0% read
← Psychology — all chapters
Class 11PsychologyPsychologyChapter 7

Thinking

≈ 50 min read · 0 Prelims and 6 Mains questions from this chapter
Attempt questions

Start here: why this chapter matters

In simple wordsYou plan a route home after the usual road is closed, decide whether to take a job offer, wonder why a man is sprinting down a railway platform, and dream up a new way to stack your books. All of it is thinking — using what you already know to get somewhere new. This chapter takes thinking apart into its tools (images and concepts), its jobs (solving, reasoning, deciding, creating) and its partner, language.

This is the seventh chapter of NCERT's Class 11 Psychology textbook (pages 109–125). It describes the nature of thinking and its building blocks — mental images and concepts; three processes of thinking — problem solving, reasoning and decision-making; the nature, process and enhancement of creative thinking; the relationship between thought and language; and the development and use of language. It has three boxes, five figures (7.2 in two parts), one table, three activities, nine review questions and one project idea; the answers to Activity 7.2 are on page 125. (Beyond NCERT: the chapter does not use the words ‘heuristic’ or ‘bias’; since these are central to GS4, they appear here in clearly marked Beyond-NCERT notes.)

  • Builds on What is Psychology? (the cognitive approach), Human Development (Piaget's sensorimotor stage, which Vygotsky's account cites), Learning (Skinner's shaping and reinforcement, which NCERT uses for language; Köhler's insight, a cousin of ‘illumination’) and Human Memory (concepts live in semantic memory). Leads into Chapter 8, Motivation and Emotion (NCERT names lack of motivation as an obstacle to problem solving).
  • Pairs with live chapters: Class 12 psychology Variations in Psychological Attributes (intelligence and creativity measured as abilities — this chapter is the process view), and Self and Personality (self-regulation). The constitutional side of mother tongues and languages lies in the polity chapters.
  • UPSC: psychology has no GS paper of its own; this chapter's main home is GS4 Ethics — ethical decision-making and its pitfalls, reason and critical thinking, and creativity and innovation in public service (asked in 2021 and 2025) — and the Essay, which set three thinking topics in 2023 alone (decision-making at the intersection of intuition and logic; creativity in the mundane; thinking needing an ‘opposite team’) and ‘Thought finds a world and creates one also’ in 2025. Box 7.3 supports GS1/GS2 points on India's linguistic diversity and mother-tongue education. No Prelims question tests the chapter.
WordWhat it means here
ThinkingA higher mental process of manipulating and analysing acquired or stored information
Mental imageA mental representation of a sensory experience — ‘seeing with the mind's eye’
ConceptA mental representation of a category: a class of objects, ideas or events sharing common properties
Problem solvingGoal-directed thinking linking an initial state (the problem) to an end state (the goal)
Mental setA tendency to solve problems by already-tried steps; helps speed, but creates rigidity
Functional fixednessFailing to solve a problem because one is fixed on an object's usual function
Deductive / inductive reasoningFrom a general assumption to a particular conclusion / from particular observations to a general conclusion
AnalogyReasoning of the form A is to B as C is to D
JudgmentDrawing conclusions, forming opinions and evaluating events or objects on available evidence
Decision-makingChoosing among already-known alternatives by weighing their costs and benefits
Convergent / divergent thinkingThinking towards one correct answer / open-ended thinking producing many answers (Guilford)
Lateral thinkingDe Bono's term for seeking alternative ways of defining and interpreting a problem
Incubation / illuminationSetting a problem aside / the sudden ‘Aha!’ when an idea emerges
BrainstormingOsborn's technique: produce ideas freely, postpone judging them
Linguistic relativityWhorf's view that language determines the content of thought (strong form: linguistic determinism)
Holophrase / telegraphic speechA one-word ‘sentence’ / two-word utterances of mostly nouns and verbs
Bilingualism / multilingualismProficiency in two / more than two languages
Reading NCERT's chapter opening (page 109)The opening page sets five goals — the nature of thinking and reasoning; problem solving and decision-making; creative thinking and how to enhance it; language and thought; and language development and use — lists the contents with its three boxes, and carries an epigraph from Helen Keller marvelling at how naming objects leads, step by step, from a child's first stammered syllable to the reach of a line of Shakespeare. The point: the chapter ends where the epigraph begins — with words as tools of thought.
Reading NCERT's Introduction (page 110)The shaded introduction notes how loosely we use ‘think’ — for remembering, paying attention or being unsure — and narrows it to mental activity directed at solving problems, drawing inferences, judging and choosing. It then pictures a child building and rebuilding a sand tower while talking to herself (‘not this’, ‘a little small’). The point: thinking is goal-directed, and talking to oneself while thinking raises the chapter's last question — how language and thought are related.

At a glance — the six ideas to carry away

  • Thinking = manipulating and analysing information; internal, inferred from behaviour; built on mental images and concepts (mental representations of categories). Box 7.1: analytical (American) vs holistic (East Asian) thinking.
  • Problem solving = goal-directed thinking, initial state → goal; seven steps (Table 7.1). Obstacles: mental set (water jars), functional fixedness (a book as a hammer), lack of motivation.
  • Reasoning: deductive (general → particular; fails if the assumption is false), inductive (particular → general; most scientific reasoning), analogy (A : B :: C : D).
  • Judgment (forming opinions from evidence; may be automatic) and decision-making (choosing among known options by costs and benefits) are interrelated.
  • Creative thinking: novel, original, appropriate; Bruner's ‘effective surprise’. Guilford: convergent vs divergent (fluency, flexibility, originality, elaboration). De Bono: lateral vs vertical; six hats. Process: preparation → incubation → illumination → verification; Osborn's brainstorming.
  • Thought and language: Whorf (language → thought; linguistic relativity), Piaget (thought → language), Vygotsky (separate, merge at ~2). Language = symbols + rules + communication; babbling ~6 m, one word ~1 yr, two words 18–20 m; Skinner (learning) vs Chomsky (universal grammar); Box 7.3: multilingualism is a way of life in India.

1. The nature of thinking: images and concepts

In simple wordsAsked the way to an old friend's house, you ‘see’ the turns in your head — that is an image. Choosing a novel in a bookshop, you think ‘thriller, this author, short’ — those are concepts. Images are mental pictures; concepts are mental filing labels. Most thinking shuffles one or both.

Thinking is the base of all cognitive activities. It goes beyond the given: looking at a painting, you do not just register colours and strokes; you interpret it, relate it to what you know, and create a new meaning that adds to your knowledge. NCERT defines thinking as a higher mental process through which we manipulate and analyse acquired or existing information — by abstracting, reasoning, imagining, problem solving, judging and decision-making. Thinking is mostly organised and goal-directed (from cooking to a maths sum): one plans, recalls steps used before for familiar tasks, and infers new strategies for new ones. It is an internal process inferred from overt behaviour — you cannot see a chess player's thoughts, only infer the strategies he weighed from his next move.

Building blocks. Thinking relies on knowledge we already possess, represented as mental images or words (concepts). An image is a mental representation of a sensory experience; it can be used to think about things, places and events — imagining a cat on a branch with its tail curved, or standing before the Taj Mahal and describing what you ‘see’. A concept is a mental representation of a category: a class of objects, ideas or events that share common properties. Meeting something new, we extract its features and match them to an existing category; if the match fits, we give it that category's name — and also inherit the category's other properties.

An unfamiliar animal on the roadfour legs, very smalldog-like facewags its tailbarks at strangersCategory ‘dog’stored concept:shared propertiesInferences‘a dog, a new breed’‘it may bite strangers’— go beyond whatis actually seenExtract features → match a category → name it → borrow everything known about the categoryNCERT pages 111–112 · its dog example · a concept = a mental representation of a category
Concept formation: from features to category to inference (pages 111–112).

Why form concepts? They organise knowledge so that it can be reached quickly and with less effort — like a child who keeps books, geometry box and pencils in fixed places, or a library that shelves and labels books by subject. Categorising makes thinking quick and efficient. (Beyond NCERT: the price of that speed is that category-based inferences can be wrong — the dog may be friendly — which is one root of stereotypes about people; see section 4.)

