Two views: critics such as Sudipta Kaviraj (Exercise Q10) argue slogans replaced real programmes; supporters point to the policies that followed — bank branches in villages, land-ceiling laws, rural employment and anti-poverty schemes — while admitting implementation fell short. Answer with both.

6. A restored system — or a new Congress?

In simple wordsReplace a table's top and its legs and call it the old table: it stands in the same place and does the same job, but it isn't the same table. NCERT says the Congress of 1972 was like that.

Did Indira Gandhi restore the Congress system? NCERT's answer: she did not revive the old party; she re-invented it. The party was as popular as before but different: it relied on the popularity of a supreme leader; its organisation was somewhat weak; it had few factions and so could not accommodate all opinions and interests; and it depended more on particular groups — the poor, women, Dalits, Adivasis and minorities. ‘Thus Indira Gandhi restored the Congress system by changing the nature of the Congress system itself.’

Old Congress system (1950s)New Congress (after 1971)Leadershipmany leaders; strong State bossesrelied on one supreme leaderOrganisationstrong, federal, down to the local levelsomewhat weak organisational structureFactionsmany — tolerated and balancedfew; less room for dissentSocial baserainbow coalition of all groupsthe poor, women, Dalits,Adivasis, minoritiesCapacityabsorbed tensions and conflictsless able to absorb conflictNCERT page 89: Indira Gandhi ‘restored the Congress system by changing the nature of the Congress system itself’
Old Congress system and new Congress, as NCERT compares them.

Despite greater popularity, the new Congress could not absorb tensions and conflicts as the old system had. As the party consolidated and Indira Gandhi gained unprecedented authority, NCERT says, the spaces for democratic expression of people's aspirations actually shrank, while unrest over development and deprivation kept growing — leading to the political crisis of the next chapter.

Reading the side cartoon and ‘Let's watch a film: Zanjeer’ (page 89)
  • A boy: ‘That is like changing the top and legs of a table and still calling it the old table! What was common between the Old and the New Congress?’ Common: the name and legacy, broad national appeal, a centrist-to-left programme and dominance at the polls; different: leadership, organisation, factions and social base.
  • Zanjeer (1973, Prakash Mehra; screenplay Salim–Javed; Amitabh Bachchan): a police officer framed and jailed takes revenge on gangsters with tacit support from within the system. NCERT: it portrayed eroding moral values and deep frustration — the ‘angry young man’ of the seventies — a cultural sign of the discontent that the new Congress could not absorb.

NCERT's in-text questions, cartoons and activities — short answers

‘When France or Canada have similar problems, no one talks of failure. Why are we under constant suspicion?’ (page 73)
Because India was new, poor, very diverse and among the few post-colonial democracies; many observers assumed such countries needed authoritarian rule. Successive peaceful successions and elections disproved the suspicion.
‘It must have been difficult for her — one woman in a world dominated by men. Why don't we have more women in such positions?’ (page 76)
Barriers include party ticket distribution, social norms, money and muscle power in elections. Remedies: reservation (local bodies since 1992–93; legislatures under the 106th Amendment once implemented), party quotas, and support for women's leadership.
‘Is non-Congressism relevant today? Could it be applied against the Left Front in West Bengal?’ (page 79)
The logic — rivals uniting against a dominant party — recurs whenever one party dominates a State or the nation. (The Left Front lost power in West Bengal in 2011.) Such alliances often struggle without a common programme, as 1967 and 1971 showed.
‘What's so unusual about hung assemblies and coalitions?’ (page 80)
Nothing today; in 1967 they were new, because the Congress had governed almost everywhere since 1952. 1967 marked the beginning of coalition politics in the States.
‘So State leaders as king-makers at the Centre is nothing new?’ (page 82)
Right — the Syndicate of State bosses chose Shastri and Indira Gandhi. In the 1990s regional parties played a similar role in coalition governments (Chapter 8).
‘Was Garibi Hatao only an election gimmick?’ (page 86)
Both views: it mobilised the poor and led to some policies (bank nationalisation's spread of credit, land ceilings, anti-poverty schemes), but poverty persisted and critics saw slogans replacing organisation and programmes. Judge by outcomes and implementation.
‘Like changing the top and legs of a table — what was common between the Old and New Congress?’ (page 89)
Name, legacy, dominance and a broadly centrist-left programme. Different: leader-centred rather than organisation-centred, fewer factions, a narrower and more specific social base, weaker capacity to absorb conflict.

NCERT exercise — answer outlines

Try each first. Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4 are also in the self-check.

