Every NCERT book that matters for UPSC — open a book, then a chapter. Learn each chapter's concepts, then how UPSC tests them — with diagrams, flowcharts and the past questions to attempt.
Thinking
Start here: why this chapter matters
This is the seventh chapter of NCERT's Class 11 Psychology textbook (pages 109–125). It describes the nature of thinking and its building blocks — mental images and concepts; three processes of thinking — problem solving, reasoning and decision-making; the nature, process and enhancement of creative thinking; the relationship between thought and language; and the development and use of language. It has three boxes, five figures (7.2 in two parts), one table, three activities, nine review questions and one project idea; the answers to Activity 7.2 are on page 125. (Beyond NCERT: the chapter does not use the words ‘heuristic’ or ‘bias’; since these are central to GS4, they appear here in clearly marked Beyond-NCERT notes.)
- Builds on What is Psychology? (the cognitive approach), Human Development (Piaget's sensorimotor stage, which Vygotsky's account cites), Learning (Skinner's shaping and reinforcement, which NCERT uses for language; Köhler's insight, a cousin of ‘illumination’) and Human Memory (concepts live in semantic memory). Leads into Chapter 8, Motivation and Emotion (NCERT names lack of motivation as an obstacle to problem solving).
- Pairs with live chapters: Class 12 psychology Variations in Psychological Attributes (intelligence and creativity measured as abilities — this chapter is the process view), and Self and Personality (self-regulation). The constitutional side of mother tongues and languages lies in the polity chapters.
- UPSC: psychology has no GS paper of its own; this chapter's main home is GS4 Ethics — ethical decision-making and its pitfalls, reason and critical thinking, and creativity and innovation in public service (asked in 2021 and 2025) — and the Essay, which set three thinking topics in 2023 alone (decision-making at the intersection of intuition and logic; creativity in the mundane; thinking needing an ‘opposite team’) and ‘Thought finds a world and creates one also’ in 2025. Box 7.3 supports GS1/GS2 points on India's linguistic diversity and mother-tongue education. No Prelims question tests the chapter.
| Word | What it means here |
|---|---|
| Thinking | A higher mental process of manipulating and analysing acquired or stored information |
| Mental image | A mental representation of a sensory experience — ‘seeing with the mind's eye’ |
| Concept | A mental representation of a category: a class of objects, ideas or events sharing common properties |
| Problem solving | Goal-directed thinking linking an initial state (the problem) to an end state (the goal) |
| Mental set | A tendency to solve problems by already-tried steps; helps speed, but creates rigidity |
| Functional fixedness | Failing to solve a problem because one is fixed on an object's usual function |
| Deductive / inductive reasoning | From a general assumption to a particular conclusion / from particular observations to a general conclusion |
| Analogy | Reasoning of the form A is to B as C is to D |
| Judgment | Drawing conclusions, forming opinions and evaluating events or objects on available evidence |
| Decision-making | Choosing among already-known alternatives by weighing their costs and benefits |
| Convergent / divergent thinking | Thinking towards one correct answer / open-ended thinking producing many answers (Guilford) |
| Lateral thinking | De Bono's term for seeking alternative ways of defining and interpreting a problem |
| Incubation / illumination | Setting a problem aside / the sudden ‘Aha!’ when an idea emerges |
| Brainstorming | Osborn's technique: produce ideas freely, postpone judging them |
| Linguistic relativity | Whorf's view that language determines the content of thought (strong form: linguistic determinism) |
| Holophrase / telegraphic speech | A one-word ‘sentence’ / two-word utterances of mostly nouns and verbs |
| Bilingualism / multilingualism | Proficiency in two / more than two languages |
At a glance — the six ideas to carry away
- Thinking = manipulating and analysing information; internal, inferred from behaviour; built on mental images and concepts (mental representations of categories). Box 7.1: analytical (American) vs holistic (East Asian) thinking.
- Problem solving = goal-directed thinking, initial state → goal; seven steps (Table 7.1). Obstacles: mental set (water jars), functional fixedness (a book as a hammer), lack of motivation.
- Reasoning: deductive (general → particular; fails if the assumption is false), inductive (particular → general; most scientific reasoning), analogy (A : B :: C : D).
- Judgment (forming opinions from evidence; may be automatic) and decision-making (choosing among known options by costs and benefits) are interrelated.
- Creative thinking: novel, original, appropriate; Bruner's ‘effective surprise’. Guilford: convergent vs divergent (fluency, flexibility, originality, elaboration). De Bono: lateral vs vertical; six hats. Process: preparation → incubation → illumination → verification; Osborn's brainstorming.
- Thought and language: Whorf (language → thought; linguistic relativity), Piaget (thought → language), Vygotsky (separate, merge at ~2). Language = symbols + rules + communication; babbling ~6 m, one word ~1 yr, two words 18–20 m; Skinner (learning) vs Chomsky (universal grammar); Box 7.3: multilingualism is a way of life in India.