Reading NCERT's Figure 7.1 ‘The Girl forming a Mental Image’ (page 111)A drawing of a girl standing under a tree, finger to her chin, with a thought-bubble showing the cat on the branch above her. The point: a mental image is a picture-like representation used in thinking, even when the object is not in view.
Reading NCERT's Activity 7.1 and Figures 7.2a–7.2b (pages 111–112)Show a friend a map with marked places (Fig. 7.2a, an outline with symbols for settlements, trees and water) for two minutes; then give a blank outline of the same area turned upside down (Fig. 7.2b) and ask the friend to locate the places, and how. The point: people locate places by forming and mentally manipulating an image of the whole layout — including rotating it. (The maps are not reproduced here; an outline is in the in-text section.)
Reading NCERT's Box 7.1 ‘Culture and Thinking’ (page 112)Students glanced briefly at an aquarium-like underwater scene and described it. American students began with the biggest, brightest objects (‘the large fish swimming to the right’); Japanese students more often began with the background (‘the bottom was rocky’, ‘the water was green’). Researchers concluded that Americans typically analyse objects separately — analytical thinking — while East Asians (Japanese, Chinese, Koreans) attend to relations between objects and their context — holistic thinking. A line drawing of fish, plants and pebbles illustrates the scene. The point: beliefs, values and social practices shape how we think, not only what we think.
Does culture shape thinking style? (attributed)What it holds
NCERT (Box 7.1)Americans think analytically, Asians holistically; social practices shape thinking
Takahiko Masuda and Richard Nisbett (Beyond NCERT: 2001)the underwater-scene study itself: Japanese participants mentioned background and relations more, and recognised fish less well when the background changed
Richard Nisbett and colleagues (Beyond NCERT: The Geography of Thought, 2003)the contrast reflects social structures and philosophical traditions — Greek individual agency versus Chinese emphasis on harmony and context
Thomas Talhelm and colleagues (Beyond NCERT: 2014)differences exist within one country — in China, people from rice-growing regions tested more holistic than people from wheat regions — so ‘East versus West’ is too coarse
Critics of broad cultural typing (Beyond NCERT)effects are averages with large overlap between individuals; they shift with priming and situation, so they describe tendencies, not fixed national minds
Box 7.1: Asian or Japanese?NCERT opens with a study of ‘American and Asian students’, reports what ‘the Japanese students’ did, and then generalises to ‘Asian people (Japanese, Chinese, Koreans)’. Beyond NCERT: the study it describes (Masuda and Nisbett, 2001) compared American and Japanese students; the wider East Asian claim draws on other studies. Safe line: ‘East Asian participants, in studies such as Masuda and Nisbett's with Japanese students, attended more to context’.
Read carefully
  • Building blocks of thought: mental images and concepts.
  • Image = representation of a sensory experience; concept = representation of a category.
  • Thinking is internal, inferred from behaviour.
  • Box 7.1: analytical = objects separately (Americans); holistic = relations and background (East Asians).
  • NCERT calls thinking ‘unique to human beings’; its own Chapter 5 describes Köhler's chimpanzees solving problems by insight. Treat ‘unique’ as NCERT's emphasis on human thought's complexity, not a settled claim.

2. Problem solving and its obstacles

In simple wordsA cook who always adds onions first will add them first even in a dessert recipe. A man who needs a hammer and sees only a ‘book’ on the table stays stuck. Problems are often hard not because we lack knowledge but because our habits narrow what we look for.

Problem solving is thinking that is goal-directed. Problems are not only obstacles; any activity aimed at a defined goal — fixing a cycle, planning a summer trip, mending a friendship, making a quick snack for a friend — is a problem. Some are solved quickly from immediate cues; others need time and effort. Every problem has an initial state (the problem) and an end state (the goal), connected by mental operations. NCERT illustrates them with organising a play for Teachers' Day.

⤵ Table 7.1: mental operations in solving a problem (organising a Teachers' Day play)
1. Identify the problema week is left and you must organise a play
2. Represent the problemit needs a theme, actors, money and so on
3. Plan the solution; set sub-goalssurvey themes, consult teachers and friends; weigh cost, duration, suitability
4. Evaluate all solutionscompare and verify the possible plays
5. Select one and execute itcollect what is needed and rehearse
6. Evaluate the outcomeif the play is appreciated, note the steps for future use
7. Rethink and redefineconsider how a better play could be planned next time
Reading NCERT's Table 7.1 ‘Mental Operations Involved in Solving a Problem’ (page 113)Two columns: the seven mental operations, and what each means for the Teachers' Day play. The point: problem solving is a cycle — it does not end with execution but with evaluating the outcome and redefining the problem for next time.
Table 7.1: rows 4 and 5 look swappedIn the printed table, step 4 ‘Evaluate all solutions’ is glossed as ‘collect all the information / stage rehearsal’, while step 5 ‘Select one solution and execute it’ is glossed as ‘compare and verify the various options to get the best solution’. The glosses fit the other step better. The flow above pairs each step with the gloss that matches it; for MCQs, learn the seven step names in NCERT's order.

Obstacles. NCERT names two major obstacles — mental set and lack of motivation — and adds functional fixedness. Mental set is the tendency to solve problems by following mental operations that worked before. Prior success often helps with a new problem, but it also creates a rigidity that blocks new rules or strategies — as when, after a few sums of one type, you keep applying the same steps until they fail and then find it hard to let go of them. Functional fixedness occurs when people fail to solve a problem because they are fixed on a thing's usual function; if you have hammered a nail with a hardbound book, you have overcome it. Lack of motivation: skill is useless if one gives up at the first failure; persistence is needed.

Reading NCERT's Activity 7.2 (page 114) and its answers (page 125)Three problems to try with friends. (1) Anagrams: NAGMARA, BOLMPER, SLEVO, STGNIH, TOLUSONI (answers: anagram, problem, solve, insight, solution — but STGNIH has only six letters: as printed it makes ‘things’ or ‘nights’, and INSIGHT needs a second I). (2) Nine dots: join all nine with four straight lines without lifting the pencil. (3) Water in three bottles: seven problems giving the capacities of bottles A, B and C and a target quantity. Page 125 shows the solution path for the dots and, in a drawing of three tumblers, the ‘standard method’ for problems 1–5 (fill B, pour off A once and C twice), a ‘simpler method’ for problem 6 and the case where only the simple method works (problem 7). The point: after five problems solved one way, most people use the long recipe on problem 6 and many fail problem 7 — a mental set made visible.
Problems 1–5 teach a recipe: fill B, pour off A once, pour off C twice (B − A − 2C)Problem 1target 100 mlA 21B 127C 3B − A − 2C = 127 − 21 − 6 = 100 ✓A − C = 21 − 3 = 18 Problem 6target 20 mlA 23B 49C 3B − A − 2C = 49 − 23 − 6 = 20 ✓A − C = 23 − 3 = 20 ✓Problem 7target 25 mlA 28B 76C 3B − A − 2C = 76 − 28 − 6 = 42 ✗A − C = 28 − 3 = 25 ✓Problem 6 can be solved both ways; problem 7 only the short way — those in a mental set often miss itour bars from NCERT’s capacities (page 114; B drawn at 60% scale) · NCERT’s answers on page 125 · Beyond NCERT: Luchins, 1942
Water-jar problems 1, 6 and 7 — the set and the shortcut (pages 114 and 125).
The puzzle: 9 dots, 4 straight lines, pen never liftedmost people assume the lines must stayinside the dotted square — nothing says soOne solution: the lines leave the squarestartself-imposed limits = a mental setour drawing of the classic answer (NCERT gives one on page 125) · ‘thinking outside the box’ is often traced to this puzzle
The nine-dot problem — a boundary nobody imposed (page 114).
Beyond NCERT — the classic studies and two kinds of strategy
  • Abraham Luchins (1942) devised the water-jar (‘Einstellung’) problems that Activity 7.2 adapts; participants who had practised the long formula often used it on problems that a simple formula solved, and many failed a problem only the simple formula could solve.
  • Karl Duncker's candle problem (published 1945) is the classic test of functional fixedness: given a candle, a box of tacks and matches, people rarely think of emptying the box and using it as a shelf; they do so more often when the tacks are presented outside the box.
  • Psychologists distinguish algorithms — step-by-step procedures that guarantee a solution if one exists (trying every arrangement of an anagram) — from heuristics — rules of thumb that are fast but can fail (looking for familiar letter clusters such as ‘-ion’). A mental set is a heuristic that has hardened.
Why this matters for GS4 and administrationMental set is the psychology behind ‘we have always done it this way’: a district office keeps a procedure long after the problem it solved has changed. Functional fixedness shows up as treating a rule only in its usual use — a scheme's form, a building, a staff role — when it could serve a new purpose. The remedies in this chapter (redefine the problem, step back, look for alternative uses, persist) are the same ones that answers on innovation in public service ask for.
Activity 7.2: a misprinted anagramThe fourth anagram, STGNIH, has six letters; its answer on page 125, INSIGHT, has seven (two Is). As printed, the letters make THINGS or NIGHTS — so a friend may give a correct answer that the key marks wrong. A letter seems to have dropped out; if you set the puzzle, print it with a second I.
Read carefully
  • Problem solving = goal-directed; initial state → mental operations → goal.
  • Table 7.1 has seven operations, ending with ‘rethink and redefine’.
  • NCERT's two major obstacles: mental set and lack of motivation; functional fixedness is added ‘like mental set’.
  • Mental set can help as well as hinder.
  • Water jars: problems 1–6 yield to B − A − 2C; problem 7 needs A − C.