Q1. Which statement(s) about the 1967 elections is/are correct? (a) Congress won the Lok Sabha but lost Assembly elections in many States (b) lost both (c) lost its Lok Sabha majority but formed a coalition (d) retained power with an increased majority.
(a) only — it kept a Lok Sabha majority (its lowest since 1952) and lost power in nine States.
Q2. Match: (a) Syndicate (b) Defection (c) Slogan (d) Anti-Congressism — with: (i) an elected representative leaving the party on whose ticket s/he was elected (ii) a catchy phrase that attracts public attention (iii) parties with different ideologies coming together to oppose the Congress (iv) a group of powerful and influential leaders within the Congress.
(a)–(iv); (b)–(i); (c)–(ii); (d)–(iii).
Q3. Whom would you identify with: (a) Jai Jawan, Jai Kisan (b) Indira Hatao! (c) Garibi Hatao!
(a) Lal Bahadur Shastri. (b) The Grand Alliance of opposition parties in 1971 — as Indira Gandhi characterised their only common programme. (c) Indira Gandhi and the Congress (R), 1971.
Q4. Which statement about the Grand Alliance of 1971 is correct? (a) formed by non-communist, non-Congress parties (b) had a clear political and ideological programme (c) formed by all non-Congress parties.
(a). Not (b) — NCERT says it lacked a coherent programme; not (c) — the CPI was allied with the Congress (R).
Q5. How should a party resolve internal differences? Assess: (a) follow the party president (b) listen to the majority group (c) secret ballot on every issue (d) consult senior leaders.
(a) Quick and disciplined, but can become authoritarian and silence dissent. (b) Democratic, but may ignore minorities and cause splits. (c) Protects free choice (as in 1966), but slow and impractical for every issue. (d) Draws on experience, but can entrench a coterie (the Syndicate). Best: internal elections, open debate in party forums, consensus where possible and majority votes where necessary, with respect for minorities.
Q6. Which were reasons for the Congress's 1967 defeat? (a) absence of a charismatic leader (b) split in the party (c) increased mobilisation of regional, ethnic and communal groups (d) increasing unity among non-Congress parties (e) internal differences in the Congress.
Yes: (a) — first election without Nehru, a new PM seen as a novice; (c) — e.g. the DMK and anti-Hindi agitation, regional parties, communal riots; (d) — non-Congressism, fronts and seat adjustments; (e) — factionalism, later defections. No: (b) — the formal split came in 1969, after the election. Add the economic crisis and price rise.
Q7. What made Indira Gandhi's government popular in the early 1970s?
‘Garibi Hatao’ and a pro-poor programme; visible measures — bank nationalisation, privy purse abolition, land ceilings; appeal to the landless, Dalits, Adivasis, minorities, women and youth; victory in the 1971 war and the creation of Bangladesh; image of a decisive national leader; a disunited opposition with no programme.
Q8. What was the ‘Syndicate’? What role did it play?
An informal group of powerful Congress organisational leaders — Kamaraj, S.K. Patil, Nijalingappa, Sanjeeva Reddy, Atulya Ghosh. It made Shastri and then Indira Gandhi PM, shaped her first ministry and policies, and expected to guide her; it nominated Sanjeeva Reddy for President in 1969, expelled her, and led the Congress (O) after the split, losing power after 1971.
Q9. What major issue led to the formal split of 1969?
The 1969 presidential election: the Syndicate's official candidate Sanjeeva Reddy versus the independent V.V. Giri backed by Indira Gandhi; the whip, the requisitioned AICC meeting, the ‘conscience vote’ and Giri's victory led to her expulsion and the Congress (O)/(R) split. Background: the power struggle, the Left turn (Ten Point Programme, bank nationalisation, privy purses) and Morarji Desai's exit.
Q10. Kaviraj: Indira Gandhi turned the federal, democratic, ideological Congress into a centralised, undemocratic organisation; populist slogans replaced ideology; amid victory the party as an organisation ‘died’. (a) Nehru's vs Indira Gandhi's strategies (b) why ‘died’? (c) effect on other parties.
(a) Nehru: federal, internally democratic party with strong State leaders and real ideological debate; Indira Gandhi (per Kaviraj): centralised control, direct appeal to voters through slogans, and leaders chosen from the top. (b) Because internal elections, factional bargaining and organisational strength gave way to dependence on one leader — the party won elections but lost its life as an organisation. (c) Other parties also became more leader-centred and slogan-driven, and opposition politics focused on one person (‘Indira Hatao’); later, coalitions of parties against a dominant leader became common. This is one scholar's critical view; defenders stress her mobilisation of the poor.
Let us do it together: list party slogans; compare manifestos and slogans with advertisements; discuss how price rise affects parties' fortunes.
Examples to begin: ‘Jai Jawan Jai Kisan’, ‘Garibi Hatao’, ‘Indira Hatao’. Like advertisements, slogans simplify, appeal to emotion and promise benefits; manifestos are fuller but also persuasive. Price rise hurt the Congress in 1967 and has shaped many later elections.