1. The nature of thinking: images and concepts
Thinking is the base of all cognitive activities. It goes beyond the given: looking at a painting, you do not just register colours and strokes; you interpret it, relate it to what you know, and create a new meaning that adds to your knowledge. NCERT defines thinking as a higher mental process through which we manipulate and analyse acquired or existing information — by abstracting, reasoning, imagining, problem solving, judging and decision-making. Thinking is mostly organised and goal-directed (from cooking to a maths sum): one plans, recalls steps used before for familiar tasks, and infers new strategies for new ones. It is an internal process inferred from overt behaviour — you cannot see a chess player's thoughts, only infer the strategies he weighed from his next move.
Building blocks. Thinking relies on knowledge we already possess, represented as mental images or words (concepts). An image is a mental representation of a sensory experience; it can be used to think about things, places and events — imagining a cat on a branch with its tail curved, or standing before the Taj Mahal and describing what you ‘see’. A concept is a mental representation of a category: a class of objects, ideas or events that share common properties. Meeting something new, we extract its features and match them to an existing category; if the match fits, we give it that category's name — and also inherit the category's other properties.
Why form concepts? They organise knowledge so that it can be reached quickly and with less effort — like a child who keeps books, geometry box and pencils in fixed places, or a library that shelves and labels books by subject. Categorising makes thinking quick and efficient. (Beyond NCERT: the price of that speed is that category-based inferences can be wrong — the dog may be friendly — which is one root of stereotypes about people; see section 4.)
| Does culture shape thinking style? (attributed) | What it holds |
|---|---|
| NCERT (Box 7.1) | Americans think analytically, Asians holistically; social practices shape thinking |
| Takahiko Masuda and Richard Nisbett (Beyond NCERT: 2001) | the underwater-scene study itself: Japanese participants mentioned background and relations more, and recognised fish less well when the background changed |
| Richard Nisbett and colleagues (Beyond NCERT: The Geography of Thought, 2003) | the contrast reflects social structures and philosophical traditions — Greek individual agency versus Chinese emphasis on harmony and context |
| Thomas Talhelm and colleagues (Beyond NCERT: 2014) | differences exist within one country — in China, people from rice-growing regions tested more holistic than people from wheat regions — so ‘East versus West’ is too coarse |
| Critics of broad cultural typing (Beyond NCERT) | effects are averages with large overlap between individuals; they shift with priming and situation, so they describe tendencies, not fixed national minds |
- Building blocks of thought: mental images and concepts.
- Image = representation of a sensory experience; concept = representation of a category.
- Thinking is internal, inferred from behaviour.
- Box 7.1: analytical = objects separately (Americans); holistic = relations and background (East Asians).
- NCERT calls thinking ‘unique to human beings’; its own Chapter 5 describes Köhler's chimpanzees solving problems by insight. Treat ‘unique’ as NCERT's emphasis on human thought's complexity, not a settled claim.
2. Problem solving and its obstacles
Problem solving is thinking that is goal-directed. Problems are not only obstacles; any activity aimed at a defined goal — fixing a cycle, planning a summer trip, mending a friendship, making a quick snack for a friend — is a problem. Some are solved quickly from immediate cues; others need time and effort. Every problem has an initial state (the problem) and an end state (the goal), connected by mental operations. NCERT illustrates them with organising a play for Teachers' Day.
Obstacles. NCERT names two major obstacles — mental set and lack of motivation — and adds functional fixedness. Mental set is the tendency to solve problems by following mental operations that worked before. Prior success often helps with a new problem, but it also creates a rigidity that blocks new rules or strategies — as when, after a few sums of one type, you keep applying the same steps until they fail and then find it hard to let go of them. Functional fixedness occurs when people fail to solve a problem because they are fixed on a thing's usual function; if you have hammered a nail with a hardbound book, you have overcome it. Lack of motivation: skill is useless if one gives up at the first failure; persistence is needed.
- Abraham Luchins (1942) devised the water-jar (‘Einstellung’) problems that Activity 7.2 adapts; participants who had practised the long formula often used it on problems that a simple formula solved, and many failed a problem only the simple formula could solve.
- Karl Duncker's candle problem (published 1945) is the classic test of functional fixedness: given a candle, a box of tacks and matches, people rarely think of emptying the box and using it as a shelf; they do so more often when the tacks are presented outside the box.
- Psychologists distinguish algorithms — step-by-step procedures that guarantee a solution if one exists (trying every arrangement of an anagram) — from heuristics — rules of thumb that are fast but can fail (looking for familiar letter clusters such as ‘-ion’). A mental set is a heuristic that has hardened.
- Problem solving = goal-directed; initial state → mental operations → goal.
- Table 7.1 has seven operations, ending with ‘rethink and redefine’.
- NCERT's two major obstacles: mental set and lack of motivation; functional fixedness is added ‘like mental set’.
- Mental set can help as well as hinder.
- Water jars: problems 1–6 yield to B − A − 2C; problem 7 needs A − C.