3. Reasoning: deduction, induction and analogy

In simple wordsA detective who says ‘all thieves wear gloves; this man wore gloves; so he is the thief’ has reasoned badly even if each sentence is true. A detective who watches the man come back with the missing bag and concludes ‘he took it’ reasons from what she saw. The first starts from a rule; the second builds one from facts. Both can go wrong in different ways.

Reasoning is the process of gathering and analysing information to arrive at conclusions; it is a form of problem solving whose goal is to determine what can be concluded from given information. NCERT's example: a man running desperately along a railway platform. Deductive reasoning begins with a general assumption you know or believe to be true and draws a specific conclusion — reasoning from general to particular. ‘People run on platforms only when late for a train; this man is running; so he is late.’ The common mistake: assuming the base statement without knowing it is true — people also run on platforms for other reasons. Inductive reasoning draws a general conclusion from particular observations: you watch the man enter a compartment and come back with a bag, and conclude he had left it there. Its common mistake is jumping to a conclusion before all the facts are known. NCERT adds that most scientific reasoning is inductive — scientists and lay persons consider instances and seek the general rule that covers them.

Deductive: general → particularAssumption (general)people run on platforms only when late for a trainObservationthis man is running on the platformConclusion (particular)so he is late for his trainvalid form — but true only if theassumption is true (it may not be)Inductive: particular → generalhe enters a compartmenthe comes out with a bagthe train is still standingConclusion: he had left his bag on the trainprobable, not certain — risk: jumping toconclusions before all facts are inNCERT pages 114–115 · our layout of its example · analogy (A : B :: C : D) is a third form
Deduction and induction on NCERT's railway platform (pages 114–115).

Analogy is a third form with four parts — A is to B as C is to D — the relation between the first pair matching the relation between the second: water is to fish as air is to humans; white is to snow as black is to coal. Analogies help in solving problems by bringing out salient attributes of an object or event that would otherwise go unnoticed.

Reading NCERT's Figure 7.3 ‘Is the mouse making a True and Valid Conclusion?’ (page 115)A cartoon mouse reasons: ‘All cats have four legs; I have four legs; therefore I am a cat.’ The point: a conclusion can be absurd even when every premise is true — the figure asks the reader to separate the truth of statements from the validity of the reasoning.
Valid formInvalid form
True premises‘All cats have four legs; Tom is a cat; so Tom has four legs’ — sound: the conclusion must be truethe mouse: ‘All cats have four legs; I have four legs; so I am a cat’ — true premises, false conclusion
A false premiseNCERT's platform: ‘People run only when late; he runs; so he is late’ — follows, but the assumption is false, so the conclusion may be falseboth faults at once — nothing can be trusted
Fig. 7.3: the mouse's mistake is the form, not a premiseNCERT's text says deductive errors arise because the assumption may be untrue, and that a false base makes the conclusion ‘invalid or wrong’. The mouse's premises are both true; its error is invalid form — having four legs is shared by cats and many other animals, so it cannot prove cat-hood (Beyond NCERT: logicians call this the fallacy of the undistributed middle). Safe line: ‘validity concerns whether the conclusion follows; truth concerns the premises; a sound argument needs both’.
Reasoning in another tradition (attributed)In its own terms
Nyāya inference (anumāna) (Beyond NCERT)the classical five-membered argument: proposition (pratijñā: the hill has fire), reason (hetu: because it has smoke), example (udāharaṇa: wherever there is smoke there is fire, as in a kitchen), application (upanaya: this hill has such smoke), conclusion (nigamana: so the hill has fire)
Scholars of Indian logic (Beyond NCERT: e.g. Bimal Krishna Matilal)because it joins a general rule (deductive) to a cited instance (inductive support), the Nyāya syllogism is often described as combining both forms rather than fitting either alone
NCERTpresents deduction and induction as two separate routes, with analogy as a third
Read carefully
  • Deductive = general → particular, starts from an assumption. Inductive = particular → general, starts from observation.
  • Deduction's typical error: an untrue assumption; induction's: jumping to conclusions.
  • NCERT: most scientific reasoning is inductive (Beyond NCERT: philosophers such as Karl Popper stressed the deductive testing of hypotheses — science uses both).
  • Analogy has four parts.

4. Judgment and decision-making

In simple wordsBraking at a red light needs no thought; choosing between two college courses keeps you awake at night. Both involve judging a situation, but the second is a decision: the options are already in front of you, and the hard part is weighing them. And first impressions — ‘this new teacher is strict’ — are judgments that later evidence may overturn.

Reasoning allows us to make judgments: we draw conclusions, form opinions and evaluate events and objects on knowledge and available evidence. NCERT's example: a talkative, sociable man who convinces others easily is judged suitable for a salesperson's job — a judgment based on the characteristics of an expert salesperson. Some judgments are automatic, needing no conscious effort, a matter of habit — braking on seeing a red light. Others draw on past knowledge and experience (evaluating a novel) or on personal preferences (judging a painting's beauty). Judgments are therefore not independent of our beliefs and attitudes, and they change with new information — students who judge a new teacher very strict on day one may, after closer interaction, judge her extremely student-friendly.

Decision-making is choosing among alternatives by evaluating the costs and benefits of each — what to wear, what to eat, psychology or economics in Class XI (interest, prospects, books, teachers; advice from seniors and faculty; attending a few classes). It differs from other problem solving because the possible solutions are already known and one has to be selected. A friend chosen for state-level badminton just before the final examinations must evaluate all possible outcomes. People differ in priorities, so their decisions differ. And because real life calls for quick decisions, we cannot always evaluate every situation thoroughly and exhaustively. Judgment and decision-making are interrelated.

Choose: state-level badminton or exams?Practise badminton+ selection at state level+ fitness, recognition− less study time− exam riskStudy for the exam+ better marks+ future courses− lose the selection chance− regret, team let downWeigh by one’s own prioritiespeople differ, so decisions differNCERT page 116 · the options are already known; the task is to choose · our layout and entries
Decision-making: known options weighed by personal priorities (page 116).
JudgmentDecision-making
What it doesforms an opinion or evaluation from evidenceselects one of several known options
Can it be automatic?yes — braking at a red lightusually deliberate; quick under time pressure
Shaped byknowledge, beliefs, attitudes, preferences; revised with new informationcosts, benefits and personal priorities
NCERT examplethe talkative man suits sales; the ‘strict’ new teacherpsychology or economics; badminton or exams
Beyond NCERT — heuristics and biases
  • Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman's paper ‘Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’ (Science, 1974) described three mental shortcuts. Representativeness: judging by resemblance to a typical case — NCERT's salesperson judgment is exactly this, and it ignores how many talkative people are not salespeople (base rates). Availability: judging frequency by how easily examples come to mind — air crashes seem commoner than they are after news coverage. Anchoring: estimates stay close to an initial number, even an irrelevant one.
  • Confirmation bias: seeking evidence that supports what one already believes; Peter Wason's ‘2-4-6’ rule-discovery task (1960) showed people testing only confirming cases.
  • Groupthink: Irving Janis (1972) described how cohesive groups suppress dissent and reach poor decisions.
  • Kahneman received the economics Nobel in 2002 (Tversky had died in 1996); Herbert Simon received it in 1978, for work on decision-making in organisations, including bounded rationality and satisficing — choosing the first option that is good enough.
How should decision-making be modelled? (attributed)What it holds
NCERTevaluate the costs and benefits of each known alternative; priorities differ; real life forces quick, less-than-exhaustive choices
Rational-choice models (Beyond NCERT: expected-utility theory in economics)an ideal decision-maker lists all options, weighs outcomes by probability and value, and picks the best
Herbert Simon (Beyond NCERT: from the 1950s)limited time, information and attention make people satisfice — bounded rationality is realistic, not a defect
Kahneman and Tversky (Beyond NCERT: from 1974)intuitive shortcuts produce systematic, predictable errors; debiasing and careful procedures help
Gerd Gigerenzer (Beyond NCERT: e.g. with Daniel Goldstein, 1996)simple ‘fast and frugal’ heuristics are often accurate in real environments; the problem is using them in the wrong setting
Why this matters for GS4 and the EssayThe 2023 essay ‘Visionary decision-making happens at the intersection of intuition and logic’ maps onto this section: automatic judgment (intuition, fast, habit-based) and deliberate cost–benefit evaluation (logic), with the Beyond-NCERT debate on when shortcuts help or mislead. The 2025 GS4 question on using reason and critical thinking in an ethical framework for welfare schemes draws on sections 3 and 4: test assumptions before deducing, gather facts before inducing, and revise judgments as new evidence arrives — as NCERT's students did about their teacher. Practical safeguards for officers: record reasons, seek dissent (a ‘black hat’, section 6), check base rates before profiling, and beware the first number on the file (anchoring).
Read carefully
  • In decision-making the alternatives are already known; in problem solving they may have to be found.
  • Judgments can be automatic (red light) and are not independent of beliefs and attitudes.
  • Judgments change with new information (the ‘strict’ teacher).
  • ‘Heuristics’, ‘biases’, Kahneman and Simon are not in the NCERT chapter — cite them as further reading.