What to remember

Numbers

Nehru's deathMay 1964 (27 May — Beyond NCERT)
Shastri as PM1964–66; died at Tashkent, 11 January 1966
Indira Gandhi elected Congress leaderJanuary 1966; over two-thirds of MPs (355–169 — Beyond NCERT)
Devaluation1966: under ₹5 to over ₹7 per dollar (₹4.76 → ₹7.50 — Beyond NCERT)
Fourth general electionFebruary 1967
Congress Lok Sabha seats 1967 (ECI, Beyond NCERT)283 of 520
States where Congress lost power, 19679 (7 lost majority + 2 by defections)
DMK founded / in power in Madras1949 / 1967
Ten Point ProgrammeMay 1967
Banks nationalised14, in 1969 (19 July — Beyond NCERT)
Presidential election won by V.V. Giri1969 (20 August — Beyond NCERT)
Congress split: (O) and (R)November 1969
Lok Sabha dissolvedDecember 1970
1971: Congress(R) / with CPI352 seats, ~44% / 375 seats, 48.4%
1971: Congress(O) / Grand Alliance16 seats / fewer than 60
Privy purses abolished1971 (26th Amendment — Beyond NCERT)
Anti-defection law (Beyond NCERT)52nd Amendment, 1985 (Tenth Schedule)
First recognised Leader of the Opposition (Beyond NCERT)Ram Subhag Singh, December 1969

One-liners

  • After Nehru, who? — and, more seriously, after Nehru, what?
  • Shastri by consensus (1964); Indira Gandhi by secret ballot (1966).
  • 1967: a ‘political earthquake’ — Congress lost nine States.
  • Non-Congressism: divided votes kept the Congress in power.
  • SVD governments were ideologically incongruent; defections made and unmade them.
  • Indira Gandhi turned a power struggle into an ideological struggle.
  • 1969: Giri vs Reddy → Congress (O) vs Congress (R).
  • Garibi Hatao vs Indira Hatao — 1971 restored dominance, but in a changed party.

Traps to avoid

  • In 1967 the Congress kept its Lok Sabha majority; it lost power in nine States.
  • The 1969 split came after the 1967 election — it was not a reason for the 1967 losses.
  • The DMK (1967) was the first non-Congress party with a majority of its own in a State; the first non-Congress State government is usually dated to Kerala 1957.
  • V.V. Giri won as an independent; Sanjeeva Reddy was the official Congress candidate.
  • The Grand Alliance was non-communist; the CPI was allied with the Congress (R).
  • Privy purses were abolished by the 26th Amendment (1971), not by the 1970 order.
  • The 1971 general election was held in March 1971 (NCERT says February).
  • ‘Indira Hatao’ was Indira Gandhi's description of the opposition's programme, not an official opposition slogan.

How to strategise

Prelims — what UPSC asks

  • Firsts: the first non-Congress State government (1987 — Kerala 1957 in the key; the DMK in 1967 was the first single-party non-Congress majority); the first recognised Leader of the Opposition, Ram Subhag Singh of the Congress (O), 1969 (1989).
  • Likely areas: the 1969 presidential election (Giri, independent, second preferences), bank nationalisation (14 banks, 1969), privy purses (26th Amendment), anti-defection (52nd Amendment, Tenth Schedule — tested from Indian Constitution at Work).

Mains — where it appears and how to answer

  • GS1 2013: a critical note on ‘Jai Jawan Jai Kisan’ — its origin in 1965 (war and food crisis), its link to the Green Revolution and food self-sufficiency, and its later adaptations; assess both its mobilising power and its limits.
  • Answer frame for 1964–72: succession tests → 1967 crisis and non-Congressism → coalitions and defections → Syndicate vs Indira, the 1969 split → 1971 and ‘Garibi Hatao’ → a restored but centralised Congress. Give each side's stated case (Syndicate and Indira Gandhi; Kaviraj's critique and the pro-poor defence) and avoid present-day comparisons.

Self-check

Tap an option. NCERT's own exercise questions come first; the rest test the figures and common confusions.

1. NCERT Q1: Which statement about the 1967 elections is correct?

2. NCERT Q2: ‘Anti-Congressism’ is best matched with:

3. NCERT Q3: ‘Jai Jawan, Jai Kisan’ is identified with:

4. NCERT Q4: The Grand Alliance of 1971:

5. In the 1969 presidential election, V.V. Giri contested as:

6. The first Leader of the Opposition to get formal recognition in the Lok Sabha was:

7. In 1967, the first non-Congress party to win a majority on its own in a State was:

UPSC questions from this chapter

Open any question to attempt it in the Question bank — your attempt is saved to your progress.

Prelims

2 questions · newest first
1989Prelims GSThe first Leader of the opposition to get recognition in the Indian Parliament wasAttempt →1987Prelims GSFirst non-Congress government to come in power in any Indian State isAttempt →

Mains

1 questions
2013GS1Write a critical note on the evolution and significance of the slogan “Jai Jawana Jai Kisan”. (Answer in 200 words)Write answer →

2 Prelims and 1 Mains UPSC questions are linked to this chapter. More from Politics in India since Independence.