3. Reasoning: deduction, induction and analogy
Reasoning is the process of gathering and analysing information to arrive at conclusions; it is a form of problem solving whose goal is to determine what can be concluded from given information. NCERT's example: a man running desperately along a railway platform. Deductive reasoning begins with a general assumption you know or believe to be true and draws a specific conclusion — reasoning from general to particular. ‘People run on platforms only when late for a train; this man is running; so he is late.’ The common mistake: assuming the base statement without knowing it is true — people also run on platforms for other reasons. Inductive reasoning draws a general conclusion from particular observations: you watch the man enter a compartment and come back with a bag, and conclude he had left it there. Its common mistake is jumping to a conclusion before all the facts are known. NCERT adds that most scientific reasoning is inductive — scientists and lay persons consider instances and seek the general rule that covers them.
Analogy is a third form with four parts — A is to B as C is to D — the relation between the first pair matching the relation between the second: water is to fish as air is to humans; white is to snow as black is to coal. Analogies help in solving problems by bringing out salient attributes of an object or event that would otherwise go unnoticed.
| Valid form | Invalid form | |
|---|---|---|
| True premises | ‘All cats have four legs; Tom is a cat; so Tom has four legs’ — sound: the conclusion must be true | the mouse: ‘All cats have four legs; I have four legs; so I am a cat’ — true premises, false conclusion |
| A false premise | NCERT's platform: ‘People run only when late; he runs; so he is late’ — follows, but the assumption is false, so the conclusion may be false | both faults at once — nothing can be trusted |
| Reasoning in another tradition (attributed) | In its own terms |
|---|---|
| Nyāya inference (anumāna) (Beyond NCERT) | the classical five-membered argument: proposition (pratijñā: the hill has fire), reason (hetu: because it has smoke), example (udāharaṇa: wherever there is smoke there is fire, as in a kitchen), application (upanaya: this hill has such smoke), conclusion (nigamana: so the hill has fire) |
| Scholars of Indian logic (Beyond NCERT: e.g. Bimal Krishna Matilal) | because it joins a general rule (deductive) to a cited instance (inductive support), the Nyāya syllogism is often described as combining both forms rather than fitting either alone |
| NCERT | presents deduction and induction as two separate routes, with analogy as a third |
- Deductive = general → particular, starts from an assumption. Inductive = particular → general, starts from observation.
- Deduction's typical error: an untrue assumption; induction's: jumping to conclusions.
- NCERT: most scientific reasoning is inductive (Beyond NCERT: philosophers such as Karl Popper stressed the deductive testing of hypotheses — science uses both).
- Analogy has four parts.
4. Judgment and decision-making
Reasoning allows us to make judgments: we draw conclusions, form opinions and evaluate events and objects on knowledge and available evidence. NCERT's example: a talkative, sociable man who convinces others easily is judged suitable for a salesperson's job — a judgment based on the characteristics of an expert salesperson. Some judgments are automatic, needing no conscious effort, a matter of habit — braking on seeing a red light. Others draw on past knowledge and experience (evaluating a novel) or on personal preferences (judging a painting's beauty). Judgments are therefore not independent of our beliefs and attitudes, and they change with new information — students who judge a new teacher very strict on day one may, after closer interaction, judge her extremely student-friendly.
Decision-making is choosing among alternatives by evaluating the costs and benefits of each — what to wear, what to eat, psychology or economics in Class XI (interest, prospects, books, teachers; advice from seniors and faculty; attending a few classes). It differs from other problem solving because the possible solutions are already known and one has to be selected. A friend chosen for state-level badminton just before the final examinations must evaluate all possible outcomes. People differ in priorities, so their decisions differ. And because real life calls for quick decisions, we cannot always evaluate every situation thoroughly and exhaustively. Judgment and decision-making are interrelated.
| Judgment | Decision-making | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | forms an opinion or evaluation from evidence | selects one of several known options |
| Can it be automatic? | yes — braking at a red light | usually deliberate; quick under time pressure |
| Shaped by | knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, preferences; revised with new information | costs, benefits and personal priorities |
| NCERT example | the talkative man suits sales; the ‘strict’ new teacher | psychology or economics; badminton or exams |
- Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman's paper ‘Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’ (Science, 1974) described three mental shortcuts. Representativeness: judging by resemblance to a typical case — NCERT's salesperson judgment is exactly this, and it ignores how many talkative people are not salespeople (base rates). Availability: judging frequency by how easily examples come to mind — air crashes seem commoner than they are after news coverage. Anchoring: estimates stay close to an initial number, even an irrelevant one.
- Confirmation bias: seeking evidence that supports what one already believes; Peter Wason's ‘2-4-6’ rule-discovery task (1960) showed people testing only confirming cases.
- Groupthink: Irving Janis (1972) described how cohesive groups suppress dissent and reach poor decisions.