5. Creative thinking: convergent and divergent

In simple words‘What is 3 + 9?’ has one answer. ‘What can you do with an old sari?’ has dozens — a curtain, a quilt, a bag, a rope, a stage backdrop. The first question tests whether you can find the answer; the second whether you can find many, varied, unusual ones and then pick the one that actually works. Creativity needs both moves.

Creative thinking produced the first planted seed, the wheel and cave paintings, and today's science, technology and arts. NCERT's Indian examples: botanist A.D. Karve, who won the UK's top energy award for a smokeless chullah that turns dry sugarcane leaves into clean fuel, and Class XI student Ashish Panwar, who won a bronze medal for a five-foot robot at the First International Robotics Olympiad in Glasgow. But creativity is not only for scientists and artists: everyone has the potential. It shows in writing, teaching, cooking, story-telling, conversation, asking questions, games, organising, and helping others resolve conflicts — ‘everyday creativity’, which NCERT distinguishes from the ‘special talent creativity’ of outstanding achievements.

What makes thinking creative? (1) Novelty and originality: ideas or solutions that did not exist before — a new model of scooter is not original unless unique features are added. (2) What Bruner calls ‘effective surprise’: an unusual product startles those who meet it. (3) Appropriateness in context: being different without purpose, non-conformity, aimless fantasy or bizarre ideas are sometimes mistaken for creativity; researchers agree that thinking is creative when it is reality-oriented, appropriate, constructive and socially desirable.

J.P. Guilford, a pioneer of creativity research, proposed two types of thinking. Convergent thinking solves problems with one correct answer — the mind converges on it (3, 6, 9, … → 12). Divergent thinking is open-ended: many answers are possible, drawn from one's experience — uses of cloth; improving a chair for comfort and looks; what would happen if school examinations were abolished. Divergent thinking abilities include fluency (the number of ideas — the more uses of a paper cup, the higher the fluency), flexibility (variety — using the cup as a container and to draw a circle), originality (rare or unusual ideas, seeing new relationships, combining old and new; research shows fluency and flexibility are necessary conditions for originality) and elaboration (working out the details and implications of an idea). It also allows remote associations — linking ‘food production’ with ‘desert’ or ‘weeds’ (extracting protein from desert weeds) where most people think of seeds, fertilisers and irrigation.

Convergent: one correct answer3, 6, 9, … what comes next?12Divergent: many possible answersUses of a paper cup?containerdraw a circleseedling pottoy phonefluency = how many ideas · flexibility = how variedoriginality = how rare · elaboration = how worked outCreative work needs both: divergent thinking to generate, convergent thinking to selectNCERT pages 117–118 · J.P. Guilford · ‘container’ and ‘draw a circle’ are NCERT’s; the other two uses are ours
Convergent and divergent thinking (Guilford; pages 117–118).
Reading NCERT's Figure 7.4 ‘Thinking Divergently’ (page 117)A cartoon boy, finger to his temple, with thought-bubbles in which pencils are bent into the letters ‘abc’ and shown as other objects. The point: one ordinary object can be seen in many ways — the essence of flexibility and originality in divergent thinking.
Divergent abilityWhat it measuresPaper-cup example
Fluencyhow many ideaslisting twenty uses rather than five
Flexibilityhow varied — different categories of usea container, and also a stencil for circles
Originalityhow rare or unusuala megaphone, a seed-starter (our examples)
Elaborationhow fully an idea is worked outhow the seed-starter would drain, be labelled and be planted
Beyond NCERT — dates and tests
  • Guilford's presidential address to the American Psychological Association in 1950 is usually credited with launching modern creativity research; his ‘structure of intellect’ model placed divergent production among many intellectual operations.
  • E. Paul Torrance's Tests of Creative Thinking (first published in 1966) score fluency, flexibility, originality and elaboration — the four abilities NCERT lists.
  • Sarnoff Mednick's associative theory (1962) and his Remote Associates Test treat creativity as the ability to link remote ideas.
  • Jerome Bruner's ‘effective surprise’ is from his essays On Knowing (1962).
Why this matters for GS4GS4 2021 asked why a public official needs, besides domain knowledge, ‘innovativeness and creativity of a high order’ in resolving ethical dilemmas. This section gives the vocabulary: dilemmas usually look like a choice between two bad options (convergent framing); divergent thinking generates a third or fourth course, and convergent thinking then tests which is lawful, fair and workable — NCERT's ‘appropriate, reality-oriented, socially desirable’ criterion is what keeps creativity ethical. The 2023 essay on finding ‘the magical in the mundane’ is NCERT's everyday creativity and its first strategy — sensitivity to the ordinary (section 7).
Read carefully
  • Convergent/divergent: Guilford. ‘Effective surprise’: Bruner.
  • Four divergent abilities: fluency, flexibility, originality, elaboration.
  • Fluency and flexibility are necessary conditions for originality.
  • Creative = novel + original + appropriate; bizarre or purposeless is not creative.
  • Both convergent and divergent thinking are needed for creativity — not divergent alone.

6. Lateral thinking and the six thinking hats

In simple wordsIf you are digging for water in the wrong spot, digging deeper will not help — you need to dig somewhere else. That is Edward de Bono's whole idea in one picture. His six hats are a way of making a group look at a problem one angle at a time, instead of arguing past each other.

NCERT says Edward de Bono used the term lateral thinking for what Guilford called divergent thinking. De Bono contrasts it with vertical thinking, whose operations move in a straight line, back and forth between lower and higher level concepts, while lateral thinking looks for alternative ways of defining and interpreting problems. In his image, vertical (logical) thinking digs the same hole deeper; lateral thinking digs a hole in another place. Lateral thinking helps make mental leaps and opens several ways of thinking.

De Bono's Six Thinking Hats technique stimulates different modes of thinking; one puts on or takes off a hat as the kind of thinking required changes. The six hats are different perspectives on an issue, and the technique works for an individual or a group.

Put on one ‘hat’ at a time — everyone looks at the issue from the same angle togetherWhite hatinformationfacts, figures, gapsRed hatfeelingsemotions on the subjectBlack hatjudgmentcaution and logicYellow hatbenefitswhat will work and whyGreen hatcreativityalternatives, changeBlue hatprocessthinking about thinkingNCERT page 118 (Box 7.2) · Edward de Bono · usable alone or in groups · hat shapes ours
De Bono's six thinking hats as Box 7.2 describes them (page 118).
Reading NCERT's Box 7.2 ‘Lateral Thinking’ (page 118)The box defines lateral against vertical thinking, quotes de Bono's ‘digging the same hole deeper’ contrast, and lists the six hats — white (information, facts, figures, filling gaps), red (feelings and emotions), black (judgment, caution and logic), yellow (what will work and why it is beneficial), green (creativity, alternatives, change) and blue (thinking about the process rather than the ideas). The point: deliberately separating modes of thought prevents one mode — usually criticism — from crowding out the others.
⤵ A six-hats review of a proposed road-widening (our example)
Blueset the agenda: decide whether and how to widen the road; agree the order of hats
Whitetraffic counts, accident data, land records, budget — and what data is missing
Redshopkeepers' anxiety, residents' anger over trees, commuters' frustration — stated without justification
Yellowfaster ambulances, fewer accidents, more trade
Blackdisplacement, tree loss, cost overrun, legal risk
Greenalternatives: one-way loop, staggered timings, elevated walkway, transplanting trees
Bluesummarise, choose next steps, assign responsibility
Reading NCERT's Activity 7.3 (page 118)Frame five different questions requiring divergent thinking on traffic management, pollution, corruption, illiteracy or poverty, and discuss them in class. The point: divergent thinking applies to social problems, not only to puzzles and art — good practice for open-ended Mains and Essay questions. An outline is in the in-text section.
Is lateral thinking the same as divergent thinking? (attributed)What it holds
NCERT (Box 7.2)de Bono's ‘lateral thinking’ is his term for what Guilford called divergent thinking
Edward de Bono (Beyond NCERT: The Use of Lateral Thinking, 1967; Six Thinking Hats, 1985)presents lateral thinking as a set of deliberate, teachable techniques for escaping established patterns — provocation, random entry, challenging assumptions
Academic psychologists (Beyond NCERT)de Bono's methods are widely used in training, but they have had far less controlled testing than Guilford's and Torrance's measures; overlap with divergent thinking is a matter of interpretation
Read carefully
  • Lateral = digging in a new place; vertical = digging the same hole deeper (logical, step by step).
  • Six hats: white facts · red feelings · black caution · yellow benefits · green creativity · blue process.
  • Black hat = judgment and caution (not ‘negativity’ for its own sake); blue hat = process, not ideas.
  • Usable individually and in groups.

7. The creative process and how to enhance it

In simple wordsYou wrestle with an essay's opening for an hour, give up and go for a walk — and the perfect first line arrives at the vegetable stall. It feels like magic, but it came only because you had wrestled first, and you will still need to check whether it really works. Preparation, a pause, the flash, the check.

Research makes clear that new ideas involve more than a flash of insight; there are stages before and after. The starting point is a need to bring out something new — not everyone feels it, as one can be content with routine — arising from sensing problems and gaps in information. Preparation: understand and analyse the task, become aware of background facts; curiosity and excitement push thinking in different directions, and divergent abilities help look from new angles. Incubation: while generating alternatives one may feel stuck or even disgusted, and leave the problem for some time; ideas may not come while one is consciously working, but strike while doing something else — going to sleep, waking up, bathing, walking. Illumination: the ‘Aha!’ or ‘I have found it’ experience, with excitement and satisfaction. Verification: the worth and appropriateness of the idea are tested and judged — here convergent thinking selects the idea that works.

Before it: a felt need — sensing a problem or a gap in informationPreparationunderstand the task,gather facts; lookfrom many anglesconscious, divergentIncubationstuck; set it aside;rest, sleep, walk,do something elsenot consciously workingIlluminationthe ‘Aha!’ —idea strikes, withexcitementsudden insightVerificationtest and judge theidea’s worth andappropriatenessconscious, convergentif verification fails — back to preparationNCERT pages 118–119 · stage names as NCERT gives them · Beyond NCERT: Graham Wallas, The Art of Thought, 1926 · loop ours
The creative process — four stages (pages 118–119; compare Fig. 7.5).
Reading NCERT's Figure 7.5 ‘The Creative Process’ (page 119)A drawing of a winding mountain road labelled ‘search effort’, which reaches a ‘dead end’ sign, then a ‘think again’ board, then a ‘new direction’ that climbs in loops to a flag marked ‘creative solution’ at the top. The point: the route to a creative solution is not straight — dead ends and pauses are part of it, and the breakthrough comes from changing direction, not only from pushing harder.

Strategies for creative thinking. Research on creative people points to attitudes, dispositions and skills that can be cultivated. (1) Become more aware and sensitive — to feelings, sights, sounds, textures; spot problems, missing information, anomalies, gaps and contradictions that others miss; read widely, seek varied information, ask questions and ponder the mysteries of situations and objects. (2) Generate many ideas to increase the flow of thought, and deliberately look for multiple angles to increase flexibility — rearranging furniture for space, ways of conversing, the costs and benefits of a course, ways of dealing with an angry friend. (3) Use Osborn's brainstorming to increase fluency and flexibility in open-ended situations. (4) Use checklists and questions for a new twist: What other changes? What else? In how many ways? What other uses?

⤵ Brainstorming on Osborn's principle
Open-ended questione.g. how can our school reduce plastic waste?
Produce ideas freelyevery idea is welcome; imagination before judgment
Postpone evaluationno criticism until ideas are exhausted — production is kept separate from judging worth
Pile up alternativesbuild on others' ideas; aim for fluency and variety
Then evaluateconvergent thinking picks the most useful ideas
Beyond NCERT — names, dates and evidence
  • The four stages are usually credited to Graham Wallas, The Art of Thought (1926), who drew on the mathematician Henri Poincaré's account of ideas arriving unbidden after rest.
  • Alex F. Osborn, an American advertising executive, popularised brainstorming, most influentially in Applied Imagination (1953).
  • Later research found that interacting brainstorming groups often produce fewer ideas than the same number of people working alone and pooling them (‘nominal groups’) — through waiting turns, social loafing and fear of evaluation (e.g. Michael Diehl and Wolfgang Stroebe, 1987). Written ‘brainwriting’ variants were designed to avoid this.
  • Experimental reviews (e.g. Ut Na Sio and Thomas Ormerod, 2009) found a modest but real incubation effect, larger for divergent tasks.
Read carefully
  • Order: preparation → incubation → illumination → verification.
  • ‘Aha!’ = illumination; setting aside = incubation.
  • Divergent thinking dominates preparation; convergent thinking dominates verification.
  • Brainstorming: Osborn; core principle — separate idea production from evaluation; it increases fluency and flexibility.
  • NCERT's summary speaks of ‘overcoming blocks to creative expression’, but the rationalised text has no section on such blocks — a leftover from an earlier edition.

8. Thought and language

In simple wordsA Hindi speaker must decide, before speaking, whether ‘uncle’ is chacha, tau, mama, mausa or phupha; an English speaker need not. Does that make the Hindi speaker think more carefully about family? A baby who copies her mother's clapping has no words yet — is she thinking? And when you mutter to yourself through a hard sum, are the words helping? Three psychologists gave three answers.

NCERT examines three viewpoints: that language determines thought, that thought determines language, and that thought and language have different origins.

Language as determinant of thought. Hindi and other Indian languages have separate words for mother's brother, father's elder and younger brothers, mother's sister's husband, father's sister's husband and so on; English has one word, ‘uncle’. English has dozens of colour words; some tribal languages have only two to four. Does an Indian child find kinship easier to think about? Benjamin Lee Whorf held that language determines the contents of thought — the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Its strong version (linguistic determinism) holds that what and how people can possibly think is determined by the language and categories they use. NCERT reports that experimental evidence instead suggests the same level and quality of thought is possible in all languages, given the availability of linguistic categories and structures — though some thoughts may be easier in one language than another.

Thought as determinant of language. The Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget held that thought not only determines language but precedes it. Children form an internal representation of the world through thinking; when a child sees something and later copies it (imitation), thinking occurs without language. Language is just one vehicle of thinking; as actions become internalised, language may widen the range of symbolic thinking but is not necessary for the origins of thought. Words can be taught, but understanding them requires the underlying concepts — so thought is basic.

Different origins. The Russian psychologist Lev Vygotsky argued that thought and language develop separately until about two years of age, when they merge. Before then, thought is pre-verbal and experienced in action (Piaget's sensorimotor stage), and utterances are more automatic reflexes — crying when uncomfortable — than thought-based. Around two, the child expresses thought verbally and speech reflects rationality; children can now manipulate thoughts with soundless (inner) speech, and conceptual thinking comes to depend on the quality of inner speech. Thought can still be used without language (when its vehicle is visual or movement-related), and language without thought (exchanging pleasantries: ‘Good morning! How are you?’). Where the two overlap, they produce verbal thought and rational speech.