- Kahneman received the economics Nobel in 2002 (Tversky had died in 1996); Herbert Simon received it in 1978, for work on decision-making in organisations, including bounded rationality and satisficing — choosing the first option that is good enough.
| How should decision-making be modelled? (attributed) | What it holds |
|---|---|
| NCERT | evaluate the costs and benefits of each known alternative; priorities differ; real life forces quick, less-than-exhaustive choices |
| Rational-choice models (Beyond NCERT: expected-utility theory in economics) | an ideal decision-maker lists all options, weighs outcomes by probability and value, and picks the best |
| Herbert Simon (Beyond NCERT: from the 1950s) | limited time, information and attention make people satisfice — bounded rationality is realistic, not a defect |
| Kahneman and Tversky (Beyond NCERT: from 1974) | intuitive shortcuts produce systematic, predictable errors; debiasing and careful procedures help |
| Gerd Gigerenzer (Beyond NCERT: e.g. with Daniel Goldstein, 1996) | simple ‘fast and frugal’ heuristics are often accurate in real environments; the problem is using them in the wrong setting |
- In decision-making the alternatives are already known; in problem solving they may have to be found.
- Judgments can be automatic (red light) and are not independent of beliefs and attitudes.
- Judgments change with new information (the ‘strict’ teacher).
- ‘Heuristics’, ‘biases’, Kahneman and Simon are not in the NCERT chapter — cite them as further reading.
5. Creative thinking: convergent and divergent
Creative thinking produced the first planted seed, the wheel and cave paintings, and today's science, technology and arts. NCERT's Indian examples: botanist A.D. Karve, who won the UK's top energy award for a smokeless chullah that turns dry sugarcane leaves into clean fuel, and Class XI student Ashish Panwar, who won a bronze medal for a five-foot robot at the First International Robotics Olympiad in Glasgow. But creativity is not only for scientists and artists: everyone has the potential. It shows in writing, teaching, cooking, story-telling, conversation, asking questions, games, organising, and helping others resolve conflicts — ‘everyday creativity’, which NCERT distinguishes from the ‘special talent creativity’ of outstanding achievements.
What makes thinking creative? (1) Novelty and originality: ideas or solutions that did not exist before — a new model of scooter is not original unless unique features are added. (2) What Bruner calls ‘effective surprise’: an unusual product startles those who meet it. (3) Appropriateness in context: being different without purpose, non-conformity, aimless fantasy or bizarre ideas are sometimes mistaken for creativity; researchers agree that thinking is creative when it is reality-oriented, appropriate, constructive and socially desirable.
J.P. Guilford, a pioneer of creativity research, proposed two types of thinking. Convergent thinking solves problems with one correct answer — the mind converges on it (3, 6, 9, … → 12). Divergent thinking is open-ended: many answers are possible, drawn from one's experience — uses of cloth; improving a chair for comfort and looks; what would happen if school examinations were abolished. Divergent thinking abilities include fluency (the number of ideas — the more uses of a paper cup, the higher the fluency), flexibility (variety — using the cup as a container and to draw a circle), originality (rare or unusual ideas, seeing new relationships, combining old and new; research shows fluency and flexibility are necessary conditions for originality) and elaboration (working out the details and implications of an idea). It also allows remote associations — linking ‘food production’ with ‘desert’ or ‘weeds’ (extracting protein from desert weeds) where most people think of seeds, fertilisers and irrigation.
| Divergent ability | What it measures | Paper-cup example |
|---|---|---|
| Fluency | how many ideas | listing twenty uses rather than five |
| Flexibility | how varied — different categories of use | a container, and also a stencil for circles |
| Originality | how rare or unusual | a megaphone, a seed-starter (our examples) |
| Elaboration | how fully an idea is worked out | how the seed-starter would drain, be labelled and be planted |
- Guilford's presidential address to the American Psychological Association in 1950 is usually credited with launching modern creativity research; his ‘structure of intellect’ model placed divergent production among many intellectual operations.
- E. Paul Torrance's Tests of Creative Thinking (first published in 1966) score fluency, flexibility, originality and elaboration — the four abilities NCERT lists.
- Sarnoff Mednick's associative theory (1962) and his Remote Associates Test treat creativity as the ability to link remote ideas.
- Jerome Bruner's ‘effective surprise’ is from his essays On Knowing (1962).
- Convergent/divergent: Guilford. ‘Effective surprise’: Bruner.
- Four divergent abilities: fluency, flexibility, originality, elaboration.
- Fluency and flexibility are necessary conditions for originality.
- Creative = novel + original + appropriate; bizarre or purposeless is not creative.
- Both convergent and divergent thinking are needed for creativity — not divergent alone.
6. Lateral thinking and the six thinking hats
NCERT says Edward de Bono used the term lateral thinking for what Guilford called divergent thinking. De Bono contrasts it with vertical thinking, whose operations move in a straight line, back and forth between lower and higher level concepts, while lateral thinking looks for alternative ways of defining and interpreting problems. In his image, vertical (logical) thinking digs the same hole deeper; lateral thinking digs a hole in another place. Lateral thinking helps make mental leaps and opens several ways of thinking.