Whorflanguage → thoughtlinguistic relativity:language shapes what andhow we think; strong form= linguistic determinismPiagetthought → languagethought comes first;imitation shows thinkingwithout words; words needthe concepts beneath themVygotskyseparate roots, then mergepre-verbal thought andpre-intellectual speechjoin around age two;inner speech shapes conceptsspeechthought~2 years:verbal thoughtkinship words, colour termsthe copying child thinks wordlesslyNCERT pages 120–121 · three positions set side by side, no verdict · NCERT spells the name ‘Vyogotsky’
Three views of thought and language (pages 120–121).
Does language shape thought? (attributed)What it holds
Benjamin Lee Whorf (NCERT; Beyond NCERT: with his teacher Edward Sapir, hence ‘Sapir–Whorf hypothesis’)language determines the content of thought; strong form — linguistic determinism
NCERT's reading of the experimental evidencethe same quality of thought is possible in all languages; some thoughts are easier in some languages
Brent Berlin and Paul Kay (Beyond NCERT: 1969)basic colour terms across languages follow a regular pattern, suggesting universal constraints on colour naming
Eleanor Rosch (Heider) (Beyond NCERT: early 1970s)the Dani of New Guinea, with two basic colour terms, still remembered ‘focal’ colours better — perception was not fixed by vocabulary
Ekkehart Malotki (Beyond NCERT: Hopi Time, 1983); Steven Pinker (The Language Instinct, 1994)Whorf's claim that Hopi lacked expressions for time was mistaken; strong determinism is rejected
Later ‘neo-Whorfian’ researchers (Beyond NCERT: e.g. Lera Boroditsky, 2000s)weaker effects of language on memory, attention and categorisation — for colour, space and time — are reported, though some findings have been hard to replicate
PiagetVygotsky
Which comes first?thought; language is one vehicle of itneither — separate roots until about two
Role of languagewidens symbolic thinking but is not needed for thought's originsinner speech becomes a tool that shapes conceptual thinking
Key evidence (NCERT)imitation — the copying child thinks without wordspre-verbal action-thought and reflexive utterances, then verbal thought
Beyond NCERTSwiss; stage theoryRussian (Soviet); Thought and Language, 1934; social and cultural origins of thinking
Word and cognition in another tradition (attributed)In its own terms
Bhartṛhari, Vākyapadīya (Beyond NCERT; usually dated to about the 5th century CE)all cognition is shot through with the word: there is no awareness in the world that does not follow the word — a position close to the strong end of the language-shapes-thought spectrum, expressed in the grammarians' theory of sphoṭa
NCERT's own Indian exampleHindi and other Indian languages' many kinship words, used to pose Whorf's question rather than answer it
Read carefully
  • Whorf: language → thought (linguistic relativity; strong form = linguistic determinism).
  • Piaget (Swiss): thought → language; thought precedes language; imitation as evidence.
  • Vygotsky (Russian): different origins; merge at about two years; inner speech.
  • NCERT prints ‘Vyogotsky’ — the standard spelling is Vygotsky.
  • Language without thought: pleasantries; thought without language: visual or movement-based thinking.

9. Development and use of language; bilingualism

In simple wordsNo one teaches a toddler that English puts the verb in the middle and Hindi at the end, yet by three she gets it right — and says ‘I goed’, a word nobody ever said to her. Is she copying and being praised, or switching on grammar she was born ready for? Probably some of each.

Meaning and nature. Without language we could neither communicate our ideas and feelings nor know what others think. A child moves from ‘ma..ma..ma’ — a moment of joy for parents — to words, to sentences, to the mother tongue at home, the language of instruction at school, and then other languages. Language is a system of symbols organised by rules that we use to communicate. Symbols stand for something else — ‘home’, ‘school’, ‘food’ mean nothing in themselves until linked to objects and events; we use symbols while thinking. Rules fix the accepted order: ‘I am going to school’, not ‘school am going I’. Communication conveys thoughts, ideas, intentions and feelings; we also communicate with gestures and postures (non-verbal communication), and people with severe hearing and speech difficulties use sign language, which is also a language.

Development. Psychologists have tried to teach sign language and symbols to chimpanzees, dolphins and parrots, but human language is more complex, creative and spontaneous. Children differ greatly in the rate of language development, yet worldwide they follow a predictable pattern. The first sound is crying — undifferentiated at first, then varying in pitch and intensity for hunger, pain or sleepiness — which gives way to cooing (‘aaa’, ‘uuu’), usually expressing happiness. At about six months comes babbling: prolonged repetition of consonants and vowels (da—, ba—). By about nine months babbling becomes repetitive strings — echolalia (‘dadadadada’); early babbling is random, later babbling imitates adult voices. Children understand a few words by six months. Around the first birthday comes the one-word stage, the first word usually one syllable (ma, da); single words that stand for whole sentences are holophrases. At 18 to 20 months the two-word stage begins — telegraphic speech, mostly nouns and verbs, like a telegram (‘got admission, send money’). Beyond two and a half years, development focuses on the rules of the language heard.

0 m6 m12 m18 m24 m30 m36 mcryingundifferentiated → variedcooing‘aaa’, ‘uuu’babblingda—, ba—echolalia‘dadadada’one wordholophrasestwo wordstelegraphic speechrules of grammarbeyond 2½ yearsIndividual children vary a lot in rate; the order of stages is broadly the same everywhereNCERT page 122 · ages approximate (cooing has no age in NCERT; placed by us before babbling) · scale in months
Milestones of language development, as NCERT gives them (page 122).
⤵ From crying to grammar (page 122)
Cryingfirst undifferentiated, then varying with hunger, pain, sleepiness
Cooing‘aaa’, ‘uuu’ — usually happiness
Babbling (~6 months)repeated consonant-vowel sounds; a few words understood
Echolalia (~9 months)repetitive strings; later babbling imitates adult voices
One word (~1 year)holophrases — one word for a whole idea
Two words (18–20 months)telegraphic speech: nouns and verbs
Rules (beyond 2½ years)attention turns to the grammar of the language heard

How is language acquired? As elsewhere in psychology the question is nature or nurture; most psychologists accept that both matter. The behaviourist B.F. Skinner held that we learn language as animals learn to press bars — by association (the sight of a bottle with the word ‘bottle’), imitation (adults saying ‘bottle’) and reinforcement (smiles and hugs when the child says it right); children produce sounds suited to their parents' language and are reinforced, and shaping leads by successive approximation to adult speech; regional accents show different patterns reinforced in different places. The linguist Noam Chomsky proposed that language development is innate: the speed at which children acquire words and grammar without teaching cannot be explained by learning alone; children produce sentences they have never heard, so cannot be imitating; there seems to be a critical period for learning language; children everywhere pass through the same stages. Language ‘just happens to the child’, like physical maturation, because children are born with a universal grammar. NCERT concludes that Skinner's emphasis on learning explains why infants acquire the language they hear and add new words, and Chomsky's built-in readiness explains why they acquire grammar so readily without direct teaching.

How is language acquired? (attributed)MechanismExplains well (NCERT)Beyond NCERT
B.F. Skinner (behaviourist)association, imitation, reinforcement, shapingwhy children speak the language they hear; vocabulary growth; regional accentsVerbal Behavior, 1957
Noam Chomsky (linguist)innate universal grammar; maturation; a critical periodspeed of acquiring grammar without teaching; novel sentences; same stages everywherehis 1959 review of Verbal Behavior attacked the learning account; Eric Lenneberg (1967) developed the critical-period idea
NCERTboth nature and nurturethe two accounts are complementary—

Language use. Knowing vocabulary and syntax does not ensure proper use. We use language with pragmatic intentions — requesting, asking, thanking, demanding — and to serve these social goals speech must be pragmatically correct (contextually appropriate) as well as grammatical and meaningful. Children often find it hard to choose polite forms — a request comes out as a command — and to take turns in speaking and listening.

Reading NCERT's Box 7.3 ‘Bilingualism and Multilingualism’ (page 122)Bilingualism is proficiency in communicating in two languages; multilingualism, in more than two. The mother tongue has been defined variously — native language, the language spoken from the cradle, the language used at home, the mother's language — but generally it is the language one identifies with at the emotional level, and a person can have more than one. India is marked by grass-roots multilingualism, at the level of both individual and society: most Indians use more than one language in different domains of daily life, so multilingualism is a way of life. Studies show bi- and multilingualism facilitate cognitive, linguistic and academic competence in children. The point: using several languages is India's normal condition, and an asset, not a burden.
Does bilingualism help thinking? (attributed)What it holds
NCERT (Box 7.3)bi- and multilingualism facilitate children's cognitive, linguistic and academic competence
Elizabeth Peal and Wallace Lambert (Beyond NCERT: 1962)bilingual children in Montreal outperformed monolinguals on verbal and non-verbal tests, reversing earlier claims of a bilingual handicap
Ellen Bialystok and colleagues (Beyond NCERT: from the 1990s)managing two languages may strengthen executive control — attention, switching, inhibition
Sceptical researchers (Beyond NCERT: e.g. Kenneth Paap and colleagues, 2010s)large, careful studies often find no executive-function advantage; published positive results may be inflated
Policy view (Beyond NCERT: National Education Policy 2020)teaching in the home language or mother tongue wherever possible, at least to Grade 5, while promoting multilingualism
Read carefully
  • Language = symbols + rules + communication; sign language is a language.
  • Babbling ~6 months; echolalia ~9 months; one word ~1 year (holophrases); two words 18–20 months (telegraphic).
  • Skinner: learning (association, imitation, reinforcement, shaping). Chomsky: innate, universal grammar, critical period.
  • NCERT tells readers to ‘refer to Chapter 6 on Learning’ — Learning is Chapter 5; Chapter 6 is memory.
  • Box 7.3: mother tongue = the language one identifies with emotionally; one can have several.
  • Pragmatics = contextually appropriate use, beyond grammar.

NCERT's activities and project — short answers

The chapter has three activities and one project idea, plus the introduction's question about why we talk while we think. Short outlines follow.

Introduction (page 110): Why do we talk while we think? What is the relationship between language and thought?
Talking to oneself (‘not this’, ‘a little small’) plans, guides and evaluates action — Vygotsky's view that speech, turned inward as inner speech, becomes a tool for regulating thought, especially in hard tasks. Piaget would add that the thinking came first and the words only express it; Whorf that the words available shape what is thought. The chapter's section on thought and language sets out all three without a verdict; NCERT concludes that language and thought are intricately related.
Activity 7.1 (page 111): After studying a map for two minutes, locate its places on a blank, upside-down outline. How was it done?
Most people report forming a mental image of the whole layout — landmarks relative to rivers, edges or each other — and then mentally rotating it to match the inverted outline. This shows that images are representations of sensory experience that can be used and manipulated in thinking. People who verbalised the positions (‘the trees are near the top bend of the river’) mix images with concepts. Accuracy usually falls with the rotation, because turning an image takes effort.
Activity 7.2 (page 114): Solve the anagrams, the nine dots and the seven water-jar problems. What do you observe?
Anagrams: anagram, problem, solve, insight, solution (STGNIH as printed gives ‘things’ or ‘nights’ — it is one I short of INSIGHT) — once one word is seen, people often guess the theme (problem solving) and solve the rest faster: a helpful set. Nine dots: hard because people assume the lines must stay inside the square; the solution extends lines beyond it. Water jars: problems 1–5 are solved by B − A − 2C; on problem 6 (target 20; 23, 49, 3) most continue the long recipe though A − C (23 − 3) works; problem 7 (target 25; 28, 76, 3) can only be solved by A − C (B − A − 2C gives 42), and many fail it. The lesson: mental set speeds routine work but blocks seeing a simpler or new route.
Activity 7.3 (page 118): Frame five questions requiring divergent thinking on traffic, pollution, corruption, illiteracy or poverty.
Open-ended questions, each with many possible answers, for example: (1) In how many ways could a city cut peak-hour traffic without building new roads? (2) What would change if every school had to measure its own air quality daily? (3) How could ordinary citizens make bribery harder in a local office? (4) What everyday objects could help an adult learn to read? (5) What would happen if every village had a public tool library? Judge the class's answers by fluency (number), flexibility (variety), originality (rarity) and elaboration (detail) — then use convergent thinking to pick the most workable.
Project idea (page 124): Observe children of one, two and three years for a week; record their speech and how many words each has learnt.
Record exact utterances with context, daily. Expect the one-year-old to use single words (holophrases: ‘milk’ = ‘I want milk’), gestures and babble; the two-year-old two-word telegraphic speech (‘daddy go’, ‘more biscuit’) and a fast-growing vocabulary; the three-year-old short sentences with grammatical markers and over-regularisation errors (‘I goed’) that show rules being applied (Beyond NCERT). Compare with NCERT's stages, note individual differences in rate, and relate the findings to Skinner (imitation, reinforcement by adults) and Chomsky (novel sentences, rule use). Obtain parents' consent and keep the children anonymous.

NCERT exercise — answer outlines

The nine review questions at the end of the chapter (page 124). Try each first, then open the outline.

1. Explain the nature of thinking.
Thinking is the base of all cognitive activity: a higher mental process through which we manipulate and analyse acquired or stored information — by abstracting, reasoning, imagining, problem solving, judging and deciding — going beyond the given (interpreting a painting). It is mostly organised and goal-directed, using past steps for familiar tasks and inferred strategies for new ones; it is internal, inferred from behaviour (the chess player's move). Its building blocks are mental images and concepts. It is shaped by culture (Box 7.1: analytical and holistic styles).
2. What is a concept? Explain the role of concept in the thinking process.
A concept is a mental representation of a category — a class of objects, ideas or events with common properties (fruit, furniture, animal). We identify new things by extracting features and matching them to a category (the unfamiliar small animal is a dog), and then draw inferences from the category (it may bite). Concepts organise knowledge for quick, low-effort access — like a well-arranged cupboard or a library shelved by subject — making thought quick and efficient. Thinking based on words relies on concepts (choosing a book by author and theme). Caution: category inferences can mislead when applied to individuals.
3. Identify obstacles that one may encounter in problem solving.
(1) Mental set: the tendency to reuse already-tried steps; it can speed solutions but creates rigidity — Activity 7.2's water jars, where people keep using B − A − 2C and miss A − C. (2) Functional fixedness: fixation on an object's usual function (not seeing a book as a hammer). (3) Lack of motivation and persistence: giving up at the first failure. Overcoming them: redefine the problem (Table 7.1's last step), take a break (incubation), look for alternative uses and approaches (lateral thinking), persist.
4. How does reasoning help in solving problems?
Reasoning — gathering and analysing information to reach conclusions — is itself a form of problem solving. Deduction applies a known general rule to a case (general → particular), quickly; it is only as good as its assumption. Induction builds a general conclusion from observations (particular → general) — the basis of most scientific reasoning; it guards against untested assumptions but risks jumping to conclusions. Analogy (A : B :: C : D) transfers a solution from a familiar problem and highlights salient attributes. NCERT's platform example shows both: assuming he is late (deduction) versus watching him fetch his bag (induction). Reasoning also underlies the judgments that decisions rest on.
5. Are judgment and decision-making interrelated processes? Explain.
Yes. Judgment draws conclusions, forms opinions and evaluates on evidence — sometimes automatically (braking at a red light), sometimes with knowledge or preferences, and revised with new information (the ‘strict’ new teacher). Decision-making chooses among known alternatives by weighing costs and benefits (psychology or economics; badminton or exams). Every decision requires judgments about each option's outcomes and value; and judgments are often made in order to decide. Both are shaped by beliefs, attitudes and priorities, so people differ. They differ in that decision-making must end in a choice among given options.
6. Why is divergent thinking important in creative thinking process?
Creative thinking produces novel, original and appropriate ideas. Divergent (open-ended) thinking supplies the raw material: fluency (many ideas), flexibility (varied ideas), originality (rare ideas — for which fluency and flexibility are necessary conditions) and elaboration (working ideas out); it allows remote associations (protein from desert weeds). In the creative process it dominates preparation, viewing the problem from many angles. But it is not enough: convergent thinking is needed at verification to pick the idea that works. De Bono's lateral thinking is NCERT's parallel term.
7. How can creative thinking be enhanced?
NCERT's strategies: (1) become aware and sensitive — notice problems, gaps, anomalies, contradictions; read widely; ask questions; (2) generate many ideas and deliberately seek multiple angles (fluency, flexibility); (3) Osborn's brainstorming — produce ideas freely, postpone judgment; (4) checklists and questions — What else? In how many ways? Other uses? Add: de Bono's six hats to separate modes of thinking; allow incubation (rest after hard work); overcome mental set and functional fixedness; keep motivation; and finally verify ideas for appropriateness.
8. Does thinking take place without language? Discuss.
Three views. Piaget: yes — thought precedes language; imitation shows thinking without words; language is one vehicle of thought and needs concepts to be understood. Vygotsky: before about two years thought is pre-verbal, in action; afterwards thought and language merge in inner speech, though thinking can still be visual or movement-based without words. Whorf: language determines the content of thought — but NCERT notes experiments show equal quality of thought across languages, some thoughts merely being easier in one. Further evidence: mental images (Activity 7.1), the chess player, infants solving problems. Conclusion: much thinking occurs without language, but language greatly extends abstract, verbal thought — they are intricately related.
9. How is language acquired in human beings?
Through predictable stages — crying, cooing, babbling (~6 months), echolalia (~9 months), one-word holophrases (~1 year), two-word telegraphic speech (18–20 months), grammar rules (beyond 2½ years) — with large individual differences in rate. Explanations: Skinner (nurture) — association, imitation, reinforcement and shaping; explains why children learn the language they hear, vocabulary and accents. Chomsky (nature) — innate universal grammar, a critical period, novel sentences never heard, the same stages worldwide. Most psychologists accept both. Social use — pragmatics — is learnt too, and many Indian children acquire two or more languages (Box 7.3).