De Bono's Six Thinking Hats technique stimulates different modes of thinking; one puts on or takes off a hat as the kind of thinking required changes. The six hats are different perspectives on an issue, and the technique works for an individual or a group.
| Is lateral thinking the same as divergent thinking? (attributed) | What it holds |
|---|---|
| NCERT (Box 7.2) | de Bono's ‘lateral thinking’ is his term for what Guilford called divergent thinking |
| Edward de Bono (Beyond NCERT: The Use of Lateral Thinking, 1967; Six Thinking Hats, 1985) | presents lateral thinking as a set of deliberate, teachable techniques for escaping established patterns — provocation, random entry, challenging assumptions |
| Academic psychologists (Beyond NCERT) | de Bono's methods are widely used in training, but they have had far less controlled testing than Guilford's and Torrance's measures; overlap with divergent thinking is a matter of interpretation |
- Lateral = digging in a new place; vertical = digging the same hole deeper (logical, step by step).
- Six hats: white facts · red feelings · black caution · yellow benefits · green creativity · blue process.
- Black hat = judgment and caution (not ‘negativity’ for its own sake); blue hat = process, not ideas.
- Usable individually and in groups.
7. The creative process and how to enhance it
Research makes clear that new ideas involve more than a flash of insight; there are stages before and after. The starting point is a need to bring out something new — not everyone feels it, as one can be content with routine — arising from sensing problems and gaps in information. Preparation: understand and analyse the task, become aware of background facts; curiosity and excitement push thinking in different directions, and divergent abilities help look from new angles. Incubation: while generating alternatives one may feel stuck or even disgusted, and leave the problem for some time; ideas may not come while one is consciously working, but strike while doing something else — going to sleep, waking up, bathing, walking. Illumination: the ‘Aha!’ or ‘I have found it’ experience, with excitement and satisfaction. Verification: the worth and appropriateness of the idea are tested and judged — here convergent thinking selects the idea that works.
Strategies for creative thinking. Research on creative people points to attitudes, dispositions and skills that can be cultivated. (1) Become more aware and sensitive — to feelings, sights, sounds, textures; spot problems, missing information, anomalies, gaps and contradictions that others miss; read widely, seek varied information, ask questions and ponder the mysteries of situations and objects. (2) Generate many ideas to increase the flow of thought, and deliberately look for multiple angles to increase flexibility — rearranging furniture for space, ways of conversing, the costs and benefits of a course, ways of dealing with an angry friend. (3) Use Osborn's brainstorming to increase fluency and flexibility in open-ended situations. (4) Use checklists and questions for a new twist: What other changes? What else? In how many ways? What other uses?
- The four stages are usually credited to Graham Wallas, The Art of Thought (1926), who drew on the mathematician Henri Poincaré's account of ideas arriving unbidden after rest.
- Alex F. Osborn, an American advertising executive, popularised brainstorming, most influentially in Applied Imagination (1953).
- Later research found that interacting brainstorming groups often produce fewer ideas than the same number of people working alone and pooling them (‘nominal groups’) — through waiting turns, social loafing and fear of evaluation (e.g. Michael Diehl and Wolfgang Stroebe, 1987). Written ‘brainwriting’ variants were designed to avoid this.
- Experimental reviews (e.g. Ut Na Sio and Thomas Ormerod, 2009) found a modest but real incubation effect, larger for divergent tasks.
- Order: preparation → incubation → illumination → verification.
- ‘Aha!’ = illumination; setting aside = incubation.
- Divergent thinking dominates preparation; convergent thinking dominates verification.
- Brainstorming: Osborn; core principle — separate idea production from evaluation; it increases fluency and flexibility.
- NCERT's summary speaks of ‘overcoming blocks to creative expression’, but the rationalised text has no section on such blocks — a leftover from an earlier edition.
8. Thought and language
NCERT examines three viewpoints: that language determines thought, that thought determines language, and that thought and language have different origins.
Language as determinant of thought. Hindi and other Indian languages have separate words for mother's brother, father's elder and younger brothers, mother's sister's husband, father's sister's husband and so on; English has one word, ‘uncle’. English has dozens of colour words; some tribal languages have only two to four. Does an Indian child find kinship easier to think about? Benjamin Lee Whorf held that language determines the contents of thought — the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Its strong version (linguistic determinism) holds that what and how people can possibly think is determined by the language and categories they use. NCERT reports that experimental evidence instead suggests the same level and quality of thought is possible in all languages, given the availability of linguistic categories and structures — though some thoughts may be easier in one language than another.
Thought as determinant of language. The Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget held that thought not only determines language but precedes it. Children form an internal representation of the world through thinking; when a child sees something and later copies it (imitation), thinking occurs without language. Language is just one vehicle of thinking; as actions become internalised, language may widen the range of symbolic thinking but is not necessary for the origins of thought. Words can be taught, but understanding them requires the underlying concepts — so thought is basic.