What to remember

Numbers

Chapter structure3 boxes, 5 figures (7.2 in two parts), 1 table, 3 activities, 9 review questions, 1 project idea, 23 key terms
Pages109–125 of the Class 11 Psychology textbook; Activity 7.2 answers on page 125
Building blocks of thought2 — mental images and concepts
Table 7.17 mental operations, from ‘identify the problem’ to ‘rethink and redefine’
Obstacles to problem solvingmental set, functional fixedness, lack of motivation
Water jars (Activity 7.2)7 problems · 1–6 solved by B − A − 2C · 6 and 7 by A − C · problem 7 only by A − C (28 − 3 = 25)
Nine-dot problem9 dots, 4 straight lines, pencil not lifted — lines must leave the square
Analogy4 parts — A : B :: C : D
Divergent abilities (Guilford)4 — fluency, flexibility, originality, elaboration
Creative thinking criteriareality-oriented, appropriate, constructive, socially desirable
De Bono's hats6 — white, red, black, yellow, green, blue
Creative process4 stages — preparation, incubation, illumination, verification
Thought and language3 views — Whorf, Piaget, Vygotsky (merge at ~2 years)
Language characteristics3 — symbols, rules, communication
Language milestonesbabbling ~6 months · echolalia ~9 months · one word ~1 year · two words 18–20 months · rules beyond 2½ years
Beyond NCERT datesWallas 1926 · Luchins 1942 · Duncker 1945 · Guilford's APA address 1950 · Osborn 1953 · Skinner 1957 · Chomsky's review 1959 · Wason 1960 · Peal–Lambert 1962 · Mednick 1962 · Torrance 1966 · de Bono 1967 · Lenneberg 1967 · Berlin–Kay 1969 · Janis 1972 · Tversky–Kahneman 1974 · Simon's Nobel 1978 · de Bono's hats 1985 · Masuda–Nisbett 2001 · Kahneman's Nobel 2002

One-liners

  • Thinking manipulates information and goes beyond the given; it is inferred from behaviour.
  • Images represent sensory experience; concepts represent categories.
  • Concepts make thinking fast — and make category-based mistakes possible.
  • Problem solving links an initial state to a goal by mental operations.
  • A mental set speeds the familiar and blinds us to the simple.
  • Deduction goes from general to particular; induction from particular to general.
  • Validity is about form; truth is about premises.
  • In decision-making the options are known; the task is to choose.
  • Judgments can be automatic, and change with new information.
  • Creative = novel, original and appropriate.
  • Divergent thinking generates; convergent thinking selects.
  • Lateral thinking digs a new hole; vertical thinking digs the same hole deeper.
  • Incubation precedes illumination; verification follows it.
  • Brainstorming separates producing ideas from judging them.
  • Whorf: language shapes thought; Piaget: thought comes first; Vygotsky: separate roots, merged at two.
  • Skinner explains which language and words; Chomsky explains the speed of grammar.

Traps to avoid

  • NCERT's two MAJOR obstacles are mental set and lack of motivation; functional fixedness is added alongside.
  • Mental set can help as well as hinder problem solving.
  • Activity 7.2's STGNIH is one letter short of its answer INSIGHT.
  • Table 7.1's glosses for steps 4 and 5 appear swapped in print; learn the step names.
  • Deductive starts from an assumption (general); inductive from observations (particular).
  • The mouse in Fig. 7.3 has true premises and an invalid form — not a false premise.
  • NCERT says most scientific reasoning is inductive; science also tests hypotheses deductively.
  • Decision-making chooses among KNOWN alternatives.
  • Fluency and flexibility are necessary conditions for originality — not the reverse.
  • ‘Effective surprise’ is Bruner's phrase; convergent/divergent is Guilford's.
  • Black hat = judgment, caution, logic; blue hat = the process, not ideas.
  • The ‘Aha!’ is illumination, not incubation.
  • Box 7.1's study compared American and Japanese students; ‘Asians’ is NCERT's generalisation.
  • NCERT's ‘Vyogotsky’ is Vygotsky; its ‘Chapter 6 on Learning’ is Chapter 5.
  • Linguistic determinism is the STRONG form of linguistic relativity.
  • Universal grammar and the critical period are Chomsky's (in NCERT); shaping and reinforcement are Skinner's.
  • Heuristics, biases, Kahneman and Simon are not in the NCERT chapter.

How to strategise

Prelims — what UPSC asks

  • No Prelims question in the archive tests this chapter. The nearest is Prelims 2001 on the Article providing instruction in the mother tongue at the primary stage — a polity fact this chapter's Box 7.3 does not teach.
  • If psychology appears, expect pairs: deductive/inductive, convergent/divergent (Guilford), lateral/vertical (de Bono), the six hat colours, the four creative stages in order, Whorf/Piaget/Vygotsky, Skinner/Chomsky, holophrase/telegraphic speech.

Mains — where it appears and how to answer

  • GS4 — creativity in public service: ‘Besides domain knowledge, a public official needs innovativeness and creativity of a high order as well, while resolving ethical dilemmas’ (2021). Frame: dilemma as a false binary → divergent thinking for third options (fluency, flexibility, originality) → convergent verification against law, fairness and feasibility (NCERT's ‘appropriate, socially desirable’) → obstacles in offices (mental set, functional fixedness) → an Indian example.
  • GS4 — reason and critical thinking: ‘For any kind of social re-engineering by successfully implementing welfare schemes, a civil servant must use reason and critical thinking in an ethical framework’ (2025). Use deduction (apply rules and entitlements, but test the assumptions), induction (field evidence, pilots, grievance data), judgments revised with new information, and Beyond-NCERT biases (confirmation, availability, anchoring) as reasons for evidence-based checks.
  • Essay: ‘Visionary decision-making happens at the intersection of intuition and logic’ (2023) — automatic judgment vs deliberate cost–benefit choice; the attributed debate (Simon, Kahneman–Tversky, Gigerenzer). ‘Inspiration for creativity springs from the effort to look for the magical in the mundane’ (2023) — everyday creativity, sensitivity to gaps and anomalies, incubation during ordinary activity. ‘Thinking is like a game, it does not begin unless there is an opposite team’ (2023; weakest link) — problem as the initial state, the black hat and devil's advocate, confirmation bias and groupthink when no one opposes. ‘Thought finds a world and creates one also’ (2025) — concepts organise (find) the world; creative thinking and language (Whorf) create one.
  • Not linked, and why: GS4 2023 ‘moral intuition vs moral reasoning’ is moral philosophy (and sits on a political-theory chapter); this chapter gives only the general reasoning vocabulary. GS4 2021 and 2024 on digital technology / AI as inputs for rational decision-making test technology ethics, not the psychology of deciding. GS4 2015 on conflict of interest in decision-making is about integrity. Gandhi quotations on thought and anger (GS4 2018, 2019) concern character and emotion (Chapter 8 and Class 12). GS1 questions on linguistic states are history and polity.
  • Answer frame: name the thinking process (problem solving, reasoning, judgment, decision, creativity) → the model (attributed: Guilford, de Bono, Wallas, Kahneman–Tversky, Simon) → an Indian administrative example → its typical failure (set, fixedness, bias) → a practical safeguard (redefine, consult dissent, verify, record reasons).

Self-check

Tap an option. NCERT's own exercise questions come first; the rest test the figures and common confusions.

1. According to NCERT, the two building blocks of thought are:

2. A person keeps solving water-jar problems by B − A − 2C even when A − C would do. This illustrates:

3. ‘All cats have four legs; I have four legs; therefore I am a cat.’ What is wrong?

4. Decision-making differs from other kinds of problem solving because:

5. Which divergent-thinking ability refers to the variety of ideas produced?

6. In de Bono's Six Thinking Hats, the hat for caution, judgment and logic is:

7. The correct order of the stages of creative thinking is:

8. Who held that thought and language develop separately until about two years of age and then merge?

UPSC questions from this chapter

Open any question to attempt it in the Question bank — your attempt is saved to your progress.

Prelims

0 questions · newest first

Mains

6 questions
2025GS4"For any kind of social re-engineering by successfully implementing welfare schemes, a civil servant must use reason and critical thinking in an ethical framework." Justify this statement with suitable examples. (Answer in 150 words)Write answer →2025EssayThought finds a world and creates one also.Write answer →2023EssayVisionary decision-making happens at the intersection of intuition and logicWrite answer →2023EssayInspiration for creativity springs from the effort to look for the magical in the mundaneWrite answer →2023EssayThinking is like a game, it does not begin unless there is an opposite teamWrite answer →2021GS4Besides domain knowledge, a public official needs innovativeness and creativity of a high order as well, while resolving ethical dilemmas. Discuss with suitable example. (Answer in 150 words)Write answer →

0 Prelims and 6 Mains UPSC questions are linked to this chapter. More from Psychology.