Different origins. The Russian psychologist Lev Vygotsky argued that thought and language develop separately until about two years of age, when they merge. Before then, thought is pre-verbal and experienced in action (Piaget's sensorimotor stage), and utterances are more automatic reflexes — crying when uncomfortable — than thought-based. Around two, the child expresses thought verbally and speech reflects rationality; children can now manipulate thoughts with soundless (inner) speech, and conceptual thinking comes to depend on the quality of inner speech. Thought can still be used without language (when its vehicle is visual or movement-related), and language without thought (exchanging pleasantries: ‘Good morning! How are you?’). Where the two overlap, they produce verbal thought and rational speech.
| Does language shape thought? (attributed) | What it holds |
|---|---|
| Benjamin Lee Whorf (NCERT; Beyond NCERT: with his teacher Edward Sapir, hence ‘Sapir–Whorf hypothesis’) | language determines the content of thought; strong form — linguistic determinism |
| NCERT's reading of the experimental evidence | the same quality of thought is possible in all languages; some thoughts are easier in some languages |
| Brent Berlin and Paul Kay (Beyond NCERT: 1969) | basic colour terms across languages follow a regular pattern, suggesting universal constraints on colour naming |
| Eleanor Rosch (Heider) (Beyond NCERT: early 1970s) | the Dani of New Guinea, with two basic colour terms, still remembered ‘focal’ colours better — perception was not fixed by vocabulary |
| Ekkehart Malotki (Beyond NCERT: Hopi Time, 1983); Steven Pinker (The Language Instinct, 1994) | Whorf's claim that Hopi lacked expressions for time was mistaken; strong determinism is rejected |
| Later ‘neo-Whorfian’ researchers (Beyond NCERT: e.g. Lera Boroditsky, 2000s) | weaker effects of language on memory, attention and categorisation — for colour, space and time — are reported, though some findings have been hard to replicate |
| Piaget | Vygotsky | |
|---|---|---|
| Which comes first? | thought; language is one vehicle of it | neither — separate roots until about two |
| Role of language | widens symbolic thinking but is not needed for thought's origins | inner speech becomes a tool that shapes conceptual thinking |
| Key evidence (NCERT) | imitation — the copying child thinks without words | pre-verbal action-thought and reflexive utterances, then verbal thought |
| Beyond NCERT | Swiss; stage theory | Russian (Soviet); Thought and Language, 1934; social and cultural origins of thinking |
| Word and cognition in another tradition (attributed) | In its own terms |
|---|---|
| Bhartṛhari, Vākyapadīya (Beyond NCERT; usually dated to about the 5th century CE) | all cognition is shot through with the word: there is no awareness in the world that does not follow the word — a position close to the strong end of the language-shapes-thought spectrum, expressed in the grammarians' theory of sphoṭa |
| NCERT's own Indian example | Hindi and other Indian languages' many kinship words, used to pose Whorf's question rather than answer it |
- Whorf: language → thought (linguistic relativity; strong form = linguistic determinism).
- Piaget (Swiss): thought → language; thought precedes language; imitation as evidence.
- Vygotsky (Russian): different origins; merge at about two years; inner speech.
- NCERT prints ‘Vyogotsky’ — the standard spelling is Vygotsky.
- Language without thought: pleasantries; thought without language: visual or movement-based thinking.
9. Development and use of language; bilingualism
Meaning and nature. Without language we could neither communicate our ideas and feelings nor know what others think. A child moves from ‘ma..ma..ma’ — a moment of joy for parents — to words, to sentences, to the mother tongue at home, the language of instruction at school, and then other languages. Language is a system of symbols organised by rules that we use to communicate. Symbols stand for something else — ‘home’, ‘school’, ‘food’ mean nothing in themselves until linked to objects and events; we use symbols while thinking. Rules fix the accepted order: ‘I am going to school’, not ‘school am going I’. Communication conveys thoughts, ideas, intentions and feelings; we also communicate with gestures and postures (non-verbal communication), and people with severe hearing and speech difficulties use sign language, which is also a language.
Development. Psychologists have tried to teach sign language and symbols to chimpanzees, dolphins and parrots, but human language is more complex, creative and spontaneous. Children differ greatly in the rate of language development, yet worldwide they follow a predictable pattern. The first sound is crying — undifferentiated at first, then varying in pitch and intensity for hunger, pain or sleepiness — which gives way to cooing (‘aaa’, ‘uuu’), usually expressing happiness. At about six months comes babbling: prolonged repetition of consonants and vowels (da—, ba—). By about nine months babbling becomes repetitive strings — echolalia (‘dadadadada’); early babbling is random, later babbling imitates adult voices. Children understand a few words by six months. Around the first birthday comes the one-word stage, the first word usually one syllable (ma, da); single words that stand for whole sentences are holophrases. At 18 to 20 months the two-word stage begins — telegraphic speech, mostly nouns and verbs, like a telegram (‘got admission, send money’). Beyond two and a half years, development focuses on the rules of the language heard.
How is language acquired? As elsewhere in psychology the question is nature or nurture; most psychologists accept that both matter. The behaviourist B.F. Skinner held that we learn language as animals learn to press bars — by association (the sight of a bottle with the word ‘bottle’), imitation (adults saying ‘bottle’) and reinforcement (smiles and hugs when the child says it right); children produce sounds suited to their parents' language and are reinforced, and shaping leads by successive approximation to adult speech; regional accents show different patterns reinforced in different places. The linguist Noam Chomsky proposed that language development is innate: the speed at which children acquire words and grammar without teaching cannot be explained by learning alone; children produce sentences they have never heard, so cannot be imitating; there seems to be a critical period for learning language; children everywhere pass through the same stages. Language ‘just happens to the child’, like physical maturation, because children are born with a universal grammar. NCERT concludes that Skinner's emphasis on learning explains why infants acquire the language they hear and add new words, and Chomsky's built-in readiness explains why they acquire grammar so readily without direct teaching.
| How is language acquired? (attributed) | Mechanism | Explains well (NCERT) | Beyond NCERT |
|---|---|---|---|
| B.F. Skinner (behaviourist) | association, imitation, reinforcement, shaping | why children speak the language they hear; vocabulary growth; regional accents | Verbal Behavior, 1957 |
| Noam Chomsky (linguist) | innate universal grammar; maturation; a critical period | speed of acquiring grammar without teaching; novel sentences; same stages everywhere | his 1959 review of Verbal Behavior attacked the learning account; Eric Lenneberg (1967) developed the critical-period idea |
| NCERT | both nature and nurture | the two accounts are complementary | — |
Language use. Knowing vocabulary and syntax does not ensure proper use. We use language with pragmatic intentions — requesting, asking, thanking, demanding — and to serve these social goals speech must be pragmatically correct (contextually appropriate) as well as grammatical and meaningful. Children often find it hard to choose polite forms — a request comes out as a command — and to take turns in speaking and listening.
| Does bilingualism help thinking? (attributed) | What it holds |
|---|---|
| NCERT (Box 7.3) | bi- and multilingualism facilitate children's cognitive, linguistic and academic competence |
| Elizabeth Peal and Wallace Lambert (Beyond NCERT: 1962) | bilingual children in Montreal outperformed monolinguals on verbal and non-verbal tests, reversing earlier claims of a bilingual handicap |
| Ellen Bialystok and colleagues (Beyond NCERT: from the 1990s) | managing two languages may strengthen executive control — attention, switching, inhibition |
| Sceptical researchers (Beyond NCERT: e.g. Kenneth Paap and colleagues, 2010s) | large, careful studies often find no executive-function advantage; published positive results may be inflated |
| Policy view (Beyond NCERT: National Education Policy 2020) | teaching in the home language or mother tongue wherever possible, at least to Grade 5, while promoting multilingualism |
- Language = symbols + rules + communication; sign language is a language.
- Babbling ~6 months; echolalia ~9 months; one word ~1 year (holophrases); two words 18–20 months (telegraphic).
- Skinner: learning (association, imitation, reinforcement, shaping). Chomsky: innate, universal grammar, critical period.
- NCERT tells readers to ‘refer to Chapter 6 on Learning’ — Learning is Chapter 5; Chapter 6 is memory.
- Box 7.3: mother tongue = the language one identifies with emotionally; one can have several.
- Pragmatics = contextually appropriate use, beyond grammar.
NCERT's activities and project — short answers
The chapter has three activities and one project idea, plus the introduction's question about why we talk while we think. Short outlines follow.
Introduction (page 110): Why do we talk while we think? What is the relationship between language and thought?
Activity 7.1 (page 111): After studying a map for two minutes, locate its places on a blank, upside-down outline. How was it done?
Activity 7.2 (page 114): Solve the anagrams, the nine dots and the seven water-jar problems. What do you observe?
Activity 7.3 (page 118): Frame five questions requiring divergent thinking on traffic, pollution, corruption, illiteracy or poverty.
Project idea (page 124): Observe children of one, two and three years for a week; record their speech and how many words each has learnt.
NCERT exercise — answer outlines
The nine review questions at the end of the chapter (page 124). Try each first, then open the outline.
1. Explain the nature of thinking.
2. What is a concept? Explain the role of concept in the thinking process.
3. Identify obstacles that one may encounter in problem solving.
4. How does reasoning help in solving problems?
5. Are judgment and decision-making interrelated processes? Explain.
6. Why is divergent thinking important in creative thinking process?
7. How can creative thinking be enhanced?
8. Does thinking take place without language? Discuss.
9. How is language acquired in human beings?
What to remember
Numbers
One-liners
- Thinking manipulates information and goes beyond the given; it is inferred from behaviour.
- Images represent sensory experience; concepts represent categories.
- Concepts make thinking fast — and make category-based mistakes possible.
- Problem solving links an initial state to a goal by mental operations.
- A mental set speeds the familiar and blinds us to the simple.
- Deduction goes from general to particular; induction from particular to general.
- Validity is about form; truth is about premises.
- In decision-making the options are known; the task is to choose.
- Judgments can be automatic, and change with new information.
- Creative = novel, original and appropriate.
- Divergent thinking generates; convergent thinking selects.
- Lateral thinking digs a new hole; vertical thinking digs the same hole deeper.
- Incubation precedes illumination; verification follows it.
- Brainstorming separates producing ideas from judging them.
- Whorf: language shapes thought; Piaget: thought comes first; Vygotsky: separate roots, merged at two.
- Skinner explains which language and words; Chomsky explains the speed of grammar.
Traps to avoid
- NCERT's two MAJOR obstacles are mental set and lack of motivation; functional fixedness is added alongside.
- Mental set can help as well as hinder problem solving.
- Activity 7.2's STGNIH is one letter short of its answer INSIGHT.
- Table 7.1's glosses for steps 4 and 5 appear swapped in print; learn the step names.
- Deductive starts from an assumption (general); inductive from observations (particular).
- The mouse in Fig. 7.3 has true premises and an invalid form — not a false premise.
- NCERT says most scientific reasoning is inductive; science also tests hypotheses deductively.
- Decision-making chooses among KNOWN alternatives.
- Fluency and flexibility are necessary conditions for originality — not the reverse.
- ‘Effective surprise’ is Bruner's phrase; convergent/divergent is Guilford's.
- Black hat = judgment, caution, logic; blue hat = the process, not ideas.
- The ‘Aha!’ is illumination, not incubation.
- Box 7.1's study compared American and Japanese students; ‘Asians’ is NCERT's generalisation.
- NCERT's ‘Vyogotsky’ is Vygotsky; its ‘Chapter 6 on Learning’ is Chapter 5.
- Linguistic determinism is the STRONG form of linguistic relativity.
- Universal grammar and the critical period are Chomsky's (in NCERT); shaping and reinforcement are Skinner's.
- Heuristics, biases, Kahneman and Simon are not in the NCERT chapter.
How to strategise
Prelims — what UPSC asks
- No Prelims question in the archive tests this chapter. The nearest is Prelims 2001 on the Article providing instruction in the mother tongue at the primary stage — a polity fact this chapter's Box 7.3 does not teach.
- If psychology appears, expect pairs: deductive/inductive, convergent/divergent (Guilford), lateral/vertical (de Bono), the six hat colours, the four creative stages in order, Whorf/Piaget/Vygotsky, Skinner/Chomsky, holophrase/telegraphic speech.
Mains — where it appears and how to answer
- GS4 — creativity in public service: ‘Besides domain knowledge, a public official needs innovativeness and creativity of a high order as well, while resolving ethical dilemmas’ (2021). Frame: dilemma as a false binary → divergent thinking for third options (fluency, flexibility, originality) → convergent verification against law, fairness and feasibility (NCERT's ‘appropriate, socially desirable’) → obstacles in offices (mental set, functional fixedness) → an Indian example.
- GS4 — reason and critical thinking: ‘For any kind of social re-engineering by successfully implementing welfare schemes, a civil servant must use reason and critical thinking in an ethical framework’ (2025). Use deduction (apply rules and entitlements, but test the assumptions), induction (field evidence, pilots, grievance data), judgments revised with new information, and Beyond-NCERT biases (confirmation, availability, anchoring) as reasons for evidence-based checks.
- Essay: ‘Visionary decision-making happens at the intersection of intuition and logic’ (2023) — automatic judgment vs deliberate cost–benefit choice; the attributed debate (Simon, Kahneman–Tversky, Gigerenzer). ‘Inspiration for creativity springs from the effort to look for the magical in the mundane’ (2023) — everyday creativity, sensitivity to gaps and anomalies, incubation during ordinary activity. ‘Thinking is like a game, it does not begin unless there is an opposite team’ (2023; weakest link) — problem as the initial state, the black hat and devil's advocate, confirmation bias and groupthink when no one opposes. ‘Thought finds a world and creates one also’ (2025) — concepts organise (find) the world; creative thinking and language (Whorf) create one.
- Not linked, and why: GS4 2023 ‘moral intuition vs moral reasoning’ is moral philosophy (and sits on a political-theory chapter); this chapter gives only the general reasoning vocabulary. GS4 2021 and 2024 on digital technology / AI as inputs for rational decision-making test technology ethics, not the psychology of deciding. GS4 2015 on conflict of interest in decision-making is about integrity. Gandhi quotations on thought and anger (GS4 2018, 2019) concern character and emotion (Chapter 8 and Class 12). GS1 questions on linguistic states are history and polity.
- Answer frame: name the thinking process (problem solving, reasoning, judgment, decision, creativity) → the model (attributed: Guilford, de Bono, Wallas, Kahneman–Tversky, Simon) → an Indian administrative example → its typical failure (set, fixedness, bias) → a practical safeguard (redefine, consult dissent, verify, record reasons).
Self-check
Tap an option. NCERT's own exercise questions come first; the rest test the figures and common confusions.
1. According to NCERT, the two building blocks of thought are:
2. A person keeps solving water-jar problems by B − A − 2C even when A − C would do. This illustrates:
3. ‘All cats have four legs; I have four legs; therefore I am a cat.’ What is wrong?
4. Decision-making differs from other kinds of problem solving because:
5. Which divergent-thinking ability refers to the variety of ideas produced?
6. In de Bono's Six Thinking Hats, the hat for caution, judgment and logic is:
7. The correct order of the stages of creative thinking is:
8. Who held that thought and language develop separately until about two years of age and then merge?
UPSC questions from this chapter
Open any question to attempt it in the Question bank — your attempt is saved to your progress.